The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology.
World War II had a significant impact on Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the molecular biology program. Pauling's division continued to focus on protein chemistry through its work on immunology, which attracted funding from various sources. Pauling's emphasis on protein structure, however, led Caltech away from the solution to the replication problem, which underlay the major questions of molecular biology. His elucidation of the "alpha helix" structure of proteins was widely applauded as a significant contribution, but the "right answer" to the riddle of replication came from Cambridge scientists Francis Crick and James Watson, who announced their DNA discoveries in 1953. Postwar institutional changes were also important. The Rockefeller Foundation continued to support Caltech's research, but this support represented only one source of funding for the Pasadena program. Similarly, Caltech no longer stood at the center of molecular biology research. This was obvious after 1953, as Caltech emerged as only one of several institutions investigating the details of DNA.
Despite the many changes that were visible by the 1950s, historian of science Lily E. Kay stresses that important continuities remained. Molecular biology was still defined in terms of technological capabilities and social possibilities. Pauling and other leading figures continued to view certain human abnormalities (including mental deficiency) as "molecular diseases" which might be "cured" through a better understanding of DNA structure and function. Current views are much more narrowly focused. The Human Genome Project may isolate genetic markers for specific diseases or conditions, but few observers or participants would argue for widespread genetic intervention for social reform. The technological capabilities that also defined molecular biology, however, remain central. Kay cogently argues that the "molecular vision of life" now dominates biology, to the potential neglect of questions that may not be answerable through "interventionist technology-based biology" (227). Her description of the establishment of this biology and her analysis of its implications represent an important contribution to our understanding of the social role of science in the late twentieth century.
George E. Webb Tennessee Technological University
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Webb, George E.|
|Article Type:||Book Review|
|Date:||Jan 1, 1994|
|Previous Article:||"The King of the Alley": William Duer, Politician, Entrepreneur, and Speculator, 1768-1799.|
|Next Article:||Caudillos in Spanish America: 1800-1850.|