Printer Friendly

The National Commission on Forensic Science.

In February 2013, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced a partnership that included formation ofthe National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) an d what is now the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC). As a federal advisory committee for DOJ, NCFS involves public meetings, public input on draft documents, and an open website sharing meeting materials and final documents ( ncfs). Video recordings of past meetings are available as well (

Co-chaired by Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and NIST Director Willie May, the NCFS meets four times a year and involves energetic discussions on a variety of issues.

Since its first meeting in February 2014, the NCFS has met nine times (as of April 2016) and approved 23 important work products that are seeking to strengthen various aspects of the forensic science ecosystem (see Figure 1 below). Work products come in the form of "Views" (V) of the NCFS or "Recommendations" (R) for the attorney general to take a specific action. DOJ has committed to respond to recommendations by the second NCFS meeting following the document's approval. Seven NCFS subcommittees have helped create these policy documents:

* Accreditation & Proficiency Testing;

* Human Factors;

* Interim Solutions;

* Medicolegal Death Investigation;

* Reporting & Testimony;

* Scientific Inquiry & Research; and

* Training on Science & Law.

NCFS currently comprises 32 voting and 8 ex officio members who represent a diverse set of stakeholders including federal, state, and local forensic science and forensic medicine service providers; research scientists and academics; law enforcement officials; prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. About 60 additional subject-matter experts aid NCFS subcommittee work. As a federal advisory committee, NCFS operates on two-year renewable terms. The second NCFS term ends on April 23, 2017.

Figure 1 is an attempt to show where the 23 NCFS documents thus far approved impact what can be termed the "forensic science ecosystem", which involves law enforcement, forensic laboratories, scientific (academic) research, medical examiner or coroner's offices, and the legal system. For example, NCFS work product #20 is a recommendation regarding a National Code of Professional Responsibility for Forensic Science and Forensic Medicine Service Providers, which received approval at the March 2016 meeting. This recommendation is currently under consideration by DOJ.

At the June 20-21 NCFS meeting, final drafts for seven work products may be introduced for a vote and approval by the commission. These documents include recommendations regarding pretrial discovery, a request for NIST to perform developmental validation studies, accreditation of digital and multimedia forensic science service providers, and formation of a national disaster call center. Views documents under consideration cover judicial vouching of experts, notice and demand provisions, and validation of forensic science methodology.

The NCFS's vision is for all forensic evidence to support the equal and impartial application of justice. The NCFS efforts can be framed into three primary goals:

* Foundational--to improve the underlying science and validity of forensic evidence and methods;

* Operational--to improve operational and management systems of forensic science service providers and forensic science medical providers; and

* Applicational--to improve clarity and understanding of forensic evidence.

Hopefully, these goals can be realized as NCFS produces work products to strengthen the forensic science ecosystem.

John M. Butler *

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Gaithersburg, Maryland

United States of America

* Vice-Chair of the National Commission on Forensic Science; NIST Fellow & Special Assistant to the NIST Director for Forensic Science.

Caption: Figure 1: First 23 NCFS-adopted work products, including Recommendations (R) and Views (V). (see (Note: R-1, 6, 8, and 9 have been responded to by DOJ; R-2, 3, and 12 are outside the purview of DOJ; R-15, 17, and 19-21 are being considered; V-4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 22, and 23 are views of the Commission; Q = questioned sample; K = known sample.)
COPYRIGHT 2016 Central Police University
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Butler, John M.
Publication:Forensic Science Review
Date:Jul 1, 2016
Previous Article:NIJ and University of South Carolina--improving detection of crime scenes: infrared camera rapidly identifies blood stains for collection and...
Next Article:Rodolphe Archibald Reiss (1875-1929) --an underrecognized pioneer in forensic science.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters