The Impact of Dependents in the Family on the Work Life Conflict of Employed Women in IT Sector in India.
Job and family is defined as a form of inter role conflict in which the role pressures from the work and family domains are mutually incompatible in some respect. There is a conflict between work and family when the earning member or brand winner is occupied by too many demands. One of the major societal changes two jobs at a time in order to meet the expenses and in case of single parent families work and family conflict is present. This study finds an impact of the dependents (non-earning member) on the work life conflict specific to employed women. It was found that for working women in India there is more work life conflict with family when there are more than two dependent members in the family and especially old-age/sick members that demand more time responsibility and income generation from the bread winner in family.
Keywords: Women Labor force employed women family work life
An important issue facing our society is the changing work and family roles of Indian women. Many women occupy both work and family roles their experiences as paid workers wives and mothers represent primary social contexts for examining women's lives (McBride 1990). Many women of today are engaged in multiple roles and the effect that these social roles have on women's well being is worth examining (Repetti 1998; Russo 1990).
Members of dual earner families and families with young children are more likely to experience work family conflict (Kelly and Voydanoff 1985). Voydanoff (1988) mentioned that important shifts in family structure and accompanying demands needed to be considered. Various work and family conflict antecedents and its outcomes have been developed and tested by (Frone Russell and Cooper 1992; Frone Yardley and Markel 1997; Grandey and Cropanzano 1999; Greenhaus and Beutell 1985; Kopelman Greenhaus and Connolly 1983). Family conflict work conflict and inter role conflict are highlighted in the study (Kopelman Greenhaus and Connolly 1983). Work conflict is the degree to which an individual face role stresses/demands with respect to family. Inter role conflict occurs when an individual face stresses/demands of one role that are disharmonious with strain in another role.
Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) articulated three possible basis of work and family conflict - strain based conflict time based conflict and behavior based conflict.
Models have been studied in relation to the work and family conflict with change in social and demographic trends with time (Kopelman Greenhaus and Connolly 1983; Bedeian Burke and Moffett 1988).
Objectives of the study
The study aims to signify the impact of the dependents in the family in the work life conflict of employed women.
Work Life Conflict
Family is a part of every adult/grown up individual with work experience. More addition has been seen in the workforce due to social and demographics changes and concerns (Edwards and Rothbard 2000; Greenhaus and Parasuraman 1999; Lambert 1990; Staines 1980).
It's a routine of the majority that an adult has two major roles family orientation and working experience. These both are the roles which are mostly played by the head of the family that man in most of the cases irrespective to ethnicity and religion. Women have now also emerged as the head of the family in the case of single parent divorced married and contributing earnings in the family etc. Adopting dual roles or accepting multiple roles of work life and home responsibilities naturally causes conflicts. It leads to stress and the limited capacity of one to perform well at work and handle the family responsibilities at the same time. Major downfalls with such individuals are physical fatigue and mental anguish (Coser 1974; Marks 1977).
Two types have been differentiated mainly in work and family conflict. First Work interference with family conflict (WIF) and second family interference with work conflict (FIW). WIF conflict occurs when there is overload of work or work is dominating the family activities and responsibilities for e.g. an individual handling office work at home at the expense of family time. FIW conflict occurs when the family responsibilities and activities hinder office work and time for e.g. leaving office timings and work more often for tackling home chores. These both constructs are correlated with each other with each being conceptually and empirically distinctive (Duxbury Higgins and Lee 1994; Frone Russell and Cooper 1992).
For WIF conflict the predictor is work variable and for FIW conflict the predictor is family variable (Kinnunen and Mauno 1998). Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) found three major types of work family differences which are as follows:
1. Time based: It often possible that time spent on one role performance of routine hinders the role performance of other routine. Expansion of time in one role performance of routine takes up the time allotted or confine to other role performance of routine.
2. Strain based: The strain is the second conflict which arises between work and family. The strain affects to actively contribute towards a certain role due to the other role's strain.
3. Behavior based: This conflict is incompatibility between the both routine behaviors. Work family conflict and health (mental and physical) has association and even overall physical health (Grandey and Cropanzano 1999). Work and family conflict makes an individual enter into depressive mode and other psychological concerns (Netemeyer Boles and McMurrian 1996; Thomas and Ganster 1995).
There is indirect relationship between organizational commitment and work family conflict in terms of work load and office work related pressures (Good Page and Young 1996).
Descriptive research design is used for this study in order to provide empirical results and conclusion. Through this research methodology behavioral differences of respondents have been investigated and reported.
H1: There is no significant difference among the different number of dependents in high conflict segment.
H2: There is no significant difference among the different number of dependents in moderate conflict segment.
H3: There is no significant difference among the different number of dependents in no conflict segment.
The data has been collected tested and reported through primary and secondary sources. First hand information regarding the respondents was collected in the form of questionnaires. Different and related literature support was gathered for this study about this research. The pilot testing was done with 50 respondents. Pilot testing was done prior to set appropriate scales questions has been modified in the questionnaire to meet the criteria of the reliability.
Variables for the study
The independent variable identified for the study is the dependents namely the number of dependents and the dependent variable is the role conflict. The respondents were grouped into three segments using cluster analysis. These segments were further used for analysis on the independent variables.
The set of statements used for measuring the role conflict was used in the study. The validity was tested using the content validity and construct validity. The reliability measure was tested using the cronbach alpha. Three dimensions of role conflict namely the time strain and behavior was made use of in the study.
A random sampling technique was incorporated and in particular judgmental sampling technique through mall intercepts method has been deployed to collect the sample. The IT industry was selected for this study. Women married and unmarried working at IT firms in India were selected as the sampling unit. The distribution of questionnaires was 1000 out of which 598 were fit for testing analysis.
Validity and Reliability
Cronbach alpha was used to check the reliability. The following are the alpha values for respective scales that have satisfied the minimum requirement of 0.8. Work Family Conflict: 0.923
Table 1: Total Number of Dependents
###Four and Above###31###5.2
The number of dependents refers to a non earning member in the family other than the children. Majority of the respondents have two dependents and the next highest percentage is having one dependent. Families having three or more dependents are considerably less.
Table 2: Number of Dependents
###No. of Dependents
From the correspondent table it is evident that those respondents who are having two dependents in the family form the majority in the high conflict segment followed by three dependents same is the case with the moderate conflict segment more of respondents fall in the moderate conflict segment even when the number of dependents increases. The least number of three as well as four and above dependent group fall in the no conflict and high conflict segment respectively.
The correspondent chart depicts the high conflict segment is associated only with the two dependent group the moderate conflict segment with four and above and the respondents with no dependents have no association with any of the conflict segments.
Results and Discussion
There were several studies carried out to explain the impact of dependents on the role conflict of employed women (Netemeyer Boles and McMurrian 1996; Thomas and Ganster 1995). As mentioned earlier a non earning member in the family other than the children can be referred to as dependent.
It is more complicated when the dependent is old and sick and always requires the attention of the another person for their daily activities. From the study it is evident that role conflict varies according to the number of dependents. The respondents were grouped into high conflict moderate conflict and no conflict segments. It is found that respondents with two dependents constitute the majority of the high conflict segment.
The conflict that arises because of one dependent is comparatively less than the conflict that arises due to two dependents.
The number of dependents is totally a new perspective as a cause of role conflict. But in any case it cannot be concluded that a number of dependents and role conflict are directly proportional. It does not prove that increase in the number of dependents leads to increase in the role conflict.
Thus the above Quantitative analysis and its Interpretation derives conclusive discussion on the nature and the intensity of the relationship between the number of dependents and its impact on the Work Life Conflict of Women Employees in IT Sector.
Bedeian A. G. Burke B. G. and Moffett R. G. (1988).Outcomes of work family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of Management 14(3) 475- 491.
Coser L. (1974). Greedy institutions. New York: Free Press.Duxbury L. Higgins C. and Lee C. (1994). Work-family conflict: A comparison by gender family type and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues 15 449466.
Edwards J. R. and Rothbard N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review 25 178199.
Frone M. R. Russell M. and Cooper M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 6578.
Frone M. R. Yardley J. K. and Markel K.S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior 50 145-167.
Good L. K. Page T. J. and Young C. E. (1996). Assessing Hierarchical differences in job- related attitudes and turnover among retail managers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (2) 148-156.
Grandey A. A. and Cropanzano R. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work-family conflict and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior 54 350-370.
Greenhaus J. H. and Beutell N. J. (1985). Sources and conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review 10 76-88. Greenhaus J. H. and Parasuraman S. (1999). Research on work family and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.) Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Kelly R. F. and Voydanoff P. (1985). Work/family strain among employed parents. Family Relations 34 367-374.
Kinnunen U. and Mauno S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations 51 157177.
Kopelman R. E. Greehaus J. H. and Connolly T. F. (1983). A model of work family and interrrole conflict: A construct validity study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processed 32198-215.
Lambert S. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations 43(3) 239257.
Marks S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy time and commitment. American Sociological Review 42 921936.
McBride A. B. (1990). A mental health effect of women's multiple roles. American Psychologist 45 381-384.
Netemeyer R. G. Boles J. S. and McMurrian R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(4) 400-410.
Repetti R. (1998). Multiple roles. In E. Blechman and K. Brownwell (Eds.) Behavioral medicine and women: A comprehensive handbook. New York: The Gulidford Press.
Russo N. (1990). Forging research priorities for women's mental health. American Psychologist 45 368-373.
Staines G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and non-work. Human Relations 33 111129.
Thomas L. T. and Ganster D. C. (1995). Impact of Family-Supportive Work Variables on WorkFamily Conflict and Strain: A Control Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (1) 6-15.Voydanoff P. (1988). Work and Family .In Elizabeth B. Goldsmith (ed) Work and Family: Theory Research and Applications. Newbury ParkCa: Sage Publications.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The South Asian Journal of Management Sciences|
|Date:||Dec 31, 2011|
|Previous Article:||Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Attitude towards Science.|
|Next Article:||An Application of GARCH while investigating volatility in stock returns of the World.|