The Experience of Landscape.
For the new reader, as well as the original still relevant material there remains the tedious repetitiousness of Appleton's effort to scientifically prove a simplistic prospect-refuge theory by endlessly applying it to landscape paintings of different eras. For the old reader, familiar with the argument, only the last chapter is relevant. And yet, here was an opportunity to edit, relate and flesh-out the original prospect-refuge and habitat theory in line with his contemporary thinking.
Appleton's objective was and is to formulate a 'unifying theory of environmental aesthetics'. The argument equating 'an inherited basis of behaviour which originally evolved to ensure [our] survival' with landscape preference and experience is apt, but to simultaneously equate it with aesthetics and the beautiful is grossly over-simplistic.
That the original work was valuable in bringing together the thinking of different disciplines to throw new light on an as yet unresolved question, and that it is of importance particularly to the landscape designer, cannot be disputed. In addition, this revision should be particularly relevant to the historian and philosopher, documenting the changing formulation of anthropological ideas.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The Architectural Review|
|Article Type:||Book Review|
|Date:||Feb 1, 1997|
|Previous Article:||Architectural Colour in British Interiors 1615-1840 and Interior House-Painting Colours and Technology 1615-1840.|
|Next Article:||Lutyens and the Edwardians.|