The economic implications of eHealth and mHealth technologies.
EHealth furthers healthcare to contact isolated population--previously nor appropriately serviced by established methods, inaugurates a revolution to conventionally paper-based health and healthcare, and involves applications of ICT to further healthcare services backing (Popescu, 2014a), distribution and education. Enhancing well-being and health of individuals are the main goal for eHealth systems. EHealth readiness evaluation is a method of establishing the possible reasons of failure to innovate (Koplyay, Lloyd, and Mako, 2014), being a key demand for effective eHealth enforcement and utilization. eHealth systems augment healthcare by supplying better evidence-based healthcare, strengthening medical practice effectiveness etc. (Li et al., 2010) EU healthcare systems encounter major challenges that are generating worries about the sustainability of healthcare distribution. Different EU stakeholders are analyzing methods of making healthcare systems more sustainable and enhance individuals' health. The regulators and payers should increase the capacity of mHealth by swiftly interfering with procedures, stimulants and strategies that promote its embracing and utilization. Healthcare suppliers and patients can swimmingly supervise the prevalence of lifestyle disturbances and sustain wellbeing. The arising advance in lifestyles and prophylactic initiatives empowered by mHealth can considerably diminish the threat of chronic diseases. The augmented attainability of healthcare resources and budgets can enable healthcare systems to secure better access to care by medicating supplementary patients. (PwC, 2013)
2. The Function of eHealth and mHealth in the Altering Healthcare Context
The health sector must incorporate ICTs at all levels (integrating ICT is a prime concern for health systems improvement). The economies in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have advanced in anticipating the integration of ICT and eHealth scheme within their health systems. There may be an absence of cognizance among government members (Ryu and Duvanova, 2014) concerning the improvement and enforcement of eHealth schemes. (Jimenez-Marroquin, Deber, and Jadad, 2014) MHealth mostly functions as an expansion and rise of current information technology-based health potential (eHealth). Economic analysis (Pinto and Pacheco, 2014) can assist in prioritizing investment (Dan, 2014) in eHealth because of expenditures, resources, yields, and results. EHealth is a relative beginner in lower and middle-income economies. Analysis of the spending of augmented utilization of health services as a consequence of mHealth can regulate cost effect. Augmented need for eHealth technologies would enable sellers to cut down costs and boost market share and dimension. (Schweitzer and Synowiec, 2012)
Ground-breaking implementations of mobile technology to present healthcare distribution and monitoring systems provide substantial undertaking for enhancing the quality of life. Mobile technology may significantly impact developing economies' health systems. The unified character of mobile communication systems determines unequalled chances for mHealth in ample geographical zones. Social networking instruments can distribute instructions about how to apply treatment to injuries and preclude the rise of communicable diseases, and can be successful in health advancement. Obtaining material via Web searching can alleviate the responsibility on health suppliers, further diagnosis, and enhance interplays between patients and suppliers. Electronic mail records among a group of subscribers can be employed to assist in disseminating material gathered from the Internet or improved in clinical contexts among suppliers or patients. Web-based learning may furnish essential and sustained instruction to raise the number and expertise of healthcare employees. (Kahn, Yang, and Kahn, 2010) EU healthcare systems are transferring care for chronic states and senescent population from hospitals to community homes (the mixture of augmented pervasiveness of chronic disease and a senescent population is intensifying the responsibility on healthcare distribution and expenditures across numerous EU economies). MHealth clarifications can affect patient conduct to enhance lifestyles, facilitate distant treatment of chronic states and equip healthcare suppliers to make better clinical judgments, confining the request for healthcare and diminishing care spending. Regulatory, economic, structural and technological obstacles (Campanella, 2014) are restricting the embracing of mHealth. The mHealth ecosystem has a wide group of stakeholders, and nearly all mHealth advantages are systemic. Health improvements made across the EU are indicated in the augmented life expectancy and embracing of the current technologies. (PwC, 2013) The effect of eHealth technologies is occasionally disputed on account of a discrepancy between the predicated advantages and confirmed results. EHealth technologies are frequently advanced with only an insignificant degree of participation from the (end) user. The social dynamic and relevance of eHealth technologies and their capacity for enhancing healthcare are unequivocal. Stakeholders are participants that have various functions in the improvement of eHealth technologies, from cerebration to operationalization. The advance of eHealth technology is the setting up of new procedures and infrastructures for healthcare distribution. (van Gemert-Pijnen et al., 2011)
3. Schemes that Could Further the Adoption of eHealth and mHealth
EHealth goods require prophylactic notes from a human view. Technology employment is no longer limited to particular groups and pervades different public and private zones. In valuing one's privacy when utilizing eHealth goods, anonymity, confidentiality of the measurement-outcomes and closeness are most critical. The employment of eHealth technologies is mainly directly connected to individuals with feeble health. The relevance of good health constitutes a significantly greater requirement than the security and autonomy of digital information. (Wilkowska and Ziefle, 2012) Evaluations of end-to-end systems to assess the public-private pattern in supplying eHealth services may furnish important chances to estimate the impact of public-private associations on expenditures. The function of the public sphere in furthering low-cost eHealth can assist in establishing the investment context for eHealth and mHealth. EHealth can diminish unit expenditures for particular services and augment benefits, such as enhanced patient access to quality healthcare. An appraisal of the advantages of eHealth programs can assist in establishing the cost-effectiveness of eHealth investments. (Schweitzer and Synowiec, 2012) Mhealth is an instrument that enables suppliers to send information to a central archive. At the group level, social networking can be employed to exchange data about the local health system. Successful messaging can link individuals to required and achievable services. Social networks can stimulate peer-to-peer interplays among both suppliers and patients. Social networks established among healthcare bodies and citizens can be utilized to distribute instructions. For persons, m-health provides enhanced communication, access to diagnostic instruments, and potential to preserve and access private medical information in central archives. E-mail can fortify communication between citizens in the healthcare system. (Kahn, Yang, and Kahn, 2010)
Steadily increasing healthcare expenditures are curbing the healthcare systems of the EU economies. The out-of-pocket contribution of individuals to health costs is rising. Inadequately handled diabetes and the problems it generates raise the price of care and utilization of healthcare resources. The possible loss of wages may confine the social security shares that finance the healthcare budgets, restricting the financial sustainability of healthcare distribution. To confine the healthcare responsibility of chronic diseases and ageing care, numerous EU healthcare systems are transferring chronic care outside of hospitals to community care locations. Enhancing the patient-centricity of care could confine the healthcare responsibility and approve healthcare resources. MHealth clarifications can strengthen the effectiveness of healthcare distribution across all patient solution routes from wellness to supervising, and can assist in transferring care for chronic and senescent patients from hospitals and community care locations to their homes. (PwC, 2013) In the circumstances of long-term care, it is significant to advance technologies that can bring about bonding links with the end users. Harmonizing persuasive technology design, human-centered design, and business modeling supplies the theoretical framework for the improvement, assessment, and enforcement of eHealth technologies. The involvement of stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, insurers, or decision makers (Herr and Ruoff, 2014), affects the improvement of eHealth technologies, their necessities, interests, values, and views establishing what the resulting technology should supply with the purpose of accomplishing the objectives. The business context for eHealth technologies is determined by the likelihood of a return on investment. (van Gemert-Pijnen et al., 2011)
4. The Potential of eHealth and mHealth Investments to Cut Down Costs and Boost Efficiency
In emerging and developing economies, the utilization of eHealth and smart health-care arrangement may increase access to required medicines and prophylaxis services that can function as foundations of fast economic development. (Meier, Fitzgerald, and Smith, 2013) Being in poor health necessitates a substantial concern in swift information access of medical staff. For suffering and senescent citizens, eHealth technology can offer a likelihood of preserving movability and autonomy at home while appreciating their longing for self-esteem in ageing. For a more significant probability of wide user approval and effective embracing, users' necessities, preconditions and perceptions should be taken into account in the carrying out of medical technologies. Features of data safety and privacy may constitute possible barriers in an effective embracing and expansion of eHealth. (Wilkowska and Ziefle, 2012)
Relevant provider-patient communication is vital for chronic disease management. The intricate care necessitated for individuals living with HIV/AIDS has stimulated employment of mHealth instruments. Reduced expenditures, even missing enhanced health outcomes, could explain mHealth policies. An economic assessment fabric (Popescu, 2014b) for mHealth would typify the interventions, their expenditures, and their planned clinical outcomes and possible detrimental consequences. Augmented economic chances lead to enhanced health. Strenuous increase of mHealth may further local economic development other than healthcare. MHealth transformation and enforcement are not restricted to external specialists. To carry out mHealth, local technical strength and instruction are essential. (Kahn, Yang, and Kahn, 2010) MHealth clarifications can equip individuals with information and incentive (Hunter, 2014) to better lifestyles and cut down the menace of chronic diseases. Covering a broader population, mHealth can assist citizens in receiving a more significant quality of care at decreased expenditures. Advancement in lifestyles across the 70 million plus chronic patients in the EU can considerably diminish the healthcare responsibility and costs. The decreased prevalence and seriousness of chronic diseases could moderate the responsibility on healthcare facilities. MHealth can provide patients with significant advice on their mobile devices, assisting them in making enhanced and knowledgeable lifestyle choices (interactive, autonomous mHealth clarifications can stimulate patients to augment their lifestyle). MHealth clarifications allow senescent patients to preserve their test results, interpretations of health constants and the therapeutic measures they take. By backing chronic patients in enhancing their lifestyles (Georgescu, 2011) via mHealth clarifications, healthcare suppliers can stimulate them to check their regime, physical activity and prescriptions. The effect of mHealth enabled wellness-oriented procedures could assist healthcare systems in undertaking the main requirements of improving quality of care and making distribution more successful. By diminishing the seriousness and prevalence of chronic diseases, mHealth clarifications could enable healthcare delivery systems to handle decreasing budgets more effectively. (PwC, 2013)
Health information systems must be assessed with the same severity as a new medicament or treatment program (eHealth interventions should be subject to the same autonomous examination as any other healthcare intervention preceding enforcement). Financial stimulants to take on particular eHealth interventions should not be the principal motive for their adoption. (Catwell and Sheikh, 2009) MHealth solutions that facilitate distant diagnosis and self-assessment of manifestations allow healthcare suppliers to identify diseases sooner and further prompt medical interventions. MHealth clarifications assist healthcare delivery systems in supplying uninterrupted care remotely by employing mobile technologies. Patients can enhance their lifestyle and assist in boosting their dietary and treatment acquiescence via SMS and call based reminders. Patients may feel more secure by assisting healthcare suppliers in identifying their movements remotely and raising emergency signals sooner. Enhanced adherence and constant distant treatment of chronic conditions employing mHealth can assist in preventing serious aggravations and enhance clinical outcomes. The healthcare systems can accomplish the objectives of securing access to care and restricting healthcare expenditures by employing mHealth. Capital costs sustained in mHealth utilizations in the near-term can be counterbalanced via future healthcare savings. MHealth could assist in constituting more significant safeguards, boosting investments and augmenting availability of funds to subsidize healthcare expenditures. (PwC, 2013)
Gheorghe H. Popescu
Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University
Campanella, Miriam (2014), "The Internationalization of the Renminbi and the Rise of a Multipolar Currency System," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 2(3): 72-93.
Catwell, Lorraine, and Aziz Sheikh (2009), "Evaluating eHealth Interventions: The Need for Continuous Systemic Evaluation," PLoS Med 6(8): e1000126.
Dan, Sorin (2014), "Welfare and Work: How and How Much Do TANF Cash Benefits Affect the Labor Supply of Single Parents?" Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 2(1): 34-50.
Georgescu, Matei (2011), "The Role of Theory in the Education of Counseling Practitioners," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 3(1): 194-199.
Herr, Hansjorg, and Bea Ruoff (2014), "Wage Dispersion as Key Factor for Changing Personal Income Distribution," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 2(3): 28-71.
Hunter, Murray (2014), "Creativity and Making Connections: 'The Patchwork of Entreprenuerial Opportunity'" (II), Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 2(1): 63-147.
Jimenez-Marroquin, Maria Carolina, Raisa Deber, and Alejandro R. Jadad (2014), "Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and eHealth Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of National Policies and Assessment of Socioeconomic Context," Pan American Journal of Public Health 35(5/6): 329-336.
Kahn, James G., Joshua Yang, and James S. Kahn (2010), "'Mobile' Health Needs and Opportunities in Developing Countries," Health Affairs 29(2): 252-258.
Koplyay, Tamas, Doug Lloyd, and Csaba Mako (2014), "HR Issues Evolution along the Market Lifecycle and the Value Chain: Case of the Hi-tech Industry," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 2(1): 7-33.
Li, JunHua, Lesley Pek Wee Land, Pradeep Ray, and Subhagata Chattopadhyaya (2010), "E-Health Readiness Framework from Electronic Health Records Perspective," International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management 6(4): 326-348.
Meier, Carlos A., Maria C. Fitzgerald, and Joseph M. Smith (2013), "EHealth: Extending, Enhancing, and Evolving Health Care," Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 15: 359-382.
Pinto, Joao M., and Luis K. Pacheco (2014), "The Economics of Structured Leasing," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 2(3): 94-116.
Popescu, Gheorghe H. (2014a), "Economic Aspects Influencing the Rising Costs of Health Care in the United States," American Journal of Medical Research 1(1): 47-52.
Popescu, Gheorghe H. (2014b), "The Economics of the Bitcoin System," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 2(1): 57-62.
PwC (2013), Socio-economic Impact of mHealth. An assessment report for the EU.
Ryu, Sooh-Rhee, and Dinissa S. Duvanova (2014), "Policy Responsiveness in Post-communist Democracies: A Study of Promise-to-Policy Congruence," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 2(3): 7-27.
Schweitzer, Julian, and Christina Synowiec (2012), "The Economics of eHealth and mHealth," Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives 17(1): 73-81.
van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC, Nicol Nijland, Maarten van Limburg, Hans C. Ossebaard, Saskia M. Kelders, Gunther Eysenbach, and Erwin R. Seydel (2011), "A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies," Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(4): e111.
Wilkowska, Wiktoria, and Martina Ziefle (2012), "Privacy and Data Security in Ehealth: Requirements from the User's Perspective," Health Informatics Journal 18(3): 191-201.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Popescu, Gheorghe H.|
|Publication:||American Journal of Medical Research|
|Date:||Oct 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Does economic policy uncertainty increase information search about condoms on the internet?|
|Next Article:||The role of the health workforce in the healthcare system.|