Printer Friendly

The countermine center forges ahead.

"The enemy will fight asymmetrically. He cannot face us frontally and will come at us from the side and in the gaps he can find. My challenge is always loss of momentum. If I can keep momentum, he will stay off balance and have to fight my fight. The area where loss of momentum is always greatest is in crossing gaps and breaching complex obstacles. Any piece of ground that stops us takes away the initiative. A great challenge. Having an adequate countermine program is a level-of-confidence issue and one of our key responsibilities."

-- General Eric K. Shinseki Chief of Staff of the Army

Since Operation Desert Storm, U.S. military missions have spanned the spectrum of conflict. Those who oppose U.S. interests and objectives acknowledge that their forces would not survive a direct confrontation with our forces in conventional war. With U.S. involvement in a conflict, direct combat actions become less frequent as opponents disperse their forces and adopt tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) designed to offset our advantages. The effectiveness of this approach has been demonstrated repeatedly. In Chechnya, forces confronted with numerically or technologically superior opponents also realized that they must operate in complex terrain and urban environments to offset the advantages of their adversaries. Analyses reveal that our potential adversaries believe that denial of regional access can dictate the tempo of conflict to the U.S. disadvantage. Adversaries understand that if they attack our alliances and coalitions, they can delay the start of decisive operations and dictate the strategic t empo by frustrating U.S. and allied access.

The current force is trained, equipped, and organized to breach complex linear obstacles intended to shape the battlefield. The Army's countermine capabilities were developed to breach linear obstacles. With few exceptions, all current countermine equipment in our inventory employs one of three strategies: metal detection or mechanical or explosive "brute-force" neutralization. While this is a critical capability that must be maintained, recent experience in multiple operations demonstrates that there is a distinct need to clear mines from an area, not just breach.

The Army is not organized--and has very few organic assets--to detect and neutralize mines for area and route clearance operations. We cannot clear routes at operational speeds; technology will not support it. We must bridge the current countermine capabilities gap with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) equipment to conduct operations in the contemporary operational environment (COE) for the Legacy and Interim Forces until countermine equipment that meets our required countermine capabilities is fielded to the Objective Force.

However, the COE--with adaptations by potential adversaries to offset U.S. advantages--is leading conflict toward nonlinear, simultaneous operations conducted throughout the depth of the area of operations, using conventional and unconventional means oriented on the destruction of U.S. national will and weakening international support. As in the attack on the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996, adversaries have added new depth to the battlespace. They have demonstrated that they clearly understand the political value of attacking soft targets when they are unable to achieve success in conventional operations.

In January 2002, the U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center (MANSCEN) began to establish a Countermine/Counter Booby Trap Center (CMCBTC) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, as the "go-to" Center of Excellence for all things having to do with countermine.

The requirement for a CMCBTC is the result of the challenges presented by the extreme proliferation of mines, booby traps, and unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the COE. The challenges have been intensified by the employment of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), side-attack mines, and command-detonated devices. Potential adversaries have learned that they no longer have to achieve military victory; instead, a way to achieve success is to avoid defeat while inflicting casualties on U.S. and allied personnel. This is an effective way to attack political will and popular support for military operations. Demonstrated repeatedly over the last decade, taking hostages, using civilians as "shields," using mines as instruments of terror, and using IEDs for ambushes have proven very effective. From southern Lebanon to Oklahoma City, from the Balkans to Latin America, mines and explosive devices in the hands of renegades have been successful in making our superpower military feel helpless and ill-prepared.

The CMCBTC was created to help remedy the current shortfall in mine/countermine training that currently exists in the Army. The center's goals are to--

* Integrate, not duplicate, countermine and counter-booby trap doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF) issues and solutions.

* Develop expertise in countermine and counter-booby trap techniques to detect and defeat booby trap and mine threats and enhance mobility and force protection in the COE.

* Maintain superiority in all facets of countermine warfare, including resident and reach-back technical capabilities.

* Focus the science and technology community on developing new technologies to counter the mine and booby trap threats that support countermine technologies for Objective Force assured mobility.

Today the CMCBTC is well on its way to establishing itself as a fully resourced Center of Excellence, which will become the recognized leader in countermine and counter-booby trap training and technology. The center will focus and synchronize aggressive countermine exploitation of present and emerging mine and explosive threats, enhance countermine interoperability and hazard awareness with the combined arms, and develop DOTMLPF solutions and TTP for integrating newly developed or COTS equipment into countermine operations.

Many organizations are trying to help solve the explosive hazard problem; this synergy of effort did not exist previously. The focus of the CMCBTC's efforts this past year centered on interfacing and integrating countermine issues and solutions with other U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command schools, allied forces, and joint services. This past year has also shown an increased awareness of the challenges in the countermine environment and initial integration of effort across branches, services, and Department of Defense agencies. The figure below shows the number and scope of organizations with involvement and interest in countermine.

The CMCBTC, working in concert with the MANSCEN Directorate of Combat Developments, developed a specification for a standard minefield database linked to Geographic Information System (GIS) tools to track and graphically display minefields and hazard areas. This effort, dubbed the Tactical Minefield Database (TMFDB), is being developed through the Topographic Engineering Center (TEC), Alexandria, Virginia--the government lead for the Maneuver Control System (MCS)-Engineer (MCS-E)--and Northrop Grumman, TEC's software development lead for MCS-E. The TMFDB will be forward-compatible with the beta release of MCS-E, which is scheduled for FY03.

The TMFDB resulted from urgent requirements emanating from Operation Enduring Freedom to develop a database of minefield and explosive hazard information. This initiative provides Coalition Joint Task Force 180 the ability to capture explosive hazard data and print georeferenced minefield maps and tactical decision aids to support the mobility and force protection of the force.

The TMFDB is relational, versatile, and customizable. The database will operate on a host unit's local area network, permitting near-real-time sharing of hazard data among U.S. elements. Friendly and enemy obstacles are assigned obstacle numbers based on the obstacle-naming convention in Field Manual (FM) 90-7, Combined Arms Obstacle Integration, and hazard locations will be displayed on tactical map backgrounds using color schemes and symbology shown in FM 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics, and Military Standard (MILSTD) 2525B, Common Warfighting Symbology.

The TMFDB and GIS software can track and display point, linear, and area obstacles, minefields, and explosive hazards. Built as a subset of MCS-E, the application is being designed to interface with the command and control personal computer (C2PC) and MCS-Light and to input and output the minefield database to multiple formats (for example, the UN-approved Standard Information Management System for Mine Action [IMSMA]). The CMCBTC is presently demonstrating TMFDB capabilities to U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Kuwait.

The past year has been demanding for the CMCBTC Countermine Training Integration Division. The CMCBTC developed mine awareness, engineer-specific countermine and counter-booby trap training to prepare forces for Operation Enduring Freedom. The CMCBTC also trained more than 4,000 soldiers and qualified more than 100 instructors at Fort Leonard Wood and various other locations (eleven mobile training teams in the continental United States [CONUS] and three outside CONUS [OCONUS]). Recently, nine CMCBTC personnel were deployed to Germany, Kuwait, and Afghanistan for countermine predeployment and on-site training.

In addition, the CMCBTC--along with the National Ground Intelligence Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technical Center, Indian Head, Maryland-- developed two handbooks that describe common explosive hazards, their doctrinal usage, recognition features, immediate action drills, reporting, countermeasure equipment, and TTP to deal with these threats. One handbook, which is titled Land Mine and Explosive Hazards Reference Guide, concerns Afghanistan. The second one is the Soldier's Handbook, Land Mines and Explosive Hazards-Iraq. The CMCBTC also developed a detailed Training Circular (TC) 20-32-5, Commander's Reference Guide, Land Mine and Explosive Hazards (Iraq).

Our current practice, in response to urgent circumstances, does not fit the "train-alert-deploy" model; instead, it is "alert-deploy-train." We need to emphasize common soldier skills training in mine awareness, detection, avoidance, and extraction, and develop combined arms strategies across Battlefield Operating Systems. The CMCBTC proposes the five functional courses shown in the table below to enhance and integrate individual and combined arms skills and to ensure that we have requisite skill sets trained before deployment. Funding is needed to support the functional training courses until the FY05 budget submission establishes funds for a throughput of 400 students per course.

The U.S. Army requires a mine-detection-dog program to support Operation Enduring Freedom and the Objective Force and to reduce the risk to soldiers. Mine-detection dogs are the only tool we have to identify mines and explosive hazards based on the chemical odor of the explosives used in these devices.

In August 2002, the U.S. Army Engineer School Assistant Commandant briefed the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army and the Army Requirements Oversight Council on the school's solutions for dealing with the countermine threat. They approved funding for the Operation Enduring Freedom area and route clearance sets, but not a CONUS-based training set. Approved items include mine-clearing armor-protected (MCAP) dozers, berm sifters, medium flails, mine-detection-dog teams, flares, weight-dispersion boots, interim vehicle-mounted mine detectors, and mine-protected vehicles.

Included in the briefing was the establishment of a mine-detection-dog unit, which was approved and funded. After careful research, it was decided that the British Army can best train the baseline requirements the U.S. Army needs for its mine-detection-dog capability. The first squad and the detachment sergeant were transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, future home of the mine-detection dogs, and are awaiting orders to the United Kingdom for training. Training is expected to begin in May 2003. Training for mine dogs is 24 weeks long.

Mine-detection dogs give Army engineers an additional tool for countermine operations--a tool last used in the Army during the Vietnam conflict. Today's planned detachment will have an offensive capability similar to that of the Vietnam-era units. However, the threat today is very different and complex. Dogs have performed civilian humanitarian demining missions for more than a decade, but the U.S. Army requires more than just that capability. This new unit will be breaking ground with TTP and doctrine for the military countermine dog. In fact, this unit will be trying to advance procedures used by other armies. The U.S. Army mine-detection-dog unit will be the world's most advanced dog unit.

It will take almost three years to field this unit of 30 dogs. The time delay is because the U.S. military has no training capability for mine-detection dogs and will have to stand up a trainer base while the unit stands up. The British Army has a small training base and the CMCBTC will be taxing it to the fullest in support of our efforts.

The Engineer School is addressing the area clearance shortfall with updated doctrine, training support plans, and TTP and certified instructors to help train our Army for ongoing and future area clearance operations.
Countermine Functional Courses

Course Description

Countermine Course Will provide joint service and
 combined arms leaders with an
 understanding of countermine
 operations and equipment and will
 advise commanders on force
 protection, area clearance, route
 clearance, and maneuver and attack
 missions. It will also train
 personnel on COTS and Legacy Force

Counter-Booby Trap Course Will teach knowledge- and
 technical-based tasks that support
 detection, identification, marking,
 recording, reporting, extraction,
 and neutralization of booby traps
 on the battlefield.

Urban Breacher Course Will provide individual training
 for Department of Defense and
 Department of Justice personnel.
 The course will teach advanced
 urban breaching operations,
 explosive theory, planning combined
 operations, safety issues, urban
 reconnaissance, employment of urban
 breaching assets, and breaching
 techniques for urban operations. It
 will also train personnel on COTS
 and Legacy Force equipment. We are
 working with the Marine Corps to
 exploit their current course (joint

Master Countermine Course Will provide training to
 noncommissioned officers (E-7 and
 above) with battle staff
 qualification and officers
 (lieutenants, captains, and majors)
 to increase the planning capability
 of joint service and combined arms
 staff personnel in mobility tasks
 influenced by mines, booby traps,
 and UXO. The course will enable
 staff personnel to establish a mine
 information and coordination cell
 within an operational headquarters
 and advise commanders on all
 countermine TTP, including force
 protection, area clearance, and
 route clearance. It will also train
 liaison skills for operations with
 coalition forces, United Nations,
 nongovernment organizations,
 private volunteer organizations,
 and demining organizations.

Unexploded Ordnance Will teach non-explosive ordnance
Reconnaissance Agent Course disposal (EOD) soldiers to conduct
 initial procedures to mitigate the
 hazards of UXO, booby traps, and

Mr. Johnson is the lessons learned researcher in the Countermine/Counter-Booby Trap Center, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. He holds a master's in computer resources and information management from Webster University in Saint Louis, Missouri, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.

Colonel LaMoe is the Director of Training, U.S. Army Engineer School, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Previous assignments include senior combat engineer trainer, Sidewinder 07, National Training Center, Fort Irwin, California, and deputy commander, 555th Combat Engineer Group, Fort Lewis, Washington. He holds a master's from Michigan State University and a master's in strategic planning from the U.S. Army War College.
COPYRIGHT 2003 U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Johnson, Eric; Colonel LaMoe, Jeffrey P.
Publication:Engineer: The Professional Bulletin for Army Engineers
Date:Apr 1, 2003
Previous Article:Planning Engineer Support for an Urban Attack. (Letter to the Editor).
Next Article:Regimental Awards.

Related Articles
Countermine Training Support Center.
54th Engineer Battalion (Combat) (Mechanized) FEMs.
Clear the way.
Countermine operations in the contemporary operational environment.
Directorate of Training (DOT). (Engineer Update).
National Training Center (NTC): Conventional Threat Antipersonnel (AP) Mines (OZM-3). (CTC Notes).
Underwater: mines, improvided explosives. a threat to global commerce?
Countermine AB wins new contracts.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters