Printer Friendly

Thinking about logistics.

Understanding the elements of military power requires more than a passing knowledge of logistics and how it influences strategy and tactics. An understanding of logistics comes principally from the study of history and lessons learned. Unfortunately, despite its importance, little emphasis is placed on the study of history among logisticians. To compound matters, the literature of warfare is replete with triumphs and tragedy, strategy and tactics, and brilliance or blunders; however, far less has been written concerning logistics and the tasks involved in supplying war or military operations. (1)

Logistics is the key element in warfare, more so in the 21st century than ever before. Success on the modern battlefield is dictated by how well the commander manages available logistical support. Victories by the United States in three major wars (and several minor wars or conflicts) since the turn of the century are more directly linked to the ability to mobilize and bring to bear economic and industrial power than any level of strategic or tactical design. The Gulf War and operations to liberate Iraq further illustrates this point.
   As the machinery of the Allied Coalition began to turn, armchair
   warriors addicted to action, and even some of the hastily recruited
   military experts, revealed a certain morbid impatience for the
   "real war" to begin. But long before the Allied offensive could
   start, professional logisticians had to gather and transport men
   and materiel and provide for the sustained flow of supplies and
   equipment that throughout history has made possible the conduct of
   war. Commanders and their staffs inventoried their stocks, essayed
   the kind and quantities of equipment and supplies required for
   operations in the severe desert climate, and coordinated their
   movement plans with national and international logistics networks.
   The first victory in the Persian Gulf War was getting the forces
   there and making certain they had what they required to fight
   [Emphasis added]. Then and only then, would commanders initiate
   offensive operations. (2)

Unfortunately, the historical tendency of political and military leadership to neglect logistics activities in peacetime and expand and improve them hastily once conflict has broken out may not be so possible in the future as it has in the past. A declining industrial base, flat or declining defense budgets, force drawdowns, and base closures have all contributed to eliminating or restricting the infrastructure that made rapid expansion possible. Regardless, modern warfare demands huge quantities of fuel, ammunition, food, clothing, and equipment. All these commodities must be produced, purchased, transported, and distributed to military forces. And of course, the means to do this must be sustained. Arguably, logistics of the 21stcentury will remain, in the words of one irreverent World War II supply officer, "The stuff that if you don't have enough of, the war will not be won as soon as." (43)


(1.) John A. Lynn, ed, Feeding Mars." Logistics in Western Warfare from the Middle Ages to the Present, San Francisco: Westview Press, 1993, vii.

(2.) Charles R. Shrader, U.S. Military Logistics, 1607-1991, A Research Guide, New York: Greenwood Press, 1992, 3.

(3.) Julian Thompson, The Lifeblood of War: Logistics in Armed Conflict, Oxford: Brassy's, 1991, 3

The Editors, Air Force Journal of Logistics
COPYRIGHT 2009 U.S. Air Force, Logistics Management Agency
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Air Force Journal of Logistics
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 22, 2009
Previous Article:Sense and respond combat support: command and control based approach.
Next Article:Shaping logistics--just-in-time logistics.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters