The role of birds in Arboviral disease surveillance in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas.
In 1999, the first sign that WNV had reached the United States was due to large numbers of dead birds, primarily crows, in New York City. (4) Subsequently, wildlife and disease ecologists noted continued large die-offs of crows and Blue Jays as the virus spread across the continent. (5) Harris County Public Health MVCD created a Dead Bird Hotline for residents to report dead birds. The first detection of WNV in the Houston area was from a dead Blue Jay in 2002.
Since WNV has been established in Harris County, avian monitoring helps explain the complex ecological interactions responsible for outbreaks. For humans to be infected, the virus must first amplify in the mosquitoavian transmission cycle. Avian antibodies, like human ones, are important to immune responses and make surviving, seropositive birds essentially resistant to reinfection. (6) In standard epidemiological susceptible-infectedremoved (SIR) models, large numbers of immune individuals reduce the viral transmission rate below a sustainable level, bringing outbreaks to an end. (7) Although more research is needed, there is evidence that some arboviruses, such as WNV and SLE, follow multiyear SIR cycles. A 40-year history of SLE seroprevelances in Harris County demonstrated a consistent cyclical pattern while a multiyear field study in Chicago found that the best predictor of WNV activity in a given year was the proportion of seropositive birds at the end of the previous year. (2) Similarly, in Los Angeles, a preseason seropositive rate of less than 10% was associated with WNV outbreaks. (8) This study provides the results from the 2015 MVCD avian surveillance activities.
Live bird trapping was conducted daily throughout the year, except when prevented by inclement weather. Trapping locations were located in Houston or Harris County parks and varied on a rotational basis. Sites that were chosen for live bird trapping provided the most uniform coverage available, ie, included historic and current WNV and SLE "hot spots" and provided a high degree of trapping success. In 2015, 27 sites were trapped, with 20 monitored biweekly from June to December when seasonal help was available, and on a monthly rotation during the rest of the year (Figure 1).
During bird trapping, an average of 3 to 5 Japanese mist nets were set up before sunrise and maintained until 9:30 am. The nets were 2.6 m in height and 6 or 12 m in length, and attached to poles that were hammered into the ground with mallets. Nets were positioned in areas that were expected to attract birds or serve as flyways and baited with commercial bird seed at least one day prior to trapping. Specific characteristics indicating favorable areas included open spaces interspersed with layered vegetation, backyard bird feeders, open trash cans, and picnic tables. Nets were checked at least every 15 minutes with optimum trapping occurring when all nets were observed from one central location. After trapped birds were removed from the mist nets, they were placed in a holding bag, transported to a mobile laboratory station and processed on-site.
During processing, we recorded the bird's species, sex (if possible), age, and whether or not it was previously banded, as required by the Bird Banding Laboratory. We used the National Geographic Society Field Guide to Birds of North America (9) along with The Sibley Field Guide to Birds of Eastern North America (10) for species identification, and Pyle's Identification Guide to North American Birds (11) for ageing, sexing, and determining the correct band size. The age of a bird is of particular interest for WNV and SLE surveillance because positive hatch year birds indicate exposures that occurred within the current season. After we collected all pertinent information, we drew blood from the bird's jugular vein or brachial vein if it was a dove, because the jugular vein is frequently obscured by engorged skin in doves. We collected either 0.1 cc of blood for smaller (sparrow-sized) birds or 0.2 cc for larger birds (ie, Blue Jays) and added it to a corresponding amount of 0.4 cc or 0.8 cc diluent of 0.9% normal buffered saline in a 13 mm by 100 mm glass culture tube. Once blood collection was complete, the bird was banded and released.
The culture tubes were labeled with a unique identifying number and kept in a refrigerated cooler while in the field. Once the diluted blood samples arrived at the MVCD Avian Laboratory, they were placed in a refrigerated (4[degrees]C) centrifuge which ran for 15 minutes at 2,500 rpm. The sera were extracted with disposable transfer pipettes into similarly labeled 2 ml cryovials, which were kept frozen until they were transferred to the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB-G) or the MVCD Virology Laboratory for testing.
Most dead birds were reported to the Dead Bird Hotline, while a smaller number was reported to the HCPH website (https://secure.hcphes.org/MC/DeadBirdReport.html). Residents may also bring dead birds to the MVCD Avian Laboratory. Information collected on all birds included the contact information (name, address, and phone number) of the caller, location, condition of the bird, and time and date the bird was found. If the bird was found within 24 hours of the call and appeared reasonably fresh, the caller was instructed to double bag the bird and place it in the freezer or a bag of ice to preserve it until retrieved by a MVCD technician. In years with large numbers of dead bird calls, 18 additional drop off centers located throughout Harris County were activated. Once the bird was collected, it was identified and its condition evaluated. If the carcass was fresh and contained no maggots or ants, it was submitted for WNV/ SLE testing and assigned a unique identifying number.
Since 2002, the UTMB-G has been conducting the initial screening of live bird samples and confirmatory testing of dead birds. Sera samples were screened with the hemagluttination inhibition (HI) test, which detected the presence of viral antibodies, but could not differentiate between antibody subtypes. Since some subtypes, such as IgG, can persist for long periods of time, this test cannot be used to distinguish currently infected birds from those that were infected in previous years. West Nile virus and SLE are also structurally similar, causing HI antigens to cross-react. If the titer levels for one virus were 4 times or more titers higher than the other, the virus with the higher titer was considered the causative agent. (12) If the causative virus was identified, the sample was considered positive solely for the causative virus. Samples in which the causative virus could not be determined were listed as WNV/SLE and analyzed separately.
To determine if the birds were recently infected, the MVCD Virology Laboratory preformed a second test, ie, the IgM antibody capture method, on all HI positive samples. This test does not cross-react and detects only IgM antibodies which are only produced during the initial stages of infection, and persist for about a month. A limitation of the IgM test is its potential for reacting to a naturally occurring antigen in the blood of some individual birds, resulting in a false positive rate of approximately 10%. Given these limitations, the most definitive results were from combining these tests. For example, a bird that tested both HI and IgM positive was definitely exposed and, most likely, that exposure was within the last month, indicating recent viral activity.
Dead birds were initially screened at the MVCD Avian Laboratory with vector and rapid analyte measurement platform (RAMP) test kits, both of which can also be used for mosquitoes. The vector test is a quick dipstick test that detects SLE and Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) in addition to WNV. While the RAMP test takes longer, it is more accurate and provides quantitative results. For both tests, the bird's throat was swabbed with a cotton-tipped applicator. For vector tests, the applicator was swirled in a 0.6 ml vial containing 600 [micro]l of grinding solution for 10 seconds. A test strip was placed in the vial and left to mature for 15 minutes. Each virus had its own specific detection zone on the test strip. For RAMP testing, a separate applicator was swirled in a 1.5 ml vial containing 1 ml of RAMP buffer solution for 10 seconds. Then, 120 [micro]l of the supernatant was transferred to a smaller 0.6 ml vial where it was mixed with a florescent dye. Finally, 70 [micro]l was transferred to the sample well of the test cartridge and dried for 90 minutes. The dry cartridge was placed into a RAMP reader which provided a quantitative ratio in a range of less than 10 to more than 640. Results of 50 or greater were considered positive.
After testing, dead birds were labeled with weatherproof tags, double-bagged and placed in an ultra-low (-62[degrees]C) freezer until they were transferred to UTMB-G. Information on the tags included date, location, species, and MVCD Avian Laboratory number. If more than 25 birds were collected during the week, only those that tested positive or species with historically high rates of WNV were transported to UTMB-G for tissue culture and WNV confirmation. During tissue culture, a small portion of brain was removed from each dead bird and was homogenized in approximately 2.0 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes, the supernatant was filtered (0.22 [micro]m) and 200 [micro]L was inoculated into a flask culture of Vero cells. Vero cultures were maintained at 37[degrees]C for 14 days and observed daily for viral cytopathic effect (CPE). If CPE was observed, the culture was confirmed as positive for WNV by complement-fixation test or by the vector test antigen assay done on the culture medium. Due to funding limitations, an alternative confirmation method consisting of a RAMP result of 100 or greater, corresponding to a UTMB-G confirmation rate of 90%, was implemented by MVCD Avian Laboratory from October 14, 2015 to December 31, 2015.
The capture and handling of wild birds was done in accordance with the US Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (13) and required both federal and state permits. This work was conducted under Scientific Collecting Permit MB730179-0 from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Bird Banding Permit 09415 from the US Geological Survey, and Scientific Research Permit SPR-0816-179 from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
The MVCD Avian technicians collected a total of 1,345 sera samples and received 358 dead bird calls from 40 species of live bird species and 39 species of dead birds in 2015 (Tables 1 and 2). Sera collections increased over 2014, improving upon the 50% increase over the number of samples collected in 2013 and surpassing all previous years since 2009.
Of the dead birds called in, 319 (89%) were collected and 253 (79%) were fit for testing. Fifteen dead birds (5.9% of those tested) were confirmed positive for WNV, while 222 (16.5%) sera samples were HI positive for WNV, 2 (0.15%) were HI positive for SLE and 10 (0.7%) were HI positive for either WNV or SLE. Additionally, 2 samples each were HI positive for EEE and Western equine encephalitis (WEE). Of the samples that were Hi positive, 25 (10.6%) were IgM positive for WNV and 4 (1.6%) IgM positive for SLE. This represented about 1.8% and 0.3% of all samples. The percentage of HI positive samples for WNV increased slightly over 2014, maintaining the generally elevated numbers recorded since 2012 (Figure 2), while the percentage of IgM positives decreased by half or more (Figure 3). The percentage of positive dead birds also decreased from 2014 (Figure 4).
The percentage of WNV positives fluctuated throughout the year (Figure 5). The period of greatest activity was from July to September, 2015. There were no IgM positive samples in January. Between 5% and 9% of samples were IgM positive from February to June, 2015. This increased to 11% in July before peaking in August at 28%. The first positive dead bird was found on July 2, 2015. More followed, with all other positive dead birds, with one exception, occurring in July and August. The percentage of HI WNV positives peaked in September at 25%. The IgM WNV positives also remained high in September at above 20% before falling below 10% in October. There were no IgM positives in November and December. The last positive dead bird was found on November 6, 2015. The percentage of HI WNV positive samples was the only metric to remain elevated during the winter months, remaining at around 15% for January, November, and December 2015. This is not surprising given the persistence of WNV antibodies and the high levels of WNV activity in 2012 and 2014.
Both HI and IgM results for WNV differed by age. After-hatch year birds had a HI seropositive rate more than double that of hatch year birds, while hatch year birds that were HI positive for WNV were twice as likely to be IgM positive (Table 3). This is consistent with after-hatch year birds maintaining protective immunity after being exposed to WNV within the previous 2 to 3 years. When disease prevalence in hatch year and after-hatch year birds was plotted by month, the differences were more pronounced (Figure 6). After-hatch year birds accounted for the majority of all positives until July, when hatch year IgM prevalence increased dramatically. After-hatch year IgM rates did not undergo a similar increase until August. Hatch year HI rates were generally low, peaking at 21.5% in September, about 15% less than after-hatch year HI rates for the same month. There were no hatch year birds in January and February, and low sample sizes prevented the analysis of hatch year seropositive rates in March and April, which had one HI positive each.
Each species had a seropositive rate markedly different from the average. Northern Cardinals had the highest HI incidence rate of 46.1%, followed by Blue Jays at 29.1% (Figure 7). Of the HI positive samples, the majority were from House Sparrows (39%), Northern Cardinals (24%), and Blue Jays (21%) (Figure 8). The highest IgM incidence rates were in Blue Jays (21.3%), Mockingbirds (18.2%), and House Sparrows (11.8%), while Blue Jays and House Sparrows comprised the bulk of the IgM positive samples (84.0%). No HI or IgM positives were found in Myrtle Warblers, Red-Winged Blackbirds, Common Grackles, and Savanah Sparrows. Myrtle Warblers and Savanah Sparrows are migratory birds that only reside in the Houston area during the winter months. House Sparrows were by far the most frequently tested species, caught 4 times as much as Blue Jays, the next most commonly caught species, and comprised 46.7% of all samples tested. The next 4 most commonly tested species were Blue Jays, Northern Cardinals, Northern Mockingbirds, and Mourning Doves, comprising 30.0% of all samples tested. Dead Blue Jays were also positive frequently, accounting for 73.3% of positive dead birds. All other dead positive bird species (Cooper's Hawk, Northern Cardinal, Northern Mockingbird, and Great-tailed Grackle) had one positive sample each (Figure 9).
Positives were not uniformly distributed across Harris County. Parts of the Harris County that had high prevalence rates were the Spring-Cypress area in the northwest, Kingwood in the north, and western Houston. Figure 10 shows the distribution of HI positive results within Harris County for all viruses in 2015. The prevalence rate for WNV ranged from 0.0% to 28.6%, and areas with the highest percentages were in the center and southern part of Harris County. Only 6 samples tested positive for SLE, EEE, and WEE. Areas 411 and 425 tested positive for SLE, while EEE was detected in areas 820 and 904, and WEE was detected in 710 and 923, which was the first time it was detected since 2011.
Figure 11 shows the distribution of IgM results for WNV in Harris County. The percentage of IgM positive samples is the percentage of HI samples testing IgM positive and indicates the proportion of HI positives in each area that is due to a recent infection. The percentage of IgM positives in each area ranged from 0.0% to 36.4%. The areas with the highest percentage of IgM positives were 820, 225, and 606. Area 606 was the only one that had a high percentage of both IgM and HI positives.
Most dead birds were reported from the western loop and northwestern Harris County, near the towns of Spring and Cypress (Figure 12). Positive birds were clustered in Baytown and near the intersection of highways 610 and 290. Five more birds were confirmed from outlying areas northwest of the Sam Houston Beltway and one from the town of Humble.
COMPARISONS TO PREVIOUS YEARS
In 2015, the percentage of positive confirmed dead birds was low, while the percentage of HI WNV positive live birds was high, relative to their historical occurrences (Figure 13). This could be explained by the high prevalence of antibodies in the avian population providing protective immunity against WNV resulting in the avian low death rate, which is reasonably well supported by the historical data. However, high antibody levels did not prevent a high death rate in 2014.
In 2002 when WNV was first detected in Harris County, birds were particularly susceptible as none had been previously exposed. Although SLE antibodies provide some protection against WNV, (6) they were at a historically low rate of 1.9%. Mortality was high, particularly for American Crows (68.4%) and Blue Jays (66.9%). It took 4 years for antibody levels to peak in 2006 at 17.7%, double the highest annual SLE rate from 1975 to 2001 of 8.4%. From 2006 to 2011, the mortality and seroprevalence rates decreased, until antibody levels reached 6% to 5% (Figure 13). In 2012, there was a sudden resurgence in WNV activity, with mortality rates reaching 2003-2004 levels. Antibody levels jumped to 14.7% and remained high throughout 2015. Recent mortality rates were inconsistent; 1.6% in 2013 and 23.5% in 2014.
The objectives were to expand and improve the MVCD Avian Surveillance Program in 2016. Trapping sites were continually evaluated and subjected to change if catch rates decreased. Scouting for new trapping locations, particularly in areas of high virus activity or low current coverage, were conducted as time permitted. Testing was expanded to include Highlands J virus (HJV), an alphavirus in the WEE complex. Although HJV is not thought to cause illness in humans, it can react with antigens for WEE similarly to WNV and SLE. Testing for both will allow for definitive identifications of WEE. Five sera samples have already tested HI positive for HJV in 2016.
Testing for non-arboviral viruses, such as Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) can also be considered. The UTMB-G has frequently recovered NDV, which is classified as a select agent by the US Department of Agriculture in pigeons and doves collected in Harris County and the City of Houston. (14) Although HPAI is not a vector-borne disease, it is a high-profile, economically devastating, and potentially life-threatening disease that uses avian species as the main host. In 2015, an HPAI outbreak occurred in at least 15 states (3 declaring states of emergency) resulting in the destruction of 49.5 million birds and at least $500 million spent in emergency funds. (15-17) The HPAI was also found in wild birds in Kansas and Missouri, (18) states that are part of the same migratory flyway that includes important wintering grounds in the Houston area. The HPAI may persist in wild birds and resurface from time to time in the United States as it has in Asia. Indeed, the 2015 outbreak was linked to incidences in British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest in 2014. (19) Another incidence was confirmed on January 15, 2016, in Indiana where 43,000 birds were destroyed as part of the containment effort. (20)
We plan to test for Avian Flu in 2017. Test kits are available from several commercial manufactures for use by veterinarians. Further testing by UTMB-G will be needed to confirm any positive samples as highly pathogenic.
Avian surveillance is an integral part of disease-based integrated mosquito and vector management programs. Overall, an average level of Avian WNV activity was indicated in 2015, and low levels of EEE and SLE in Harris County and the City of Houston. However, WEE was last detected in 2011. Most infections were in residential birds. If viral activity conforms to SIR models, Harris County should be entering a low point in the WNV cycle. Initial results showed WNV activity was low in 2016, with only one confirmed dead bird. Low levels of viral activity will eventually diminish avian arboviral protection, inviting another outbreak. Continued surveillance is needed to determine when this will likely occur. * 1
(1.) Rappole JH, Hubalek Z. Migratory birds and West Nile virus. JAppl Microbiol. 2003; 94(suppl):47s-58s.
(2.) McKee EM. West Nile Seroreversion and the Influence of Herd Immunity on Disease Risk in a LongTerm Study of Free-Ranging Birds [master's thesis]. University Park, IL; Governors State University; 2012. Available at: http://opus.govst.edu/theses/9/. Accessed December 14, 2016.
(3.) Nemeth NM, Oesterlem PT, Bowen RA. Humoral immunity to West Nile virus is long-lasting and protective in the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus). Am J Trop MedHyg. 2009; 80(5):864-869.
(4.) Nash D, Mostashari F, Fine A, et al. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:1807-1814.
(5.) Koenig WD, Hochachka WM, Zuckerberg B, Dickinson JL. Ecological determinants of American crow mortality due to West Nile virus during its North American sweep. Oecologia. 2010; 163:903-909.
(6.) Fang Y, Reisen WK. Previous infection with West Nile or St. Louis encephalitis viruses provides cross protection during reinfection in house finches. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 75(3):480-485.
(7.) Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1991.
(8.) Kwan JL, Kluh S, Reisen WK. Antecedent avian immunity lifts tangential transmission of West Nile virus to humans. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e34127.
(9.) Dunn JL. National Geographic Field Guide to the Birds of North America, 4th ed. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society. 2002.
(10.) Sibley DA. The Sibley Field Guide to Birds of Eastern North America. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc; 2003.
(11.) Pyle P. Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part 1. Bolinas, CA: Slate Creek Press; 1997.
(12.) Casals J. The arthropod-borne group of animal viruses. Trans N YAcad Sci. 1957; 19(3):219-235.
(13.) Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, 16 USC [section]703-712; Ch 128; 40 Stat. 755 (July 13, 1918). Available at: http://law2.house.gov/view.xhtml? req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title16-chapter7-su bchapter2&saved=%7CMTYgdXNj%7CdHJlZXN vcnQ=%7CdHJ1ZQ==%7C5302%7Ctrue%7Cprel im&edition=prelim. Accessed December 14, 2016.
(14.) Kim LM, Guzman H, Tesh RB, Bueno R, Dennett JA, Alonso CL. Biological and phylogenetic characterization of pigeon paramyxovirus serotype-1 circulating in North American pigeons and doves. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:3303-3310.
(15.) McKenna M. The avian flu epidemic: massive impact, uncertain future [The National Geographic Society Web site]. May 7, 2015. Available at: http:// phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2015/05/07/ bird-flu-1/. Accessed December 14, 2016.
(16.) McKenna M. Bird flu cost the US $3.3 billion and worse could be coming [The National Geographic Society Web site]. June 15, 2015. Available at: http:// phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/15/ bird-flu-2/. Accessed December 14, 2016.
(17.) Lowe P, Boden S. Avian flu outbreak takes poultry producers into uncharted territory [NPR Web site]. May 21, 2015. Available at: http://www.npr.org/ sections/thesalt/2015/05/21/408306843/avian-fluoutbreak-takes-poultry-producers-into-unchartedterritory. Accessed September 19, 2016.
(18.) US Department of Agriculture. USDA list of confirmed US highly pathogenic avian influenza wild bird cases in the United States. Updated September 4, 2015. Available at: www.CDC.gov/flu/avianflu/ h5/.
(19.) US Geological Survey Instructional Memorandum No: IM OA 2014-05. Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses H5N2 and H5N8 in wild birds of the United States. July 7, 2014.
(20.) US Department of Agriculture. Confirmed Avian Influenza Detections--2016. Available at: https:// www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/ animal-disease-information/avian-influenza-disease/sa_detections_by_states/ai-2016-map. Accessed September 19, 2016.
Lauren Wilkerson, MS
Martin Reyna Nava, MS
Amelia Travassos da Rosa
Robert Tesh, MD, PhD
Mustapha Debboun, PhD, BCE
Ms Wilkerson is the Avian Biologist at the Mosquito and Vector Control Division, Harris County Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Mr Reyna Nava is a Medical Entomologist and the Technical Operations Manager of the Mosquito and Vector Control Division, Harris County Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Ms Freeman is the Virologist at the Mosquito and Vector Control Division, Harris County Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Ms Travassos da Rosa is a Virologist at the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Ms Guzman is a Virologist at the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Dr Tesh is a Professor at the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Dr Debboun is the Director of the Mosquito and Vector Control Division, Harris County Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Caption: Figure 1. Map of Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, showing bird trap sites in 2015.
Caption: Figure 2. Percentage of live bird sera samples collected from Harris County and the City of Houston that tested HI positive for WNV, SLE, and WNV/SLE since 2002.
Caption: Figure 5. Monthly WNV activity in live and dead birds collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, in 2015.
Caption: Figure 6. Monthly WNV activity in live hatch year and after-hatch year birds collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, in 2015.
Caption: Figure 7. Percentages of live bird sera samples collected from Harris County and the City of Houston that tested HI positive for WNV in 2015.
Caption: Figure 10. Map of Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, showing the geographical distribution of HI test results for WNV, SLE, EEE, and WEE in 2015.
Caption: Figure 11. Map of Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, showing the geographical distribution of IgM test results for WNV in 2015.
Caption: Figure 12. Map of Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, showing the geographical distribution of dead birds reported, tested, and confirmed WNV positive in 2015.
Caption: Figure 13. Percentage of dead birds confirmed positive and live birds that tested HI positive for WNV from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, since 2002.
Table 1. Number of live bird sera samples collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, that tested HI and IgM positive at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston and the Mosquito and Vector Control Division in 2015. Common Name Scientific Name Sera HI WNV House Sparrow Passer domesticus 628 86 Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata 158 46 Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis 117 54 Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos 66 11 Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura 63 9 Myrtle Warbler Dendroica coronata 48 0 White-winged Dove Zenaida asiatica 37 3 Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus 34 0 European Starling Sturnus vulgaris 20 4 Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula 18 0 Great-tailed Grackle Quiscalus mexicanus 18 2 Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis 17 0 Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater 15 1 Red-bellied Melanerpes carolinus 13 1 Woodpecker Chipping Sparrow Spizella passerina 12 0 American Robin Turdus migratorius 11 2 Nutmeg Manakin Lonchura punctulata 8 1 Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus 8 0 Tufted Titmouse Baeolophus bicolor 7 0 House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus 5 1 White-throated Zonotrichia albicollis 5 0 Sparrow Hermit Thrush Catharus guttatus 4 0 Inca Dove Scardafella inca 4 0 Yellow-bellied Sphyrapicus varius 4 0 Sapsucker Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens 3 0 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus 3 0 Bronzed Cowbird Molothrus aeneus 2 0 Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum 2 1 Eurasian Collared Streptopelia decaocto 2 0 Dove Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus 2 0 Rock Dove Columba livia 2 0 Carolina Chickadee Parus carolinensis 1 0 Eastern Bluebird Sialia sialis 1 0 Eastern Phoebe Sayornis phoebe 1 0 Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis 1 0 Lincoln's Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii 1 0 Orange-crowned Vermivora celata 1 0 Warbler Purple Martin Progne subis 1 0 Rose-breasted Pheucticus ludovicianus 1 0 Grosbeak White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus 1 0 (40 Bird Species) 1,345 222 Totals Common Name HI SLE HI HI EEE HI WEE IgM IgM WNV/SLE WNV SLE House Sparrow 1 6 1 0 11 2 Blue Jay 0 1 0 0 10 2 Northern Cardinal 0 1 0 0 2 0 Northern Mockingbird 0 0 0 2 2 0 Mourning Dove 0 0 0 0 0 0 Myrtle Warbler 0 0 0 0 0 0 White-winged Dove 0 1 0 0 0 0 Red-winged Blackbird 1 0 0 0 0 0 European Starling 0 0 0 0 0 0 Common Grackle 0 0 0 0 0 0 Great-tailed Grackle 0 0 0 0 0 0 Savannah Sparrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brown-headed Cowbird 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red-bellied 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodpecker Chipping Sparrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Robin 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nutmeg Manakin 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carolina Wren 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tufted Titmouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 House Finch 0 0 0 0 0 0 White-throated 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sparrow Hermit Thrush 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inca Dove 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow-bellied 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sapsucker Downy Woodpecker 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red-headed Woodpecker 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bronzed Cowbird 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brown Thrasher 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eurasian Collared 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dove Loggerhead Shrike 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rock Dove 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carolina Chickadee 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eastern Bluebird 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eastern Phoebe 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gray Catbird 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lincoln's Sparrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orange-crowned 0 0 0 0 0 0 Warbler Purple Martin 0 0 1 0 0 0 Rose-breasted 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grosbeak White-eyed Vireo 0 0 0 0 0 0 (40 Bird Species) 2 10 2 2 25 4 Totals HI indicates hemagluttination inhibition. WNV indicates West Nile virus. SLE indicates St Louis encephalitis. EEE indicates Eastern equine encephalitis. WEE indicates Western equine encephalitis. IgM indicates immunoglobulin M Table 2. Number of dead birds collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, that were tested and confirmed positive at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, and the Mosquito and Vector Control Division in 2015. Common Name Scientific Name Tested Vector Test Positive White-winged Dove Zenaida asiatica 61 0 Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata 30 9 European Starling Sturnus vulgaris 22 0 Blue-winged Teal Anas discors 19 0 House Sparrow Passer domesticus 18 0 Great-tailed Grackle Quiscalus mexicanus 17 1 Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura 14 0 Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos 8 0 American Robin Turdus migratorius 7 1 Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum 6 0 Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula 6 0 Rock Dove Columba livia 4 0 Yellow-crowned Nycticorax violacea 4 0 Night-heron Cooper's Hawk Accipter cooperii 3 0 Eastern Screech-owl Otus asio 3 0 Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis 3 0 Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater 2 0 Carolina Wren Thryothorus 2 0 ludovicianus Eurasian Collared Streptopelia decaocto 2 0 Dove Hermit Thrush Catharus guttatus 2 0 Purple Martin Progne subis 2 0 American Coot Fulica americana 1 0 American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos 1 0 Baltimore Oriole Icterus galbula galbula 1 0 Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis 1 0 Chipping Sparrow Spizella passerina 1 0 Laughing Gull Larus atricilla 1 0 Lesser Snow Goose Chen caerulescens 1 0 Mallard Anus platyrynchos 1 0 Myrtle Warbler Dendroica coronata 1 0 Orange-crowned Vermivora celata 1 0 Warbler Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapillus 1 0 Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus 1 0 Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus 1 0 Sora Porzana carolina 1 0 Tennessee Warbler Vermivora peregrina 1 0 Veery Catharus fuscescens 1 0 White-faced Ibis Plegadis chihi 1 0 Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens 1 0 (39 Bird Species) 253 11 Totals Common Name RAMP Confirmed Percentage Positive Positive Confirmed White-winged Dove 0 0 0.0% Blue Jay 9 11 36.7% European Starling 1 0 0.0% Blue-winged Teal 0 0 0.0% House Sparrow 0 0 0.0% Great-tailed Grackle 1 1* 5.9% Mourning Dove 0 0 0.0% Northern Mockingbird 1 1 12.5% American Robin 0 0 0.0% Cedar Waxwing 0 0 0.0% Common Grackle 0 0 0.0% Rock Dove 0 0 0.0% Yellow-crowned 1 0 0.0% Night-heron Cooper's Hawk 0 1 33.3% Eastern Screech-owl 0 0 0.0% Northern Cardinal 1 1 33.3% Brown-headed Cowbird 1 0 0.0% Carolina Wren 0 0 0.0% Eurasian Collared 0 0 0.0% Dove Hermit Thrush 0 0 0.0% Purple Martin 0 0 0.0% American Coot 0 0 0.0% American Crow 0 0 0.0% Baltimore Oriole 0 0 0.0% Brown Pelican 0 0 0.0% Chipping Sparrow 0 0 0.0% Laughing Gull 0 0 0.0% Lesser Snow Goose 0 0 0.0% Mallard 0 0 0.0% Myrtle Warbler 0 0 0.0% Orange-crowned 0 0 0.0% Warbler Ovenbird 0 0 0.0% Red-eyed Vireo 0 0 0.0% Red-winged Blackbird 0 0 0.0% Sora 0 0 0.0% Tennessee Warbler 0 0 0.0% Veery 0 0 0.0% White-faced Ibis 0 0 0.0% Yellow-breasted Chat 0 0 0.0% (39 Bird Species) 14 15 5.9% Totals * Includes bird confirmed in MVCD Avian Laboratory. RAMP indicates rapid analyte measurement platform. Table 3. Number and percentage of live birds collected in Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, that tested HI and IgM positive in 2015. 2015 Total HI WNV HI SLE HI WNV/ Sera N (%N) (%N) SLE (%N) All Birds 1,345 222 (16.5%) 2 (0.1%) 10 (0.9%) Age After Hatch 777 177 (22.8%) 1 (0.1%) 7 (0.9%) Year Hatch Year 568 45 (7.9%) 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.5%) Sex Male 395 91 (23.0%) 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.7%) Female 234 42 (17.8%) 1 (0.4%) 2 (0.8%) Unknown 716 89 (12.4%) 0 (0.0%) 5 (0.7%) 2015 HI EEE HI WEE IgM WNV+ IgM SLE+ (%N) (%N) (%N) (%N) All Birds 2 (0.1%) 2 (0.1%) 25 (10.7%) 4 (1.7%) Age After Hatch 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 16 (8.7%) 3 (1.6%) Year Hatch Year 1 (0.2%) 2 (0.3%) 9 (18.3%) 1 (2.0%) Sex Male 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 7 (7.3%) 0 (0%) Female 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (2.2%) Unknown 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.2%) 18 (19.3%) 3 (3.2%) HI indicates hemagluttination inhibition. WNV indicates West Nile virus. SLE indicates St Louis encephalitis. EEE indicates Eastern equine encephalitis. WEE indicates Western equine encephalitis. IgM indicates immunoglobulin M. Figure 3. Percentages of live bird seropositive samples collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas that tested IgM positive for WNV and SLE in 2014 and 2015. Year WNV SLE 2014 25% 12.5% 2015 11% 2% Note: Table made from bar graph. Figure 4. Number and percentage of dead birds collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, that were tested and confirmed WNV positive since 2002. WNV Lab Tested % WNV Positive 2002 57.2% 2003 18.6% 2004 24.5% 2005 12.7% 2006 14.1% 2007 9.2% 2008 0.3% 2009 3.0% 2010 1.9% 2011 5.3% 2012 32.5% 2013 1.6% 2014 23.5% 2015 5.9% Note: Table made from bar graph. Figure 8. Species distribution of HI positive live bird samples collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, in 2015. Mourning Dove 4.1% Northern Mockingbird 5% Other 7.2% Blue Jay 20.7% Northern Cardinal 24.3% Northern Cardinal 6.6% House Sparrow 38.7% Note: Table made from pie chart. Figure 9. Species distribution of WNV dead birds collected from Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas, in 2015. Northern Mockingbird 6.6% Great-tailed Grackle 39% Cooper's Hawk 6.6% Blue Jay 73.3% Note: Table made from pie chart.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Wilkerson, Lauren; Nava, Martin Reyna; Battle-Freeman, Cheryl; da Rosa, Amelia Travassos; Guzman, Hi|
|Publication:||U.S. Army Medical Department Journal|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Military medicine of the Russo-Japanese war and its influence on the modernization of the US army medical department.|
|Next Article:||Laboratory and semi-field evaluations of two (transfluthrin) spatial repellent devices against Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae).|