Printer Friendly

The histomorphological changes in the proximal tubules of metanephros of developing kidney of chick embryo induced by electromagnetic radiations from conventional and advanced mobile.

Introduction

Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy emitted and absorbed by charged particles, exhibits wave-like behavior as it travels through space. EMR has both electric and magnetic field components, which stand in a fixed ratio of intensity to each other, and which oscillate in phase perpendicular to each other and perpendicular to the direction of energy and wave propagation. Mobile phone is a device that can make and receive telephone calls over a radiolink, by connecting to a cellular network. According to stroud district council, it is a two way radio. Voice is converted into radio waves by cell phone. The mobile phones that can be used only for the purpose of voice calls and messaging are the conventional ones. The electromagnetic radiation emitted by such mobile phone is in GSM frequency range of 850-1900MHz, when used for phone calls and messaging [1]. Advanced mobile phones are the modern cell phones that are not used only for voice and message communication but also have additional features of Wi-Fi/WLAN technology, GPRS and Bluetooth.

Material and Methods

The study was carried out in Anatomy Department, Army Medical College Rawalpindi, in collaboration with Poultry Research Institute, Rawalpindi (Table 1). The eggs were divided into five groups, with 10 eggs in each group, by non-probability convenient sampling technique and above table shows the exposure of the groups to the radiations from the two type of cellular phones. The still-air incubator was used in the experiment with the temperature of 37[degrees]C and humidity range of 50-60% [2]. The incubator was 24 inch (length) x 24 inch (width) x 12.5 inch (height), with 100 eggs capacity. Four 100 watt bulbs were set inside for heat and thermostat was set at 37[degrees]C. The temperature monitoring was carried out by mercury thermometer. The humidity was maintained by filling the plastic pans with water and it's monitoring done by hygrometer. The eggs were marked with 'X' on one side and 'O' on the other side with lead pencil and turned 180[degrees] twice a day manually, for 15 days. The eggs were candled on 7th day by locally made candler and dead eggs were removed from the incubator. After the completion of exposure the chick embryos were decapitated and dissected for kidneys and tissue fixation, processing and staining was carried out subsequently to observe the changes in the histomorphology of the tissue. The future kidney that is the metanephros was observed for changes and diameter and epithelial height of proximal tubules was measured at 40X after calibrating ocular micrometer (Figure 1).

Results

In the control group, the mean tubular (external) and mean luminal (internal) diameters of proximal tubules in the metanephros were 40.53 [+ or -] 0.08 [micro]m and 12.51 [+ or -] 1.00 [micro]m respectively. Mean epithelial height of the columnar cells of the proximal tubules, that were PAS positive was 12.44 [+ or -] 0.25 [micro]m in the metanephric tissue.

The mean proximal tubular diameter in the metanephric tissue of the experimental group II was 37.07 [+ or -] 0.054 [micro]m, in group III was 30.30 [+ or -] 0.041 [micro]m, in group IV was 33.33 [+ or -] 0.077 [micro]m and in group V was 32.97 [+ or -] 0.85 [micro]m.

The mean proximal luminal diameter in metanephric tissue of group II was 11.16 [+ or -] 0.14 [micro]m, in group III was 9.55 [+ or -] 0.38 [micro]m, in group IV was 10.82 [+ or -] 0.52 [micro]m and in group V was 9.16 [+ or -] 0.31 [micro]m. In metanephros the mean height of proximal tubular cells in group II was 10.40 [+ or -] 0.12 [micro]m, in group III was 11.34 [+ or -] 0.46 [micro]m, in group IV was 7.21 [+ or -] 0.07 [micro]m and in group V was 10.35 [+ or -] 0.14 [micro]m (Tables 2- 4).

Discussion

In metanephric tissue, when group I was compared with the experimental groups, showed that EMR of mobile phone had effects on the histomorphology of developing tissue. Statistically significant results on comparison of group II with group III showed that advanced mobile phone radiations had more effect on tubular diameter. Statistically significant result on comparison of group II with IV showed that the increased exposure from 15 to 30 minutes to conventional mobile phone radiations affected the tubular diameter more. Regarding luminal diameter in metanephros, statistically significant results on comparing group I with group III and group I with group V, showed that advanced mobile phone radiations were affecting the tissue more than conventional mobile phone radiations. Renal tubules showed dilatation, observed by Al-Glaib et al. [3] in mouse kidney induced by GSM mobile phone radiations but Accinni et al. [4] gave an account of collapse of the renal tubules.

In metanephros, the results were statistical significant when group I was compared with all the experimental groups and when group II was compared with IV and group IV with V, for the cells lining the proximal tubules. Here conventional mobile phone radiations seemed to be decreasing the cells' height more than advanced ones that appeared to lead to growth enhancement as per finding of Zareen et al. [5]. The epithelial height was observed to be affected by electromagnetic radiations as it decreased in the germinal epithelial in the rat testis induced by cellular radiation [6] but opppsite was noticed in the thyroid follicular cells which showed an increase in the height of cell lining follicles [7].

The combined use of GSM and WI-FI in our modern cellular phones has effects on the developing tissue. The radiations reduced the size of the tubules and height of the cells which shows the radiations affect growth of developing tissue, moreover the combination of radiations and increased exposure to the combination of both type of radiations affected the histomorphology of tubular and luminal diameters whereas epithelial height seemed to be affected more by GSM radiations that caused them to decrease and combination of GSM and WI-FI appeared to revert the cellular height to increase growth.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/0974-8369.1000237

Acknowledgment

To National University Of Science and Technology, Islamabad for funding.

References

[1.] Agarwal A, Singh A, Hamada A, Kesari K (2011) Cell Phones and Male Infertility: A Review of Recent Innovations in Technology and Consequences. Int. Braz J Urol 37: 432-454.

[2.] Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88: 49-92.

[3.] Al-Glaib B, Al-Dardfi M, Al-Tuhami A, Elgenaidi A, Dkhil M (2008) A technical report on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from a mobile phone on mice organs. Libyan J. Med 3: 8-9.

[4.] Accinni L, De Martino C, Mariutti G (1988) Effects of radiofrequency radiation on rabbit kidney: a morphological and immunological study. Exp Mol Pathol 49: 22-37.

[5.] Zareen N, Khan MY, Minhas LA (2009) Derrangement of chick embryo retinal differentiation caused by radiofrequency electromagnetics fields. Congenital Anamolies, 49: 15-19.

[6.] Al-Damegh MA (2012) Rat testicular impairment induced by electromagnetic radiation from a conventional cellular telephone and the protective effects of the antioxidants vitamins C and E. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67: 785-792.

[7.] Shaukat F, Qamar K, Butt SA (2011) Effects of mobile phone induced electromagnetic field on height of follicular cells in thyroid gland of mice. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College 15: 27-29.

Sabah Rehman (1) *, Naureen Waseem (2) and Maria Yousaf (3)

(1) Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

(2) Assistant Professor, Al Nafees Medical College, ISRA University, Islamabad, Pakistan

(3) Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, National University of Science and Technology, Pakistan

* Corresponding author: Sabah Rehman, Anatomy Department (Instructor), Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, National University of Science and Technology, Hno 118, Westridge-I, Peshawar Road Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Tel: 0320-9942678; E-mail: sabahrehman@live.com

Received March 28, 2015; Accepted May 30, 2015; Published June 06, 2015

Table 1: Fifty fertilized eggs of Fayoumi breed were used for the
experiment.

Groups                                   Exposure to The EMR

Group I                                     Sham exposed

Group II (conventional mobile     Exposed to GSM (23 missed calls)
phone radiations)                 radiations for 15 minutes, daily
                                             for 15 days

Group II (advanced mobile phone   Exposed to GSM (23 missed calls)
radiations)                            and Wi-Fi radiations by
                                  downloading files for 15 minutes,
                                          daily for 15 days

Group IV (conventional mobile       Exposed to GSM radiations (45
phone radiations)                   missed calls) for 30 minutes,
                                          daily for 15 days

Group V (advanced mobile phone    Exposed to GSM (45 missed calls)
radiations)                            and Wi-Fi radiations by
                                  downloading files for 30 minutes,
                                          daily for 15 days

Table 2: Proximal tubular diameter in control and experimental groups
II, III, IV and V (metanephros).

Groups   Comparison   P-value   Significance

I            II        0.008      < 0.05 *
            III          0       < 0.05 **
             IV          0       < 0.05 **
             V           0       < 0.05 **
II           I         0.008      < 0.05 *
            III          0       < 0.05 **
             IV        0.005      < 0.05 *
III          I           0       < 0.05 **
             II          0       < 0.05 **
             V         0.093       > 0.05
IV           I           0       < 0.05 **
             II        0.005      < 0.05 *
             V         0.997       > 0.05
V            I           0       < 0.05 **
            III        0.093       > 0.05
             IV        0.997       > 0.05

* p-value <0.05 significant, ** p-value <0.001 highly significant

Table 3: Proximal luminal diameter in control and experimental groups
II, III, IV and V (metanephros).

Groups   Comparison   P-value   Significance

I            II        0.48        > 0.05
            III        0.008      < 0.05 *
             IV        0.26        > 0.05
             V         0.003      < 0.05 *
II           I         0.48        > 0.05
            III        0.34        > 0.05
             IV        0.99        > 0.05
III          I         0.008      < 0.05 *
             II        0.34        > 0.05
             V         0.99        > 0.05
IV           I         0.003       > 0.05
             II        0.99        > 0.05
             V         0.34        > 0.05
V            I         0.003      < 0.05 *
            III        0.99        > 0.05
             IV        0.34        > 0.05

* p-value <0.05 significant, ** p-value <0.001 highly significant

Table 4: Epithelial height of columnar cells of proximal tubules in
control and experimental groups II, III, IV and V (metanephros).

Groups   Comparison   P-value   Significance

I            II        0.000     < 0.05 **
            III        0.02       < 0.05 *
             IV        0.000     < 0.05 **
             V         0.000     < 0.05 **
II           I         0.000     < 0.05 **
            III        0.09        > 0.05
             IV        0.000     < 0.05 **
III          I         0.02       < 0.05 *
             II        0.09        > 0.05
             V         0.09        > 0.05
IV           I         0.000     < 0.05 **
             II        0.000     < 0.05 **
             V         0.000     < 0.05 **
V            I         0.000     < 0.05 **
            III        0.09        > 0.05
             IV        0.000     < 0.05 **

* p-value <0.05 significant, ** p-value <0.001 highly significant
COPYRIGHT 2015 HATASO Enterprises, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Rehman, Sabah; Waseem, Naureen; Yousaf, Maria
Publication:Biology and Medicine
Article Type:Report
Date:Jul 1, 2015
Words:1777
Previous Article:Prenatal exposures to environmental agents or drugs promote the development of diseases later in life.
Next Article:Burden and determinants of hypertension in rural Pondicherry, India.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |