Printer Friendly

The (Balanchine) debate rages on.

In response to your lively and laudably wide-ranging interchange on the influence of Balanchine today ("Are We Overdosing on Balanchine?" Jan.):

After our common pro forma genuflection before Balanchine (which being pro forma makes it no less sincere), it seems self-evident that a like-minded group of former dancers, administrators, foundation executives, and critics has stifled alternatives to Balanchine in the name of a sometimes pedantic, even hysterical fidelity to their own youthful memories. There's a lot of meretricious new choreography, but America has missed out on too much innovative ballet and modern dance. You don't have to be a latter-day Balanchine loyalist to be close-minded (see Peter Boal as a sterling counter-example). But it sometimes seems to help.

John Rockwell


I liked the Balanchine argument (which I found via Twitter). I feel like we are doing so many other things at Stuttgart that I miss doing a lot of Balanchine! I can understand how the U.S. may need to take a little break to explore some other exciting stuff, but here I would love to have at least one juicy Balanchine per season.

Evan McKie

Stuttgart Ballet


COPYRIGHT 2010 Dance Magazine, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:letters
Author:Rockwell, John; McKie, Evan
Publication:Dance Magazine
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Apr 1, 2010
Previous Article:Persistence is key.
Next Article:Koresh goes Gaga.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters