The efficacy of combined topical niosomal dapsone gel and intralesional injection of meglumine antimoniate in comparison with intralesional meglumine antimoniate and cryotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
To evaluate the efficacy of niosomal dapsone gel and intralesional meglumine antimoniate with cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate in cutaneous leishmaniasis.
This was a randomized clinical trial with 73 participants that were divided into two groups including, case group (weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate and twice a day niosomal dapsone gel) and control group (weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate with biweekly cryotherapy). The treatment course continued until 16 weeks or complete cure, whatever occurred earlier and participants were followed up in 4th, 8th, 12th and 16th weeks of the treatment.
Overall, 68 patients (33 males and 35 female) completed the study. Age, sex, size and duration of the lesions were not statistically different between two groups. At the end of the study, 82.9% of patients in case group showed complete response.
Niosomal dapsone gel has promising results with fewer adverse effects, so, it can be used as an alternative treatment modality, especially in children and patients with contraindication of systemic drugs.
Leishmaniasis, dapsone, niosomal, topical, treatment.
Leishmaniasis is a protozoan infectious disease caused by several species of the Leishmania and transmitted by infected sandfly bite.1 The three mainstay clinical forms of the disease including cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis have been recognized.2
Cutaneous Old World leishmaniasis is categorized into two groups, anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) and zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) which, classically are caused by L. tropica and L. major, respectively.2,3,4
Annual incidence of the disease is approximately 1.5 to 2 million.5,6 It affects more than half of Iran's provinces and there is an increase in geographical spreading of the disease in Kerman, southeast of Iran.3,7,8,9
Although CL is not a fatal disease, the treatment is necessary in order to prevent disease transmission and scar formation especially in exposed sites.10,11
Currently, based on recommendation of WHO, gold standard of the disease treatment is intramuscular pentavalent antimonial with cryotherapy, but, there is limitation to the administration of standard treatment due to poor availability, high cost, serious side effects and painful injection of the drug.2,4,8,11,12
In recent years, several treatment modalities such as systemic antifungal drugs, amphotericin, topical paromomycin and physical therapies were evaluated with different results.10,13-18 One of the systemic drugs which can be used as an alternative treatment for leishmaniasis is dapsone. This drug affects alternative complement pathway and can enhance cellular immunity through cytokines.19,20
Absorption of dapsone after oral intake is slow and after absorption, it is found in internal organs such as liver, muscle, kidney and skin. Side effects of this drug are dose-dependent such as hemolysis, methemoglobinemia, peripheral neuropathy, allergic dermatitis, headache, anemia, hepatitis and agranulocytosis.19,20
Investigations show that oral intake of dapsone in the treatment of different infections leads to low efficacy and therapeutic index of the drug, due to lower concentration at the site of infection.19,20
Based upon recently gathered data, some of the topical treatment regimens had superior effects compared to systemic ones or at least had equal efficacy. Topical treatment options such as niosomal drug delivery systems for the leishmaniasis have increased in recent years.21-24
Considering the good efficacy and safety of 5% dapsone gel in the treatment of acne,20,25,26 we decided for the first time, to assess the efficacy of niosomal form of dapsone in the treatment of leishmaniasis.
This open randomized clinical trial was performed from December 2011 to October 2013 in dermatology clinic of Afzalipour hospital - Kerman (southeast of Iran). A total of 73 patients were enrolled in the study after their written consent. Patients aged [greater than or equal to] 7 years and diagnosed with positive smear or demonstration of Leishman-Donovan (LD) bodies in skin biopsy were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria were pregnancy or nursing period, lesions on the face, number of the lesions more than 5, duration of the disease more than 1 year, lesion size larger than 3 centimeter, a history of the treatment of leishmaniasis during last month, a history of allergy to meglumine antimoniate or dapsone, taking immunosuppressive therapy during last six months, patients with systemic disorders such as liver, heart, kidney disease, pancreatitis, immunosuppression, hematological disease, and sporotrichoid or lupoid forms of the leishmaniasis.
Demographic information including age, sex, size and site of the lesions were completed and induration of the lesions were assessed with ruler through Sokal method. Patients were randomly assigned to group A (intralesional meglumine antimoniate and biweekly cryotherapy) and B (niosomal dapsone gel twice a day and weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate).
Cryotherapy was conducted by dipstick technique with liquid nitrogen. Cotton-tipped applicator was applied on the lesion until 1 mm white halo formation around the lesion. Meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime(tm), Rhone-Poulenc, France) was injected until blanching of the lesion.
Considering the fact that dapsone is soluble in lipid, we chose gel as drug vehicle, in order to better drug delivery into skin. In order to prepare niosomal dapsone by conventional hydrated film method, cholesterol and nonionic surfactant and dapsone were dissolved in chloroform and acetone respectively, then, the solvent was evaporated by rotary evaporator, next, the resultant lipid film was hydrated with 5ml deionized water at 70. At last, niosome was mixed with 1% carbomer934 with equal rates. Particle's size analysis, physical stability, encapsulation efficacy, percentage of drug delivery and penetration into rat's abdominal skin have been done in pharmaceutical research center.
Participants were treated for 16 weeks or until complete healing, whatever happened earlier. They were evaluated in the 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th weeks of the treatment and response rate was recorded according to ESL (evaluation of lesions scheme) as follows: Cured (complete re-epithelialization without induration); partially cured (more than 50% re-epithelialization and decrease induration); improved (<50% re-epithelialization and decrease induration in the lesion); no change (without any change in the size of the lesion) or worsening (increase in the size of the lesions).
In this study we, categorized participants into three groups as: complete response (100% improvement), partial response (50%-99% improvement) and no response (improvement <50%). None of the patients in this study had increase in the size of the lesion.
This proposal was approved by the ethics committee of research center of medical science university of Kerman with approval code K/90/503.
Data analysis was performed by SPSS 17.0 software (SPSSINC, Chicago, USA) and Random effects mixed model, Mann-Whitney test, t test and chi-square were applied for analysis.
Sixty-eight patients (33 male and 35 female) completed the study. Age of the patients ranged between 7 to 80 years). Total number of the lesion was 73, 44 (60.3%) ulcerative, 29 (39.7%) nonulcerative including papules, nodules and plaques. Sixty-three (86.3%) of the lesions were in the upper limb and 10 (13.7%) of the lesions were in the lower limb. Thirty-five of the patients with 38 lesions and 33 patients with 35 lesions were randomly assigned to groups A and B, respectively (Table1).
Table 1 Demographic features and response rate in two treatment groups
###Cryotherapy and meglumine###Dapsone and meglumine###P value
Mean age (year)###31.6+-20.4###29.6+-15.9###0.653
Male###14 (40.0%)###17 (51.51%)###0.135
Female###21 (60.0%)###16 (48,49)
Site of the lesion
Upper Limb###27 (77.1%)###31 (93.9%)###0.570
Lower Limb###8 (22.9%)###2 (6.1%)
Type of the lesion
Non Ulcerative###21 (55.3%)###8 (22.9%)
Ulcerative###17 (44.7%)###27 (77.1%)###0.005
Table 2 Treatment response according to percent improvement during the treatment in 2 groups, cryotherapy and meglumine antimoniate (group A) and niosomal dapsone gel and meglumine antimoniate (group B).
Treatment 4 week###8 week###12 week###16 week
Response###n (%)###n (%)###n (%)###n (%)
Partial###26 (74.3%)###26###23###30 (78.9) 11 (31.4)###14###5###4 (10.5%)
Without###9 (25.7)###12###1###1 (2.6%) 1 (2.9%)###1 (2.6%)###1 (2.9%)###1 (2.6%)
Table 3 Treatment response comparison between two groups.
Response rate###OR (95% CI)###P value
Type of the lesion###1.32 (0.8-2.18)###0.271
Site of the lesion###1.15 (0.68-1.93)###0.595
The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age, sex, duration of the disease and size of the lesions. Table 2 shows the treatment response in two groups at week 4, 8, 12 and 16 of follow-up. 29 (82.9%) patients in group A (meglumine antimoniate and cryotherapy) showed complete response as compared to 33 (86.8%) in group B (meglumine antimoniate and niosomal dapsone gel). During the twelve months post-treatment follow-up, no recurrence was reported in the case group, but in the control group one patient developed lupoid leishmaniasis and was treated with systemic meglumine antimoniate.
No side effect with application of niosomal dapsone gel during the treatment and follow up was observed.
Intralesional infiltration of the pentavalent antimony compounds is the treatment of choice for leishmaniasis which had variable efficacy in different studies from 81% to 97%, depending on duration of the treatment, Leishmania species and definition treatment response.1,27,28
Combination therapy of cryotherapy and intramuscular meglumine antimoniate has more efficacy than single treatment modalities, which leads to lower therapeutic dose, shorter period of the treatment with lower cost and adverse effects.29,30,31
Asilian et al. evaluated the efficacy of cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate on L. major. Ninety percent of the patients showed complete response. This result was compatible with our results (86.8% in control group), however recent conducted studies demonstrated that L. tropica is more refractory to treatment than L. major.27,29
Dapsone is an antibacterial drug that inhibits synthesis of dihydrofolic acid through competition with para-aminobenzoate. This drug also has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects by myeloperoxidase blocking.38
In one study by Dogra et al. efficacy of oral dapsone in leishmaniasis was evaluated and oral dapsone had 82% response rate in comparison with placebo.13. In another study by Dogra et al. oral dapsone was used in dose of 2 mg/kg/day for 21 days and 80% of patients responded to treatment and there was no recurrence in the next 6 months.
Due to adverse effects of oral dapsone, 5% topical dapsone gel was used in several studies. Advantage of this form of dapsone is low systemic absorption with plasma peak which is 100 times lower than oral types. Topical dapsone gel has been evaluated in the treatment of acne with good efficacy and favorable results.20,25,26
One of the newest structural drug delivery systems is niosomal form. This form consists of hydrated cholesterol and nonionic surfactants such as alkyl ether, alkyl ester and alkyl acid that induce more stability, higher absorption of drug in the skin and slow release of effective substance.41,42
Niosomes have structure similar to lipids layers of biologic membrane. This structure leads to increase of drug penetration into skin through melting of the niosome in stratum corneum and delivery of drug in deeper layer of epidermis. On the other hand, this structure enhances penetration of different substances in cells such as Langerhans cells, thus, it has been used and assessed for intracellular infection such as leishmaniasis. Other advantages of this form are lower drug toxicity and cost, as well as, easy manufacturing of the drug.41,42
Our study is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of niosomal dapsone gel in the treatment of CL. Our results showed that efficacy of niosomal dapsone gel combined with intralesional meglumine antimoniate was comparable with the standard treatment including cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate. There was no significant difference in partial and complete response rate between the two groups; also, both treatments had similar increase in efficacy during follow-up. During the twelve months of observation, no recurrence was reported in the case group whereas in the control group one patient developed lupoid leishmaniasis.
In this study we were not able to demonstrate Leishmania species for all of the patients, but, in the previous study in Kerman, most of the Leishmania species were reported as L. tropica.43
Strengths of our study are randomization, adequate sample size and similarity between demographic features in the two groups, which increase reliability and stability of our results. We were not able to conduct a double-blind clinical trial, due to different treatment modalities.
We recommend further studies in order to evaluate, efficacy and side effects of niosomal dapsone gel compared to other topical treatment regimens.
Niosomal dapsone gel can be used as an alternative and adjunctive drug with lower cost and approximately without any adverse effect in the treatment of CL, especially in children, due to painful injection of meglumine antimoniate. It can be applied as an alternative treatment, instead of cryotherapy, in sites such as ear, nose and fingers because of possible risk of scar formation secondary to vascular compromise and in individual with darker skin type due to complications such as hypo/ hyperpigmentation.
1. Ramtin Hadighi R, Mehdi Mohebali M, Patrick Boucher P, Homa Hajjaran H, Ali Khamesipour A, Marc Ouellette M. Unresponsiveness to glucantime treatment in Iranian cutaneous leishmaniasis due to drug- resistant Leishmania tropica parasites. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e162.
2. Desjeux P. The increase in risk factors for leishmaniasis worldwide. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:239-43.
3. William H, Markle MD, Khaldoun M. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: recognition and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:1455-60.
4. Al-Jaser M, el-Yazigi A, Kojan M, croft SL. Distribution and elimination of antimony following administration of sodium stibogluconate to patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:516-9.
5. Jeronimo SB, Sousa A, Pearson RD. Leishmaniasis species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill-Livingstone 2005; 45-65.
6. Dowlati Y. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: clinical aspect. Clin Dermatol. 1996;14:425-31.
7. Mohajery M, Bolursaz M, Shamsian S. A survey on the prevalence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the students of Mashhad district. J Mashhad Faculty Med. 2001;44(72):54-60.
8. Azizi F, Hatam H, Janghorbani M. Epidemiology and control of common disorders in Iran. Tehran: Khosravi Publications 2003. P. 524-32.
9. Athari A, Jalalloo N. Epidemiology of five year of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran (2001-2005). Isfahan Faculty Med J. 2006;24:8-13.
10. Vardy D, Barenholz Y, Cohen R, Zvulunov A, Biton A, Klaus S. Topical amphotericin B for cutaneous leishmaniasis. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:856-7.
11. Al-Jaser MH. Treatment trends of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:1220-4.
12. Akilov OE, Kosaka B. Parasiticidal effect of delta-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis in direct and mediated through the killing of host cell. Exp Dermatol. 2007;16:651-60.
13. Dogra J. A double-blind study on the efficacy of oral dapsone in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:212-3.
14. Esfandiarpour I, Alavi AF. Evaluating the efficacy of allopurinol and meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a pilot study. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:59-60.
15. Shamsi Meimandi S, Zandi S, Dabiri SH. Efficacy of topical 5% imiquimod with cryotherapy versus intralesional meglumine antimoniate in treatment of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iran J Dermatol. 2001;14:42-47.
16. Magill AJ. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the returning traveler. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2005;19:241-66.
17. Dogra J, Lal BB, Misra SN. Dapsone in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int J Dermatol. 1986;25:398-400.
18. Al-Mutairi N, Alshiltawy M, El Khalawany M, Joshi A, Eassa BI, Manchanda Y et al. Tropical medicine rounds: Treatment of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis with dapsone, itraconazole, cryotherapy and imiquimod alone and in combination. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:862-9.
19. Zhu, Y.I. and M.J. Stiller, Dapsone and sulfones in dermatology: overview and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:420-34.
20. Raimer S, Maloney JM, Bourcier M, Wilson D. Efficacy and safety of dapsone gel 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris in adolescents. Cutis. 2008;81:171-8.
21. Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:111-26.
22. Faghihi G, Tavakoli-kia R. Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with either topical paromomycin or intralesional meglumine antimoniate. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:13-6.
23. Shazad B, Abbaszadeh B, Khamesipour A. Comparison of topical paromomycin sulfate (twice/day) with intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:85-7.
24. Alavi-Naini R, Fazaeli A, O'Dempsey T. Topical treatment modalities for old world cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review. Prague Med Report. 2012;113:105-18.
25. Draelos ZD, Carter E, Maloney M. Two randomized studies demonstrate the efficacy and safety of dapsone gel 5%, for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:439.e1-10.
26. Lucky AW, Roberts J, Maloney M, Ling M. Dapsone gel 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris: safety and efficacy of long-term (1 year) treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6:981-7.
27. Khatami A, Firooz A, Gorouhi F, Dowlati Y. Treatment of acute Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:335. e1-29. E.
28. Munir A, Janjua SA, Hussain I. Clinical efficacy of intramuscular meglumine antimoniate alone and in combination with intralesional meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica. 2008;16(2):60-4.
29. Asilian A, Sadeghinia A, Faghihi G, Momeni A. Comparative study of the efficacy of combined cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) vs. cryotherapy and intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) alone for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43:281-3.
30. Nilforooshzadeh MA, Jaffari F, Malekafzali B. Efficacy of combined triple therapy (paromomycin ointment, cryotherapy and intralesional Glucantime) in comparison with intralesional Glucantime for the treatment of acute cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iran J Dermatol. 2004;7:136-9.
31. Asilian A, Sadeghinia A, Faghihi G, Momeni A, Amini Harandi A. The efficacy of treatment with intralesional meglumine antimoniate alone, compared with that of cryotherapy combined with the meglumine antimoniate or intralesional sodium stibogluconate, in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003;97:493-8.
32. Layegh P, Rajabi O, Jafari MR, Emamgholi Tabar Malekshah P, Moghiman T, Ashraf H et al. Efficacy of topical liposomal amphotericin B versus intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Parasitol Res. 2011;2011:523-656.
33. Larbi EB, al-Khawajah A, al-Gindan Y, Jain S, Abahusain A, al-Zayer A. A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of topical clotrimazole versus miconazole for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52:166-8.
34. El-On J, Halevy S, Grunwald MH, Weinrauch L. Topical treatment of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major: A double-blind control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27:227-31.
35. Asilian A, Davami M. Comparison between the efficacy of photodynamic therapy and topical paromomycin in the treatment of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis: a placebo- controlled, randomized clinical trial. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31:634-7.
36. Carneiro G, Santos DC, Oliveira MC, Fernandes AP, Ferreira LS, Ramaldes GA et al. Topical delivery and in vivo antileishmanial activity of paromomycin-loaded liposomes for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Liposome Res. 2010;20:16-23.
37. Asadi AP, Moshafi M, I Sharifi M. Preparation and in vivo administration of paromomycin niosomes in balb/c mice. Res Pharm Sci. 2012;7:S373.
38. Wadher, S, Puranik MP, Karande NA, Yeole PG. Synthesis and biological evaluation of Schiff base of dapsone and their derivative as antimicrobial agents. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2009;1:22-33.
39. Paniker U, Levine N. Dapsone and sulfapyridine. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19:79-86.
40. Ji B, Perani EG, Petinom C, N'Deli L, Grosset JH. Clinical trial of ofloxacin alone and in combination with dapsone plus clofazimine for treatment of lepromatous leprosy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:662-7.
41. Raeiszadeh M. Preparation and characterization of dapsone-loaded niosomal gel for local treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Kerman, Iran: School of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Sciences; 2012.
42. Manconi M, Sinico C, Valenti D, Lai F, Fadda AM. Niosomes as carriers for tretinoin: III. A study into the in vitro cutaneous delivery of vesicle-incorporated tretinoin. Int J Pharm. 2006;311:11-9.
43. Fazaeli A, Fouladi B, Sharifi I. Emergence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a border area at south-east of Iran: an epidemiological survey. J Vector Borne Dis. 2009;46:36-42.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists|
|Date:||Dec 31, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Dermatology education by social media.|
|Next Article:||Comparison of efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil alone versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with 5-fluorouracil in small keloids.|