The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among industrial hog operation workers, community residents, and children living in their households: North Carolina, USA.
In industrial hog operations IHOs, low doses of antibiotics are commonly administered in hog feed and water for the purposes of growth promotion and disease prevention (Love et al. 2011; Silbergeld et al. 2008). This practice can promote antibiotic-resistant (ABR) Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant (MRSA) (de Neeling et al. 2007; Lewis et al. 2008; Smith et al. 2009; Voss et al. 2005) and multidrug-resistant (MDRSA) resistance to [greater than or equal to] three antibiotic classes (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013) strains. ABR S. aureus can be transmitted between pigs and persons who have occupational exposure to pigs (e.g., IHO workers, swine veterinarians) (Khanna et al. 2008; Price et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2009; van den Broek et al. 2009). Evidence of human exposure to livestock-associated (LA-) ABR S. aureus emerged in the European Union in the early 2000s when a novel clonal complex (CC) of MRSA (CC398) was documented in swine and swine-worker households and subsequently in communities with a high density of swine production (Smith and Pearson 2011). Evidence of human infection due to LA-MRSA CC398 emerged in the European Union via case reports of infections among swine workers and their children, including infants (Hartmeyer et al. 2010; Huijsdens et al. 2006; Voss et al. 2005).
In the United States, knowledge of LA-S. aureus exposure dynamics has progressed more slowly than in the European Union. MRSA CC398 has been detected in swine and swine workers in the Midwestern United States (Smith et al. 2009) and North Carolina (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013), but little is known about S. aureus exposure dynamics between swine workers and their children. Filling this knowledge gap is critical because children's (particularly young children's and infants') frequent mouthing and fomite touching behaviors (Ko et al. 2007; Mattioli et al. 2015) and developing immune systems (Goenka and Kollmann 2015) may enhance their susceptibility to S. aureus exposure and infection (Chen et al. 2009; Fridkin et al. 2005; Graber et al. 2011). Moreover, the proportion of children colonized with community-associated (CA-) MRSA strains in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) appears to be increasing over time, increasing from 6.7% in 2001 to 36.1% in 2009 in one PICU (Hermos et al. 2013). Known risk factors for child exposure to and infection with CA-S. aureus strains include child care attendance, household crowding, pet ownership, sports participation, and parental or caregiver occupation in a health care or child care setting (Fritz et al. 2008; Miller et al. 2011; Nakamura et al. 2002; Shapiro et al. 2009). However, to our knowledge, parental or caregiver occupation in IHOs has not been investigated as a risk factor of child S. aureus nasal carriage and infection in the United States.
Here, we investigated nasal carriage of ABR S. aureus among children living with IHO workers in the United States. We examined prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA nasal carriage outcomes, including several putative markers of LA-S. aureus--scn-negative S. aureus, S. aureus CC398, and S. aureus CC9 (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013; Ye et al. 2016a, 2016b)--among adults with occupational exposure to IHOs, adult community resident without occupational exposure to IHOs, and one child < 7 years of age living in the same household as each adult in rural southeastern North Carolina.
This study was a collaboration among the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH), the Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help (REACH) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). The JHSPH Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this study (IRB00004608). The UNC Non-Biomedical IRB approved reliance on the JHSPH IRB. Before participation, adult participants provided written informed consent. Parents or legal guardians provided written informed assent for their participating child < 7 years of age and provided questionnaire responses for their participating child.
Data were collected between March and October 2014 in North Carolina by community organizers from REACH and researchers from JHU and UNC. Using a snowball sampling approach, community organizers recruited both IHO and community referent (CR) participants residing anywhere in the top 10 hog-producing counties in North Carolina, the second-largest hog-producing state in the United States (USDA and NCDA&CS 2010). In order of highest to lowest density of hogs, these counties were Duplin, Sampson, Bladen, Wayne, Robeson, Greene, Pender, Lenoir, Jones, and Columbus (USDA and NCDA&CS 2010). One adult ([greater than or equal to] 18 years old) worker and one child (< 7 years of age) were recruited from each household. If there was more than one child (< 7 years of age) living in the household, the children's parent or legal guardian was asked to choose which child would participate and provide permission and assent for the child to participate. IHO households were those with at least one adult who was employed full time at an IHO (IHO group) at the time of the study visit or within the prior 3 months and did not have contact with other livestock at work (e.g., poultry). CR households were those with adult residents who were not employed in any livestock-related industry within the prior 12 months. Study participants were ineligible if a) they or their household members worked in a health care or child care setting (defined as being cared for at an establishment or home along with five or more unrelated children); b) no child < 7 years of age lived in the household; or c) they could not respond to a questionnaire in English or Spanish. Eligibility criteria were assessed during recruitment and before beginning questionnaire data and sample collection. Data analysis included eligibility criteria assessment; ineligible participants were not included in the analysis.
Questionnaire Data and Nasal Swab Collection
Questionnaire responses and nasal swabs were collected during the same study visit. Adult participants and parents or legal guardians of child participants reported occupational activities and workplace exposures, personal and household member contact with livestock and pets, environmental exposures (e.g., known nearby land application of livestock or human waste), health care exposures (defined as having been to a hospital, doctor's office, or other medical facility for any reason), child care attendance (defined as being cared for at an establishment or home along with five or more unrelated children), medical history, and demographic information. The study questionnaires were developed in collaboration with REACH organizers who obtained feedback from current and former IHO workers and community residents living in the top 10 hog-producing counties of North Carolina about the appropriate phrasing and formatting of questions. The IHO group questionnaire included more detailed questions about hog and other livestock production activities than the CR group questionnaire. During training sessions, REACH community organizers were trained to consistently apply study eligibility criteria and were trained as interviewers to administer the questionnaires to participants to account for varying literacy levels. REACH interviewers included those who were fluent in English and Spanish. Participants had to have the ability to respond to study questions in English or Spanish; adult participants responded for any child participants who were too young to respond. Study personnel obtained a nasal swab from adult participants by rotating a sterile, double-tipped BD BBL[TM] CultureSwab[TM] five times clockwise and five times counter-clockwise in both nares. To minimize discomfort of child participants, two single, mini-tipped BD BBL[TM] CultureSwab[TM] nasal swabs were collected in the same manner from child participants. A set of trip blanks were collected before transport from REACH to UNC and stored with samples during transport. Swabs were stored in Stuart's medium at 4[degrees]C and transported to UNC within 5 days of sample collection for processing.
Detection of S. aureus and MRSA
One tip of the double-tipped adult swab and one of the mini-tipped children's swabs were aseptically clipped into 1 mL sterile 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After vortexing for 1 min, 100 [micro]L were pipetted directly onto CHROMagar[TM] Staph aureus (CA) media (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and distributed using a sterilized spreader and an inoculating turntable. Plates were then incubated at 37[degrees]C for 24 hr, and up to two colonies with morphological characteristics of S. aureus were picked and streaked to isolation on CA media. If fewer than two colonies grew on CA after 24 hr, the entire PBS swab suspension including swab was inoculated into 10 mL Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 6.5% NaCl and incubated overnight at 37[degrees]C. This enrichment was then streaked on CA and Baird-Parker plates and incubated at 37[degrees]C for 24 hr and 48 hr, respectively (Nadimpalli et al. 2013). Up to two presumptive S. aureus colonies were then archived at -80[degrees]C in brain-heart infusion broth with 15% glycerol until further characterization. Catalase and tube coagulase testing with rabbit plasma (BD BBL[TM], Franklin Lakes, NJ) were used to confirm S. aureus biochemical characteristics before molecular testing.
S. aureus and MRSA Molecular Confirmation
Following crude DNA extraction (Reischl et al. 2000), a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was employed to detect the S. aureus-specific gene spa, as well as mecA, mecC (mecALGA251), scn, and pvl  as described by Stegger et al. (2012). A sequenced S. aureus isolate obtained from a previous study (Rinsky et al. 2013) was used as the positive control for spa, mecA, scn, and pvl, and LGA251 (Garcia-Alvarez et al. 2011) was used for mecC. Each PCR product was confirmed by gel electrophoresis on a 3% agarose gel. Among morphologically and biochemically characteristic S. aureus isolates that lacked spa by multiplex PCR, we attempted to amplify alternate S. aureus-specific genes by PCR including an alternate spa target (DTU Food 2009), nuc (Poulsen et al. 2003) and femA (Paule et al. 2004). Finally, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was performed on 12 isolates that were negative for both spa primers but positive for nuc or femA to confirm S. aureus identity. From archived cultures, isolates were streaked on Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood and incubated overnight at 37[degrees]C. MALDI-TOF MS was performed using the FDA-cleared VITEK MS per manufacturer's recommendations for direct colony spotting (bioMerieux, Durham, NC) (Rychert et al. 2013).
Isolates that met the following criteria were classified as S. aureus: a) spa-positive; b) positive for nuc and femA; or c) identified as S. aureus by MALDI-TOF-MS. Confirmed S. aureus isolates were classified as MRSA if they were positive for mecA or mecC by PCR ("MRSA genotype").
Antibiotic Susceptibility of S. aureus
Confirmed S. aureus isolate(s) from each positive nasal swab were tested for susceptibility to the following 12 classes of antibiotics: aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, macrolides, oxazolidinones, rifamycin, streptogramins, sulfonamide, nitrofuran, and tetracyclines (see Table S1). The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used to test each isolate's susceptibility to all antibiotic classes. Interpretation of zones of inhibition was reported as susceptible, resistant, or intermediately resistant (where applicable) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2015). In erythromycin-resistant isolates, inducible clindamycin resistance was assessed using the D-zone test (Steward et al. 2005). S. aureus isolates that exhibited complete phenotypic resistance to at least three antibiotic classes were classified as MDRSA (Magiorakos et al. 2012). S. aureus isolates that exhibited complete resistance to oxacillin were classified as phenotypic MRSA ("MRSA phenotype"). MRSA isolates meeting the definition of MDRSA were classified as multidrug-resistant MRSA.
S. aureus spa Typing
Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing was performed by amplifying the spa gene as described above. PCR products were sequenced by Eton Biosciences, Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC). spa types were assigned using the Ridom Staph Type standard protocol (http://www.ridom.com) and the Ridom SpaServer (http://spa.ridom.de/index. shtml). To assess nasal carriage prevalence of CC398 and CC9, spa types were assigned to these clonal complexes based on the scientific literature and analyses of S. aureus isolates collected from our prior livestock worker studies in North Carolina (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013). The spa types classified as CC398 and CC9 are listed in the Supplemental Material in "Assignment of spa types to clonal complexes (CCs)." For within household concordance, spa types were assigned to multi-locus sequence types (MLSTs) based on the scientific literature, analyses of S. aureus isolates collected from our prior livestock worker studies in North Carolina (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013), and queries of the Ridom SpaServer.
S. aureus Nasal Cairriage Outcomes
We examined the following nasal carriage outcomes: S. aureus, MRSA, MDRSA, S. aureus CC398, S. aureus CC9, and scn-negative S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA. An individual was considered positive for a given S. aureus nasal carriage outcome if either of their two S. aureus isolates met the criteria for that outcome. We report MRSA prevalence by two criteria: a) S. aureus that was positive for mecA or mecC by PCR (hereafter, MRSA genotype) and b) S. aureus that exhibited complete resistance to oxacillin by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (hereafter, MRSA phenotype).
We first compared the distribution of demographic characteristics and potential risk factors for S. aureus nasal carriage among the IHO and CR groups for adult and child participants, respectively. Next, we calculated the crude prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage outcomes in each exposure group (IHO and CR) for adults and children, respectively. For S. aureus outcomes for which there was sufficient sample size, we used log-binomial regression models to calculate crude prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing nasal carriage prevalence for each S. aureus outcome in the IHO versus the CR groups among adults and children, respectively. We examined potential confounding covariates for which there was sufficient sample size ([greater than or equal to] 5) within strata of the exposure and S. aureus nasal carriage outcome and a priori evidence that a covariate could be acting as a confounder. The following covariates were considered as potential confounders in adjusted log-binomial regression models: adult household member's highest level of education [< high school or [greater than or equal to] high school, used as a proxy for household socioeconomic status (SES)], total number of individuals living in the household (tertiles categorized as 2-3, 4, or >[greater than or equal to] 5 people, used as a proxy for household crowding), and household pet ownership (defined as owning a pet of any kind kept in- or outside the household). Race/ ethnicity and sex were imbalanced between the IHO and CR groups, leading to small sample sizes within strata of the exposure, which precluded inclusion of these covariates in adjusted regression models. Other potential confounding covariates (recent antibiotic use, gym attendance, and contact sports within the previous 3 months, smoker living in the household, and child care attendance) were uncommon (sample size of < 5 within strata of exposure and S. aureus nasal carriage outcome) in our study population, and thus were not included as covariates in log-binomial regression models. Based on IHO workers' responses to the study questionnaire, we summarized the distribution of characteristics of the IHOs where they worked and their IHO work activities, including size of the IHO, number of pigs each IHO worker typically contacted per day, pig life stage, hours worked per week, length of employment at current IHO, and whether the IHO worker took personal protective equipment (PPE) home from the IHO, performed cleaning activities at work using disinfectants (ammonia or Clorox bleach), and handled dead pigs. These factors are categorized as shown in Table S2. We estimated PR (95% CI) to examine whether any IHO characteristics and IHO work activities were associated with S. aureus nasal carriage outcomes of IHO children. All statistical analyses were completed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
A total of 400 households participated in this study, comprised of 198 IHO and 202 CR households (Table 1). The majority of IHO participants resided in Duplin (54%) and Sampson (37%) counties, and the majority of CR participants resided in Duplin (41%) and Wayne (40%) counties (Table 1). Overall, IHO adults and children were older than CR adults and children (Table 1). In the IHO group, roughly half of adult IHO participants were female (46%), whereas 80% of adult CR participants were female. The majority of adults in the IHO group self-identified as Hispanic (94%). The majority of adults in the CR group self-identified as non-Hispanic (67%)--a majority of non-Hispanic CR participants self-identified as black alone (125/202; 62%). Few other racial/ ethnic groups were represented in the CR group (8/202 white alone, not Hispanic; 3/202 multi-race/ethnicity). The majority of adult participants in both groups reported that their household's primary health care provider was a private doctor or clinic. However, more IHO (34%) than CR (21%) adults reported not having any health insurance. In general, fewer IHO adult participants reported antibiotic use, healthcare contact, and gym attendance in the 3 months before sample collection compared with CR adult participants. Specifically, 45% of CR adults reported visiting a health care facility in the 3 months before sample collection, compared with only 5% of adults in the IHO group. CR adult participants reported less participation in contact sports within 3 months of sample collection (Table 1).
Roughly half of participating children in the CR group were female, whereas only 38% of children in the IHO group were female.
The majority of children in the IHO group were identified as Hispanic by their assenting caregiver (94%), whereas in the CR group the majority of children were identified as non-Hispanic (66%). The vast majority of children in this study had public health insurance (e.g., Medicaid). Caregivers reported that few children used antibiotics within 3 months before sample collection; however, more children within the CR group (42%) reported visiting a health care facility in the 3 months before sample collection, compared with children in the IHO group (13%). Reported child care attendance was also higher among CR children (11%) compared with IHO children (3%) (Table 1).
S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA Nasal Carriage Prevalence among Adults and Children
The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage was significantly higher among IHO adults (53%) than among CR adults (31%) (PR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.32, 2.15), including after adjustment for highest level of education of adult participant, total number of individuals living in the home, and the presence of pets in the home [adjusted PR (aPR) = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.83] (Table 2). Prevalence of MRSA genotype nasal carriage was similar between IHO adults (2%) and CR adults (4%) (Table 2). The prevalence of MRSA genotype (28/198) compared with MRSA phenotype (27/198) was in agreement for all participants except for one IHO child participant. The S. aureus isolate from this child was geno-typically but not phenotypically resistant. Prevalence of MDRSA nasal carriage was higher among IHO adults (12%) compared to CR adults (8%), but the crude and adjusted point estimates had wide confidence intervals (Table 2). A complete description of antibiotic resistance characteristics, scn gene status, and spa type for individual S. aureus isolates recovered from adult and child S. aureus carriers is provided in Excel File Table S1.
S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence was 49% among children in the IHO group and 31% among children in the CR group (Table 2). Among children living with IHO workers, 14% and 23% carried MRSA and MDRSA intranasally, respectively, compared with 6% and 8% of CR children (Table 2). Adjusting for covariates, nasal carriage prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA among IHO children was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.99), 2.37 (95% CI: 1.14, 4.92), and 2.64 (95% CI: 1.47, 4.75) times that of CR children, respectively (Table 2).
Prevalence of Livestock-Associated S. aureus Nasal Carriage Outcomes among Adults and Children
Among IHO adults, 13% carried scn-negative S. aureus, 1% carried scn-negative MRSA, and 10% carried scn-negative MDRSA intranasally, compared with 2%, 0%, and 1% of CR adults, respectively (Table 3). Nasal carriage prevalence of S. aureus CC398 was 4% among IHO adults compared with 1% among CR adults, and 6% of IHO adults carried S. aureus CC9 intranasally compared with 1% of CR adults. All S. aureus CC398 and CC9 carried intranasally by IHO and CR adult participants were scw-negative (Table 3).
The prevalence of scw-negative S. aureus, scw-negative MRSA, and scw-negative MDRSA was low among children in the IHO group (4%, 1%, and 3%, respectively) and the CR group (2%, 0%, and 1%, respectively) (Table 3). Nasal carriage prevalence of S. aureus CC398 and S. aureus CC9 was 1% among both IHO and CR children. Nasal carriage of S. aureus CC398 was identified in two IHO children and two CR children (Table 3). All of the S. aureus CC398 isolates in children were scw-negative except for one that was recovered from an IHO child participant (see Excel File Table S1). One CR child and one IHO child carried S. aureus CC9, and none of these isolates were scw-negative (Table 3).
S. aureus spa Types among Adults and Children
The most prevalent spa types observed are listed in descending frequency in Table S3. Among IHO adults who were S. aureus nasal carriers, the two most common spa types were t1937 (41/98) followed by t337 (CC9, 10/98) (see Table S3). spa types belonging to CC398 were detected infrequently among IHO adults--t034 (4/98) was the most common CC398-associated spa type among IHO adults (see Tables S3 and S4). Among CR adults who were S. aureus nasal carriers, t1937 (10/62) and t688 (ST8, 7/62) were most prevalent. Among children who were S. aureus nasal carriers, the most prevalent spa types in both groups were t008 (ST8, 30/94 IHO and 15/59 CR children) followed by t688 (ST5, 10/94 IHO and 11/59 CR children). A small number of S. aureus nasal carriers had discordant spa types between their two S. aureus nasal swab isolates, including 6 of 98 IHO adults, 3 of 94 IHO children, 1 of 62 CR adults, and 3 of 59 CR children with S. aureus positive nasal swabs (see Table S4 for the spa types identified in each pair of isolates).
Within-Household S. aureus spa Type Concordance between Adults and Children
Among 88 households that had both an adult and a child who carried S. aureus, we observed 20 households (7 of 198 IHO households and 13 of 202 households) in which adults and children were carrying concordant S. aureus strains (Table 4), defined as at least one of the S. aureus isolates collected from an adult's nasal swab having an identical spa type as at least one of the S. aureus isolates collected from the nasal swab of a child living in the same household. Nineteen of the 20 pairs of spa type-concordant S. aureus had identical ABR profiles, (Table 4). The majority of concordant S. aureus strain pairs in both the IHO and CR groups were scw-positive, non-MRSA, and non-MDRSA. However, one IHO and one CR adult-child household pair carried concordant scw-negative S. aureus in their nose. In the IHO household this S. aureus was MRSA and MDRSA and belonged to spa type t002 (ST5) (Table 4). In the CR household this S. aureus was MDRSA and belonged to spa type t034 (ST398) (Table 4). Another adult-child pair in the IHO group carried tetracycline-resistant S. aureus; however, both isolates were not MDRSA (because only two antibiotic drug classes were resistant), were scw-positive, and the spa type (t1077) is not commonly associated with livestock (Table 4; see also Excel File Table S1).
Association Between IHO Work Activities and Child S. aureus Nasal Carriage Outcomes
Several IHO work activities were associated with the S. aureus nasal carriage outcome of IHO child household members (Table 5). The strongest association observed was for IHO workers who reported taking personal protective equipment home from the IHO. In households with an IHO worker participant who did versus did not report taking personal protective equipment home we observed higher child participant nasal carriage prevalence of S. aureus (PR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.81), MRSA (PR = 12.07; 95% CI: 3.78, 38.60), and MDRSA (PR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.55) (Table 5). Other IHO work activities that were associated with S. aureus nasal carriage outcomes of child household members included working with nursery pigs, performing cleaning activities at work using disinfectants, and handling dead pigs (Table 5). The other IHO work activities and factors evaluated (listed in Table S2) were null or noninterpretable due to insufficient numbers (data not shown).
To our knowledge, this study provides the first estimates of ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence among children < 7 years of age living with IHO workers in the United States, which we observed to be high for S. aureus (49%) as well as for MRSA (14%) and MDRSA (23%) compared to a community referent group (31%, 6%, and 8% prevalence, respectively). Other studies of pediatric MRSA nasal carriage in community settings have shown prevalence estimates ranging between < 1% and 7.6% (Creech et al. 2005; Nakamura et al. 2002; Shopsin et al. 2000). Although MRSA nasal carriage prevalence among children < 7 years living in CR households (6%) fell within this range, that of children living in IHO households was roughly twice as high. Our findings differ from a 1.3% MRSA nasal carriage prevalence observed among preschool-age children at 24 child care centers in rural eastern North Carolina and Virginia between 2007 and 2010 (Miller et al. 2011). Children living in IHO households also had a higher prevalence of MDRSA nasal carriage (23%) than children in CR households (8%). Because few studies have investigated nasal carriage of MDRSA in healthy children < 7 years of age, it is unclear how our observed prevalence compares to population-based estimates in the United States. Because children and infants may have enhanced susceptibility to ABR S. aureus infection (Adcock et al. 1998; Fridkin et al. 2005; Milstone et al. 2010; Naimi et al. 2003) the higher prevalence of MRSA and MDRSA nasal carriage we observed, particularly among children living in IHO households, requires confirmation in other populations including prevalence in other IHO populations and in a study that would permit more detailed assessment of important covariates, potential confounding and effect modification.
The higher ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence among IHO children (14% MRSA carriage and 23% MDRSA carriage) compared with CR children (6% MRSA carriage and 8% MDRSA carriage) is somewhat surprising for several reasons. First, among IHO compared with CR adults, we did not estimate a positive prevalence ratio for MRSA and MDRSA. IHO workers' MRSA nasal carriage prevalence (2%) was similar to CR adults (3%) and general U.S. adult population estimates (1.5%) (Gorwitz et al. 2008), but lower than that observed in IHO workers in the Midwestern United States (45%; 9/20) (Smith et al. 2009) and Europe (30%; 15/50) (van den Broek et al. 2009). We observed a similarly low prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage among industrial livestock operation workers (3%; 3/99) (Rinsky et al. 2013) and IHO workers (5%; 1/22) (Nadimpalli et al. 2015) in our previous studies in North Carolina. The prevalence of MDRSA nasal carriage among IHO workers and CR adults observed in this study is consistent with findings from other studies in North Carolina and Iowa (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Neyra et al. 2014; Rinsky et al. 2013; Wardyn et al. 2015). Second, we rarely observed S. aureus strains with putative markers of livestock-association (i.e., scn-negative, CC398, CC9) among IHO and CR children. Instead, among IHO and CR children, we frequently observed nasal carriage of S. aureus that are considered human-associated and commonly observed in community settings (i.e., scn-positive, spa types t008 [ST8] and t688 [ST5]). Some IHO and CR adults also carried these strains. Interestingly, 41 of 104 S. aureus nasal carriage positive IHO workers were carrying scn-positive, spa type t1937, but only one IHO child and no CR children carried this strain. Together, these observations suggest that IHO children predominantly acquire S. aureus from other sources than their adult household member's nares. Future studies should aim at identifying livestock and community reservoirs and exposure sources related to acquisition of distinct scn-positive S. aureus strains by IHO children and adults.
Within-household S. aureus spa type concordance was observed in 7 IHO households and 13 CR households. Most concordant households involved S. aureus strains that are commonly associated with humans. In 1 IHO and 1 CR household, the adult-child pair was carrying concordant strains of scn-negative MDRSA that belonged to spa types t002 (ST5) and t034 (ST398), respectively. These are spa types that have been identified in hogs and in humans in direct contact with hogs (Hau et al. 2015; Smith et al. 2013). In the IHO household both the adult's and the child's scn-negative S. aureus t002 (ST5) isolates were multidrug-resistant MRSA. Because lineages of ST5 and ST398 have demonstrated a successful capacity for human colonization and infection in community and hospital settings (Bosch et al. 2016; Hau et al. 2015; Larsen et al. 2015), these instances of within-household S. aureus concordance suggest the need for further research of potential human-to-human transmission in households with and without occupational livestock exposure. The potential for bidirectional S. aureus transmission between adults and children is also important to consider because the predominant LA-MRSA CC398 clone in the European Union (Bosch et al. 2016) started in humans as a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and subsequently developed methicillin resistance via adaptation and selective pressures in livestock (Price et al. 2012).
The prevalence ratios and household strain concordance we observed could have been related to an environmental or community transmission pathway. Because this study was conducted in an IHO-dense region of the United States, environmental or community exposures to ABR S. aureus, including to LA-S. aureus strains, may occur. Relatively few CR adults and children carried scn-negative S. auieus (adults, 5/202; children, 4/202) and scw-negative MDRSA (adults, 3/202; children, 1/202). But considering the increasing number of MRSA CC398 infections in general community populations living in pig-dense regions of Denmark (Larsen et al. 2015) and high human MRSA CC398 nasal carriage prevalence in the Netherlands (Feingold et al. 2012; van Cleef et al. 2010), additional studies are needed to determine whether residential proximity to IHOs is related to ABR scn-negative S. aureus nasal carriage in this region of North Carolina.
A hypothesis to consider in future studies is the possibility that IHO children's ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence is related to IHO work activities and take-home exposures. We observed some evidence of this based on the higher prevalence ratios for S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA nasal carriage comparing children who lived with an IHO worker who did versus workers who did not bring personal protective equipment home from the IHO. Thus, it is possible that the higher ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalences observed among children in the IHO group are attributable to take-home introductions of ABR S. aureus on fomites from the IHO to the household. However, these associations were not observed for LA-S. aureus strains.
In addition to being a reservoir for strains of LA-S. aureus, the IHO work environment may harbor non-LA MRSA and non-LA MDRSA strains (those lacking any of the putative markers of livestock association we employed). Because we evaluated S. aureus carriage at only one anatomical site (anterior nares), it is possible that IHO workers could have carried non-LA MRSA and/or non-LA MDRSA strains on other anatomical sites or on personal clothing, boots, workplace protective equipment, or other fomites, which could lead to introductions into their household environment. Among 27 IHOs in Germany, 74% of IHO worker boot swabs were MRSA positive (Friese et al. 2012), demonstrating that work clothing or protective gear may be an important fomite for take-home introductions of ABR S. aureus.
Several study limitations should be considered. First, we did not have access to sample pigs and the environment inside IHOs, nor did we have information about dose, type, quantity, and frequency of antibiotic use at IHOs in the study area or at facilities where the IHO adults were employed. This limited our ability to determine whether the low MRSA nasal carriage prevalence we observed among IHO workers reflects low MRSA prevalence in pigs at IHOs in North Carolina. Lack of access to this information also limited our ability to determine whether the antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus carried intranasally by study participants reflect antibiotic use patterns in IHOs. We also did not swab other body sites, personal clothing of the workers, workplace protective equipment, household surfaces, other household members, or the proximal environment, which limited the determination of mechanisms of MRSA and MDRSA exposure and transmission among adults and children in our study. Other S. aureus diversity and transmission studies demonstrated that there exists within-host and temporal diversity of S. aureus strains (Paterson et al. 2015), suggesting that reliance upon the S. aureus geno- and phenotypes from two anterior nares isolates per individual may not represent the full complexity of within household transmission dynamics.
Second, the putative markers of LA-S. aureus that we employed may have less than optimal specificity and/or temporal stability for S. aureus strains that originate in swine raised in IHOs. For example, the scw gene has been shown to be highly mobile, with phage-mediated loss in an animal host and insertion in a human host potentially occurring in as little as 4 hr (McCarthy et al. 2014; Thammavongsa et al. 2015). S. aureus spa types that circulate in livestock also can evolve quickly and putative LA-S. aureus markers based on spa types, CCs (e.g., CC398 or CC9) and/or MLSTs may have uncertain specificity depending on regional and microbial selection factors (Bosch et al. 2016; Hau et al. 2015; Lahuerta-Marin et al. 2016; Ye et al. 2016b).
Third, participants in this study were volunteers, recruited using a snowball sampling approach. It is possible that selection bias may have occurred if individuals who enrolled as IHO and CR participants differed in some way from those who did not enroll in our study. For example, the percent of people who identified as belonging to the following race/ethnicity categories was different in the CR group compared with the general population (GP) living in the same counties as CR participants: Hispanic or Latino (33% CR vs. 13% GP), black or African American (62% CR vs. 30% GP), and white (4% CR vs. 66% GP) (Table 1) (U.S. Census Bureau 2015). Therefore, our results may not be generalizable to the general population living in the same counties as our participants. Access to employee rosters and perhaps voter registries (Wardyn et al. 2015) could facilitate sampling of IHO employees and community residents, respectively, and improve the generalizability of future studies.
Finally, we incorporated some SES-related variables in aPRs, but we did not measure country of origin or immigration status. S. aureus CC398 has been observed in some individuals of Caribbean nationality (Mediavilla et al. 2012) and some families who immigrated from the Dominican Republic to New York City (Bhat et al. 2009). We are unaware of a biological basis of race/ethnicity being causally related to S. aureus nasal carriage, but there could be social or cultural factors in the IHO and CR populations that might have contributed to the differences in ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence. The small sample sizes in strata of the race/ethnicity covariate between the IHO and CR groups precluded its inclusion in adjusted regression models, and race/ethnicity-stratified PRs could not rule out confounding or effect measure modification (data not shown).
Our findings suggest that children < 7 years of age living in households with IHO workers were more likely to carry ABR S. aureus intranasally, particularly MRSA and MDRSA, than children living in CR households. Based on unadjusted prevalence ratios, IHO workers' taking home personal protective equipment was positively associated with nasal carriage of S. aureus, MRSA and MDRSA among IHO child household members. Interestingly, IHO children were infrequent nasal carriers of putative LA-S. aureus strains. We also observed that CR participants who had no occupational livestock contact but live in counties with a high density of IHOs sometimes carry putative LA-S. aureus in their noses. The higher ABR S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence estimated among IHO children needs to be confirmed in other populations, and potential pathways and mechanisms of exposure should be more closely studied. Because the first evidence of human infection burden for the LA-MRSA CC398 clone in the European Union emerged via case reports among swine workers and their children (Hartmeyer et al. 2010; Huijsdens et al. 2006; Voss et al. 2005), further studies should be conducted to determine whether the MRSA and MDRSA nasal carriage prevalence in children in IHO worker households in the United States represents a risk factor for infection.
Adcock PM, Pastor P, Medley F, Patterson JE, Murphy TV. 1998. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in two child care centers. J Infect Dis 178(2):577-580.
Bhat M, Dumortier C, Taylor BS, Miller M, Vasquez G, Yunen J, et al. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus ST398, New York City and Dominican Republic. Emerg Infect Dis 15(2):285-287.
Bosch T, van Luit M, Pluister GN, Frentz D, Haenen A, Landman F, et al. 2016. Changing characteristics of livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans emergence of a subclade transmitted without livestock exposure, the Netherlands, 2003 to 2014. Euro Surveill 21(21), doi: 10.2807/1560-7917. ES.2016.21.21.30236.
Chen AE, Cantey JB, Carroll KC, Ross T, Speser S, Siberry GK. 2009. Discordance between Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and skin infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28(3):244-246.
CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). 2015. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Testing: Approved Standard--12th Edition. CLSI Document M02-A12. Wayne, PA:Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Creech CB II, Kernodle DS, Alsentzer A, Wilson C, Edwards KM. 2005. Increasing rates of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in healthy children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24(7):617-621.
de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJ, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WD, Boshuizen HC, et al. 2007. High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol 122(3-4):366-372.
DTU Food (National Food Institute). 2009. Protocol for spa Typing. http://www.crl-ar.eu/data/images/ tc_april-2009/7-protocols%20for%20spa%20typing. pdf [accessed 28 February 2017].
Feingold BJ, Silbergeld EK, Curriero FC, van Cleef BA, Heck ME, Kluytmans JA. 2012. Livestock density as risk factor for livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 18(11):1841-1849.
Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, et al. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med 352(14):1436-1444.
Friese A, Schulz J, Hoehle L, Fetsch A, Tenhagen BA, Hartung J, et al. 2012. Occurrence of MRSA in air and housing environment of pig barns. Vet Microbiol 158(1-2):129-135.
Fritz SA, Garbutt J, Elward A, Shannon W, Storch GA. 2008. Prevalence of and risk factors for community-acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children seen in a practice-based research network. Pediatrics 121(6):1090-1098.
Garcia-Alvarez L, Holden MTG, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DFJ, Curran MD, et al. 2011. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11(8):595-603.
Goenka A, Kollmann TR. 2015. Development of immunity in early life. J Infect 71(suppl 1):S112-S120.
Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, McQuillan G, McDougal LK, Fosheim GE, et al. 2008. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001-2004. J Infect Dis 197(9):1226-1234.
Graber CJ, Shane AL, Weintrub P, Chambers HF. 2011. Clonality of Staphylococcus aureus colonization over time in attendees of a camp for children with chronic dermatoses. Pediatr Dermatol 28(5):519-523.
Hartmeyer GN, Gahrn-Hansen B, Skov RL, Kolmos HJ.
2010. Pig-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: family transmission and severe pneumonia in a newborn. Scand J Infect Dis 42(4):318-320.
Hau SJ, Sun J, Davies PR, Frana TS, Nicholson TL. 2015. Comparative prevalence of immune evasion complex genes associated with [beta]-hemolysin converting bacteriophages in MRSA ST5 isolates from swine, swine facilities, humans with swine contact, and humans with no swine contact. PLoS One 10(11):e0142832, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142832.
Hermos CR, Sandora TJ, Williams LE, Mosammaparast N, McAdam AJ. 2013. Changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in paediatric intensive-care units. Epidemiol Infect 141(9):1983-1992.
Huijsdens XW, van Dijke BJ, Spalburg E, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Heck ME, Pluister GN, et al. 2006. Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5:26, doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-5-26.
Khanna T, Friendship R, Dewey C, Weese JS. 2008. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol 128(3-4):298-303.
Ko S, Schaefer PD, Vicario CM, Binns HJ, Safer Yards Project. 2007. Relationships of video assessments of touching and mouthing behaviors during outdoor play in urban residential yards to parental perceptions of child behaviors and blood lead levels. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17(1):47-57.
Lahuerta-Marin A, Guelbenzu-Gonzalo M, Pichon B, Allen A, Doumith M, Lavery JF, et al. 2016. First report of lukM-positive livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC30 from fattening pigs in Northern Ireland. Vet Microbiol 182:131-134.
Larsen J, Petersen A, S0rum M, Stegger M, van Alphen L, Valentiner-Branth P, et al. 2015. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to 2011. Euro Surveill 20:37, doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.37.30021.
Lewis HC, M0lbak K, Reese C, Aarestrup FM, Selchau M, S0rum M, et al. 2008. Pigs as source of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 infections in humans, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 14(9):1383-1389.
Love DC, Davis MF, Bassett A, Gunther A, Nachman KE. 2011. Dose imprecision and resistance: free-choice medicated feeds in industrial food animal production in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 119:279-283, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002625.
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(3):268-281.
Mattioli MC, Davis J, Boehm AB. 2015. Hand-to-mouth contacts result in greater ingestion of feces than dietary water consumption in Tanzania: a quantitative fecal exposure assessment model. Environ Sci Technol 49(3):1912-1920.
McCarthy AJ, Loeffler A, Witney AA, Gould KA, Lloyd DH, Lindsay JA. 2014. Extensive horizontal gene transfer during Staphylococcus aureus co-colonization in vivo. Genome Biol Evol 6(10):2697-2708.
Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Uhlemann AC, Hanson BM, Rosenthal M, Stanak K, et al. 2012. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398, New York and New Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 18(4):700-702.
Miller MB, Weber DJ, Goodrich JS, Popowitch EB, Poe MD, Nyugen V, et al. 2011. Prevalence and risk factor analysis for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in children attending child care centers. J Clin Microbiol 49(3):1041-1047.
Milstone AM, Carroll KC, Ross T, Shangraw KA, Perl TM. 2010. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in pediatric intensive care unit. Emerg Infect Dis 16(4):647-655.
Nadimpalli M, Heaney C, Stewart JR. 2013. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus from enriched nasal swabs within 24 h is improved with use of multiple culture media. J Med Microbiol 62(pt 9):1365-1367.
Nadimpalli M, Rinsky JL, Wing S, Hall D, Stewart J, Larsen J, et al. 2015. Persistence of livestock-associated antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among industrial hog operation workers in North Carolina over 14 days. Occup Environ Med 72(2):90-99.
Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, Borchardt SM, Boxrud DJ, Etienne J, et al. 2003. Comparison of community-and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA 290(22):2976-2984.
Nakamura MM, Rohling KL, Shashaty M, Lu H, Tang YW, Edwards KM. 2002. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in the community pediatric population. Pediatr Infect Dis J 21(10):917- 921.
Neyra RC, Frisancho JA, Rinsky JL, Resnick C, Carroll KC, Rule AM, et al. 2014. Multidrug-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hog slaughter and processing plant workers and their community in North Carolina (USA). Environ Health Perspect 122:471-477, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1306741.
Paterson GK, Harrison EM, Murray GG, Welch JJ, Warland JH, Holden MT, et al. 2015. Capturing the cloud of diversity reveals complexity and heterogeneity of MRSA carriage, infection and transmission. Nat Commun 6:6560, doi: 10.1038/ncomms7560.
Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Hacek DM, Fisher AG, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, et al. 2004. Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Mol Diagn 6(3):191-196.
Poulsen AB, Skov R, Palleson LV. 2003. Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood cultures using the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit. J Antimicrob Chemother 51(2):419-421.
Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, et al. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio 3(1):e00305-11, doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11.
Reischl U, Linde HJ, Metz M, Leppmeier B, Lehn N. 2000. Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR. J Clin Microbiol 38(6):2429-2433.
Rinsky JL, Nadimpalli M, Wing S, Hall D, Baron D, Price LB, et al. 2013. Livestock-associated methicillin and multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus is present among industrial, not antibiotic-free livestock operation workers in North Carolina. PLoS One 8(7):e67641, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067641.
Rychert J, Burnham CAD, Bythrow M, Garner OB, Ginocchio CC, Jennemann R, et al. 2013. Multicenter evaluation of the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 51(7):2225-2231.
Shapiro A, Raman S, Johnson M, Piehl M. 2009. Community-acquired MRSA infections in North Carolina children: prevalence, antibiotic sensitivities, and risk factors. N C Med J 70(2):102-107.
Shopsin B, Mathema B, Martinez J, Ha E, Campo ML, Fierman A, et al. 2000. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the community. J Infect Dis 182(1):359-362.
Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB. 2008. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 29:151-169.
Smith TC, Gebreyes WA, Abley MJ, Harper AL, Forshey BM, Male MJ, et al. 2013. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs and farm workers on conventional and antibiotic-free swine farms in the USA. PLoS One 8(5):e63704, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063704.
Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, Kroeger JS, Tinkler GP, Moritz ED, et al. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 4(1):e4258, doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0004258.
Smith TC, Pearson N. 2011. The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11(4):327-339.
Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A, Pichon B, Holmes MA, Edwards G, et al. 2012. Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mec[A.sub.LGA251]. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(4):395-400.
Steward CD, Raney PM, Morrell AK, Williams PP, McDougal LK, Jevitt L, et al. 2005. Testing for induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43(4):1716-1721.
Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. 2015. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol 13(9):529-543.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. Quick Facts North Carolina. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/ PST045215/37 [accessed 7 September 2016].
USDA, NCDA&CS (U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service; North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Service). 2010. North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_ by_State/North_Carolina/Publications/Annual_ Statistical_Bulletin/AgStat2010.pdf [accessed 28 February 2017].
van Cleef BA, Verkade EJM, Wulf MW, Buiting AG, Voss A, Huijsdens XW, et al. 2010. Prevalence of livestock-associated MRSA in communities with high pig-densities in The Netherlands. PLoS One 5(2):e9385, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009385.
van den Broek IVF, van Cleef BAGL, Haenen A, Broens EM, van der Wolf PJ, van den Broek MJ, et al. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiol Infect 137(5):700-708.
Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis 11(12):1965-1966.
Wardyn SE, Forshey BM, Farina SA, Kates AE, Nair R, Quick MK, et al. 2015. Swine farming is a risk factor for infection with and high prevalence of carriage of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 61(1):59-66.
Ye X, Fan Y, Wang X, Liu W, Yu H, Zhou J, et al. 2016a. Livestock-associated methicillin and multidrug resistant S. aureus in humans is associated with occupational pig contact, not pet contact. Sci Rep 6:19184, doi: 10.1038/srep19184.
Ye X, Wang X, Fan Y, Peng Y, Li L, Li S, et al. 2016b. Genotypic and phenotypic markers of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC9 in humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(13):3892-3899.
Sarah M. Hatcther, (1) Sarah M. Rhodes, (1) Jill R. Stewart, (1) Ellen Silbergeld, (2) Nora Pisanic, (2) Jesper Larsen, (3) Sharon Jiang, (1) Amanda Krosche, (2) Devon Hall, (4) Karen C. Carroll, (5) and Christopher D. Heaney (2,6)
(1) Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; (2) Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (3) Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; (4) Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help, Warsaw, North Carolina, USA; (5) Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (6) Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Address correspondence to C.D. Heaney, Departments of Environmental Health and Engineering and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Room W7033B, 615 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 USA. Phone: (443) 287-4989. E-mail: email@example.com
Supplemental Material is available online (http:// dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP35).
This study would not have been possible without a strong partnership between researchers and community-based organizations that have the trust of members of communities in areas where the density of industrial hog production is high. The authors thank the workers, community residents, and their household members who participated in this study. The authors also acknowledge T. Le for assistance with antibiotic susceptibility testing; technicians from M. Miller's Clinical Molecular Microbiology Laboratory at UNC Hospitals; N. Kwiatkowsi and T. Howard from the Johns Hopkins Hospital Medical Microbiology Laboratory for assistance with microbiology procedures and sample analysis; and S. Wing for guidance on data analysis and presentation of findings.
Funding for this study was provided by E.W. "Al" Thrasher Award 10287 from the Thrasher Research Fund and National Science Foundation grant 1316318 as part of the joint National Science Foundation (NSF)-National Institutes of Health (NIH)-U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases program.
S.M.H. was supported by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (award no. DGE-1144081) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)-NIH award no. T32ES007018. S.M.R. was supported by NSF grant 1316318. N.P. was supported by NIEHS award no. 5T32ES00714130. J.L. was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-NIH grant 1R01AI101371-01A1. C.D.H. was supported by K01 grant 1K01OH010193-01A1 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), by E.W. "Al" Thrasher Award 10287, and by NSF grant 1316318.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
D.H. is Program Manager and co-founder of the Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help (REACH), a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization located in Duplin County, North Carolina. D.H. is a complainant in a Title VI administrative complaint against the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality related to its statewide hog operation lagoon and sprayfield liquid waste management permitting system. There is no potential personal financial gain from this administrative complaint, which is not directly related to the research described in this manuscript and is not a lawsuit or litigation. S.M.H. served as an unpaid member of the board of directors of REACH between September 2013 and June 2015. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Received: 26 February 2016; Revised: 14 September 2016; Accepted: 14 September 2016; Published: 18 October 2016.
Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.
Table 1. Description of study population characteristics among industrial hog operation (IHO) and community referent (CR) participants, North Carolina, 2014 [n (%)]. Characteristic Adults IHO CR Age (years) 198 202 0-2 -- -- 3-5 -- -- 6-< 7 -- -- 18-27 47 (24) 108 (54) 28-37 88 (44) 62 (31) 38-47 42 (21) 24 (12) [greater than or equal to] 47 21 (11) 8 (4) Sex 198 202 Male 107 (54) 41 (20) Female 91 (46) 161 (80) Race/ethnicity (a) 198 202 Any Hispanic 186 (94) 66 (33) Non-Hispanic 12 (6) 136 (67) Hispanic alone 185 (93) 66 (33) Black alone, not Hispanic 12 (6) 125 (62) White alone, not Hispanic 0 (0) 8 (4) Multi-race/ethnicity 1 (< 1) 3 (2) Black/Hispanic 0 (0) 0 (0) White/Hispanic 1 (< 1) 0 (0) Black/white 0 (0) 1 (< 1) American Indian/white 0 (0) 1 (< 1) Black/American Indian/white 0 (0) 1 (< 1) Education 198 201 < High school 139 (70) 44 (22) [greater than or equal to] 59 (30) 157 (78) High school County of residence 198 202 Duplin 106 (54) 83 (41) Sampson 73 (37) 24 (12) Wayne 9 (5) 81 (40) Bladen 5 (3) 11 (5) Pender 4 (2) 1 (< 1) Lenoir 0 (0) 2 (1) Greene 1 (< 1) 0 (0) Primary healthcare provider 198 202 Private doctor or clinic 147 (74) 150 (74) Emergency room 13 (7) 15 (7) Hospital 9 (5) 13 (6) Free clinic 21 (11) 14 (7) Urgent care 1 (< 1) 4 (2) Company clinic or doctor 6 (3) 3 (1) Other 0 (0) 1 (< 1) Do not use healthcare 1 (< 1) 2 (1) Health insurance 198 202 None 67 (34) 42 (21) Company/employer 79 (40) 19 (9) Private 2 (1) 8 (4) Public 49 (25) 133 (66) Other 1 (< 1) 0 (0) Total number of household 198 196 members (tertiles) 2-3 69 (35) 106 (54) 4 65 (33) 39 (20) [greater than or equal to] 5 64 (32) 51 (26) Household pet (b) 198 201 No 133 (67) 162 (81) Yes 65 (33) 39 (19) Pet location 64 39 Indoor only 4 (6) 10 (26) Outdoor only 49 (76) 21 (54) Indoor and outdoor 11 (17) 8 (21) Smoker (c) 198 202 No 167 (84) 130 (64) Yes 31 (16) 72 (36) Recent antibiotic use (d) 198 202 No 196 (99) 185 (92) Yes 2 (1) 17 (8) Recent healthcare contact (d,e) 198 202 No 188 (95) 112 (55) Yes 10 (5) 90 (45) Contact sports (d,f) 198 202 No 186 (94) 200 (99) Yes 12 (6) 2 (1) Gym attendance (d,g) 198 202 No 193 (97) 176 (87) Yes 5 (3) 26 (13) Child care attendance (d,h) -- -- No -- -- Yes Characteristic Children IHO CR Age (years) 198 202 0-2 32 (16) 75 (37) 3-5 116 (59) 100 (50) 6-< 7 50 (25) 27(13) 18-27 -- -- 28-37 -- -- 38-47 -- -- [greater than or equal to] 47 -- -- Sex 198 202 Male 123 (62) 90 (45) Female 75 (38) 112 (54) Race/ethnicity (a) 198 202 Any Hispanic 187 (94) 68 (34) Non-Hispanic 11 (6) 134 (66) Hispanic alone 186 (94) 65 (32) Black alone, not Hispanic 11 (6) 122 (60) White alone, not Hispanic 0 (0) 3 (1) Multi-race/ethnicity 1 (< 1) 12 (6) Black/Hispanic 0 (0) 2 (1) White/Hispanic 1 (< 1) 1 (< 1) Black/white 0 (0) 6 (3) American Indian/white 0 (0) 0 (0) Black/American Indian/white 0 (0) 3 (1) Education -- -- < High school -- -- [greater than or equal to] -- -- High school County of residence 198 202 Duplin 106 (54) 83 (41) Sampson 73 (37) 24 (12) Wayne 9 (5) 81 (40) Bladen 5 (3) 11 (5) Pender 4 (2) 1 (< 1) Lenoir 0 (0) 2 (1) Greene 1 (< 1) 0 (0) Primary healthcare provider 197 202 Private doctor or clinic 165 (84) 177 (88) Emergency room 14 (7) 6 (3) Hospital 1 (< 1) 5 (3) Free clinic 7 (4) 6 (3) Urgent care 3 (2) 1 (< 1) Company clinic or doctor 3 (2) 3 (1) Other 0 (0) 4 (2) Do not use healthcare 4 (2) 0 (0) Health insurance 198 202 None 11 (6) 7 (3) Company/employer 39 (20) 12 (6) Private 0 (0) 5 (2) Public 147 (74) 178 (88) Other 1 (< 1) 0 (0) Total number of household 198 196 members (tertiles) 2-3 69 (35) 106 (54) 4 65 (33) 39 (20) [greater than or equal to] 5 64 (32) 51 (26) Household pet (b) 198 201 No 133 (67) 162 (81) Yes 65 (33) 39 (19) Pet location 64 39 Indoor only 4 (6) 10 (26) Outdoor only 49 (76) 21 (54) Indoor and outdoor 11 (17) 8 (21) Smoker (c) -- -- No -- -- Yes -- -- Recent antibiotic use (d) 198 202 No 196 (99) 192 (95) Yes 2 (1) 10 (5) Recent healthcare contact (d,e) 198 202 No 173 (87) 115 (57) Yes 25 (13) 87 (42) Contact sports (d,f) 198 202 No 196 (99) 201 (> 99) Yes 2 (1) 1 (< 1) Gym attendance (d,g) -- -- No -- -- Yes -- -- Child care attendance (d,h) 198 202 No 193 (97) 179 (89) Yes 5 (3) 23 (11) (a) Any Hispanic includes participants whose self/reported race/ ethnicity was Hispanic alone or Hispanic and one or more of the following: black, white, Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, or other. Non/Hispanic includes individuals whose self/reported race/ ethnicity was one or more of the following: black, white, Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, or other. (b) Defined as owning a pet of any kind kept in-or outside the household. (c) Defined as ever smoked cigarettes or having regularly used cigarillos, cigars, or pipes for > 6 months. (d) Within 3 months of sample collection. (e) Defined as having been to a hospital, doctor's office, or other medical facility for any reason. (f) Defined as playing any recreational sport during which human contact is common (e.g., soccer). In questionnaire, phrasing was "contact sport." (g) Defined as attending a workout/sports gym or facility. (h) Defined as being cared for at an establishment or home along with five or more unrelated children. Table 2. Prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA in the industrial hog operation (IHO) compared to the community referent (CR) group among adult and child study participants, North Carolina, 2014. Nasal carriage Adults outcome No. pos/total (%) Crude PR (95% CI) S. aureus IHO 104/198 (53) 1.68 (1.32, 2.15) CR 63/202 (31) Reference MRSA genotype (b) IHO 4/198 (2) -- CR 7/202 (3) Reference MRSA phenotype (c) IHO 4/198 (2) -- CR 7/202 (3) Reference MDRSA IHO 24/198 (12) 1.53 (0.84, 2.79) CR 16/202 (8) Reference Nasal carriage Adults Children outcome Adjusted aPR (95% CI) (a) No. pos/total (%) S. aureus IHO 1.40 (1.07, 1.83) 97/198 (49) CR Reference 62/202 (31) MRSA genotype (b) IHO -- 28/198 (14) CR Reference 12/202 (6) MRSA phenotype (c) IHO -- 27/198 (14) CR Reference 12/202 (6) MDRSA IHO 1.14 (0.56, 2.29) 45/198 (23) CR Reference 16/202 (8) Nasal carriage Children outcome Crude PR (95% CI) Adjusted aPR (95% CI) (a) S. aureus IHO 1.60 (1.24, 2.05) 1.50 (1.13, 1.99) CR Reference Reference MRSA genotype (b) IHO 2.38 (1.25, 4.55) 2.37 (1.14, 4.92) CR Reference Reference MRSA phenotype (c) IHO 2.30 (1.20, 4.40) 2.07 (1.02, 4.23) CR Reference Reference MDRSA IHO 2.87 (1.68, 4.90) 2.64 (1.47, 4.75) CR Reference Reference Note; CI, confidence interval; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MDRSA, multidrug-resistant S. aureus defined as complete resistance to three or more antibiotic drug classes; pos, positive; PR, prevalence ratio. Dash (-) indicates prevalence ratio not estimated due to low prevalence (< 5%). Complete antibiotic resistance profiles for S. aureus isolates from participant carriers are available in Excel File Table S1. "Adjusted PR (95% CI) estimated from log-binomial regression model including covariates for level of education of adult participant (< high school, [greater than or equal] high school), total number of individuals living in the home (2-3, 4, [greater than or equal] 5 people) and the presence of any pets inside or outside of the home. 'Defined as mecA or mecC positivity by pCR. "Defined as complete resistance to oxacillin. Table 3. Prevalence of S. aureus with putative markers of livestock association in the industrial hog operation (IHO) compared to the community referent (CR) group among adult and child participants, North Carolina, 2014. Adults Children Nasal carriage No. Prevalence No. Prevalence outcome pos/total (%) pos/total (%) scn-negative S. aureus IHO 25/198 13 7/198 4 CR 5/202 2 4/202 2 MRSA (a) IHO 2/198 1 1/198 1 CR 0/202 0 0/202 0 MDRSA (b) IHO 19/198 10 5/198 3 CR 3/202 1 1/202 1 CC398 (c) IHO 7/198 4 2/198 1 CR 1/202 1 2/202 1 CC9t (d) IHO 12/198 6 1/198 0 CR 2/202 1 1/202 0 Note; MDRSA, multidrug-resistant S. aureus defined as complete resistance to three or more antibiotic drug classes; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; pos, positive. Prevalence ratios not estimated due to low prevalences (< 5%). (a) Defined as mecA or mecC positivity by PCR. (b) Defined as complete resistance to three or more antibiotic drug classes by disk diffusion. (c) S. aureus CC398 defined according to the spa types listed in the Supplemental Material in "Assignment of spa types to clonal complexes (CCs)." All S. aureus CC398 carried intranasally by IHO and CR adult participants were scn-negative, MDRSA. One of two S. aureus CC398 carried intranasally by IHO child participants was scn-negative. All S. aureus CC398 carried intranasally by CR child participants was scn-negative. (d) S. aureus CC9 defined according to the spa types listed in the Supplemental Material in "Assignment of spa types to clonal complexes (CCs)." All S. aureus CC9 carried by IHO and CR adult participants were scn-negative. None of the S. aureus CC9 carried intranasally by IHO and CR children were scn-negative. Table 4. S. aureus isolate characteristics for households in which there was concordance of S. aureus spa-types between adult and child participants by industrial hog operation (IHO) and community referent (CR) group, North Carolina, 2014. Group/ Participant spa MLST MRSA MDRSA scn (-) household type type IHO 1 Adult t189 188 Child t189 188 2 Adult t1077 -- Child t1077 -- 3 Adult t1937 -- Child t1937 -- 4 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 5 Adult t002 5 X X X Child t002 5 X X X 6 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 7 Adult t008 8 Child t008 8 CR 1 Adult t034 398 X X Child t034 398 X X 2 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 3 Adult t015 45 Child t015 45 4 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 5 Adult t008 8 X X Child t008 8 X X 6 Adult t493 -- Child t493 -- 7 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 8 Adult t493 -- Child t493 -- 9 Adult t688 5 Child t688 5 10 Adult t2949 -- Child t2949 -- 11 Adult t088 8 X X Child t088 8 X X 12 Adult t185 50 Child t185 50 13 Adult t089 30 Child t089 30 Group/ Antibiotic-resistance profile household IHO 1 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 2 TET, AMP, PEN TET, AMP, PEN 3 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 4 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 5 CRO, CC, ERY, OX, AMP, PEN CRO, CC, ERY, OX, AMP, PEN 6 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 7 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN CR 1 CC, ERY, TET, AMP, PEN CC, ERY, TET, AMP, PEN 2 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 3 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 4 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 5 CIP, CRO, GAT, LVX, OX, AMP, PEN CIP, CRO, GAT, LVX, OX, AMP, PEN 6 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 7 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 8 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 9 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 10 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 11 CRO, CC, ERY, OX, AMP, PEN CRO, CC, ERY, OX, AMP, PEN 12 AMP, PEN AMP, PEN 13 NONE AMP, PEN Note: AMP, ampicillin; CC, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; ERY, erythromycin; GAT, gatifloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; MDRSA, multidrug/resistant S. aureus defined as complete resistance to three or more antibiotic drug classes; MLST, multi/locus sequence type; MRSA, methicillin/resistant S. aureus defined as positive for mecA or mecC; OX, oxacillin; PEN, penicillin; TET, tetracycline; X, the characteristic is present. Antibiotics listed represent distinct drug classes except the beta/lactams (ampicillin, oxacillin, and penicillin) and the quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin). Dashes (-) indicate that spa types could not be assigned to MLST based on the scientific literature, analyses of S. aureus isolates collected from our prior livestock worker studies in NC (Nadimpalli et al. 2015; Rinsky et al. 2013), or queries of Ridom SpaServer (http://spa.ridom.de/index.shtml). Table 5. Crude associations between occupational activities of the industrial hog operation (IHO) worker and the S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA nasal carriage outcomes of their child household member, North Carolina, 2014. IHO work activity S. aureus No. pos/total (%) Crude PR (95% CI) Take PPE home Yes 45/78 (58) 1.35 (1.02, 1.81) No 48/113 (43) Reference Use disinfectant (a) Yes 60/112 (54) 1.22 (0.90, 1.64) No 37/84 (44) Reference Work with nursery pigs Yes 22/39 (56) 1.18 (0.86, 1.63) No 75/157 (48) Reference Handle dead pigs Yes 74/143 (52) 1.24 (0.87, 1.76) No 23/55 (42) Reference IHO work activity MRSA No. pos/total (%) Crude PR (95% CI) Take PPE home Yes 25/78 (32) 12.07 (3.78, 38.60) No 2/113 (3) Reference Use disinfectant (a) Yes 25/112 (22) 6.25 (1.95, 20.01) No 3/84 (4) Reference Work with nursery pigs Yes 10/39 (26) 2.23 (1.12, 4.45) No 18/157 (11) Reference Handle dead pigs Yes 25/143 (17) 3.21 (1.01, 10.19) No 3/55 (5) Reference IHO work activity MDRSA No. pos/total (%) Crude PR (95% CI) Take PPE home Yes 26/78 (33) 2.09 (1.23, 3.55) No 18/113 (16) Reference Use disinfectant (a) Yes 34/112 (30) 2.32 (1.25, 4.30) No 11/84 (13) Reference Work with nursery pigs Yes 11/39 (28) 1.30 (0.73, 2.33) No 34/157 (22) Reference Handle dead pigs Yes 39/143 (27) 2.50 (1.12, 5.57) No 6/55 (11) Reference Note: CI, confidence interval; MDRSA, multidrug-resistant S. aureus defined as resistance to three or more antibiotic drug classes by disk diffusion; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; pos, positive; PPE, personal protective equipment; PR, prevalence ratio. (a) Defined as performing cleaning activities at work using ammonia or Clorox bleach disinfectant.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Hatcther, Sarah M.; Rhodes, Sarah M.; Stewart, Jill R.; Silbergeld, Ellen; Pisanic, Nora; Larsen, Je|
|Publication:||Environmental Health Perspectives|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||DNA methylation score as a biomarker in newborns for sustained maternal smoking during pregnancy.|
|Next Article:||Sex-specific associations between particulate matter exposure and gene expression in independent discovery and validation cohorts of middle-aged men...|