Printer Friendly

The principal and healthy school climate.

An organization consists of people and because this is so, organizational culture is important. Although the people in an organization come from varying cultures and each individual holds different beliefs, the organization they make up holds beliefs and values that are common within it (Eren, 2010). This culture is "the sum of the taught and shared values, beliefs, behavior characteristics and the symbols" (Kocer, 2003, p. 31).

Organizational Culture

Organizational culture is a concept different from social culture. Organizational culture "reflects the more directive and descriptive samples of common behaviors which characterize the types of organization" (Celik, 2012, p. 4). If there is a strong culture in an organization, the confidence of the members increases and they feel more powerful and energetic (Eren, 2010). The concept of culture has recently become considered as important in educational organizations, because the product of educational institutions is people. People need to be trained well and educated in a strong school culture (Celik, 2012), where the climate "reflects the touchable and definable elements of the culture" (Balci, 2011, p. 118).

Organizational Climate

The concept of organizational climate was initially used to explain the ongoing quality of organizational life and later it became a useful concept related to organizational behaviors (Korkmaz, 2005). Gilmer described organizational climate as "the characteristics that distinguish the organization from others and affect the behaviors of persons in that organization" (quoted in Gulcen & Gokyer, 2012, p. 351). Litwin and Stringer described organizational climate as "a measurable quality, which is identified depending upon the common perceptions of people living and working together in a specific place and affects the behaviors of individuals of the working environment." (as quoted in Hoy & Miskel, 2010, p. 185).

School climate is a broad concept that includes the perception of the teachers regarding the working environment of the school, its formal and informal organization, and the leadership of the organization (Hoy & Miskel, 2010). It is the common reactions or perceptions of the individuals in a situation that affect the behaviors of people in an organization. Climate is the observable form of the culture (Balci, 2011). Climate is a psychological concept that dominates the organization and has a consistent and constant characteristic that affects the behaviors of individuals, and is felt and perceived by the individuals although it is not written (Yuceler, 2009). "Whatever personality means for the individual, the climate stands for the school in the same way" (Hoy & Miskel, 2010, p. 185).

An appropriate organizational climate helps employees become integrated with the goals of the organization and work more productively (Gedikoglu & Tahaoglu, 2010). In several papers researchers have shown that the policies of principals and teachers constitute the healthy school climate and influence the effectiveness of the school. The principal is the key figure whose actions have a direct effect on the school climate (Price, 2012). The school climate can be examined in two frames; open organizational climate and healthy organizational climate (Hoy & Miskel, 2010).

Open Organizational Climate

In schools with an open organizational climate there exists cooperation and respect among teachers and between the director and the teachers. The principal is supportive, listens to teachers, and shows respect for their professional competences. Moreover, he or she encourages them to perform without rigid direction and demonstrates facilitative leadership behaviors. In addition, there are good relationships among teachers individually as well as professionally (Hoy & Miskel, 2010). In studies of effectiveness in schools, the school climate is often emphasized. According to these studies, principals willing to boost the efficacy of education become more successful when they create an open climate in their schools (Cicman, 2011b).

Healthy Organizational Climate

Like other social systems, schools "need to adapt to their environments, present their goals, take action, have an integrating atmosphere, create a separate culture, and preserve this in order to sustain their existence, to grow, and to develop" (Korkmaz, 2005), p. 531). Schools with a healthy climate can cope with their environment and utilize resources effectively in order to realize their goals. In this respect, in the current study we examined the organizational health of a secondary school in three dimensions: the institutional dimension, the administrative dimension and the technical function (Hoy & Miskel, 2010).

Institutional dimension. For schools to function well, being accepted by, and receiving support from, society are both important. The support of society helps a school adapt to its environment and achieve and maintain a valid educational program. This protects the school from inappropriate requests from the parents and society in general (Hoy & Miskel, 2010).

Administrative dimension. Administrative process is the responsibility of the principal. This includes motivating teachers in order to coordinate the work as well as to boost teachers' trust and commitment. The administrative dimension has four characteristics: a) impact of principal, b) caring, c) initiator effect, and d) support for resources. Impact is the ability of the principal to influence his subordinates. When needed, a principal would work with his subordinates effectively for the sake of his superordinates. Caring is the behavior of a friendly, supportive, and open principal. For the initiator effect, a principal presents his expectations clearly and identifies the standards. Support for resources implies that the principal should supply the required materials and atmosphere for educational activities (Hoy & Miskel, 2010).

Technical function. The technical function is composed of the education process for which the teachers are responsible. The first dimension of the technical function is that of moral importance, representing the feelings of trust and friendship among teachers. The second dimension is academic emphasis, representing the pressure that the school applies to the students for their success. The school holds high expectations of academic success (Hoy & Miskel, 2010).

An institution in which institutional, administrative, and technical dimensions work in harmony is referred to as a healthy organization. Healthy organizations meet their own needs and deal with outside problems successfully. In some studies researchers have shown that a healthy school climate has positive effects on learning and has boosted the efficacy of teachers.

The principal and the school climate. Numerous studies have been conducted regarding increasing the efficacy of schools and many factors have been put forward as affecting the success of schools. In the current study school success is mentioned often. School climate, including healthy school climate, is one of the factors that indirectly affects the success of the school (, 2011a). For a school to be effective, an appropriate atmosphere for education is essential (Bush, Bell, Bolam, Glatter, & Ribbins, 1999). The leadership of the principal is the key factor in the formation of school climate. A positive correlation has been found between educational leadership and school climate, resulting in greater school efficacy (, 2011b).

Our aim in this study was to present the status of organizational health in a school.


Research Model

We used a descriptive model in this study. This research was conducted to examine an existing situation. The second author adapted the Healthy School Scale (Akbaba, 1997) for use in the study.

Participants and Research Site

The research site was Cumhuriyet High School and the participants were the teachers employed at this school. The school used to be the type called a common high school in Turkey (no entrance examination required), but it became a vocational school for girls in August 2012. Therefore the students in grade 9 were studying as students of a vocational school, whereas grades 10, 11, and 12 were students of a common high school. There were 68 teachers on the staff of the school. This school was chosen because the person holding the position of principal had changed six times over the previous five years. The survey forms were given to 63 teachers, with the 55 who returned their forms comprising the participants in this study.

Data Collection and Analysis

Literature was reviewed in order to develop the instrument with which to collect the data wherein it was noted that a healthy organizational climate was described as having seven characteristics (Hoy & Miskel, 2010). These seven characteristics are: a) institutional unity, b) the impact of the director, c) caring, d) initiator effect, e) support for resources, f) moral importance, and g) academic importance. These features are represented in three dimensions. The second author developed an adaptation of the Healthy School Scale (Akbaba, 1997), which consists of 14 items representing these seven characteristics in three dimensions (Hoy & Miskel, 2010); institutional (4 items), administrative (5 items), and technical function (5 items). The items were arranged in a Likert-type scale and were graded under 5 alternative responses, as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Percentages (%), arithmetic averages (XX), and frequencies f) were calculated. When evaluating the data, intervals in the scale were set equally. The options, limits, and grades of the scale were identified as in Table 2 (Karasar, 2012).

According to our statistical analysis, those features for which the arithmetic averages were in the middle level and below the middle level formed the features that did not meet the criteria of a healthy school.

Results and Discussion

The responses given by the participants to the Healthy School Scale are interpreted in Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6.

The arithmetic average of teachers' answers about the administrative dimension in Table 3 shows that they agreed with these items reasonably (= 3.06).

The average score of the teachers' answers about the institutional dimension of the school in Table 4 shows that they agreed with these items reasonably ([bar.X] = 3.38). This average is higher than the average in the administrative dimension.

The average score of the teachers' answers on the technical function as presented in Table 5 reveals that they agreed with these items reasonably (= 3.06).

The average scores of the teachers' answers in the three dimensions revealed that they agreed with the items reasonably. The average score for the institutional dimension was relatively higher than the scores for the other dimensions.

The data in Table 6 show that the teachers agreed mostly with the items "In this school teachers love and show respect for each other" and "The principal expresses his expectations frankly", and they agreed reasonably with the other statements. The statement "In this school teachers think that all of the students will be successful" had the lowest average score.


In today's world, schools are expected to teach effectively. The principal plays a crucial role in the formation of the school climate, which, in turn, has a positive effect on the school's efficacy.

Teachers were in reasonable agreement with the items in the Healthy School Scale, which showed that the health of the school was not at their desired level.

Because the expectations related to the success of the students were low, success was not rewarded in the school. The results we obtained showed that the technical dimension, which includes the education process, was not of an adequate standard and the school staff members were not eager enough for the success of the students.

The teachers agreed reasonably with the items in the institutional dimension, which is about the integration of the school with the environment. The statement in this dimension "This school is supported by its environment" had the third lowest score of all the items in the scale, and this reveals that the school had some inadequacies in terms of support and acceptance by its environment.


From our findings in this study, we suggest that a consistent administration is required for the formation of a healthy school climate. We also suggest that teachers at in-service training sessions should learn that school efficacy will be boosted by high expectations regarding academic success. Teachers and principals should be supplied with performance assessments and feedback in real terms and reward systems should be applied properly in order to promote success of students and teachers. In regard to improving the institutional dimension in a school, campaigns and activities to reinforce the relationship of the school with its environment should be organized.


Akbaba, S. (1997). Ortaogretim Okullarinda Orgut Sagligi [Organizational health of secondary school]. Ankara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ankara University, Turkey.

Balci, A. (2011). Etkili okul/okul gelistirme [School effectiveness/school development]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Bush, T., Bell, L., Bolam, R., Glatter, R., & Ribbins, P. M. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In P. Hallinger & R. H. Heck (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp. 178-190). London, UK: Paul Chapman.

Celik, V. (2012). Okul kulturu ve yonetimi [School culture and management]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Eren, E. (2010). Orgutsel davranis ve yonetim psikolojisi [Organizational behavior and management psychology]. Istanbul, Turkey: Beta Basim.

Gedikoglu, T., & Tahaoglu, F. (2010). Ilkogretim okullarinin Orgut Iklimi: Gaziantep Ili Sahinbey ve Sehitkamil Ilcesi Ornegi [Organizational climate of primary schools: Example from Sahinbey District of Gaziantep Province and Sehitkamil township]. Milli Egitim [National Education], 186, 39-68.

Gulsen, C., & Gokyer, N. (2012). Turk egitim sistemi ve okul yonetimi [system of Turkish education and school management]. Ankara, Turkey: Ani.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Egitim Yonetimi (Cev. Ed. S. Turan) [Educational administration (Trans. Ed. S. Turan)]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.

Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel arasttrma yontemi [Scientific research methodology]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.

Kocer, T. (2003). isletme yoneticiligi [Business administration]. Istanbul, Turkey: Beta Basim.

Korkmaz, M. (2005). Ilkogretim okullarinda Orgutsel Saglik Ile Ogrenci bacansi arasindaki lliski [Relationship between student success and organizational health at primary schools]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi [Educational Administration Theory and Practice], 44, 529-548.

Price, H. E. (2012). Principal-teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 39-85.

Sisman, M. (2011a). Egitimde mukemmellik arayisi: etkili okullar [Perfection-seeking in education: School effectiveness]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Sisman, M. (2011b). Ogretim liderligi [Educational leadership]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Yuceler, A. (2009). Orgutsel baglilik ve Orgut Iklimi Iliskisi: Teorik ve uygulamali bir Calisma [Relationship of organizational commitment and organization climate]. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi [Selcuk University Social Sciences Institution], 22, 445-458.

Celal Gulsen and Gulden Buckun Gulenay

Fatih University

Celal Gulsen, Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Head of the Department of Educational Administration, Planning, and Economics, Fatih University; Gulden Buckun Gulenay, Master's student of Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Fatih University.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Assistant Professor Dr. Celal Gulsen, Fatih University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Email:
Table 1. Percentage and Frequency of Participants' Response to the Survey

Participants                           The survey              Total

                                replied       did not reply

                               f       %       f       %      f     %

Teachers of Cumhuriyet
High School                  55      87.30   8       12.70   63    100

Table 2. The Grades Defined for the Items in
the Survey and their Limits

Grade   Option                   Limits

1       I don't agree at all    1.00-1.79
2       I barely agree          1.80-2.59
3       I agree reasonably      2.60-3.39
4       I agree mostly          3.40-4.19
5       I agree totally         4.20-5.00

Table 3. Teachers' Views on the Administrative Dimension

   Question                                               f    [bar.X]

1  This school works in accord with its environment       55    3.16
2  This school is supported by its environment            55    2.69
3  This school is accepted by its environment             55    3.18
4  This school can stand out against inappropriate
   demands of parents and society.                        55    3.22

GENERAL AVERAGE                                           55    3.06

Note. I don't agree at all (1) 0.00-1.24; I barely agree (2)
1.25-2.24; I agree reasonably (3) 2.25-3.24; I agree mostly (4)
I agree totally (5) 4.25-5.00.

Table 4. Teachers' Views on the Institutional Dimension

   Question                                               f    [bar. X]

1  The principal has an impact on decisions of
   subordinates                                           55    3.23
2  The principal is friendly                              55    3.49
3  The principal expresses his expectations frankly       55    3.52
4  The principal states his performance standards
   frankly                                                55    3.24
5  The principal provides the needs of teachers about
   the school                                             55    3.45

GENERAL AVERAGE                                           55    3.38

Note. I don't agree at all (1) 0.00-1.24; I barely agree (2) 1.25-2.24;
I agree reasonably (3) 2.25-3.24; I agree mostly (4) 3.25-4.24;
I agree totally (5) 4.25-5.00.

Table 5. Teachers' Views on the Technical Function

   Question                                               f    [bar.X]

1  In this school teachers love and show respect for
   each other                                             55    3.93
2  In this school teacher morale is high                  55    3.36
3  In this school teachers think that all of the
   students will be successful                            55    2.49
4  This school has high goals about success of the
   students                                               55    2.87
5  In this school success is rewarded                     55    2.65

GENERAL AVERAGE                                           55    3.06

Note. I don't agree at all (1) 0.00-1.24; I barely agree (2) 1.25-2.24;
I agree reasonably (3) 2.25-3.24; I agree mostly (4) 3.25-4.24;
I agree totally (5) 4.25-5.00

Table 6. The Views of Teachers on Healthy School Climate in Descending
Order According to Arithmetic Average

    Question                                              f    [bar.X]

1   In this school teachers love and show respect for
    each other                                            55   3.92
2   The principal expresses his expectations frankly      55   3.52
3   The principal is friendly                             55   3.49
4   The principal provides for the needs of teachers
    about the school                                      55   3.45
5   In this school teacher morale is high                 55   3.36
6   The principal states his performance standards
    frankly                                               55   3.24
7   The principal has an impact on decisions of
    immediate managers                                    55   3.23
8   This school can stand out against inappropriate
    demands of parents and society                        55   3.22
9   This school is accepted by its environment            55   3.18
10  This school works in accord with its environment      55   3.16
11  This school has high goals about success of the
    students                                              55   2.87
12  This school is supported by its environment           55   2.69
13  In this school success is rewarded.                   55   2.65
14  In this school teachers think that all of the
    students will be successful                           55   2.49

GENERAL AVERAGE                                           55   3.18

Note. I don't agree at all (1) 0.00-1.24; I barely agree (2) 1.25-2.24;
I agree reasonably (3) 2.25 3.24; I agree mostly (4) 3.25-4.24;
 I agree totally (5) 4.25-5.00
COPYRIGHT 2014 Scientific Journal Publishers, Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Gulsen, Celal; Gulenay, Gulden Buckun
Publication:Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2014
Previous Article:Developing a bullying scale for use with university students.
Next Article:Do age and gender influence multiple intelligences?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters