Printer Friendly

The Journal of Philosophy: January 2009, Vol. 106, No. 1.

What is' Lying? DON FALLIS

According to the standard philosophical definition, lying is saying something that you believe to be false with the intent to deceive. However, people sometimes "go on the record" with something that they believe to be false even though they have no intent to deceive. In response to such examples of nondeceptive lying, it has been suggested that lying is simply asserting something that you believe to be false (where asserting something involves a normative component that goes beyond merely saying something). However, the existing accounts of asserting something give us a definition of lying that still does not capture common usage. This paper argues that the correct definition of lying is that (a) you say something that you believe to be false and (b) you believe that you are in a situation where the following norm of conversation is in effect: "Do not say what you believe to be false."--Correspondence to: fallis@email.arizona.edu
COPYRIGHT 2010 Philosophy Education Society, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PHILOSOPHICAL ABSTRACTS
Publication:The Review of Metaphysics
Article Type:Author abstract
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2010
Words:161
Previous Article:International Philosophical Quarterly: June 2010, Vol. 50, No. 2.
Next Article:The Journal of Philosophy: February 2009, Vol. 106, No. 2.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters