Printer Friendly

The Mais Medicos (More Doctors) Program: panorama of the scientific output.


The universalization of access and the provision of quality services are challenges faced by health systems, which seek strategies and policies that can overcome them and respond to the health needs of the population. Even in countries with universal systems and constitutional guarantees, as is the case in Brazil, in practice they face difficulties in achieving the Right to Health.

With the scientific support of the evidence, it is feasible to claim that countries with health systems organized on the basis of Primary Health Care (PHC) have better health outcomes, translated into lower costs of care, improved health, greater user satisfaction and the reduction of social inequalities (1-7).

PHC should be understood as a level of basic and essential health care sustained by the principle of comprehensive care and based on scientifically sound and socially acceptable methods and technologies, ensuring full participation of the people (8). It should be based on fundamental elements or attributes namely access and first contact, longitudinality, comprehensiveness and coordination of care, as well as individual attention focused on the family and the community (9).

In Brazil, the empowerment of PHC has been a gradual process, with the expansion of the Family Health Strategy (FHS), which is the Brazilian way of organizing Primary Care in the Unified Health System (SUS), maintaining the principles of the SUS and supported on the attributes of PHC. In 20 years, the FHS has expanded its coverage from 5% to 60% (7) and has had a positive impact on the health of the population, in addition to strong evidence showing that the results of the FHS are far superior when compared to the traditional PHC model in the SUS (6,10).

Despite the marked expansion of the FHS in recent years, the ability to train physicians has not maintained the same momentum, nor have sufficient technologies been developed for adequate planning of human resources in health (7). The lack of professionals with the appropriate profile for comprehensive care, combined with the shortfall and poor distribution of same are one of the main barriers to the universalization of access to health. New measures are also required to bolster the skills and competencies and the equitable distribution of medical professionals in the services (11,12).

In this context, the Mais Medicos Program was launched in Brazil with the enactment of Law No. 12,871 of October 22, 2013, as the way to move forward in resolving PHC problems in the SUS, with measures to tackle the training, structure and supply of physicians in PHC services. The influx of foreign physicians to work in primary health care elicited a major negative reaction in the medical community with numerous ideological and legal disputes (7).

Despite the criticisms, the Mais Medicos Program is more than the mere influx of foreign physicians on an emergency basis, as it proposes structural actions in the SUS (7). These are aimed at expanding access and strengthening the work process in Basic Care, by intervening in the quality and comprehensiveness of care and planning of medical training. It is a program with a spectrum of actions ranging from the short to the long term; encompassing emergency and structural actions promoted in three areas: (i) expansion and enhancement of infrastructure of health units; (ii) emergency placement of physicians in unserved areas; and (iii) training of human resources for the SUS (13).

In line with this government initiative, which aims to bolster PHC in the SUS by increasing access to and coverage of health services, among other measures, scientific research is required to evaluate this new and complex public policy as well as support decision-making and the enhancement of future strategies.

The Mais Medicos Program has not yet generated a large volume of published articles, especially for the evaluation of the effective results of the Program (14). Due to the short time since the creation of the Program, the consensus is that many research projects are underway or recently completed and as yet unpublished. Thus, this study aims to map and measure the scale of the scientific production on the Mais Medicos Program, systematize the findings and present the results based on a critical analysis. The expected result is to add elements for reflection and discussion on this important strategy for the SUS.


This is a review of the literature of the Mais Medicos Program, in order to provide a scientific overview and critical analysis of the literature selected. This study fits the definition of Vosgerau and Romanowski (15) for a review of the literature, which consists of a way of mapping a field of knowledge, for the purpose of understanding the area's movements, configuration, methodological theoretical propensities and critical analyses indicating trends, recurrences and lacuna.

This review started with an electronic search in the Medline, SciELO, Lilacs and BVS/Bireme databases, using the term 'programa mais medicos' as key words. This was then followed by a search for other articles from the references cited in selected studies. The Knowledge Platform of the Mais Medicos Program ( was also used as a search tool by inserting the title of the research registered on the platform for the search in Google Scholar. This search was conducted between the months of January and February through March 20, 2016.

For the selection of publications, the criteria considered for inclusion were studies, articles and other publications mentioning the term Mais Medicos Program in the title or that had the program as its study focus and were published during the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. In total, 82 publications were found, though conference papers, those that did not generate articles and publications, or news reports in electronic media, blogs, institutional sites and social networks were excluded. After this screening process, 54 publications were considered for this literature review (Graph 1). In addition to these texts, a further 12 articles were selected to serve as a conceptual and methodological benchmark for the text.

Results and discussion

A total of 54 publications were considered for the review of the Mais Medicos Program, 37 of which were in the format of articles and 17 were academic papers, divided into nine course completion works or dissertations and eight master's theses.

The revised texts were organized into six categories considering the main focus of the study or the results presented. The categories are: a) Analysis of the deployment of the Mais Medicos Program (15 publications); b) Effectiveness (15); c) Media (8); d) Limitations and criticisms (6); e) Training (5); and f) Legal/constitutional analysis (5) (Chart 1). The issue of effectiveness was divided into five sub-topics, namely: access, coverage and equity; comprehensiveness and longitudinality; changes in the work process and model of care; user satisfaction; and intersectoriality. Despite most of the publications featuring results in more than one area or topic, for purposes of this categorization, they were included in only one of them.

The areas that had the highest number of publications selected were those that included studies of the analysis of the deployment and effectiveness of the Mais Medicos Program. The hypothesis is that, as it is a recent policy, this justifies the number of studies that assess the Mais Medicos Program with respect to its deployment being higher than other areas and the need to evaluate it in terms of effectiveness, providing input for its legitimation and also producing evidence to back both the government's actions and provide answers to society.

In essence, the research set out to analyze and recount the historical process of the Mais Medicos Program and examine it in relation to compliance with the rules and from the perspective of social actors. It conducted comparative analysis, both with other countries and with the rules of recruitment and placement of the World Health Organization (WHO). It also involved studies of user satisfaction, on the broadening of access and coverage, with a focus on equity, on the impact on training and analysis of the main media channels in the country and legal studies in view of the constitutionality of the program and the right to health. It is significant that eight academic works were produced in areas other than that of health, namely in the area of law, administration, social sciences, philosophy, among others, pointing to an awakening of interdisciplinary interest generated by the Mais Medicos Program.

The outcome of the analysis of the publications, with a focus on the results thereof, will be presented in a systematic manner duly stratified by category below.

Analysis of the Deployment of the Mais Medicos Program

To begin a review of the deployment of the Mais Medicos Program, it is worth mentioning the factors that triggered the Program, which generated a political debate and opened a window of opportunity that turned into a social issue. The popular mobilizations in June 2013, the march of the mayors to Brasilia in the same year and the inclusion of the decision makers at the political and institutional level, imbued with the purpose of choosing the alternatives for the most appropriate solution to the problem raised (16,17).

The Mais Medicos Program deployment process was permeated by judicial disputes and ideological clashes, having been considered by medical organizations as an electioneering and poorly planned unilateral measure by the Federal Government (7).

Even considering the hypothesis of a response to social mobilizations, authors have the gall to classify the deployment of the Mais Medicos Program as a top down public policy model, considering that the strategies and solutions come down from the top, despite acknowledging the efforts of the policy to attain the Right (18).

August 2013 saw the arrival of the first foreign physicians within the scope of the Mais Medicos Program. The demand of municipal managers for physicians amounted to 15,460 vacancies, which were not filled by Brazilian physicians. One year after the start, the program had 14,462 physicians, working in 3,785 municipalities and attending a population of approximately 50 million people (7).

Considering the range of the proposed objectives for the deployment process, one of the articles classifies the Mais Medicos Program as successful, since the call notices met their immediate employment goals. The number of Brazilian physicians who signed up to the Program has increased and the management is decentralized, but with well-defined roles and a clear and organized hiring structure (19).

The Mais Medicos Program arises as a response to the legitimate need to enhance Primary Care and expand the coverage of the ESF, which had been experiencing slow growth (1.5% per year). It also set out to provide a more equitable distribution of medical services, with a focus on expansion and universalization of access to health and consequently impacts on training in care (17-18).

In addition to the immediate placement of physicians, the Mais Medicos Program incorporates strategies to reorganize training in health in the country in an attempt to comply with the State's regulatory role in ensuring the Right to Health as enshrined in the Federal Constitution (5,20-22).

In terms of inherent potential, the Mais Medicos Program is configured as an effective transformative project for the future of the SUS. It is also an opportunity to redefine PHC and deploy the care model as it was designed by the FHS. This should contribute to the organization and development of health care networks and the transformation of the care model (23,24).

It makes it possible to deploy the regionalization of medical training away from the major population centers and is configured as a strategy that permits new structuring of care teams, which may bring about an enhancement in the production of knowledge and new forms of care (25).

From a comparative international perspective, the Mais Medicos Program is impressive in terms of its magnitude and scale to meet the demand of municipalities. It also has a marked differential in terms of ethics, since countries with the same proportion of physicians per capita or less than Brazil are not eligible (26,27). With respect to the Mais Medicos Program (emergency placement), it is seen by the Cubans as a new cooperation model with a difference in relation to other medical aid or cooperation missions. This is due to the concept of ongoing education through training strategies throughout the in-service time on the project as well as many educational propositions (28,29).


Cover, Access and Equity

The lack of access to basic care affects a large part of the population in remote areas, which is vulnerable and on the outskirts of large cities, caused to a great extent by the shortage of medical professionals. The Mais Medicos Program contributes to ensuring the permanent presence of entire teams in high staff turnover regions, also allowing access and equity in services to historically deprived populations, such as the Quilombola (descendents of runaway slaves). Thus, it is possible to show that the Mais Medicos Program helped to reduce iniquities, serving the most underprivileged municipalities, which had the worst physician per capita ratios in situations of extreme poverty and with more health requirements (29-33).

In terms of coverage and effective access to health care and services, by placing medical professionals in teams the Mais Medicos Program brings healthcare to regions lacking in professionals and contributes to the growth required for expansion of the FHS (34). Increased access is also witnessed by the increase in the gamut of services provided and the productivity of teams (35).

It should be stressed that the coverage of the Mais Medicos Program is well qualified, since professionals comply with the recommended hourload, have adequate training to work in primary care and are in an ongoing process of in-service training and education (35).

In numbers, we can see that the amount of Family Health teams in the country increased by more than 10% between May 2013 and May 2014. The population coverage of the Mais Medicos Program in the first 10 months was about 30 million people, especially in municipalities characterized as the 20% in greatest poverty (36).

When one compares the years 2011 and 2013 with 2014, the population coverage of the FHS in the state of Pernambuco increased by 5%. When considering the parameter of the National Policy of Primary Care (NPPC) of 3,000 people per team, the Mais Medicos Program ensured access to an estimated population of two million people (June 2014). With the Mais Medicos Program, it was possible to deploy 25 Family Health teams in the municipality of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul (37,38).

In terms of equitable distribution, it is on record that the number of municipalities with a shortage of medical professionals dropped from 1,200 in March 2013 to 558 in September 2014 (a reduction of 53.5%). With the placement of an average of 4.9 physicians per municipality (the highest ratio among the regions), 91.2% of the municipalities with shortages in the North in 2013 were provided for. Of the 143 participating municipalities in the state of Pernambuco, 103 (72%) are in a situation of poverty and these municipalities were allocated 58% of physicians of the Project (17,29,37).

Of the municipalities covered by the Mais Medicos Program, around 400 had never had medical professionals in their midst. A case in point is the 34 Special Indigenous Health Districts (DSEI), distributed throughout the country, which had never had physicians and now have 300 professionals. For example, in 2013 the Yanomami had about 500 medical consultations, whereas the number of visits increased to seven thousand in 2014, with 15 Cuban physicians dedicated exclusively to the ethnic group (99% of the physicians who attend the indigenous population in the program are Cuban) (39).

Integrality and longitudinality

The research shows that health actions and practices from the perspective of comprehensive care, as well as an expanded conception of the health-disease process, were identified in the Mais Medicos Program. The Program has expanded the provision and services from health promotion to palliative care and provided a closer bond and relationship with users which, in addition to strengthening the integrity, contributes to longitudinality (continuity of care over time) and is facilitated by the medical professional remaining in the team for a longer period of time (32,39,40).

The attribute of longitudinality in PHC was identified by virtue of the fact that the physicians know the personal aspects of the life of their patients and this may mark the beginning of a long-term personal relationship. It became clear that a more open and communicative relationship between physician and patient is formed, as well as respect and a close relationship between the physician and the health team, which has boosted the comprehensiveness of health actions performed (39).

Change of Work Process and Care Model

Like other health systems, the SUS faces the challenge of the triple burden of illness and the crisis caused by the mismatch between health conditions and a health system focused on providing care in acute conditions, which is reactive, episodic, focused on illness and without the active participation of users in care of their health (2,5).

The inclusion of physicians in Family Health teams enhances and expands the capacity of intervention in view of the adoption of a model of care that attends health needs. It adds new practices and forms of care, brings new shared practices, strengthens the integration of the teams, while supporting the organization of services and contributing to the invigoration of Primary Care (25,29,32).

The studies reveal evidence of an improvement in the work processes, such as the reports of managers and health professionals noting that the integration of the medical professional has expanded the diagnostic capabilities of the area's problems and brought more agility and continuity in the treatment of users. Changes were also observed in the quality of care since deployment of the Mais Medicos Program (25,41).

With respect to care to specific population groups, one can highlight the improvement in the organization and delivery of services to the Quilombola, the strengthening of relations within the teams and greater coordination among professionals. Similarly, in an indigenous community, with the quality of the academic training of the foreign physicians, especially Cubans, it was possible to impact health care positively, with emphasis on the knowledge of medicinal plants and home visits with a more holistic approach (33,42).

User satisfaction

In addition to demonstrating that users of the Basic Health Units are more satisfied with the medical care of the Mais Medicos Program professionals, concrete differences in the assistance provided by the Cuban physicians and the Brazilian physicians are highlighted. In many ways, the care of the Cuban physicians is considered by the users to be superior to that of the Brazilians, with emphasis on the question of listening, looking or paying attention and showing interest, education and respect (43).

In one study, the high degree of user satisfaction considering the dimensions of "waiting time for scheduling an appointment" and "care during the appointment" was also observed (29).

Results of a survey conducted by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and the Institute for Social, Political and Economic Research (Ipespe) in 2014 revealed that 85% of users evaluated that the medical care was 'better' or 'much better' after the arrival of foreign professionals through the Mais Medicos Program. Another 87% indicated an improvement in professional care during the consultation. Also according to the survey, 60% highlighted the constant presence of the physician and respecting working hours as a positive point and 46% said that access to appointments improved (39).


Besides the nature of the Mais Medicos Program being intersectorial, since it began as a joint policy of the Ministries of Health (MOH), Education (MEC) and Planning, the fact that all actions of the Mais Medicos for Brazil Project, refer to joint actions of the MOH and the MEC, as stipulated in the Law, is highlighted (44).

During the deployment actions of the Mais Medicos Program it is possible to identify the traits of intersectoriality. This was true in discussion of training geared to the SUS needs, in undergraduate courses and during residency, the opening up of new vacancies in courses of medicine and space given to Primary Care in discussions in the National Curricular Guidelines (DCN) (44).

A clear example of intersectorial coordination is the strategy of integrated support to the Program implemented by the MEC. It has been presented as a coordinated management action that requires dialogue and collaboration. This brought the different levels of management and deployment of the Mais Medicos Program together and contributed to the improvement of Primary Care and the Brazilian Health System (45).

This review does not intend to present counter-arguments for the limitations and criticisms presented. As with other topics of this article, the idea was to systematize and present them to the reader, providing input for debate and reflection. It should be pointed out that the texts included on this topic--limitations and criticisms--are mostly texts on opinion, editorial or debate.

As a limitation, there is marked concern about the sustainability of the Mais Medicos Program, considered as a measure of a provisional and emergency nature. It runs the risk of merely becoming a short-term and high-cost stopgap model, with the same problems remaining after its duration period (16,35).

In this respect, criticisms are also levied at the Mais Medicos Program being considered a response to structural problems of the SUS. The claim is that political and temporary responses, such as the Mais Medicos Program, are not sufficient to tackle structural problems, which require structural and long-term measures, with increased availability of resources for health as a whole, with investment in infrastructure, human resources, technology, among others (20,35). For one of the authors, a solution suggested is the need to define a Personnel Policy for the SUS, which is consistent with the complexity of the health needs of Brazilians (22).

One article suggests, more forcefully, that the Mais Medicos Program is a measure that goes against the grain of history, focusing on quantity to the detriment of quality. According to the authors, the opening up of new vacancies in courses of medicine and residencies and the sudden increase of physicians will not effectively contribute to the change in lifestyle of the population. It will also not resolve the issue of the equitable placement of professionals who, at the first opportunity, will turn to the private sector as a supposedly more rewarding professional alternative and contact with the major centers (46,47).

Other aspects of the Mais Medicos Program are also criticized including: the commitment of professionals to practice medicine without proper training or cultural and linguistic adaptation; the amount paid to Cuban physicians; the restriction on the free movement of family members of Cuban physicians; the limit on the availability of migration of physicians; inadequacies in the implementation of supervision and mentoring activities; substitution of contracted physicians by foreign physicians; the allocation of physicians in already saturated areas; the contract format and the recruitment process; the extension of the courses in medicine and support to the expansion of private universities (48,49).

Another point highlighted as a limitation is the fact that Brazil has a more complex environment than other countries, because together with the regional inequalities of distribution of physicians there is the underfunding of the SUS and fierce competition with the private sector. Moreover, with the deployment of the Mais Medicos Program the inability of municipalities to implement Primary Care with quality, sustainability and coverage of the population became evident. Only with the direct interference of the MOH was it possible to hire and place SUS physicians in a short time (22,34,49).

Finally, in an article that analyzes the trends and elements that appear in the discourse linked to physicians and their representative organizations, it is possible to infer that the Mais Medicos Program might not be understood in its entirety. It transcends the emergency placement of physicians in deprived locations, as well as the misperception that the State, by fulfilling its role in regulating the structure, is interfering with the autonomy of the medical profession (7).


Since the official announcement, the Mais Medicos Program has generated intense debate in the media and social networks, being evident in the media coverage, public debate and pronouncements of the Federal Government and medical institutions. The media is an important tool for a particular purpose, as well as a key player in the implementation of public policy and can contribute to its failure or success (50).

In general, analysis of these studies reveals a clear division of interests and positions and a strong political bias regarding the Mais Medicos Program. The majority prioritize the opposition between the representative bodies of the medical corporation and the Federal Government, the shallowness of content relating to the area of Public Health and the absence of the user's voice. Aspects relating to the nationality of the physicians, the validation of the foreign degree and professional registration were highlighted. They imply that the Mais Medicos Program is an electioneering policy and point to alleged flaws in the organization and the rules (51-53).

With respect to the studies that analyze the comments of physicians and representative bodies, one perceives a discriminatory position that discredits the foreign physicians and hints at the superiority of Brazilian physicians. However, there has been a change of position regarding the Cuban physicians as the program becomes consolidated. The results also point to the conclusion that Brazilian physicians have difficulty in accepting changes that might benefit a public, not only that of medicine, as a professional collective group (54-56).

One study examined the debate on the Mais Medicos Program on the Facebook page of the Ministry of Health and concluded that it may even represent a form of participation by circulating differences of opinion. However, this is not sustainable due to the lack of representation and legitimacy as only 0.18% of the population commented on the posts (57).


An important objective set out in the law creating the Mais Medicos Program is the transformation of the process of training physicians in Brazil, in a clear attempt to concentrate training on comprehensive care and the needs of the population and the SUS. In essence, the State is finally attempting to restructure the entire concept of training in health (17).

The analyses reveal a clear incompatibility in Brazil between the current model of medical practice and the universal and equitable access of the population to health services. They also point out that the Mais Medicos Program builds structural measures to improve medical training and attends the SUS legislation, which calls for new practices (58-60).

The changes that are stipulated in the Law refer to undergraduate courses in medicine, demanding the opening up of new vacancies and requiring the adaptation of the curriculums to the new National Curriculum Guidelines defined by the National Education Council (CNE). The law also stipulates changes in the residency requirements of some specialties, as it is necessary to do at least one year of general and community medicine.

Current public policies appear to be in line with the international recommendations to invest in the training of family physicians in sufficient numbers for a health system focused on PHC. Results show that the law establishing the Mais Medicos Program is a major evolution in management tools of human resources for health. They also herald changes and stricter application of the National Curriculum Guidelines for training physicians in the country, with an emphasis on Primary Care (7).

With respect to in-service training, it has been seen that the Mais Medicos Program has excellent pedagogic potential (58) and has contributed to the improvement of learning processes. Furthermore, the integration of school, service and the community has increased the level of satisfaction of medical students and their awareness of the importance of practicing in the community and the potential for learning in undergraduate courses in medicine (61,62).

Legal/constitutional analysis

The studies that perform a legal and constitutional analysis of the Mais Medicos Program see the Program as a public policy which reaffirms the right to health from the perspective of ensuring legal and constitutional effectiveness and with the prerogative to improve the health levels of the population. The Program attends and is compatible with the Brazilian legal and constitutional framework and presents itself as an indispensable instrument of social efficacy to the right to health (18,63-65).

On the other hand, a single study was found, written while still under the Provisional Measure (MP 621/13) prior to the Law enacting the Mais Medicos Program, which alleges that the MP violates basic constitutional rules and hampers the proper provision of public health services. The author considers a Provisional Measure as a high-handed act of government, incompatible with what is expected of discretionary acts of Public Administration (66).

Final considerations

The SUS moved forward in the process of reorganization of primary care, including the expansion of coverage and implementation of the FHS, as a proposal for a new model of care. However, challenges still remain to improve the quality of care and expansion of access towards universal access to health. In order to tackle one of the critical drawbacks of primary care, the Brazilian government proposed the Mais Medicos Program, considered as a series of measures to ensure the supply, placement and training of physicians for the SUS.

The Mais Medicos Program deployment process was fraught with debate and criticism regarding the way it was structured, its true effectiveness, and especially with respect to its sustainability, since it is a program linked to the Ministry of Health and is of a provisional nature. However, with the support of scientific research, it is possible to analyze it from the perspective of the positive changes that are taking place, the process of cooperation and exchange of knowledge between professionals and, in particular, user satisfaction.

With respect to the analysis of the publications selected, it is emphasized that, in general, the results of the Mais Medicos Program assessments are positive. This would indicate that satisfactory results are generated in relation to increased access, equity, user satisfaction and humanization of care. Innovative practices and changes in work processes were also identified, with emphasis on the practice of comprehensive care and longitudinality. The two-way exchange of knowledge between foreign medical professionals and health staff in the provision of care, contributing to the improvement of practices and in-service training and consequently in improved health outcomes should also be highlighted.

Results indicate that the Mais Medicos Program has a strong potential for reorganization of training in health, focused on the need of the country and the Health System, with the resumption of the state regulatory role in moving forward with this process, which is characterized as a response to a structural problem of the SUS.

From the standpoint of this article, the most important result is the evidence that the Mais Medicos Program is a public policy that complies with constitutional principles and is an important tool for ensuring the right to health.

DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232015219.17842016


ES Kemper participated in the conception, framework, analysis and interpretation of the data and drafting of the article. AV Mendoca participated in revision of the article. MF Sousa participated in the approval of the version to be published.


Special thanks to Ariel Delgado Ramos for his support in the preparation of the graph.


(1.) Giovanella L. Atencao Primaria a Saude e coordenacao dos cuidados na rede assistencial. Saude em Debate 2014; 51:30-37.

(2.) Mendes EV. As Redes de Atencao a Saude. 2a ed. Brasilia: Organizacao Pan-Americana da Saude; 2011.

(3.) Sisson MC, Andrade SR, Giovanella L, Almeida PF, Fausto MCR, Souza CRP. Estrategia de Saude da Familia em Florianopolis: integracao, coordenacao e posicao na rede assistencial. Saude Soc 2011; 20(4):991-1004.

(4.) Chueiri PS. Proposta de instrumento para a avaliacao da coordenacao do cuidado e da ordenacao das redes de atencao a saude pela Atencao Primaria no Brasil [dissertacao]. Porto Alegre: Faculdade de Medicina; 2013.

(5.) Diretoria Nacional (CEBES). O SUS precisa de Mais Medicos e de Muito Mais!. Saude em Debate 2013; 37(97):200-207.

(6.) Macinko J, Starfied B, Shi L. The Contribution of Primary Care Systems to Health Outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OCDE) Countries. HSR 2003; 38(3):831-865.

(7.) Alessio MM. Analise da Implantacao do Programa Mais Medicos [dissertacao]. Brasilia: Faculdade de Ciencias da Saude; 2015.

(8.) Sousa MF, Hamann EM. Programa Saude da Familia no Brasil: uma agenda incompleta? Cien Saude Colet 2009; 14(1):1325-1335.

(9.) Starfield B. Atencao Primaria: equilibrio entre necessidades de saude, servicos e tecnologia. Brasilia: UNESCO, Ministerio da Saude; 2002.

(10.) Mendes EV. O cuidado das condicoes cronicas na Atencao Primaria a Saude: o imperativo da consolidacao da Estrategia Saude da Familia. Brasilia: Organizacao Pan -Americana da Saude; 2012.

(11.) Frenk J. Leading the way towards universal health coverage: a call to action. Lancet 2015; 385(9975):1352-1358.

(12.) Cassiani SHB. Strategy for universal access to health and universal health coverage and the contribution of the International Nursing Networks. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2014; 22(6):891-892.

(13.) Brasil. Lei no. 12.871 de 22 de outubro de 2013. Institui o Programa Mais Medicos, altera as Leis n. 8.745, de 9 de dezembro de 1993, e n. 6.932, de 7 de julho de 1981, e da outras providencias. Diario Oficial da Uniao 2013; 23 out.

(14.) Baiao DC, Leonidas SR, Lins CFM. Avaliacao do Programa Mais Medicos: uma revisao da literatura. XIV Encontro de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa. Fortaleza: Universidade de Fortaleza; 2014.

(15.) Vosgerau DSAR, Romanowsi JP. Estudos de revisao: implicacoes conceituais e metodologicas. Rev. Dialogo Educ. 2014; 14(41):165-189.

(16.) Couto MP. O Programa Mais Medicos: a formulacao de uma nova politica publica de saude no Brasil [dissertacao]. Curitiba: Pos-Graduacao em Politicas Publicas; 2015.

(17.) Pinto HA, Sales MJT, Oliveira FP, Brizolara R, Figueiredo AM, Santos JT. O Programa Mais Medicos e o fortalecimento da Atencao Basica. Divulg. Saude Debate 2014; 51:105-120.

(18.) Santos MCF. Programa Mais Medicos. Estrutura do Programa Mais Medicos e Implementacao do Projeto Mais Medicos para o Brasil [monografia]. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas; 2015.

(19.) Bull World Health Organ. Funding, Flexible management needed for Brazil's health worker gaps 2013. Francisco Eduardo de Campos--Entrevista. [acessado 2016 mar 10] Disponivel em:

(20.) Madson AMD. Dificuldades de se proporcionar mais medicos para o Sistema Unico de Saude (SUS) [dissertacao]. Brasilia: Faculdade de Economia, Administracao e Contabilidade--FACE; 2015.

(21.) Campos GWS. A Saude, o SUS e o Programa "Mais Medicos" 2013. RADIS Comunicacao e Saude [acessado 2016 mar 10] Disponivel em:

(22.) Molina J, Suarez J, Cannon LRC, Oliveira G, Fortunato MA. O Programa Mais Medicos e as Redes de Atencao a Saude no Brasil Mais Medicos. Divulg. Saude Debate 2014; 52:190-201.

(23.) Lima RCGS, Garcia Jr CAS, Kerkoski E, Chesani FH. Programa Mais Medicos no Estado de Santa Catarina: breve relato de experiencias iniciais. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):67-80.

(24.) Collar JM, Almeida Neto JB, Ferla AA. Formulacao e impacto do Programa Mais Medicos na atencao e cuidado em saude: contribuicoes iniciais e analise comparativa. Saude em Redes 2015; 1(2):43-56.

(25.) Rovere MR. El Programa Mas Medicos: un analisis complementario desde la perspectiva de la salud internacional. Interface (Botucatu) 2015; 19(54):635-636.

(26.) Oliveira FP, Vanni T, Pinto HA, Santos JTR, Figueiredo AM, Araujo SQ, Matos MFM, Cyrino EG. "Mais Medicos": um programa brasileiro em uma perspectiva internacional. Interface (Botucatu) 2015; 19(54):623-634.

(27.) Gonzalez JEC, Morales ECL, Ramos AD. Proyecto "Mais Medicos para Brasil": nueva modalidad de colaboracion cubana en el exterior. Rev Edumecentro 2015; 7(1):171-177.

(28.) Carvalho KSR. Programa Mais Medicos e as recomendacoes da Organizacao Mundial de Saude sobre atracao, retencao e recrutamento de medicos para areas rurais e remotas [monografia]. Brasilia: Faculdade de Saude Coletiva; 2015.

(29.) Santos LMP, Costa AM, Girardi SN. Programa Mais Medicos: uma acao efetiva para reduzir iniquidades em saude. Cien Saude Colet 2015; 20(11):3547-3552.

(30.) Silva RJO, Sousa D. O Programa Mais Medico na Perspectiva dos Atores Sociais Responsaveis por sua Implantacao e dos Beneficiarios no Municipio de Boqueirao, PB. REUNIR: Revista de Administracao, Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade 2015; 5(3):59-75.

(31.) Organizacao Pan-Americana da Saude (OPAS). Implementacao do Programa "Mais Medicos" em Curitiba. Experiencias inovadoras e licoes aprendidas. Brasilia: OPAS; 2015.

(32.) Pereira LL, Silva HP, Santos LMP. Projeto Mais Medicos para o Brasil: Estudo de caso em Comunidades Quilombolas. Revista da ABPN 2015; 7(16):28-51.

(33.) Schefer M. Programa Mais Medicos: em busca de respostas satisfatorias. Interface (Botucatu) 2015; 19(54):637-640.

(34.) Mendes BC. O Programa Mais Medicos trara bons resultados? [monografia]. Brasilia: Faculdade de Economia, Administracao e Contabilidade; 2014.

(35.) Florentino Junior AL. Mais Medicos e Mais Cobertura? Efeitos iniciais do Projeto Mais Medicos na cobertura da Atencao Basica no Brasil [monografia]. Brasilia: UNB; 2014.

(36.) Souza BPA, Paulette AC. Projeto Mais Medicos para o Brasil em Pernambuco: uma abordagem inicial. Tem pus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):11-34.

(37.) Rojas VC. Impactos na Atencao Basica no municipio de Pelotas-RS com a implantacao do Programa Mais Medico [dissertacao]. Porto Alegre: Escola de Administracao; 2015.

(38.) Cruz MAC. A integralidade nas praticas de saude apos a implantacao do Programa Mais Medicos: A experiencia da Unidade Basica de Saude Samambaia-Juatuba/MG [dissertacao]. Campinas: Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas; 2015.

(39.) Goncalves RC, Ribeiro CLM, Medeiros MR, Souza MT, Kunitake CST. Projeto Mais Medicos para o Brasil Uso de instrumentos de avaliacao e acompanhamento dos profissionais--municipio de Sao Paulo (julho-dezembro 2014). XXIX Congresso de Secretarios Municipais de Saude do Estado de Sao Paulo. [acessado 2016 mar 10] Disponivel em:

(40.) Bertao IR. A atuacao de um medico do Programa Mais Medicos para o Brasil e a mudanca processo de trabalho da equipe de Estrategia de Saude da Familia. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):217-224.

(41.) Silva RP, Barcelos AC, Hirano BQL, Izzo RS, Calafate JMS, Soares TO. A experiencia de alunos do PET-Saude com a saude indigena e o Programa Mais Medicos. Interface (Botucatu) 2015; 19(1):1005-1014.

(42.) Brito LM. Programa Mais Medicos: satisfacao dos usuarios das Unidades Basicas de Saude de Ceilandia/DF quanto ao atendimento medico [monografia]. Brasilia: Graduacao em Saude Coletiva; 2014.

(43.) Silva IEP. "Tem hora que a gente se pergunta por que e que nao se junta tudo numa coisa so?y> Programa Mais Medicos para o Brasil: Caminhos da Intersetorialidade [dissertacao]. Porto Alegre: Faculdade de Educacao; 2014.

(44.) Almeida ER, Germany H, Firminiano JGA, Martins AF, Dias AS. Projeto Mais Medicos para o Brasil: A experiencia pioneira do apoio institucional no Ministerio da Educacao. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):49-66.

(45.) Schanaider A. Mais ou menos medicos! Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2014; 41(5):303-304.

(46.) Robespierre CR. Programa Mais Medicos: um equivoco conceitual. Cien Saude Colet 2105; 20(2):421-424.

(47.) Caramelli B. Os medicos estrangeiros: a questao da lingua. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2013; 59(5):407-408.

(48.) Campos GWS. Mais medicos e a construcao de uma politica de pessoal para a Atencao Basica no Sistema Unico de Saude SUS. Interface (Botucatu) 2015; 19(54):641-642.

(49.) Segallin M. O Programa Mais Medicos: Um estudo de imagem a partir da revista Veja [dissertacao]. Porto Alegre: Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicacao; 2013.

(50.) Luz CA. O Programa Mais Medicos em uma abordagem lexical: representacao social e repercussao cientifica [dissertacao]. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Medicina; 2015.

(51.) Morais I, Alkimin D, Lopes J, Santos M, Leonel M, Santos R, Rosas W, Mendonca AV, Sousa MF. Jornais Folha de Sao Paulo e Correio Braziliense: o que dizem sobre o Programa Mais Medicos? Rev Esc Enferm USP 2014; 48(2):112-120.

(52.) Scremin L, Javorski E. O enquadramento das noticias sobre os estrangeiros do Programa Mais Medicos. In: 9[degrees] Ciclo de Debates sobre Jornalismo UniBrasil. Curitiba: UniBrasil; 2013.

(53.) Carvalho FC. A Consolidacao do Programa Mais Medicos na Opiniao Publica e na Cobertura Jornalistica. Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Interdisciplinares da Comunicacao. In: XV Congresso de Ciencias da Comunicacao na Regiao Sul; 2014.

(54.) Souza L. Representacoes do "Programa Mais Medicos" pelo site Pragmatismo Politico e pelo Portal do Conselho Federal de Medicina [dissertacao]. Brasilia: Instituto de Letras; 2014.

(55.) Santos RSO. Medicos Brasileiros Conservadores: O Programa Mais Medico pela Retorica da Intransigencia [dissertacao]. Brasilia: Graduacao em Saude Coletiva; 2014.

(56.) Landim IC. Um estudo sobre a relacao entre a Democracia Digital e a Participacao Politica a partir do debate sobre o Programa Mais Medico no Facebook: Midia e Cotidiano 2013; 3(3) [acessado 2016 mar 10]. Disponivel:

(57.) Castro TF. Reflexoes sobre a pratica de supervisao no Pro grama de Valorizacao do Profissional da Atencao Basica (PROVAB) e no Programa Mais Medicos [dissertacao]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2015.

(58.) Sousa MF, Franco MS, Rocha DG, Andrade NF, Prado EAJ, Mendonca AV. Por que mais medicos no Brasil? Da politica a formacao. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):159-174.

(59.) Cyrino EG, Pinto HA, Oliveira FP. O Programa Mais Medicos e a formacao no e para o SUS: por que a mudanca? Escola Anna Nery Revista de Enfermagem 2015; 19(1).

(60.) Santos BEF, Sena IS, Alves CP, Batista NA, Nazina MTST, Morais LSS. Avaliacao discente sobre interacao ensino, servicos e comunidade em equipes de saude integradas ao Programa Mais Medico no Estado da Amazonia. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):123-136.

(61.) Sena IS, Guerreiro LC, Ribeiro AC, Morais LSS, Nazima MTST, Santo BEF. Percepcoes de estudantes de medicina sobre a experiencia de aprendizado na comunidade dentro do programa mais medicos: analise de um grupo focal. Tempus, actas de saude colet. 2015; 9(4):81-95.

(62.) Carvalho GL. Enfrentando paradoxos: A analise constitucional do Programa Mais Medico como afirmacao ao direito a saude [dissertacao]. Pouso Alegre: Faculdade de Direito do Sul de Minas; 2015.

(63.) Silva SM, Santos LMP. Estudo das Acoes Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade do Programa Mais Medicos. Cad. Ibero-Amer. Dir. Sanit. 2015; 4(2):68-82.

(64.) Vasconcelos D. Programa Mais Medicos: Exegese Constitucional da Politica, Direitos Sociais e Politicas Publicas III CONPEDI, Florianopolis, SC; 2014.

(65.) Di Jorge FM. Estudo juridico do Programa Mais Medicos. ADV: Advocacia Dinamica--Selecoes Juridicas 2013; 14-26.

(66.) Kamikawa GK, Motta ID. Direito a Saude e Estudo da Politica Publica do Programa "Mais Medicos". Revista Juridica Cesumar--Mestrado 2014; 14(2):341-367.

Article submitted 28/03/2016

Approved 30/06/2016

Final version submitted 02/07/2016

Elisandrea Sguario Kemper [1]

Ana Valeria Machado Mendonca [1]

Maria Fatima de Sousa [1]

[1] Organizacao PanAmericana da Saude (OPAS/ OMS). Setor de Embaixadas Norte, lote 19. 70800-400 Brasilia DF Brasil.
Chart 1. Selected articles for the literature
review according to the author and category.

Analysis of the          Effectiveness              Media
implementation of the
Mais Medicos Program

Alessio M (2015)         Santos L. et al.           Segallin M.
                         (2015)                     (2013)

Baiao D et al.           Silva R. e Sousa D.        Luz C.
(2014)                   (2015)                     (2015)

Couto M (2015)           OPAS (2015)                Morais I. et
                                                    al. (2014)

Pinto H et al.           Pereira L. et al.          Scremin L.
(2014)                   (2015)                     e Javorski
                                                    E. (2013)

Santos M (2015)          Mendes B. (2014)           Carvalho F.

Bull WHO (2013)          Florentino A.              Souza L.
                         (2014)                     (2014)

Madson A (2015)          Souza B. e Paulette        Santos R.
                         A. (2015)                  (2014)

Campos G (2013)          Rojas V. (2015)            Landim I.

Molina J et al.          Cruz M. (2015)

Lima R et al.            Goncalves R. et al.
(2015)                   (2014)

Collar J et al.          Bertao I. (2015)

Rovere M (2015)          Silva R. et al. (2015)

Oliveira F et al.        Brito L. (2014)

Gonzalez J. et al.       Silva I. (2014)

Carvalho K. (2015)       Almeida E. et al. (2015)

Analysis of the          Limitations      Training        Legal/consti-
implementation of the    and criticisms                   tutional
Mais Medicos Program                                      analysis

Alessio M (2015)         Schefer M.       Castro T.       Carvalho G.
                         (2015)           (2015)          (2015)

Baiao D et al.           Schanaider A.    Sousa MF. et    Silva S. e
(2014)                   (2014)           al. (2015)      Santos L.

Couto M (2015)           Robespierre C.   Cyrino E.       Vasconcelos
                         (2015)           et al (2015)    D. (2014)

Pinto H et al.           Caramelli B.     Santos B. et    Di Jorge F.
(2014)                   (2013)           al. (2015)      (2013)

Santos M (2015)          Campos G.        Sena I.         Kamikawa G. e
                         (2015)           et al. (2015)   Motta I.

Bull WHO (2013)          CEBES (2013)

Madson A (2015)

Campos G (2013)

Molina J et al.

Lima R et al.

Collar J et al.

Rovere M (2015)

Oliveira F et al.

Gonzalez J. et al.

Carvalho K. (2015)

Graph 1. Number of publications selected in this
study based on the application of the exclusion
criteria--Brazil, 2016.

Publications inserted with the search criterion    (82)

Publications included by evaluation of the title
and results for the Mais Medicos Program and
theoretical support for the article                (66)

Publications considered for review of the
Mais Medicos Program                               (54)

Note: Table made from bar graph.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:texto en ingles
Author:Kemper, Elisandrea Sguario; Mendonca, Ana Valeria Machado; de Sousa, Maria Fatima
Publication:Ciencia & Saude Coletiva
Date:Sep 1, 2016
Previous Article:Mais Medicos (More Doctors) Program: its contribution in view of WHO recommendations for provision of doctors.
Next Article:Academic tutorship of the Mais Medicos para o Brasil (More Doctors to Brazil) project in Santa Catarina: the ethical-political viewpoint.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters