Printer Friendly

Two textual problems in Ovid, Ex Ponto 3.3.

Ex Ponto 3.3.71-76:
 utque hoc, sic utinam defendere cetera possem!
 scis aliud quod te laeserit esse magis.
 quidquid id est (neque enim debet dolor ipse referri,
 nec potes a culpa dicere abesse tua),
 tu licet erroris sub imagine crimen obumbres,
 non grauior merito vindicis ira fuit. 75

 Would that I could ward off other charges as I can this one! You
 know that it is another thing which has done you greater harm.
 Whatever this is (for the pain itself should not be brought back,
 nor can you say that you are untouched by blame in your own case),
 though you may cover your offence under the representation of an
 error, the anger of the avenger was no heavier than deserved.

Here Cupid, appearing in a famous vision to the poet, has just stated that he can justify and defend the poet's carmen (the Ars); he then goes on to say that he cannot do the same for his (famously mysterious) error. The problem here is line 74: the combination of needing to understand te ipsum as the object of dicere and the oddness of the phrase a culpa ... abesse tua makes the expression dubious. Tristia 1.2.98 a culpa facinus scitis abesse mea provides some kind of parallel, but there as in the other Ovidian cases of the metaphorical use of abesse ... a the expression is used of a specific quality X lacking from object or person Y (Her. 12.170 et tener a misero pectore somnus abest, Her.20.68 cur suus a tanto crimine fructus abest?), and the use of an implied personal subject is unique here.

I suggest nec potes, a!, culpam dicere abesse tuam. The apparently prepositional a can be interpreted as the 'neoteric' exclamation a!, found in other passages of the exile poetry where Ovid laments his downfall and its causes--cf. Tristia 2.77 a! ferus et nobis crudelior omnibus hostis, | delicias legit qui tibi cumque meas, 4.4.40 a! sine me fati non meminisse mei; for its mid-clause position and the metrical shape of the line in general we can compare Tristia 5.10.51 quid loquor, a, demens, Ex Ponto 4.3.29 quid facis, a, demens. Once exclamatory a! was misinterpreted as the preposition, an original culpam ... tuam would be easily changed to culpa ... tua, especially if the accusatives were written compendiously with supralineal abbreviations for the m's. The Latin now makes much better sense: 'alas, you cannot say that blame on your part is absent': for culpam ... meam in a similar sense cf. Tristia 5.11.10 mollior est culpam poena secuta meam. Here as elsewhere in the exile poetry the poet admits freely to culpa (cf. Tristia 1.2.98, 1.3.38, 2.104,208, 3.5.51, 4.1.24, 4.4.37, 5.4.18; Ex Ponto 1.1.61-62, 1.6.25-26, 7.7.39, 2.2.15).

Ex Ponto 3.3.99-102:
 conueniens animo genus est tibi; nobile namque
 pectus et Herculeae simplicitatis habes. 100
 Liuor, iners uitium, mores non exit in altos
 utque latens ima uipera serpit humo.

 Your family well matches your disposition: for you have a noble
 heart and one of Herculean simplicity. Jealousy, that vice of
 inactivity, does not burst out to lofty characters, and like a
 low-moving viper is concealed and moves along the ground.

Here Ovid praises his addressee Fabius Maximus: Hercules was the legendary ancestor of the Fabii (cf. Fasti 2.237; Plutarch Fab.1.2). The problematic phrase here is 101 exit in. Though exit as a verb of motion seems to cohere with serpit in 102, its metaphorical force here is unclear; exire in in Ovid normally means 'emerge into', as at Amores 3.12.41 exit in immensum, and the recurring Ovidian phrase exit in auras (Ars Amatoria 3.741; Met.7.127, 13.610), and this makes no sense with an abstract such as mores. This difficulty is shown in the impressionistic translations given in the two most used modern editions, Wheeler's 'enters not into lofty character', almost translating init rather than exit, and Andre's 'n'atteint pas un caractere superieur', where 'atteint' suggests tangit not exit. (1). Leumann in the Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (V.2.1366,49-53) compares Seneca De Tranquillitate Animi 9.1.14 [animus] ambitiosus in uerba est altiusque ut spirare ita eloqui gestit et ad dignitatem rerum exit oratio and glosses 'exsurgit, effertur', but surely exit there means 'emerges, results' as in the recent translation by John Davie ('so that language emerges in keeping with the dignity of the topic'); (2) in the Ex Ponto passage, by contrast, we need some verb which implies that mores ... altos are the potential object of an attack by the serpentine Liuor which it is in fact too cowardly to carry out.

I suggest mores non uescitur altos, 'does not feed on lofty characters'; uescor would be used with the accusative, a rare construction but firmly found in elegy at Tibullus 2.5.63-64 sic usque sacras innoxia laurus | uescar. This would appeal to the traditional topos of Livor edax (cf. Amores 1.15.1, and especially Tristia 4.10.123-24 nec, qui detractat praesentia, Livor iniquo ullum de nostris dente momordit opus), and the image would cohere nicely with the cowardly snake of 102: the serpent tooth of envy does not feed on morally elevated individuals such as Maximus but on the inferior forms of life found in its naturally lower habitat. Non uescitur altos could easily be corrupted into non exit in altos given the common confusion in MSS of x and sc and the frequency of in before a part of altus at the end of the Ovidian hexameter (cf. e.g. Tristia 3.9.29 scopulo proponit in alto; Ibis 375 pila minuaris in alta; and 18 other Ovidian examples).

S.J. Harrison

Corpus Christi College, University of Oxford

* I cite the text of J.A. Richmond (Teubner, 1990). It is a special pleasure to offer this small tribute to a scholar who has made such a major contribution to work on the exile poetry of Ovid. I am most grateful to the anonymous referees of Acta Classica, whose comments improved the piece.

(1) A.L. Wheeler, Ovid: Tristia, Ex Ponto (Cambridge, Mass. 1924) 399 (unchanged in the 1988 revision by G.P. Goold); J. Andre, Ovide: Pontiques (Paris 1977) 95.

(2) J. Davie, Seneca: Dialogues and Essays (Oxford 2008) 114.
COPYRIGHT 2011 Classical Association of South Africa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:NOTES: KORT BYDRAES
Author:Harrison, S.J.
Publication:Acta Classica
Date:Jan 1, 2011
Previous Article:Traffic policy and circulation in Roman cities.
Next Article:A Classical Association of South Africa in 1908.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters