Printer Friendly

The 1993 Soft*Letter Leadership Scorecard.

Last year, we launched our first annual "Leadership Scorecard"--a special issue that gave Soft-letter readers a chance to grade the industry's ten largest companies on such qualities as management, technology, customer service, and marketing.

Now we're back to take a new look at how these top companies fared in 1993. We're also expanding our rankings this year to include a total of 17 companies, all of which play a major role in the PC software marketplace. And, again, we'd like you to share your thoughts about the leadership qualities of these firms.

Naturally, the ratings you give will be completely anonymous (though we've randomly coded the forms to prevent anyone from stuffing the ballot box). The deadline for returning the survey forms is November 30; a tally of results, with commentary, will appear in Soft*letter in early December.

So please take a few moments to fill out the form on the back of this letter and send it back to us. We value your opinion as an industry insider, and we look forward to hearing from you!

Regards,

Jeffrey Tarter

editor & publisher
COPYRIGHT 1993 Soft-letter
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:survey of computer software industry leadership
Publication:Soft-Letter
Date:Oct 22, 1993
Words:184
Previous Article:Process reengineering: Stac's new support model.
Next Article:Microsoft unveils a new consumer strategy.


Related Articles
The 1990 Soft-letter 100.
The 1992 Soft*Letter leadership scorecard.
The 1993 Soft-Letter executive compensation survey.
Postscript.
The 1993 Soft*Letter Leadership Scorecard.
Trade press coverage.
Benchmark: print advertising costs.
Postscript.
The 1994 leadership scorecard.
The 1995 Soft-Letter 100.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters