Printer Friendly

Time to revisit job description.

Dear Editor,

Your coverage of the primacy of Archbishop Michael Peers (February) was well done and particularly your inclusion of his wife, Dorothy, and his family. Too often families are overlooked in such tributes. I certainly add my own expression of thanks to Michael for the leadership which he has provided to the whole church during his watch.

However, as the church prepares to elect his succesor in this office, we ought to revisit the job description. It is unconscionable that we as a church require the commitment indicated in your Primate by numbers story. I was alarmed both at the few holidays the primate has taken and at the amount of time he has been required to be away from home.

It is also time to revisit our theology of episcopacy and of the exercise of the office of bishops. It appears to have become more administrative than pastoral, more reflective of a modern chief executive officer than a shepherd of the people of God.

One further point: the cumulative cost of travel to deal with the church's business must be considerable. Surely in this age of instant communication there are more economical methods (but equally efficient) in the use of both time and money to achieve the desired ends.

Canon Frank Cluett

St. John's, Nfld.
COPYRIGHT 2004 General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Cluett, Canon Frank
Publication:Anglican Journal
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Apr 1, 2004
Words:217
Previous Article:Not holy matrimony.
Next Article:What cost?


Related Articles
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.
Rethinking the rules. (Editor's Note).
Do you know the ABC's of engagement letters?
Making my portfolio work for me.
Tag it: graffiti in the classroom.
'Simple statement' of fitness for work is sufficient under FMLA.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters