The prosecution won't rest: Washington law group fights housing discrimination. (Buying Power).
As predicted by area academics and public officials, the steady increase of prosperous black families moving to the outermost counties of Washington, D.C., once predominantly white, has not been well received. The racist incidents are not always as overt as the vandals who smeared "KKK" on the house that a black family was about to purchase in the mostly white suburb of Woodland Beach in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, last August.
"Real estate companies and agents often use the tactics of discouragement, steering, and delay to keep African Americans out of certain neighborhoods," says Attorney Reed N. Colfax, director of the Washington Lawyers' Committee's Fair Housing Project (www.washlaw.org). "These tactics may be more than the blatant and explicit refusals to sell, seen frequently in the past, but they still prevent African Americans from purchasing their desired homes and that violates the law."
Working closely with the National Fair Housing Alliance and the Equal Rights Center, Colfax relies on the financial and human resources of local law firms to help their nonprofit organization handle the 15 to 20 housing discrimination cases they are able to take on per year. There are hundreds looking for assistance.
Claiming a 95% success rate, they recently won $160,000 in a disability discrimination case for Jack Wright, a deaf and blind man who was also awarded a free, two-bedroom apartment for life in the case of Wright and the Fair Housing Council v. Ralph D. Rocks.
Jerry Cromwell and Ricardo Ledbetter, in their present lawsuit, are alleging unlawful and purposeful discriminatory conduct after they each made unsuccessful attempts to purchase $550,000 houses in the Winchester Homes development in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.
The Fair Housing Project is also awaiting a verdict on a case filed in April 1998 against Capital City Mortgage Corporation, accused of predatory lending practices targeted at the black community. Eleven years ago, the Reverend Clyde Hargraves, pastor of the Greater Little Ark Baptist Church in Washington, D.C., and one of the eight plaintiffs in the case, signed loan papers with the mortgage company.
At the time, Hargraves was literally signing away his property. "We didn't understand what we thought we understood. We were under the impression that the interest and the principal were both being paid," he states. Hargraves' agreement with the mortgage company included outrageous fees and a balloon payment for the $160,000 borrowed, due in full, after five years of only paying interest.
"There was no specific language that identified Reverend Hargraves' loan as a balloon note. You would have to run the calculation yourself to see what the numbers come out to be," says co-council Attorney Jeff Robinson of Baach, Robinson & Lewis, Washington, D.C. "Balloon notes are legal. The predatory aspect comes in when the loan company fails to disclose that the loan is in fact a balloon loan, when people don't understand what they are signing, and they don't realize that after a period of time they will have to either come up with all of the money or lose a property which has substantially more value than the money they borrowed?
"The best defense is awareness," Colfax offers. "If you know that this can happen, then you would naturally look more carefully at what kind of loan you're going to get." (See Consumer Life "Mortgage Maneuvers," Shopsmart, February 2002, for information on avoiding scams.)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Jackson, Lee Anna|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2002|
|Previous Article:||Mortgage maneuvers: how doing your homework helps. (Consumer Life).|
|Next Article:||Bargain movie rentals: no lines, no late fees--now that's blockbuster. (Secret Savings).|