Printer Friendly

The effect of whole-body vibration on balance in elderly women.

Introduction

Balance has a significant role in the activities of daily living in the elderly population. Since falls contribute a significant number of injuries in the elderly [1], the risk of falling is even higher when the elderly have to ambulate a complex and unfamiliar environment [2]. Balance requires a high level of cognitive neural function and an intact neuromuscular system with afferent information from vision, vestibular, musculoskeletal and somatosensory systems [2-4].

Postural sway is induced as result of the constant adjustments and activation of the postural muscles in an attempt to keep the center of pressure (CoP) within the center of the base of support (BoS) [5]. Sway velocity determines the rate of this compensation and root mean square (RMS) gives the amount of compensation needed to maintain the CoP within the center of the BoS and thereby effectively maintain balance. Higher values of velocity and RMS indicate decreased postural stability and balance as they imply larger angular changes in the location of the CoP [5]. These two measures are used as they provide different characteristics of postural sway. An increase in postural sway can be an indicator for impairment of postural control as a result of functional instability [6] and it has been shown that an increased sway is strongly associated with increased frequency of falls [7,8]. The age related decline in impairments in physcial funcitoning [1] and an increase in cases of chronic health problems such as scaropenia, cardiovasular disease, osteoporosis, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders is well known.

The integration and organization of the visual, vestibular, somatosensory systems, a higher level of cognitive control and an intact musculoskeletal system is responsible for the maintenance of balance [3,4]. Static postural stability refers to the control of the center of mass relative to the base of support under unperturbed conditions, whereas dynamic postural stability is the same under perturbed conditions. Balance declines with age due to reductions in both the available muscle mass and neurological adaptations to aging [1,9]. Musculoskeletal components, such as strength, flexibility, range of motion, tone, timing and coordination have been reported to decrease with age. The decline in cognitive control and sensory systems combined with the impaired musculoskeletal system renders the postural control system less effective among the elderly [10-15]. Therefore, static and dynamic postural stability may be impaired and maintenance of balance in activities of daily living may be compromised.

Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been used as a facilitator of muscle activation with mixed success. Some studies have shown acute enhancement, while others have reported no improvement or a reduced performance [16-20]. Nevertheless, WBV has been shown to activate the tonic vibration reflex, a polysynaptic reflex resulting in many small reflex contractions of the targeted musculature [16,17,19-22]. In relation to balance, WBV may aid in spindle reflex responses, where dynamic stablility is pre-dominatlely dependent on the somatosensory system. The main mechanisms cited for acute improvements in ballistic type performance following vibration exposure are an increased sensitivity of the stretch reflex coupled with an increased synchronization of higher threshold motor units [15-17,19,20,22-24]. Increases in force, power output, and RFD have previously been reported following acute exposure to WBV [16-20,25] and these increases may be related to better maintenance of dynamic balance among older adults. With higher values of RFD, the latency time to maintain dynamic balance may be lowered, thus helping in a faster recovery from an external perutrbation, resulting in better balance.

When WBV is used as a training modality to elicit chronic adaptations, older participants appear to respond more favorably when compared to their younger counterparts, possibly due to their lower relative training state or decreased motorneuron acitivity prior to incorportating WBV training [10-14]. The majority of acute research using WBV has been performed using younger males and females with increasingly variable responses seen with older subjects [10-14,16-21,25]. Acute exposure to WBV in older subjects may ultimately stimulate key elements of central and peripheral nervous system control. This may result in positively altered force/velocity characteristics, reflex control and proprioceptive regulation, leading to improvements in walking gait and functional balance. These elements may be altered since static and dynamic postural control requires less cognitive control and becomes challenging during dual tasks where they are competing for the same information processing pathways, resulting in a decrement in performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of acute WBV in elderly women on balance.

Methods

Participants

Fifteen post menopausal women (age: 68.3 [+ or -] 5 years) with no history of clinically significant or disabling muscular, orthopedic, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neurological conditions, who have the ability to walk and stand independently, and who are not taking any CNS-depressant drugs completed the study. Participants were screened and deemed eligible to participate in the study if they were able to complete the American Academy of Neurology's up and go test 3 times successfully (less than 8.5s) [26].

Testing and Procedures

Participants were asked to visit the lab on 2 separate occasions, separated by 48 hours. The first session was considered the qualifying and familiarization while the second visit was the testing session.

Lab visit one

Visit one served as a screening and familiarization session. Each participant read and signed the intuitionally approved informed consent document. Anthropometrics were recorded followed by a five-minute cycle ergometer warm-up at a self-selected pace followed by a seated three-minute rest. Following warm-up the qualifying up and go tests were recorded; upon qualification participants were then familiarized with WBV protocol and balance protocol.

Lab visit two

Following at least 48 hours, participants returned for their second visit. Participants again warmed up on a cycle ergometer for five minutes. Following a three-minute seated rest, the participants were tested for each of the balance measures (described below in Functional Balance Assessment section). The participants then had five minutes of seated rest before they were exposed to the vibration protocol treatment. Immediately following the last vibration treatment, the participants performed the same functional balance measures as pre-treatment measures.

Whole Body Vibration

The treatment utilized the AIRdaptive (Power Plate, Inc.), composed of a 33" x 33" flat platform fixed to a stable handle. The vibration platform produces tri-axial accelerations with a primary emphasis upon the z-plane. Participants were instructed to stand in a quarter squat position with their feet flat, positioned shoulder width apart with their toes pointing slightly outward. Their knee joint angles were corrected to 135[+ or -]5[degrees] of flexion for optimal vibration exposure to the lower-body. Participants maintained this position by holding on to the central support handles. For each experiment participants underwent 3 trials of 20 seconds each of WBV exposure at a frequency of 30 Hz and low amplitude of 2-4 mm, with a 60 seconds rest period between each exposure.

Functional Balance Assessment

Balance assessment was done on the NeuroCom[R] Equitest System(tm) (NeuroCom, Inc., Clackamas, OR). The system utilizes a dynamic 18" x 18" dual force plate and a visual surround, both with rotational and transitional capabilities to measure the veritcal forces exerted by the subject's feet as balance is challenged. The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) was used to assess static balance and the Motor Control Test (MCT) for assessing dynamic balance. The SOT is based on the sensory conflict hypothesis, in which the individuals are challenged with conflicting unreliable visual and proprioceptive sensory information using the sway referencing visual surround and support of the Neurocom Equitest and thereby creating six sensory testing conditions. 1) eyes open (EO) and 2) eyes closed (EC) with no sway reference of the support and the visual surround, 3) eyes open with sway referenced vision (EOSRV) and 4) sway referenced support (EOSRS), 5) eyes closed with sway referenced support (ECSRS) and 6) eyes open with sway referenced vision and support (EOSRVS). The experimental conditions used the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) incorporating the sway-referencing capabilities of the platform (support) and the visual surround (vision) to produce six balance testing conditions: standing with 1) eyes open (EO) and 2) eyes closed (EC) with no sway reference of the support and the visual surround, 3) eyes open with sway refernced vision (EOSRV) and 4) sway referenced support (EOSRS), 5) eyes closed with sway referenced support (ECSRS) and 6) eyes open with sway referenced vision and support (EOSRVS). The MCT was performed following the SOT, which based on automatic postural responses in response to an external perturbation. This consisted of sequences of small, medium or large platform translations which were scaled to the patient's height, in forward and backward directions to elicit automatic postural responses. The SOT lasted for 3 trials of 20 seconds each and the MCT lasted for 10 seconds for each of the translations. Forces were recorded to estimate center of pressure for sway analysis during the testing conditions. A harness system was used to prevent injury from falling during all testing [5,27].

Data processing

SOT: The values of the dependent sway variables were derived from the Center of Pressure (CoP) movement, which were calculated from the raw data from the NeuroCom Equitest Balance Master. The average sway velocity and the root-mean-square (RMS) of the CoP were used to characterize the postural sway in the AP and the ML directions during the 60-second testing period. Sway velocity in particular is a measure of the peak-to-peak change of the CoP per unit time. The RMS sway, which is used as a rectifying measure, estimates the amplitude of sway and the overall amount of movement of the CoP. The Sway RMS and velocity were calculated using the following equations respectively.

MCT Data Processing: The MCT assesses the ability of the automatic motor/postural response system to quickly recover following an unexpected external disturbance. The external disturbances are administered by forward and backward translations scaled to the height of the participant and this measurement allows for a dynamic measure of balance. MCT records latency responses, which is a measure of how long it takes to restore normal balance following an unexpected perturbation. While static stability is a measure of balance under un-perturbed conditions, dynamic stability tests are under external perturbations, similar to those that normally arise from the external environment and with failure to restore balance, potentially lead to an increased risk of fall rates.

Statstial analysis

All statistical procedures were conducted using the PASW 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). An a-priori alpha was set at 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Twenty-four paired sample t-tests were performed to determine if differences existed between the pre and post measures for each of the six conditions (RMS sway, sway velocity in the A/P and M/L direction) during the SOT. Six paired sample t-tests were performed to determine if differences existed between the pre and post measures of latency during the six MCT conditions. Bonferooni correction of alpha was not used for each t-test since each test was an independent measure of balance.

Results

Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were found in the main effects of balance dependant variables. Siginificant differences existed in the EC, ECSRS and EOSRVS among the six SOT balance conditions for RMS sway and sway velocity in both the anterior posterior and medio-lateral directions (AP & ML RMS and AP & ML sway velocity). There were no statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences found for the pre and post test measures between all other conditions in the SOT (Fig. 1-4). There were no statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences found between the pre and post test scores among the lactency measures for dynamic stability.

Discussion

This study investigated balance in elderly women following WBV exposure. The major findings were that following WBV there was an increase in AP and ML RMS sway and sway velcoity for EC, ECSRS, EOSRVS conditions from pre to post. To our knowledge, this study is the first study to illustrate possible adverse effects in balance immediately following WBV. This may be a concern for elderly populations as it could be an obstacle in administration of WBV. A recent study by Carlucci et al. found no difference between pre and post measures in balance following vibration [28]. However, their balance assessement did not test multiple systems, they used a posturographic protocol, whereas our study that utilized the NeuroCom Balance Master which tested somatosensory, vision and vestibular systems to determine balance. This may explain the contradictions in results, as Carlucci et al. only assessed static balance. Another consideration for our study is that in the pre condition, we did not have participants perform static squats with no vibration for a better comparison, however previous research has shown no differnce is balance measures following static squats alone [29].

In our study, acute WBV exposure significantly altered sway measures in this population immediately post vibration exposure. The statistically significant results for AP and ML sway velocity and sway RMS was found in EC, ECSRS and EOSRVS conditions. The EC is tested with absent vision and is a measure of the vestibular and somatosensory systems to maintain balance. The ECSRS is tested with absent vision and conflicting somatosensory information, which measures the vestibular system in maintaining balance. The EOSRVS condition measures the vestibular system in maintaining balance with conflicting somato-sensory and visual information. Therefore results suggest a decrement in balance performance when vision is compromised and when the vestibular system alone works to maintain balance following WBV. A possible explanation for this may be that the WBV affects the vestibular system, which is why conditions 5 and 6 of the SOT were compromised. It is possible the vestibular system was affected by transmission of vibration to the head [30] however, not likely since participants knees were flexed, allowing for vibration exposure to be disbursed throughout the musculature in the body.

Although the current study found a decrement in balance following WBV, these results are in contrast with other studies where balance was found to be significantly better for the WBV group when compared to the control group [3]. Researchers also concluded that benefits of WBV may be obtained after longer or more intensive training programs [10]. This was also supported by an investigation showing beneficial effects in the elderly population with WBV exercise in addition to muscle strengthening, balance and walking exercises on walking ability [14]. Acute WBV has previously been shown to improve power output, muscle strength and flexibility, which are all important components of postural control, but not analyzed in the current study [16-20,31].

Previous research also investigated the effects on balance following WBV as a training intervention and no differences were found between the vibration and control group on postural sway at 2 and 4 month test sessions [32]. Another study examined pre balance assessed by RMS and peak-to-peak amplitude of postural sway both in the AP and ML direction did not differ after 6 months of WBV training [33]. Although the current study did not investigate WBV chronic training intervention, it is important to note that WBV training over an extended period of time may not affect balance measures in the same way as acute WBV training. This indicates that there may be different effects of acute WBV compared to chronic WBV exposure. In chronic WBV training, individuals usually are exposed to a larger training volume over an extended period of time and tested in weekly intervals where acute WBV training balance is assess immediately or within a short time frame. This ultimately suggests that acute and chronic WBV training likely elicit different responses.

Recovery time between WBV exposure and balance tasks also needs to be addressed and investigated further, as existing theory currently suggests that longer rest times are necessary to result in participants' improvement balance tasks such as the SOT and MCT. Performing multiple balance assessments at distinct time points following WBV exposure may provide additional helpful data concerning residual effects of WBV as recovery time is a key variable especially to this population. For instance, if an older individual utilized WBV for other known benefits previously mentioned, a sufficient time after exposure may be necessary to prevent slips or falls due to an increase in AP and ML sway velocities. If sway velocities are increased, this may increase instability, indicating that older women may want to take precautions immediately following WBV.

WBV has been shown to cause a tonic vibration reflex, which in turn leads to an increase in the recruitment of motor units through activation of muscle spindles and polysynaptic pathways [34]. A potential mechanism to explain our findings may relate to the increase in muscle spindle activation induced by the tonic vibration reflex (TVR) mediated by the neural signal of the Ia afferents [35] and activation of muscle fibers via large alpha-motorneurons. Following WBV, a decrease inhibition from the alpha motorneuron may occur, increasing muscle spindle activation. The increase in muscle spindle activation may potentiate an increase in force production causing an increase in sway velocity. If an individual's sway velocity is increased from exerting too much force, this may make it difficult to maintain proper balance.

Future research should investigate the interaction between balance and muscle spindles, which play a part in both ankle and hip strategies of postural control. Also, research is needed with respect to varied frequencies, amplitude, durations, rest intervals and platform type, of WBV exposures in combination with multiple balance assessments to track the "residual" effects of WBV upon functional balance. More research is also warranted in chronic interventions utilizing static and dynamic exercises performed on the WBV platform with and without additional loading to improve; strength, power output, rate of force production and functional balance.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

DOI: 10.5604/17342260.1094780

References

[1.] Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988; 319(26): 1701-7.

[2.] Nashner LM, Black FO, Wall C. Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J Neurosci 1982; 2(5): 536-44.

[3.] Lord SR, Ward JA. Age-associated differences in sensori-motor function and balance in community dwelling women. Age Ageing 1994; 23(6): 452-60.

[4.] Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys Ther 1986; 66(10): 1548-50.

[5.] Guskiewicz KM, Perrin DH. Research and clinical applications of assessing balance. J Sport Rehabil 1996; 5: 45-63.

[6.] Yaggie JA, McGregor SJ. Effects of isokinetic ankle fatigue on the maintenance of balance and postural limits. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83(2): 224-8.

[7.] Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU, Postema K. A systematic review of the effects of shoes and other ankle or foot appliances on balance in older people and people with peripheral nervous system disorders. Gait Posture 2007; 25(2): 316-23.

[8.] Hasselkus BR, Shambes GM. Aging and postural sway in women. J Gerontol 1975; 30(6): 661-7.

[9.] Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82(8): 1050-6.

[10.] Bautmans I, Van Hees E, Lemper JC, Mets T. The feasibility of Whole Body Vibration in institutionalised elderly persons and its influence on muscle performance, balance and mobility: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN62535013]. BMC Geriatr 2005; 5: 17.

[11.] Rees SS, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML. Effects of whole-body vibration exercise on lower-extremity muscle strength and power in an older population: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2008; 88(4): 462-70.

[12.] Cheung WH, Mok HW, Qin L, et al. High-frequency whole-body vibration improves balancing ability in elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88(7): 852-7.

[13.] Henwood TR, Taaffe DR. Short-term resistance training and the older adult: the effect of varied programmes for the enhancement of muscle strength and functional performance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2006; 26(5): 305-13.

[14.] Kawanabe K, Kawashima A, Sashimoto I, et al. Effect of whole body vibration exercise and muscle strengthening, balance, and walking exercises on walking ability in the elderly. Keio JMed 2007; 56(1): 28-33.

[15.] Schlumberger A, Salin D, Schmidtbleicher D. Strength training with superimposed vibrations. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2001; 15(1): 1-7.

[16.] Bosco C, Colli R, Introini E, et al. Adaptive responses of human skeletal muscle to vibration exposure. Clin Physiol 1999; 19(2): 183-7.

[17.] Cardinale M, Lim J. Electromyography activity of vastus lateralis muscle during whole-body vibrations of different frequencies. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17(3): 621-4.

[18.] Issurin VB, Tenenbaum G. Acute and residual effects of vibratory stimulation on explosive strength in elite and amateur athletes. J Sports Sci 1999; 17(3): 177-82.

[19.] Bosco C, Cardinale M, Tsarpela O. Influence of vibration on mechanical power and electromyogram activity in human arm flexor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999; 79(4): 306-11.

[20.] Cardinale M, Bosco C. The use of vibration as an exercise intervention. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003; 31(1): 3-7.

[21.] Mester J, Kleinoder H, Yue Z. Vibration training: benefits and risks. JBiomech 2006; 39(6): 1056-65.

[22.] Delecluse C, Roelants M, Verschueren S. Strength increase after whole-body vibration compared with resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35(6): 1033-41.

[23.] Rittweger J, Beller G, Felsenberg D. Acute physiological effects of exhaustive whole-body vibration exercise in man. Clin Physiol 2000; 20(2): 134-42.

[24.] Zehr EP. Training-induced adaptive plasticity in human somatosensory reflex pathways. J Appl Physiol 2006; 101(6): 1783-94.

[25.] De Ruiter CJ, Van Der Linden RM, Van Der Zijden MJ, et al. Short-term effects of whole-body vibration on maximal voluntary isometric knee extensor force and rate of force rise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 88(4-5): 472-5.

[26.] Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39(2): 142-8.

[27.] Nashner L, Jacobson G, Newman C, Kartush J. Computerized dynamic posturography, In Handbook of Balance Function and Testing. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book 1993; 280-307.

[28.] Carlucci F, Mazza C, Cappozzo A. Does whole-body vibration training have acute residual effects on postural control ability of elderly women? J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24(12): 3363-8.

[29.] Rees SS, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML. Effects of whole body vibration on postural steadiness in an older population. J Sport Sci Med 2009; 12(4): 440-4.

[30.] Abercromby AF, Amonette WE, Layne CS, et al. Variation in neuromuscular responses during acute whole-body vibration exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39(9): 1642-50.

[31.] Poston B, Holcomb WR, Guadagnoli MA, Linn LL. The acute effects of mechanical vibration on power output in the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21(1): 199-203.

[32.] Torvinen S, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Effect of four-month vertical whole body vibration on performance and balance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34(9): 1523-8.

[33.] Verschueren SM, Roelants M, Delecluse C, et al. Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19(3): 352-9.

[34.] Torvinen S, Kannu P, Sievanen H, et al. Effect of a vibration exposure on muscular performance and body balance. Randomized cross-over study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2002; 22(2): 145-52.

[35.] Hagbarth KE. The effect of muscle vibration in normal man and in patients with motor disease. New Development in Electromyography and clinical Neurophysiology 1973; 428-43.

Accepted: March 18, 2014

Published: March 27, 2014

Address for correspondence:

Nicole C. Dabbs, PhD.

California State University, San Bernardino

5500 University Parkway

San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA

ndabbs@csusb.edu

Christopher J. MacDonald: cmacdonal@coastal.edu

Harish Chander: harrytherapy@gmail.com

Hugh S Lamont: hlamont@callutheran.edu

John C. Garner: jcgarner@olemiss.edu

Authors' contribution

A--Study Design

B--Data Collection

C--Statistical Analysis

D--Data Interpretation

E--Manuscript Preparation

F--Literature Search

G--Funds Collection

Nicole C. Dabbs (1) (D-F), Christopher J. MacDonald (2) (BD), Harish Chander (3) (B,D-F), Hugh S. Lamont (4) (A-C), John C. Garner (3)(A-C)

(1) California State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA

(2) Costal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA

(3) The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

(4) California Luthern University, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
COPYRIGHT 2014 Medicina Sportiva
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Author:Dabbs, Nicole C.; MacDonald, Christopher J.; Chander, Harish; Lamont, Hugh S.; Garner, John C.
Publication:Medicina Sportiva
Article Type:Report
Date:Mar 1, 2014
Words:4029
Previous Article:The fastest female butterfly swimmers were younger than the fastest male butterfly swimmers.
Next Article:Importance of coordination motor abilities in expert-level on-sight sport climbing.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters