# The ups and downs of magnetic cycles.

On the average, the earth's magnetic field does an about-face, completely flipping direction, every 650,000 years. But the actual frequency of geomagnetic reversals can vary considerably. One exciting development in the last few years was the finding by a number of researchers that the reversal frequency successively increases and decreases every 30 million years [Myr] or so. Thsi is tantalizing because it bolsters the increasingly popular but hotly debated view that the earth and the life it supports are subjected to dramatic changes with clocklike regularity (SN: 10/1/83, p. 212; 5/25/85, p. 324).

The results of a new paper in the Oct. 3 Nature, however, should be sobering to those who have subscribed to the 30 Myr geomagnetic cycle. While the paper, by Timothy M. Lutz, a geologist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, does not prove that the geomagnetic record is not periodic, it does show that a statistical technique used to find this 30 Myr cycle is flawed. The paper also suggests that the periodicities claimed in other geologic records, such as surges of volcanism, impact cratering and biological extinctions, be carefully reexamined.

In his paper, Lutz looks at the statistical procedure used by David M. Raup at the University of Chicago in a Nature paper published earlier this year. Lutz concludes that the 30 Myr cycle found by Raup was not a real periodicity but rather a subharmonic of a dip in the number of reversals 150 Myr ago which has long been recognized to occur in the 165-Myr-old record. A subharmonic means that one can multiply an integer (in this case, five) times 30 Myr to get 150 Myr. If, however, the time to this dip were shortened from 150 Myr, the 30 Myr cycle would no longer show up as a subharmonic; it would only be evident if it represented a real periodicity. This is exactly the test Lutz applied; he truncated the record by eliminating the most recent reversals so that the time to the dip was shortened. Not only did the 30 Myr cycle disappear, but after his analysis Lutz found no evidence for any other periodicities either.

In the "News and Views" section of the same issue of Nature, Raup graciously acknowledges his error. Lutz "has shown by an elegant experiement that the 30 Myr signal is predictably sensitive to the length of the time series," he writes. Both he and Lutz also urge that this truncation test be applied to past statistical studies of other geologic phenomena. "Two of the three studies of [biological] extinction used essentially the same statistical techniques that I used with the magnetic data but, as Lutz points out, the extinction and magnetic data are different," Raup continues. "I am happy to report that Lutz's truncation procedure has been applied to the analysis of the extinction data with no effect on its results."

In his recent paper, Lutz also presents a new statistical approach for periodicity hunting, which he believes is conceptually simpler than other methods and which burns up less computer time for moderate-size data sets. Still, he argues that this and the other techniques are simplistic, partially because there is so little geomagnetic data available. Moreover, most of the statistical work in geology, econometrics and other fields has not focused on looking for periodicities. "If we had a really good statistician to work on this," Lutz says, "he might come up woth some new ideas."

The results of a new paper in the Oct. 3 Nature, however, should be sobering to those who have subscribed to the 30 Myr geomagnetic cycle. While the paper, by Timothy M. Lutz, a geologist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, does not prove that the geomagnetic record is not periodic, it does show that a statistical technique used to find this 30 Myr cycle is flawed. The paper also suggests that the periodicities claimed in other geologic records, such as surges of volcanism, impact cratering and biological extinctions, be carefully reexamined.

In his paper, Lutz looks at the statistical procedure used by David M. Raup at the University of Chicago in a Nature paper published earlier this year. Lutz concludes that the 30 Myr cycle found by Raup was not a real periodicity but rather a subharmonic of a dip in the number of reversals 150 Myr ago which has long been recognized to occur in the 165-Myr-old record. A subharmonic means that one can multiply an integer (in this case, five) times 30 Myr to get 150 Myr. If, however, the time to this dip were shortened from 150 Myr, the 30 Myr cycle would no longer show up as a subharmonic; it would only be evident if it represented a real periodicity. This is exactly the test Lutz applied; he truncated the record by eliminating the most recent reversals so that the time to the dip was shortened. Not only did the 30 Myr cycle disappear, but after his analysis Lutz found no evidence for any other periodicities either.

In the "News and Views" section of the same issue of Nature, Raup graciously acknowledges his error. Lutz "has shown by an elegant experiement that the 30 Myr signal is predictably sensitive to the length of the time series," he writes. Both he and Lutz also urge that this truncation test be applied to past statistical studies of other geologic phenomena. "Two of the three studies of [biological] extinction used essentially the same statistical techniques that I used with the magnetic data but, as Lutz points out, the extinction and magnetic data are different," Raup continues. "I am happy to report that Lutz's truncation procedure has been applied to the analysis of the extinction data with no effect on its results."

In his recent paper, Lutz also presents a new statistical approach for periodicity hunting, which he believes is conceptually simpler than other methods and which burns up less computer time for moderate-size data sets. Still, he argues that this and the other techniques are simplistic, partially because there is so little geomagnetic data available. Moreover, most of the statistical work in geology, econometrics and other fields has not focused on looking for periodicities. "If we had a really good statistician to work on this," Lutz says, "he might come up woth some new ideas."

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Title Annotation: | earth's magnetic fields |
---|---|

Author: | Weisburd, Stefi |

Publication: | Science News |

Date: | Oct 19, 1985 |

Words: | 576 |

Previous Article: | Hyperactivity: will it stay or go? |

Next Article: | Medicine: Brown, Goldstein honored. |

Topics: |