Printer Friendly

Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.

This quarterly report describes US. Treasury and System foreign exchange operations for the period from April through June 1997. It was presented by Peter R. Fisher Executive Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and Manager for Foreign Operations, System Open Market Account. Grace Sone was primarily responsible for preparation of the report.

During the second quarter of 1997, the dollar depreciated 7.3 percent against the Japanese yen but gained 4.2 percent against the German mark. On a trade-weighted basis against other Group of Ten (G-10) currencies, the dollar appreciated 1.0 percent.(1) The contrast between the dollar's performance against the yen and its performance against the mark primarily reflected broad-based yen strength and generalized mark weakness. Early in the period, the dollar had initially continued the upward trend against the yen that it had established in the previous quarter. However, in the weeks after the April 27, Group of Seven (G-7) meeting, the yen appreciated as the Japanese authorities pointed to improvement in Japan's near-term economic prospects and suggested that excessive yen depreciation might be addressed with intervention. The U.S. monetary authorities did not undertake any intervention operations in the foreign exchange market during the quarter.

A Slight Rise in the Intraday Volatility of the Dollar

Foreign exchange market volatility was slightly higher during die quarter, with the average daily trading range for the dollar widening to 1.0 percent against both the mark and the yen, compared with average daily ranges of 0.9 percent experienced in the first quarter of 1997 and 0.7 percent in the second quarter of 1996.

In the middle of the period, implied volatility on dollar-mark and dollar-yen options moved higher as the dollar-yen exchange rate fell 8.5 percent during May but tapered off as the dollar-yen exchange rate stabilized in June. Dollar-yen implied volatility ended the second quarter only slightly higher than its first-quarter close, while dollar-mark implied volatility ended slightly lower. The dispersion of the probability distribution of the future dollar-mark exchange rate one-month hence implied by currency options prices was little changed over the quarter but became skewed toward a weaker dollar against the yen, reflecting a higher cost of protection against a sharp downward move in the dollar-yen exchange rate.

Strengthening of the Yen against other Major Currencies

The dollar began the quarter by continuing its upward movement against the yen, supported by expectations for further monetary tightening in the United States and steady monetary policy in Japan. On April 8, the spread between ten-year U.S. and Japanese government bond yields widened to an eight-year high of 463 basis points. Market participants focused on a reference to "persisting strength in demand" in the press release after the March Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, which was viewed as suggesting that the FOMC might apply more monetary restraint than had been anticipated. Meanwhile, market analysts became concerned that Japan's economic recovery was neither broad-based nor self-sustaining and that there was a potential for negative effects from the April I consumption tax hike; there were also concerns about strains in the Japanese financial sector.

In this perceived dollar-supportive environment there was no immediate reaction to the April 27, G-7 statement, which emphasized the importance of avoiding exchange rate levels that could lead to the reemergence of large external imbalances. On May 1, the dollar rose to a fifty-six-month high of 127.50 [yen], as the yen depreciated against most major currencies. However, initial releases of economic data for April appeared to suggest that the Japanese economy was not as adversely affected by the consumption tax hike as had been anticipated. Concurrently, Japanese officials began hinting at the possibility of intervention to support the yen. In particular, a Ministry of Finance official noted that the yen might strengthen to 103 [yen] by year-end, a comment that was interpreted by market analysts as a warning against further yen depreciation. Also, U.S. officials indicated their agreement with Japan's concern about yen depreciation. In addition, Japanese officials commented that the Japanese economic recovery was stronger than perceived by market participants and that an interest rate hike could occur sooner than expected. Against this backdrop, the Nikkei began to rise, closing above the 20,000 level on May 6 for the first time in 1997; yields on the benchmark ten-year Japanese government bond increased; and the yen started to appreciate against a broad range of currencies. Contributing to the yen's broad-based strength was the apparent unwinding of yen-financed positions in emerging market currencies, a move that was exacerbated by reports of worsening current account deficits and downwardly revised economic growth forecasts in countries such as Thailand and the Czech Republic.

Later in the period, market attention again shifted toward signs of a softer Japanese economy after releases of data implied a two-tiered economic recovery led by the export sector. However, the yen remained firm amid heightened concerns over possible intervention to stem any renewed yen weakness. These concerns were prompted by indications of a widening Japanese trade surplus and comments from U.S. officials suggesting that Japan should avoid an export-led recovery. Meanwhile, market participants started to scale back their expectations for U.S. monetary tightening after the release of data on retail sales and housing, both of which were viewed as indicating moderating consumer demand.

The U.S.-Japan ten-year bond-yield spread narrowed from its eight-year high of 463 basis points on April 8, to end the period at 391 basis points. On a trade-weighted basis, the yen appreciated 9.2 percent during the second quarter. Against the Australian dollar, Swiss franc, and British pound the yen appreciated 12.5 percent, 9.0 percent, and 6.3 percent respectively.

Support of the Dollar-Mark Exchange Rate by Broad German Mark Weakness

Over the reporting period, the German mark was pressured lower by growing market expectations of broad participation in the European monetary union (EMU). In addition, expectations of steady monetary policy in Germany, supported by reports that German unemployment remained at high levels, contributed to the weakness of the mark. Although the yield differential between U.S. and German ten-year bonds narrowed 20 basis points, to end the quarter at 90 basis points, the dollar continued to move higher against the German mark as market participants focused on developments in Europe.

In May, the German mark firmed somewhat as doubts about the likelihood of a timely start to the EMU reemerged. This uncertainty reflected both the prospects for a Socialist victory in the French elections and the criticism raised regarding the German government's proposal to revalue the Bundesbank's gold reserves. At this time, the dollar-mark exchange rate moved from around DM 1.73 to near DM 1.68. However, by mid-June, the dollar-mark exchange rate moved back above DM 1.73, toward levels seen in April, as earlier market doubts about a timely launch to EMU dissipated. Reports that France and Germany would have difficulty strictly meeting the Maastricht reference value of 3 percent deficit-to-gross domestic product, combined with assertions from French and German officials of their commitment to start the EMU on time, made it appear increasingly likely that the EMU would start with a broader set of countries. During the second quarter, the mark depreciated more than 4.0 percent against the U.S. dollar and Japanese yen, and more than 12.0 percent against the British pound. On a trade-weighted basis, the German mark depreciated 2.4 percent during the period.

Treasury and Federal Reserve Foreign Exchange Reserves

The U.S. monetary authorities did not undertake any intervention operations this quarter. At the end of the quarter, the current values of the German and Japanese yen reserve holdings totaled $18.0 billion for the Federal Reserve System and $15.1 billion for the Exchange Stabilization Fund.

The U.S. monetary authorities invest all of their foreign currency balances in a variety of instruments that yield market-related rates of return and have a high degree of liquidity and credit quality. A significant portion of these balances is invested in German and Japanese government securities held either directly or under repurchase agreement. As of June 30, outright holdings of government securities by U.S. monetary authorities totaled $7.4 billion. Japanese and German government securities held under repurchase agreement are arranged either through transactions executed directly in the market or through agreements with official institutions. Government securities held under repurchase agreements by the U.S. monetary authorities totaled $11.8 billion at the end of the quarter. Foreign currency reserves are also invested in deposits at the Bank for International Settlements and in facilities at other official institutions.

(1.) The dollar's movements on a trade-weighted basis against ten major currencies are measured using an index developed by members of the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
COPYRIGHT 1997 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Sone, Grace
Publication:Federal Reserve Bulletin
Date:Sep 1, 1997
Words:1475
Previous Article:Changes in the distribution of banking offices.
Next Article:Industrial production and capacity utilization for July 1997.
Topics:


Related Articles
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.
Treasury and Federal Reserve foreign exchange operations.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters