Printer Friendly

The quiz.

The FAA has made final its most recent take on RNAV as well as many of
the terms associated with it and new RNAV approaches. How much do you
know on the topic? If you're really motivated, the complete text can be
found here:

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan2007l800/edocket.access.
gpo.gov/2007/E7-10609.htm. The answers to just these questions are on
page 23.

1. The term RNAV actually stands for:

a. Area Navigation
b. Random Navigation
c. Radial Navigation
d. Radial Navigation and Approach Vectoring

2. True or False: The LNAV/VNAV and LPV approaches you
can fly with a WAAS IFR GPS are neither precision nor
non-precision. They are called Approach Procedures
with Vertical Guidance.

3. What does LPV officially stand for?
a. Lateral Navigation with Vertical Guidance
b. Localizer Precision with Vertical Navigation
c. Lateral Precision Vectoring
d. Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance

4. Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) is now "expressed in feet
--, depicted on an approach chart that provides at
least feet of obstacle clearance for--use within
-- from the specified navigation facility or fix."

a. AGL, 1000, navigational, 25 miles
b. MSL, 1000, emergency, a certain distance
c. AGL, 2000, navigational, 10 miles
d. MSL, 2000, emergency, 25 miles

5. FAR 91.183 is titled "IFR Radio Communications."
Given that our brave new world of technology may
use something other than a traditional radio to communicate,
the FAA is changing this to:

a. I FR Voice Communications
b. IFR Communications by Radio or Other Method
c. IFR Communications
d. The FAA change something in anticipation rather than in
reaction? Get real.

6. True or False: The new rule will allow IFR-certified
GPS units to meet the requirement for DME above
FL240.

7. Changes to FAR 91.177 would clarify that flights may
be conducted below the minimum en route altitude
(MEA) but at or above the minimum obstruction
clearance altitudes (MOCA) will be OK

a. only within 22 miles of the VOR defining the route.
b. only within 25 miles of the VOR defining the route
c. anywhere along the route.
d. anywhere along the route, provided applicable
navigation signals are available.


QUIZ ANSWERS (questions on page 12)

1. a. The term dates back well before GPS, but wasn't an officially defined term until this year.

2. False. Many industry groups complained about the new definition and it has been withdrawn. For now, you can treat any approach with vertical guidance as "precision," but recognize that it may not have the 200-foot DH that's the hallmark of a Cat I ILS. Expect some redefining here in the future.

3. d. The lateral navigation is fixed width, but comparable to a localizer in accuracy. You'll also get a glideslope right down to the pavement (although you're only supposed to fly it to DA).

4. b. Not to be confused with the ICAO Minimum Sector Altitude, which is based on 25 miles.

5. c. Can you believe it? They're actually making a regulation simpler.

6. True. You can thank AOPA for that one. You can also thank AOPA for a lead role in the effort to keep the requirement for DME to FL240 rather than having it changed to FL180.

7. d. If you're using GPS, you can go to the MOCA anywhere along the route. With VOR navigation, you can only go down to the MOCA within 22 miles of the VOR. In all cases, the lower altitude must be approved by ATC.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Belvoir Media Group, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:IFR
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2007
Words:582
Previous Article:The stealthy storms: embedded thunderstorms can be deadly poison for any IFR flier. The best antidote is reading the signs before takeoff.
Next Article:Simulating IMC failures: flying your desktop PC is fine way to keep those IFR skills from getting too rusty, but doing it partial-panel might save...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters