Printer Friendly

Tire pressure monitoring rule rejected by appeals court.

A federal appeals court threw out a regulation requiring tire pressure monitors in vehicles as "arbitrary and capricious." The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals eliminated the federal rule, which would have required monitors that alert drivers to underinflated tires in all vehicles made after November. Three nonprofit consumer advocacy organizations challenged the rule in a lawsuit, saying the government, under pressure from automotive companies, adopted a less safe standard than it should have. The appeals court agreed, noting that the system the government required would have failed half the time to warn drivers when tires were underinflated. The rejected rule would have allowed automakers to choose between a less expensive indirect system that would work off the antilock braking system and a more accurate direct system of monitors in each wheel.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Lippincott & Peto, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Corporate Financial News
Publication:Rubber World
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:133
Previous Article:The Rubber Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C., has joined a coalition to assist in reducing tire piles and developing a scrap tire recycling...
Next Article:Indonesian tire producers are proposing the government impose a 15% export tax on Indonesian rubber to prevent a possible domestic shortage.


Related Articles
California high court limits 'cancerphobia' damages except for callous negligence.
Supreme Court clarifies expert testimony rules.
AROUND THE STATES.
Foreign rollover cases can stay in U.S. court, judge rule.
Safety groups sue over tire pressure regulation.
Battle's not over. (Editorial).
A civics lesson.
Homeland security.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |