The vital work of planning and training for disasters.
Any or all of these incidents could happen, and any or all could be a disaster. In large part, the outcome will depend on whether the employer and employees are prepared for such events and able to respond appropriately.
Developing a disaster preparedness policy with supporting plans and training employers and employees to execute them are the best ways to protect workers and property. It is the only way to keep business flowing smoothly if a disaster--any disaster--occurs. (The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requires that we have a plan in place to protect our electronic data.) In addition, disaster preparedness planning helps focus attention on the many business processes that need to be tightened and/or updated, so in addition to the benefits of the plan itself, business systems tend to improve. It would be hard to put a dollar figure on the value of doing this well.
All that said, it is incredibly difficult to find the time and resources for such comprehensive planning and training. There are a great many considerations to take into account. Are communications systems in place to ensure that workers can contact each other and their loved ones during and after a disaster? Are records and other workplace documents stored in a secure place, and are they easily accessible? Are resources available to assist those who are most vulnerable to disasters--typically single parents and heads of single-earner households?
As you consider these and other issues, reflect on how best to help your employer and employee clients prepare to respond to a disaster. I urge you to read Bill Badzmierowski's article on the value of conducting a disaster audit, Rocky Lopes' comments on the need for workers to ensure their families are safe, and Brenda Phillips' thoughts on how disasters affect some workers differently than others. As you ponder your professional role during a disaster, review the article by Dotty Blum, Jodi Jacobson, and Jan Paul on the EAP Critical Incident Response Continuum. And if you find yourself wondering how disaster preparedness can benefit your EAP as well as your employer and employee clients, read the piece by Andrew Armatas on how his EAP firm used disaster preparedness training prior to the 2004 Olympic Games to familiarize workers in Greece with the concept and benefits of employee assistance.
These articles, by themselves, would make for an interesting issue of the Journal, but I'm proud to say they're in good company An article by Raquel Warley and Charlotte Elkin examines the impact that EAPs can have on low-wage workers, while Marc Belanger of Join Together discusses the value of workplace screening programs in addressing alcohol abuse. Cynthia Thompson asserts that many employers have not done a good job of aligning their work-life benefits with their corporate strategies and have failed to examine more fundamental aspects of worker satisfaction. Finally, Eduardo Villar looks at the impact of kidnappings on Colombian society in general and workplaces in particular and discusses how EAPs can intervene.
While these articles touch on a wide variety of subject material, they all share a common thread. As employee assistance practitioners, we can help our clients in the vital work of planning and training for disasters and thus ensure our place at the table as workplace partners in other matters, such as screening for alcohol problems, developing effective work-life programs, and consulting on productivity issues.
I would also like to welcome the newest member of the Communications Advisory Subcommittee, Joan Clark, who has been in the EAP field since 1984 and is director of Coping EAP in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. We look forward to her contributions.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Front Desk|
|Publication:||The Journal of Employee Assistance|
|Date:||May 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||Pocket card offers advice for cold-weather workers.|
|Next Article:||Work-life: organizations in denial: while work-family programs may provide some employees with useful resources, they do not address the root causes...|