Printer Friendly

The mountain pass and ridgeline Venturi effect.

Mountain-flying training stresses the dangers of what can happen downwind from a pass or ridge, but the windward approach can be worse.

Mountain flying is one of the more challenging but rewarding types of aviation available to most pilots. The scenery is magnificent, landing on remote strips affords access to some of the least-trammeled locations on Earth and it's rare to find much of a crowd. Whole books--and careers--have been based on the skills and knowledge needed to fly mountainous terrain safely.

Indeed, the hazards of mountain flying in personal aircraft go far beyond what is normally taught to "flatlander" pilots in ground school. Most mountain flying caveats dwell on the vagaries of leeward hazards such as downdrafts, waves, rotors and resulting turbulence. The effects of temperature and altitude on aircraft performance also are part of this equation, as is the reduced power available when a normally aspirated engine is taken up to around 10,000 feet msl and the pilot forgets proper leaning. This is not one of those articles.


Instead, we want to focus on one specific and often-overlooked aspect of mountain flying: the possible hazards of flying to the windward side of a ridge or mountain pass. Put simply, windward hazards usually go unmentioned in mountain-flying discussions, yet they have their roots in the fundamentals of fixed-wing aerodynamics.


At the outset, let's state something perhaps not immediately obvious: The works and names of Daniel Bernoulli and Giovanni Venturi should be associated with mountain flying. Bernoulli and Venturi have been familiar names in aviation for over a century now. They are primarily associated with the airfoil, lift and instrumentation. Bernoulli and his theories should need no introduction: An increase in the speed of a fluid (air, in this case) occurs simultaneously with a decrease in pressure. Air flowing over an airfoil experiences this decrease in pressure.

Meanwhile, older airplanes--specifically those without vacuum pumps--may have a small venturi tube mounted on the fuselage in the air stream to power at least one vacuum-driven instrument gyro. The narrow section of this hour-glass-shaped device has a port through which air is sucked from the cockpit instrument case out through the venturi via a small vacuum line. The instrument's case is designed to draw air across it and spin the gyro. The sidebar above explains a venturi tube's basic math.

So that's the theory behind a venturi tube; what's the practical application in a mountain pass, or over a ridgeline? It's the same basic principle, just on a larger scale: As the wind-driven air mass is accelerated over the ridgeline or through the mountain pass, its velocity increases at the geographic feature's midpoint, with a proportional reduction in air pressure. Once past that midpoint, the air slows again as it exits the narrowed area. The air mass expands.

As should be evident from the formula in the sidebar above, the higher the increase in wind speed, the greater the pressure drop--and resulting air density decrease.


This pressure decrease consequently produces a false high altimeter indication error, leaving the airplane at a lower altitude than indicated. It's the same effect as flying from a high-pressure system to lower pressure. In addition to altimeter error, with a strong wind at the midpoint of the pass or over the ridge line, the air density could potentially be reduced enough to deny the already marginally powered airplane adequate manifold pressure (power) with which to maintain level flight. The venturi effect on power loss, however marginal, can be the last straw.

This hazardous condition, produced by the combination of power loss and altimeter error is amplified considerably when visibility is reduced. The wind velocity increase through the pass or over the ridge line can be as much as three to one. The barometric pressure drop when encountering the venturi effect in a mountainous area can be as much as one inch in extreme cases, leading to a dangerous altimeter error of as much as a thousand feet, and critical manifold pressure loss of one inch.

Altimeter settings provided to pilots in mountainous areas are not necessarily valid for the area where the plane is actually flying, although most pilots assume they are. These readings are point samples, taken from nearby airports and remote weather stations. They are not valid area-wide values.

In fact, there is no en route procedure for calculating the actual altimeter setting at the pilot's immediate position other than some improvised calculation from GPS data, comparing the altimeter with the GPS altitude. Even the GPS altitude itself is usually not an exact altitude reference.


Approaching a mountain ridge or pass with a tailwind can provide a much shallower climb angle than the pilot anticipates. This is due mostly to a progressively increasing tailwind as the feature is approached. Also, power is lost due to increasing absolute and pressure altitudes and the climb angle becomes shallower and shallower as the airplane approaches the ridge line or narrow point in the pass.

Poor choice of a lateral approach angle, such as 90 degrees to the windward ridgeline, can result in no viable abort option as the distance to the ridge line decreases, tree tops come closer, and a turn away becomes impossible. In a narrow mountain pass, there may simply be no direction to turn at all. The addition of any turbulence can also distort the pilot's sight picture, resulting in adversely affected situational judgment. Remember, the first 90 degrees of the abort turn is still continuing uphill, and the necessary abort turn bank angle itself increases the stall speed considerably. "Unloading" the wing for the turn is not possible while still going uphill.


A Super Decathlon, similar to the one flown by Steve Fossett on his last flight, has a stall speed of 53 mph and best angle of climb ([V.sub.x]) speed at sea level of 58 mph. The best angle of climb speed should actually be increased by one mph per 1500 feet of altitude--an unlikely correction from a practical standpoint by a pilot already in trouble. In Fossett's situation, considering density altitude, this would be about an eight mph increase--to 66 mph. A 45-degree bank angle, still going uphill for the next 90 degrees of turn and unable to be "unloaded" because of tree-top altitude, would increase the stall speed by a factor of 1.2, to 63.6 mph, 10 mph higher than the sea level speed. A 60-degree bank angle would increase sea-level stall speed to 75 mph.

Just when the pilot has decided he can barely make it through the pass, or over the ridge line, and commits, he enters the region most affected by the venturi effect and loses that little bit of marginal horsepower that otherwise would have allowed him to clear the high point. He also enters the area of highest tailwind, shallowest climb angle and greatest altimeter error. How often do we hear of an airplane striking the mountain at an elevation just a few feet from what was needed? We wonder, "Why does it always happen that way?"

This "new" windward (tailwind) situation has an additional issue to be considered: impact energy. Since kinetic energy is a function of velocity squared, an airplane stalling at 60 mph but with a 30 mph tailwind hits the ground with nine times the energy of the same airplane with a 30 mph headwind. The ground speed in the tailwind case is 90 mph, and in the headwind case is 30 mph. The physical damage incurred in a downwind crash is apt to be much greater than one would intuitively expect. The downwind crash is considerably less survivable. In Fossett's case, a considerable tailwind was reported by campers in the area, and the resulting debris field reflected a very high impact speed.


Most mountain flying indoctrination discusses thoroughly the leeward approach hazards, but windward hazards and tailwind situations are seldom if ever discussed. There's a lot going on when approaching the geographic feature from windward, including engine power loss, which works in a different and insidious way, and affects the airplane equally, regardless of direction traveling after arrival in the pass or over the ridge line. This is especially important as the most often chosen path through a mountain range by the pilot of a marginally powered aircraft is navigation through a mountain pass, or low point in a ridge line.

Let's be careful out there.

Jim Lock ridge is a former USAF fighter pilot and retired airline captain who now lives in Reno, Nev. Although he's type-rated in several transports, he now flies a Mooney.


How does a venturi work? Some basic math is necessary.


The diagram here depicts a hypothetical but typical venturi tube. Air enters the tube at the left and moves right. At the red dot labeled 1, the air has velocity [V.sub.1] and pressure [P.sub.1]. Area of that portion of the tube is represented by A1. As the air moves through the narrower portion of the tube at the second red dot, area is represented by A2 where velocity is V2 and pressure is P2. The difference in pressure is represented by h, which can be measured at each red dot.

Air pressure times the velocity at the opening of the venturi tube equals the air pressure times the velocity at the necked down "waist" of the venturi. This is represented mathematically by the formula below:

[V.sub.1] X [P.sub.1] = [V.sub.2] X [P.sub.2]

The formula is simple, and clearly shows the pressure of air accelerated through the venturi's neck drops inversely with the increase to its velocity.

More Mountain-Flying Tips

If you don't have some formal training in mountain flying, consider the following as reasons you should:


A proficient pilot should be good at computing takeoff and landing distances, but what about climb angle? Remember: Terrain clearance is a function of rate of climb and groundspeed. Calculate your expected rate of climb in feet per nautical mile.



Extra weight means reduced performance, something you can ill afford in high-altitude situations. Not only should you consider leaving behind any excess cargo, plan to depart a high-altitude airport with minimum fuel. Make two trips, if necessary.



Many runways in mountainous areas are not flat and instead feature a significant slope and can present abnormal visual cues. Pay close attention to the available airport information during your preflight planning. Plan to land uphill and takeoff downhill, wind permitting.
COPYRIGHT 2010 Belvoir Media Group, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:AIRMANSHIP
Author:Lockridge, James
Publication:Aviation Safety
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2010
Previous Article:Why rain is a pain: flying in rain might get you a free rinse but it can also affect your airplane's performance in a variety of ways.
Next Article:Why so many CFITs? They rank right behind stalls as a major accident result. Scud runs are the main reason, but all have one thing in common: bad...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters