Printer Friendly

The effects of supplementation of [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-melthylbutyrate on inflammatory markers in high performance athletes.

INTRODUCTION

It is believed that athletes use the leucine metabolite [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB) to promote skeletal muscle mass to increase athletic performance. As an ergogenic aid, it is used by strength and power athletes, bodybuilders, and athletes in high performance sports. There is also evidence to suggest that HMB plays a role in specific physiological and biochemical variables in relation to metabolic demands during athletic competitions. Although the role is a positive one in that it appears to increase the athletes' chances of achieving success, it is important to point out that benefits from HMB may not be the same for all types of athletes. Naturally, when HMB works well with training, it encourages coaches and athletes in the pursuit of gains in athletic performance. They are more prone to use various nutritional strategies and/or dietary supplements (7).

Although not clearly understood, it has been demonstrated that leucine has anti-catabolic properties (27). This means that the metabolite of leucine, a-ketoisocaproate (KIC) appears to contribute to these results (26) by decreasing muscle breakdown. Thus, the ingestion of dietary supplement containing proteins may promote an increase in the rate of total body protein synthesis and suppression of protein degradation (2,8,11). This anabolic effect can be attributed to the increased contribution of amino acids to skeletal muscle. In particular, leucine, a branched chain amino acid, has the ability to independently stimulate protein synthesis (1) and thus as a regulator of protein metabolism (20).

There is evidence that untrained men and women (22) who are involved in 3 to 4-wk resistance training program show a higher gain in fat-free mass (FFM) and strength with doses of 1.5 to 3 g x [d.sup.-1] of HMB. The FFM gain is associated with a significant loss in the excretion of 3-methylhistidine muscle, suggesting a decrease in catabolism (22). In agreement, after elderly men and women engaged in abeginner training program for 8 wks with supplementation of 3 g x [d.sup.-1] of HMB, there was a significant increase in lean body mass and in 1RM strength, and a decrease in fat mass (37). Gallagher and colleagues (10) reported on the effects of HMB supplementation of 0.38 and 0.76 Mg x [kg.sup.-1] x [d.sup.-1] during 8 wks of resistance training in untrained men. They found a significant decrease in the excretion of creatine kinase and increased lean body mass only in the group of 0.38 mg x [kg.sup.-1] x [d.sup.-1.] The results suggest that supplementation with 1.5 to 3 g x [d.sup.-1] of HMB can increase the FFM and strength in untrained individuals in a resistance training program (22,28,36).

Vukovich and Adams (37) reported that after 2 wks of HMB supplementation (3 gx [d.sup.-1]), there was a significant increase in rate fatigue, lactate threshold, and V[O.sub.2] peak in trained cyclists. It seems clear that HMB supplementation provides an ergogenic value during intense exercise (29,38). However, it is clear that further investigations are needed before definitive conclusions can be made regarding the HMB supplementation in all athletes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HMB supplementation at 37.5 mg x [kg.sup.-1] x [d.sup.-1] during intense endurance training affects markers of catabolism, body composition, and sports performance in kayak athletes' high performance sprints.

METHODS

Subjects

Twenty elite canoeists volunteered to participate in this study, which took place during their strength training season. The subjects were informed about the procedures and, then, they signed the consent form approved by the ethics committee of the Federal University of Parana (No. 1179.104.11.08). All subjects signed a statement indicating that they never used anabolic/androgenic steroids according to the criteria of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The subjects were informed that they could undergo random doping tests in accordance with the need of the Committee Brazilian Olympic (COB) and/or the Brazilian Canoe Confederation (CBCa). Moreover, no subject (i.e., athlete) had a history of a positive test for the presence of anabolic/androgenic steroids.

Procedures

The individual kayak (K1) boat built of carbon fiber (Nelo Vanquish[R] Model II) was selected. The variables time and speed were verified in the sports performance using fixed distance for the 1,000 m sprint. This test consisted of a single maximum sprint on flat water (lake) that was marked with buoys. The test was held monthly for 6 months at the same climatic conditions.

A stopwatch (Nielsen-Kellerman Interval[R] 2000[R]) with precision .001 secs was used to determine the time. After each sprint, samples of venous blood were obtained by venipuncture of the antecubital vein using standard procedures (9,14,33,34). The venous blood was collected in vacuum tubes of 10 ml for serum separation. The tubes were centrifuged at 5000 RPM for 10 min using a bench top refrigerated centrifuge (Excelsa[R] Model 280R4). Biochemical parameters [Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), Creatine Kinase (CK), MB and MM isoenzyme of CK (CKMB and CKMM) and Lipids (LDL, HDL and Triglycerides)] were analyzed using kits of Vital Scientific[R] (Ellitech Group Spankeren, Netherlands) in the semi-automatic analyzer model 300 MicroLab[R] Vital Scientific (Ellitech Group, Spankeren, Netherlands). Body weight was determined using a digital scale (Sanny) with an accuracy of [+ or -] 0.02 kg (Sterling Scale Co., Southfield, MI). Measurements of body composition (fat mass%) were determined using bioimpedance (35) tetrapolar model BF 906 Maltron [R] following the procedures described by the supplier (Maltron [R]) (15).

Experimental Approach to the Problem

All subjects maintained the training program during the study. They were randomized and double-blind into the placebo-controlled (PLB) group (n = 6) and the "treatment" group supplemented with HMB (n = 14).The treatment group received a dose of 37.5 mg-kg-1-d-1 of HMB. The placebo (PLB) group was supplemented with a placebo. All meals were kept under strict control by the nutritionist. None of the subjects was allowed the use of creatine and/or beta-agonists for at least 8 wks prior to the study. All subjects (i.e., athletes) were instructed to not ingest other dietary supplements with ergogenic effects during the study.

The supplements were prepared in powder form by the laboratory Metabolic Technologies, Inc., (Iowa--USA), and were weighted according to body weight for each subject and encapsulated in flasks and conditioned at a specialized laboratory (Botica Ouro Preto--Brazil). All subjects ingested the daily portions, which were divided into three parts (morning, afternoon, and evening). Each vial contained enough supplement for 15 d. Daily control of the supplement was supervised by a coach who was responsible for returning the empty vials and receiving a new supply every 15 d.

The subjects' training sessions were individualized workloads that averaged of 6 hr x [wk.sup.-1] of resistance training (1 to 3 sets of 2 to 8 repetitions at intensities ranging from 80 to 95% of 1 RM) on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday plus 10 hr x [wk.sup.-1] of specific sprint technique training in the boat. The subjects averaged two daily sessions for a total of 11 training sessions a week. All trainings sessions were conducted under the supervision of certified coaches by CBCa. Subjects who missed a training session were required to make them up in accordance with the procedures of the study. All subjects underwent monthly testing of venous blood samples, body composition analysis, and specific testing for performance in the water (boat).

Statistical Analyses

The analysis of data normality was confirmed by the Wilcoxon test. The comparison of means was carried out using the t test for paired samples (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The delta of change along with the magnitude (pre and post) was calculated with the variables selected and analyzed by ANOVA. Results were expressed as mean [+ or -] standard deviation. The data were considered significantly different when the probability of error was P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In relation to the body composition data (Body Weight and % Fat mass) the HMB group showed a decrease in both components (Table 1), unlike the PLB group (Table 2). Also, in relation to body composition over the period studied, there were significant differences between groups (Figure 1). When compared with the biochemical changes, the HMB group (Table 1) demonstrated a significant increase in Serum Creatinine versus the PLB group (Table 2). An interesting finding was that there was a significant decrease in serum CK-MM for the HMB group while there was a significant increase in the PLB group.

In Figure 1, it can be observed that the behavior of the variables (Body Weight, % Fat Mass, Serum Creatinine, and Time--Official Race) decreased in the HMB group. Among the variables of Figure 1, Serum Creatinine in the HMB group was significantly different from the PLB group only at the 1st month (P < 0.05). Serum Creatinine showed an interesting behavior over time. There was an initial increase in both groups and, then, at the 2nd and subsequent months, it increased in the PLB group while it decreased in the HMB group.

Figure 2 indicates that there was a marked decrease in all the variables (CK-MM, CK-MB, LDH, and CK Total) with the HMB group demonstrating the greatest decrease across time. Significant differences for CK-MM, CK-MB, and Total CK between the groups occurred at the 2nd month (P < 0.01). Also, an interesting finding was that at the 1st month, there was an increase in CK-MM and CK Total for both groups.

DISCUSSION

This study identified a significant reduction in the triglycerides, HDL, and LDL in both the HMB group and the PLB group after 6 months of the same training sessions. This confirms the findings in the international literature (21) and in the hypothesis about the change in lipid parameters (30).

Nissen and colleagues (22) reported that supplementation with HMB (3 g x [d.sup.-1)] resulted in a significant change in muscle function with respect to strength and body composition (3.10% increase in lean mass, P < 0.01; -7.3% reduction of fat mass, P < 0.03) in response to intense resistance training. Portal and colleagues (31) found a significant increase in lean body mass in elite volleyball athletes when supplemented with HMB (3 g x [d.sup.-1]) for 7 wks (31). Whereas the strength in trained athletes have less potential for an increase when compared to untrained athletes (12). Others studies (16-18,21-23) show that athletes supplemented with HMB (3 g x [d.sup.-1]) during 7 wks of training resulted in a significant increase in lean mass (approximately 2.7 kg, P < 0.05), thus confirming the data found in this study. Athletes supplemented with HMB lost 2.2 kg of body weight, which was the case with the PLB group as well, but the difference was not significant.

Although only a few studies were found a gain strength in subjects supplemented with HMB, it is also believed that the increase in lean body mass is important for many sports (7), among them canoeing sprint (19). The canoeing sprint and football athletes required a large accumulation of energy reserves, thus the volume of lean body mass is crucial (22). In particular, in the canoeing race of K1-1000 m, there are many moments characterized by increased intensity of muscle contraction and speed (requiring a greater recruitment of type II muscle fibers). The increased lean body mass volume allows for an increase in the reserve mobilization of phosphocreatine for the regeneration of ATP, resulting in an increase in serum creatinine (5,13,24) that supports the findings in the present study for both groups (HMB and PLB).

It is known that high intensity training may require excessive force, this may cause an overload in the muscles and as well in the contractile systems with structural disruption (6,9,14,33,34). This generates higher neutrophil infiltration; consequently, the release of cellular proteins (e.g., CK). The increased activity of plasma muscle enzymes such as LDH, CK, and respective fractions may be a physiological response typical of very strenuous exercise. As a result, these enzymes can be used as markers of muscle damage. In the present study, there was a decrease in LDH in both groups (HMB and PLB). However, the decrease was more pronounced for HMB group (-20.92%), which is in agreement with the literature (22,32).

The activity of enzymes LDH and CK are considered important markers of muscle damage, however, are values isolated, because are parameters indirect. Furthermore, there are variations in activity according to the conditions of volume and intensity of training (4). The PLB group in this study demonstrated an increase in CK, however not significant and HMB group had a significant reduction in LDH (-16%, P < 0.05) (23).

The muscle damage by exercise is characterized by decreased force, increased inflammation, breakdown of muscle fibers and increased activity of proteolytic enzymes. The elevation of CK may be associated with an adaptive microtrauma in that highly trained athletes may be a constant response, able to accelerate the turnover of muscle fibers. If the workload is repeated over time, this muscle damage is reduced and the athlete develops an adaptation in skeletal muscles, characterized by a reduction in the release of CK. This may explain the drop in levels of total CK from the fourth month of training in this study (25). About concentrations CK total, in this study, there was a reduction, not significant in group HMB corroborates findings in the literature (23). On other way, in the group PLB there was a slight increase (+2.01%), but not significant.

The results of the activity of CK-MM showed an increase for the PLB group (P = .04) for this release bloodstream is more specific to muscle overload when compared to total Ck (4,6,14,34). The HMB group showed a significant decrease (P=.04) progressive over months again suggesting a protective effect of HMB supplementation versus catabolism imposed by resistance exercise training, contrary to the PLB group (36).

Numerous hypotheses have been established in order to explain the adaptive micro injuries, among some assumes the occurrence of a metabolic overload in which the need for ATP would become higher than its rate of production, another theory proposes that muscle injury may be caused by mechanical forces, such as the eccentric contraction, able to break the muscle architecture; another hypothesis is the increase of inflammation mediators and oxidative stress (4,6,14,34). Concentrations isoenzyme MB of Creatine Kinase (CK-MB) shows the same behavior that Isoenzyme MM of Creatine Kinase (CK-MM) for both groups. The increase in serum CK-MB can happen due to atypical shape CK, for example, macro-CK, which is a complex consisting of CK-BB bound to immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG), whose presence can causing an apparent increase in the activity of CK-MB.

In canoeing, the main index is the race time (3,19) where the difference between the final contestants in an international championship is close to 1 sec. We observed that during the present study there was no significant reduction (P=.11) of 4.45 sec (-2.19%) for the HMB group and of 2.13 sec (-1.04%) for the PLB group, although perhaps relevant (34). The response cannot be considered an improvement due to HMB supplementation, however biochemical parameters and body composition appears to suggest such. The data show improvement of approximately 4 sec on a boat Olympic, that is very significant when compared on the international scene. The present results regarding HMB supplementation, along with other recent studies of sports medicine have established opportunities for improvement in quality of life, as well as in the athletic performance in sports. Recommend that future research explores supplementation in different dosages and different populations, as well as injury recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that supplementation with HMB at 37.5 mg x [kg.sup.-1] x [d.sup.-1], can increase lean body mass, strength gains associated with resistance training in already trained athletes of high performance. The correct mechanism by which this can occur is still unknown, but these results indicated that there may be a decrease in the skeletal muscle damage. There was a response towards the improvement of sports performance greater for the supplemented group. While research so far are encouraging, obviously there need for further studies controlled and long-lasting to verify, the possible effects in the improvement in strength and development of muscular hypertrophy helping not only athletes but the general population, which has some muscle atrophy and elderly.

REFERENCES

(1.) Antony JC, Antony TG, Kimbal SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr. 2001; 131:856-860.

(2.) Biolo G, Tessari P, Inshiostro S, Bruttomesso C, Fongher C, Sabadin L, et al. Leucine and phenylalanine kinetics during mixed meal ingestion. A multiple tracer approach. Am J Physiol. 1992; 262:455-463.

(3.) Bonetti DL, Hopkins WG, Kilding AE. High-intensity kayak performance after adaptation to intermittent hypoxia. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006; 1(3):246-260.

(4.) Bounds RG, Grandjean PW, O'Brien BC, Inman C, Crouse SF. Diet and short term plasma lipoprotein-lipid changes after exercise in trained Men. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000; 10(2):114-127.

(5.) Brahm H, Piehl-Aulin K, Ljunghall S. Bone metabolism during exercise and recovery: The influence of plasma volume and physical fitness. Cal Tissue Int. 1997; 61(3):192-198.

(6.) Brites F, Verona J, De Geitere C, Fruchart JC, Castro G, Wikinski R. Enhanced cholesterol efflux promotion in well-trained soccer players. Metabolism. 2004; 53(10):1262-1267.

(7.) Cooper R, Naclerio F, Allgrove J, Jimenez A. Creatine supplementation with specific view to exercise/sports performance: An update. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2012;9(1):33.

(8.) De Feo P, Horber PFF, Haymond MW. Meal stimulate albumin synthesis: A significant contribuitor to wrole body protein synthesis in humans. Am J Physiol. 1992; 283:794-799.

(9.) Echegaray M, Rivera MA. Role of creatine kinase isoenzymes on muscular and cardiorespiratory endurance. Sports Med. 2001; 31(13):919-934.

(10.) Gallagher PM, Carrithers JA, Godard MP, Schulze KE, Trappe SW. [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate: Supplementation during resistance-training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31:402.

(11.) Gautsch TA, Antonhy JC, Kimball SR, Paul GL, Layman DK, Jefferson LS. Eukariytioc inition factor 4E availability regulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis during recovery from exercise. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274:406-414.

(12.) Hakkinen K. Factors influencing trainability of muscular strength during short term and prolonged training. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J. 1985; 7:32-37.

(13.) Hansen KN, Bjerre-Knudsen J, Brodthagen U, Jordal R, Paulev PE. Muscle cell leakage due to long distance running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1982; 48(2):177-188.

(14.) Kratz A, Lewandrowski KB, Siegel AJ, Chun KY, Flood JG, Cott EV. Effect of marathon running on hematologic and biochemical laboratory parameters, including cardiac markers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 118(6):856-863.

(15.) Kreider R, Ferreira M, Wilson M, Almada A. Effects of creatine supplementation on body composition, strength and sprint performance. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1998; 30:73-82.

(16.) Kreider RB. Dietary supplements and the promotion of muscle growth with resistance exercise. Sports Med. 1999; 27:97-110.

(17.) Lefavi RG, Anderson RA, Keith RE. Efficacy of chromium supplementation in athletes: emphasis on anabolism. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 1992; 2:111-122.

(18.) Lemon PWR, Tarnopolsky MA, MacDougall JD. Protein requirements and muscle mass/strength changes during intensive training in novice bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol. 1992; 73:767-775.

(19.) Liow DK, Hopkins WG. Velocity specificity of weight training for kayak sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(7):1232-1237.

(20.) Nair KS, Schwartz RG, Welle S. Leucine as a regulator of whole body and skeletal muscle protein metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263:928-934.

(21.) Nissen S, Morrical D, Fuller Jr JC. The effects of the leucine catabolite [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB) on the growth and health of growing lambs. J Animal Sci. 1994; 72(1):243-249.

(22.) Nissen S, Panton L, Wilhelm R. Effects of [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on strength and body composition of trained and untrained males undergoing intense resistance training. FASEB J. 1996; 10:A287.

(23.) Nissen SL, Abumrad NN. Nutritional role of the leucine metabolite [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB). Nutr Biochem. 1997; 8:300-311.

(24.) Noakes TD. Effect of exercise on serum enzyme activities in human. Sports Med. 1987; 4(4):245-267.

(25.) Nunan D, Howatson G, van Someren KA. Exercise-induced muscle damage is not attenuated by beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate and alpha-ketoisocaproic acid supplementation. J Strength CondRes. 2010 Feb; 24(2):531-537.

(26.) Nunes EA, Kuczera D, Brito GA, Bonatto SJ, Yamazaki RK, Tanhoffer RA, et al. Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation reduces tumor growth and tumor cell proliferation ex vivo and prevents cachexia in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats by modifying nuclear factor-kappaB expression. Nutr Res. 2008 Jul; 28(7):487-493.

(27.) Ostaszewski P, Kostiuk S, Balasinska M, Jank M, Papet I, Glomot F. The leucine metabolite 3-hydroxy-3methylbutyrate (HMB) modifies protein turnover in muscles of laboratory rats and domestic chickens in vitro. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2000; 84:1-8.

(28.) Peterson AL, Qureshi MA, Ferket PR, Fuller JCJ. Enhancement of cellular and humoral immunity in young broilers by dietary supplementation of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate. Immunopharmacol Immunotozicol. 1999; 21:307-330.

(29.) Pinheiro CH, Gerlinger-Romero F, Guimaraes-Ferreira L, de Souza-Jr AL, Vitzel KF, Nachbar RT, et al. Metabolic and functional effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation in skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jul; 112(7):2531-2537.

(30.) Portal S, Eliakim A, Nemet D, Halevy O, Zadik Z. Effect of HMB supplementation on body composition, fitness, hormonal profile and muscle damage indices. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jul; 23(7):641-650.

(31.) Portal S, Zadik Z, Rabinowitz J, Pilz-Burstein R, Adler-Portal D, Meckel Y, et al. The effect of HMB supplementation on body composition, fitness, hormonal and inflammatory mediators in elite adolescent volleyball players: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Sep; 111(9):2261-2269.

(32.) Rice DE, Sharp R, Rathmacher J. Role of [beta]-hydroxy [beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB) during acute exercise-induced proteolysis. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1995; 995(27):220-226.

(33.) Siegel AJ, Lewandrowski KB, Strauss HW, Fischman AJ, Yasuda T. Normal post-race antimyosin myocardial scintigraphy in asymptomatic marathon runners with elevated serum creatine kinase MB isoenzyme and troponin T levels. Evidence against silent myocardial cell necrosis. Cardiology. 1995; 86(6):451-456.

(34.) Siegel AJ, Sholar M, Yang J, Dhanak E, Lewandrowski KB. Elevated serum cardiac markers in asymptomatic marathon runners after competition: Is the myocardium stunned? Cardiology. 1997; 88(6):487-491.

(35.) Thomson JS, Watson PE, Rowlands DS. Effects of nine weeks of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation on strength and body composition in resistance trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May; 23(3):827-835.

(36.) Vukovich M. The effect of dietary beta-hidroxy-beta-metylbutyrate (HMB) on strength gains and body composition changes in older adults. FASEB J. 1997; 11:A376.

(37.) Vukovich MD, Adams GD. Effect of [beta]-hydroxy-[beta]-methylbutyrate (HMB) on V[O.sub.2]peak and maximal lactate in endurance trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29:252-256.

(38.) Zanchi NE, Gerlinger-Romero F, Guimaraes-Ferreira L, de Siqueira Filho MA, Felitti V, Lira FS, et al. HMB supplementation: Clinical and athletic performance-related effects and mechanisms of action. Amino Acids. 2011; Apr; 40(4):1015-1025.

Heros Ribeiro Ferreira [1], Andre Luiz Felix Rodacki [2], Pamela Gill [1], Ricardo Tanhoffer [1], Jose Fernandes Filho [3], Luiz Claudio Fernandes [1]

[1] Laboratory Cell Metabolism (LABMETAB), Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. [2] Laboratory Motor Behavior (CECOM), Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, [3] Ferderal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Address for correspondence: Ferreira, HR, Sports Science Department--Brazilian Canoe Federation, 3877Sete de Setembro Avenue, Apartment 601, Curitiba City, Parana State, Brazil, zipcode 84250-210. Phone:055 21 41 3083 2614, Email:heros@cbca. org.br

Table 1. Pre- and Post-Treatment Biochemical Parameters in the HMB
Group for 6 Months.

                                            HMB Group

                                               Pre

Body Weight (kg)                       78.50 [+ or -] 3.04
% Fat Mass (%)                         11.11 [+ or -] 2.17
Triglycerides (mg x [dL.sup.-1])       85.50 [+ or -] 22.73
LDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])    167.20 [+ or -] 37.16
HDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     47.10 [+ or -] 4.87
Serum Creatinine (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     0.84 [+ or -] 0.15
Total Serum CK (U x [L.sup.-1])       299.95 [+ or -] 27.47
Serum CK-MM (U x [L.sup.-1])          192.76 [+ or -] 26.95
Serum CK-MB (U x [L.sup.-1])          122.25 [+ or -] 28.51
Lactate Dehydrogenase                 367.25 [+ or -] 30.25
  (U x [L.sup.-1])
Official Time--Race (s)               202.40 [+ or -] 4.89

                                                HMB Group

                                               Post            M (%)

Body Weight (kg)                       76.30 [+ or -] 2.82      -2.80
% Fat Mass (%)                          9.97 [+ or -] 1.44     -10.26
Triglycerides (mg x [dL.sup.-1])       76.55 [+ or -] 8.21     -10.46
LDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])    151.30 [+ or -] 26.81     -9.50
HDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     44.40 [+ or -] 4.44      -5.73
Serum Creatinine (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     1.00 [+ or -] 0.08 *   +16.00
Total Serum CK (U x [L.sup.-1])       188.25 [+ or -] 24.32    -37.23
Serum CK-MM (U x [L.sup.-1])          126.36 [+ or -] 28.81 *  -34.44
Serum CK-MB (U x [L.sup.-1])           65.88 [+ or -] 15.51    -46.11
Lactate Dehydrogenase                 290.40 [+ or -] 26.34    -20.92
  (U x [L.sup.-1])
Official Time--Race (s)               197.95 [+ or -] 5.23      -2.19

Where: M = % magnitude (-) decrease, (+) increase. Mean [+ or -] SD,
* P < 0.05.

Table 2. Pre- and Post-Treatment Biochemical Parameters in the PLB
Group for 6 Months.

                                            PLB Group

                                               Pre

Body Weight (kg)                       79.38 [+ or -] 3.56
% Fat Mass (%)                          9.63 [+ or -] 1.62
Triglycerides (mg x [dL.sup.-1])       86.10 [+ or -] 20.76
LDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])    148.90 [+ or -] 22.61
HDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     39.90 [+ or -] 5.02
Serum Creatinine (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     0.94 [+ or -] 0.15
Total Serum CK (U x [L.sup.-1])       263.20 [+ or -] 52.28
Serum CK-MM (U x [L.sup.-1])          124.28 [+ or -] 33.98
Serum CK-MB (U x [L.sup.-1])           66.92 [+ or -] 18.29
Lactate Dehydrogenase                 336.60 [+ or -] 53.30
  ((U x [L.sup.-1])
Official Time--Race (s)               204.84 [+ or -] 4.38

                                                  PLB Group

                                               Post            M (%)

Body Weight (kg)                       78.70 [+ or -] 3.46      -0.86
% Fat Mass (%)                          9.65 [+ or -] 1.62      +0.21
Triglycerides (mg x [dL.sup.-1])       78.66 [+ or -] 11.48     -8.64
LDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])    156.70 [+ or -] 29.62     +5.24
HDL Cholesterol (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     40.90 [+ or -] 2.88      +2.51
Serum Creatinine (mg x [dL.sup.-1])     1.02 [+ or -] 0.06 *    +7.84
Total Serum CK (U x [L.sup.-1])        268.5 [+ or -] 31.00     +2.01
Serum CK-MM (U x [L.sup.-1])          174.52 [+ or -] 20.15 *  +40.42
Serum CK-MB (U x [L.sup.-1])           93.97 [+ or -] 10.85    +39.07
Lactate Dehydrogenase                 332.90 [+ or -] 50.85     -1.01
  ((U x [L.sup.-1])
Official Time--Race (s)               202.71 [+ or -] 5.32      -1.04

Where: M = % magnitude (-) decrease, (+) increase. Mean [+ or -] SD,
* P < 0.05.
COPYRIGHT 2013 American Society of Exercise Physiologists
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ferreira, Heros Ribeiro; Rodacki, Andre Luiz Felix; Gill, Pamela; Tanhoffer, Ricardo; Filho, Jose Fe
Publication:Journal of Exercise Physiology Online
Article Type:Author abstract
Date:Feb 1, 2013
Words:4566
Previous Article:Investigation of core muscle function through electromyography activities in healthy young men.
Next Article:A comparison of cardiovascular responses during walking and jogging on the treadmill with and without handrail support.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters