Printer Friendly

The devil's in the details: will the AIDS initiative make a difference? (Global Aids).

Proverbs tells us that where there lacks vision, the people perish. The United States has lacked vision in the fight against global HIV/AIDS, the greatest health crisis in human history. For the majority of the 42 million people infected in the world, AIDS still represents a death sentence. More than 12 million orphaned children in Africa alone interrogate our response and demand that we do more.

In his State of the Union address this winter, President Bush outlined a bold role for the United States by pledging $15 billion over five years to fight HIV/AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. The initiative promises to provide life-prolonging treatment to 2 million people and to prevent 7 million new infections. In addition to this desperately needed new money, the president stated a principle that activists and people of faith have embraced in the fight against HIV/AIDS. "In an age of miraculous medicines," Bush said, "no person should have to hear" the words, "`You've got AIDS. We can't help you. Go home and die.'"

With Bush's plan the devil lies in the details. The political landscape around HIV/AIDS will be defined by how this new commitment is implemented. The advocacy battle must turn to getting the details right. While the details may not generate the same degree of outrage, they will determine how many lives are lost or saved.

In the AIDS initiative, Bush exacerbates a ongoing streak of the United States going it alone in addressing global crises. In the first year, only 10 percent--$200 million--of the new money will go through the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS, Malaria, and Tuberculosis. The Global Fund represents a new multilateral mechanism designed to pool money from wealthy nations and deliver it to scientifically sound and fiscally accountable programs in countries most heavily impacted by HIV/AIDS. The fund represents one of our best hopes, because it significantly depoliticizes aid and gives both the donor and recipient country a say in how money is used. A pledge of only $200 million would mean a significant step backward in U.S. leadership toward the fund and could cripple the fund in the future. And the World Health Organization conservatively estimates that a fair U.S. share of AIDS assistance would be at least $3.5 billion a year, while the Bush initiative includes less than $2 billion in its first year.

ALONG WITH THE exponential spread of HIV, the world has also witnessed the rapid growth of public pressure and activism. Students, health professionals, and churches have mobilized in a manner reminiscent of the civil fights movement--through letter-writing, lobbying, op-eds, and demonstrations--to pressure Congress and the Bush administration on the issue. The Student Global AIDS Campaign, for example, educates, trains, and mobilizes college students to serve as advocates in the spirit of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.

The longer our nation waits to address the crisis with the urgency and priority it deserves, the more lives will be lost and the more costly it becomes to turn back the course of the epidemic. The war against HIV/AIDS must be wrapped around underlying issues of poverty, inequality, and marginalization. HIV disproportionately impacts "the least of these" in relation to both color and class. And along with aid, the administration should support full debt cancellation for poor nations in order to free up desperately needed resources for health.

It was not coincidental that the president outlined the new act immediately before building a case for military intervention against Iraq. The AIDS initiative lends a more compassionate face to what has become an increasingly unilateral and bellicose U.S. foreign policy.

In 1963 President John Kennedy urged Congress to take steps to end the evil of segregation. Civil fights organizers viewed this breakthrough as an opportunity for escalated mobilization. A few months later the movement assembled 300,000 people for the historic March on Washington to turn Kennedy's words into reality.

We stand at a similar crossroads in the fight against HIV/AIDS. We have the tools of prevention, treatment, and care to stop this deadly epidemic. What is needed most is the personal, societal, and political will. To paraphrase Rabbi Hillel: If not now, when? If not people of faith, who?

Adam Taylor is executive director of Global Justice, which mobilizes students around public policy issues.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Sojourners
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Taylor, Adam
Publication:Sojourners
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:724
Previous Article:Seeing green: why the penal system isn't colorblind. (Race Matters).
Next Article:Change, one call at a time. (Trends).
Topics:


Related Articles
Politicians urged to rise above prejudices and embrace HIV/AIDS prevention strategies. (Policy Update).
Bush proposes near tripling of U.S. commitment on global HIV epidemic.
U.S. to spend $15b on HIV/AIDS in Africa and Caribbean. (Health).
Bush's shell game: are the president's bold steps against the global AIDS pandemic glossing over his antigay attempts to fight the disease here at...
Religious Right leaders seek to hijack overseas AIDS prevention effort. (People & Events).
Bush signs global AIDS bill.
Battling HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean.
Treatment of HIV/AIDS in the nursing home: variations in rural and urban long-term care settings.
AIDS home- and community-based waivers: effects on use of services, expenditures, and survival.
Reflections on the Toronto AIDS Conference.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters