Printer Friendly

The Fascist Nature of Neoliberalism.

Andrea Micocci, Flavia Di Mario

London: Routledge, 2017, 94 pp.

978-1-351-25118-1

If one agrees with the rather enticing idea that Hayek's ideology pamphlet The Road to Serfdom (1944) is one of the ur-texts of neoliberalism, then neoliberalism was indeed invented during the dying days of German Nazism and Italian fascism. In the foreword to their short book on The Fascist Nature of Neoliberalism, the authors Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario write 'We are going to argue that capitalism, in its latest, neoliberal, version, is not what liberal and communist thinkers alike thought it would become. Instead, it has some telling characteristics that make it similar, in fact, to what fascist and Catholic/Christian political movements have dreamt' of (p. vii). Their book comes with the idea that neoliberalism has 'transmogrified into a new fascist militia' (p. viii). The authors make this statement even though there are no longer any Italian style black-shirts (Fasci Italiani di Combattimento) or German style brown-shirts (SA and later SS, dressed in black) roaming the streets rounding up Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, trade unionists, communists, socialists, anarchists, progressive academics, democrats and the like.

Despite the rather obvious lack of the present-day fascist brutalities, the authors say there is a 'spirit of capitalism [that] is fascism' (p. ix). And indeed, capitalism never contradicted German Nazism or Italian fascism. It has not contradicted any other form of right-wing authoritarianism, ranging from Spain's Franco and Chile's Pinochet to Liberia's Charles Taylor. With this brief outline of their core argument, namely, that neoliberalism is similar to fascism, Micocci and Di Mario's booklet of just 94 pages begins. On neoliberalism, the authors emphasise seven key points (p. 2):

1. fascism and capitalism...imply an organic society;

2. trade unions that are fought and repressed until they are tamed into a corporatist structure and strategy;

3. a role for a social/socialised ethics and even a business ethics that is sought and even (in some historical periods) surprisingly found;

4. war as a means to resolve thorny international relations issues;

5. horror towards forms of sociality that are not based on the standard capitalist state;

6. the perception of the 'other' as either a threat or an ally; and

7. a tension between politics and the economy, easy to brand as an efficiency problem.

Germany's Nazis called the first point on Micocci and Di Mario's list Volksgemeinschaft--a racially purified community. Capitalism and contemporary neoliberalism seek quite a different society compared to Germany's racial nightmare and 'the fascist dictatorship of the bourgeoisie' (Sohn-Rethel 1978:70). Neoliberalism's society is based on rampant consumerism with engineered and homogeneous mass taste. In mass consumerism with supporting mass media, everyone is made to know Coca Cola, IKEA and Toyota. Neoliberalism's global ideology not only supports homogenous mass taste, it also presents some organisations that fall within their prescribed ideology as acceptable. At the same time, neoliberalism seeks to undermine others, such as, for example, socialist and social-democratic parties as well as trade unions. Indeed, neoliberalism fights trade unions under its stated goal that 'the union should be eliminated' (p. 75). The deliberately engineered decline of trade unions--the only workplace organisation representing democracy--is not seen to be unethical by a non-democratic but deeply ideological actor, namely, neoliberalism. Meanwhile, business ethics has become a pure ideology, not only justifying neoliberalism and business attacks on trade unions, but also camouflaging corporate criminality and environmental vandalism on a global scale (Klikauer 2017).

Given the prevalence of Eisenhower's military-industrial complex, neoliberalism still drives wars and global aggression (Klein 2007). To mask many of neoliberalism's evils, it welcomes populism (e.g. Donald Trump, USA; Nigel Farage, UK; Viktor Orban, Hungary, etc.). Under populism, the other is presented as an outcast. Seeking to eliminate class politics, contemporary European right-wing populism feeds on presenting the other--refugees and migrants--as dangerous. Lastly, there are inherent tensions between politics (a populace's quest for social welfare, public schools, hospitals, etc.) and economics including an unbridled free market and what Mandell once called The Privatization of Everything (2002). Neoliberalism conceals its own contradictions as efficiency problems. Such problems are increasingly 'solved' through authoritarian means.

Much of this process is designed to create an 'intellectual homogenisation of the individual' (p. 6). In short, rafts of people--including entire economics departments in universities--have been made to subscribe to neoliberalism's global free market ideology. The power of neoliberal hegemony also supplies a general logic...for...pigeon-holing anything that might come forth' (p. 7). Beyond that, neoliberalism's 'organic societies, to take a typical fascist dream [also means] that no revolution is possible' (p. 11). Neoliberalism presents this as TINA--there is no alternative. The authors argue that 'in the metaphysics of capitalism, perfect freedom and perfect deception overlap. This we call fascism' (p. 16). Under fascism and Nazism, there were next to no freedoms and definitely no elections. By contrast, today's highly engineered and corporate mass media-driven election spectacles have been reduced to system-stabilising choices--Coke-vs.-Pepsi, Republicans-vs.-Democrats, Labour-vs.-Tories, and so on. Voting under neoliberalism often means not much more than one 'hierarchy...replaces another hierarchy' (p. 19). Just as George Orwell once said,
from the point of view of the low,
no historic change has ever meant much more
than a change in the name of their masters.


Perhaps what goes for fascism also goes for neoliberalism: 'fascism not simply had an ideology, it had ideas...fascism endowed itself with a set of practical ideas for practical politics' (p. 24). Indeed, neoliberalism has an ideology and it has ideas. In the case of fascism, the age-old propaganda still works: fascism made trains run on time--the trains to Auschwitz in the case of Nazi-Germany, for example. Neoliberalism's 'practical ideas for practical politics' are, for example, lowering unemployment. Neoliberalism does this largely by creating the working poor and what Guy Standing (2014) calls the precariat. These lower the statistics of unemployment--not unemployment and under-employment. It creates a favourable media image of neoliberalism. Neoliberalism also claims to have practical solutions for global warming, changing light bulbs, for example. What we are facing under neoliberal capitalism has been descried by Wallace-Wells so magnificently: the coming of the Uninhabitable Earth (2017). What we are engaged in is a bit like the overpaid CEO in his corporate jet dropping a teabag into a recycling bin while saying I do my bit!

In capitalism and neoliberalism, as in fascism, 'production must nonetheless remain in private hands, while wages must be elastic. The government intervenes in production only when private initiative fails' (p. 27). The neoliberal term elastic is the euphemism for wage stagnation and their actual wage reduction--a problem recognised even by the otherwise staunchly neoliberal IMF some time ago (Jaumotte & Buitron 2015). Like capitalism and neoliberalism, 'fascism was, and is, a mass phenomenon' (p. 30). Neoliberalism is somewhat similar albeit without having created a mass movement. Like fascism, capitalism and neoliberalism need the masses (Le Bon 1896)--just not as a fascist mass political movement, but as depoliticised mass consumers.

Without Fordist mass-production and mass-consumerism there is no neoliberalism. Beyond that, Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario argue that neoliberalism depends 'on ten nebulous points: fiscal discipline, public expenditure, fiscal reform, financial liberalisation, competitive exchange rates, liberalisation of trade, foreign direct investment, privatisation, deregulation, and property rights' (p. 36). This leads to one of the key arguments of the book: neoliberalism works in 'authoritarian and democratic regimes...whether there is the presence of a dictator or of a democratic regime, neoliberal actions can be adopted [as shown by] the dictatorship of Pinochet in Chile and the Bush administrations' (p. 40). Neoliberalism can (!) or perhaps has to live with democracy--fascism can not.

Like fascism, 'neoliberalism is not a set of economic policies but a new and more effective technology of power' (p. 41). While neoliberalism may enjoy power, fascism is all about power. Indeed, Neoliberalism uses its power--not directly like fascism--but indirectly, shaping political power through its ideology. As a result, it seeks to get its political parties into power while remaining in the background, working as an hegemonic ideology (Mirowski & Plehwe2015). Once in power, 'domestic and international brutalities are a characterising factor of neoliberalism' (p. 46). This, of course extends into workplaces.

Hence, there is a 'link between neoliberalism and Managerialism' (p. 52). Under the formula of 'management + ideology + expansion = Managerialism' (p. 54), Managerialism infiltrates many previously non-managerial areas (schools, hospitals, universities, etc.). It relentlessly enforces managerial concepts such as performance management and KPIs into every eventuality of workplaces. Beyond that, Managerialism turns human beings into human resources or what Michael Pool calls 'Menschenmaterial'--human material (p. 58).

Both inside workplaces driven by Managerialism and outside, where society is driven by neoliberalism, the guiding motto has become 'credere, obbedire, combattere' (p. 64).--believe, obey, combat. Neoliberalism makes you believe in the so-called free market; obey its unseen and increasingly brutal forces; and combat rising job insecurity, stagnating and falling wages and your colleagues who are set against you in an eternal workplace battle for promotions, bonuses, and so-called personal advancement (Schrijvers 2004; James 2013). Credere, obbedire, combattere was the motto of Benito Mussolini. Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario conclude by saying 'people in power and their lackeys can only...stick to the neoliberal policies that increase inequalities while increasing the grip of the state over the economy and politics' (p. 72).

While Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario make several strong arguments for their 'fascism-equals-neoliberalism' claim, their little book also encounters three problems: a linguistic problem, a conceptual problem and an historical problem. The least serious problem is the linguistic problem. Neither fascism nor neoliberalism has a nature as the title of the book says. Fascism and neoliberalism are not natural. Instead, they are man-made inventions--created mostly by men. The second problem is conceptual in character. In many ways, the concept of neoliberalism and the concept of fascism do not match even though parts of both may overlap. Contemporary neoliberal societies are not fascist societies. Unlike Italian fascism and German Nazism, democracy allows you to change government, to leave neoliberalism behind and to move towards another politics. Changes can also be made in the sphere of political economy. According to the Economist's Democracy Index, Norway, Iceland, Sweden and New Zealand, for example, are democracies, These countries are not the same as Italy in 1929 or Germany in 1939. In short, neoliberalism can live with democracy--fascism can not.

Digging deeper into the conceptual problem, one discovers even more problems. The next conceptual problem engages with an Italian, a compatriot of the authors of the book, namely, the Italian writer and philosopher Umberto Eco. Eco (1995) outlined fourteen conceptual elements that together create fascism. Recently, Eco's fourteen elements have been applied to Germany's new right-wing and to Donald Trump (Klikauer 2018, Berry (2016). Berry concludes--correctly--that Donald Trump is not a fascist. Trump may very well be racist, a conman and a cheat (ABC-News 2019) but he is not a fascist. Trump is not the new Adolf Hitler of the USA. And he is no way a new Benito Mussolini even though Trump may be as pompous as Mussolini. Finally, fascism and Nazism do not have mid-term elections to the US Congress (6th November 2018). Instead, fascism has Auschwitz.

The next drawback is the problem of history. Neoliberalism's economic policies cannot be equated with fascism's economic policies (Baker 2006). Neoliberalism is not about 'self-sufficiency and war [nor is it about] autarky' (Baker 2006:227). Neoliberalism may welcome war and even encourage warfare (Klein 2007), but its entire economic system is not geared toward war-making. War-making was the focus in Italy and was even more so in the case of Nazi Germany. In addition, 'fascism represents crisis capitalism with a cudgel' (Baker 2006:228) in the form of marauding, beating and torturing brown-shirt thugs (Italy) and the SA (Germany). Neoliberalism simply does not have that. The Italian and German police forces are not even close to fascist thugs and Hitler's SA.

Fascism also prefers the well organised and ideologically confined homo corporativus while neoliberalism fancies the homo economicus (Baker 2006:234). The latter clings to the hallucination of a rational choice driven by cost-benefit analysis and hyper-individualism. Perhaps one of the key differences between neoliberalism and fascism is what Buchheim and Schemer (2006:411) call a 'state-directed private ownership economy'. While neoliberalism would definitely agree with the private ownership economy, neoliberalism will very strongly reject such a state-directed economy (Buchheim & Scherner 2006:411). In short, 'capital, remains, as ever, private' (Sohn-Rethel 1978:129). If neoliberalism could, it would almost abolish the state or reduce it to a night watchman state. By comparison, fascism likes the strong and all-controlling uber-state run by the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento (Italy) and in Germany by the Kapo, the Blockwart, and the Ubermensch--the racially superior Aryan.

On the plus side, Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario are correct in identifying the many similarities between fascism and neoliberalism. A deeper engagement with the historical evidence for both--fascism and neoliberalism--would have enhanced the book. In the same way, a constructive engagement with their Italian counterpart Umberto Eco would have also improved the book. Despite these shortcomings, Andrea Micocci and Flavia Di Mario's booklet remains an insightful and exquisite discussion of neoliberalism.

REFERENCES

ABC-News (2019). Cohen to Congress: Trump is a 'racist,' 'conman' and a 'cheat' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4nMBiqp87k, 27th February 2019, accessed: 5th March 2019).

Baker, D. (2006). The political economy of fascism: Myth or reality, or myth and reality? New Political Economy, 11(2), 227-250.

Berry, L. (2016). Umberto Eco on Donald Trump: 14 ways of looking at a fascist. Literary Hub (https://lithub.com, 29th February 2016, accessed: 5th March 2019).

Buchheim, C., & Scherner, J. (2006). The role of private property in the Nazi economy: The case of industry. Journal of Economic History, 66(2), 390-416.

Eco, U. (1995). Ur-Fascism, New York Review of Books, 22nd June (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/, accessed: 5th March 2019).

Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: G. Routledge & Sons.

James, O. (2013). Office politics: How to thrive in a world of lying, backstabbing and dirty tricks. New York: Random House.

Jaumotte, F., & Buitron, C. O. (2015). Power from the people. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books.

Klikauer, T. (2017). Business ethics as ideology? Critique, 45(1/2), 81-100.

Klikauer, T. (2018). Umberto Eco and Germany's New Fascism (https://www.counter-punch.org, 23rd February 2018, accessed: 5th March 2019).

Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd--A study of the popular mind. London: Unwin.

Mandell, B. (2002). The privatization of everything. New Politics, 9(1), 83-100.

Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (eds.) (2015). The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schrijvers, J. (2004). The way of the rat--A survival guide to office politics. London: Cyan Books.

Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978). Economy and class structure of German fascism. London: CSE Books.

Standing, G. (2014). The Precariat--The new dangerous class. Amalgam, 6(6/7), 115-119.

Reviewed by

Thomas Klikauer (Western Sydney University) and

Kathleen Webb Tunney (University of Wisconsin--Madison)

Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.
COPYRIGHT 2019 Addleton Academic Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Klikauer, Thomas
Publication:Knowledge Cultures
Geographic Code:4EUUK
Date:Jul 1, 2019
Words:2535
Previous Article:THE DISCIPLINE OF THE GAZE: SELF-TECHNOLOGY AND IDOL TRAINEES.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters