Printer Friendly

Three strikes law upheld. (Upfront Update).

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld California's "three strikes law" ("Three Strikes and You're in for life," 1/24/03), rejecting constitutional challenges to sentences of 25 years without parole for a man who stole three golf clubs, and 50 years without parole for another who stole children's videos. Both men had committed previous property crimes that qualified as prior "strikes" under California's sentencing law. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the 5-4 majority, said the 25-years-to-life sentences did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Scholastic, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Greenhouse, Linda
Publication:New York Times Upfront
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Apr 18, 2003
Previous Article:Doin' soft time. (International).
Next Article:Frankie on top. (Q&A).

Related Articles
California Supreme Court throws three-strikes law a judicial curve.
'Three-strikes' laws proving more show than go.
Government aid and religious schools: 70 years of controversy.
Revisiting three strikes.
Three strikes and you're in for life: stealing so much as a slice of pizza can mean life in prison under a controversial law. Is it fair? The Supreme...
Sentences out of line.
Almost constitutional? (The Last Word).
Court rules on campaign finance law. (Headlines).
Stuck behind bars: mandatory minimum sentences are filling U.S. prisons: are they fair? Are they stopping crime?
Is any sentence cruel and unusual punishment?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters