Printer Friendly

Territorial hypothesis predicts the trade-off between reproductive opportunities and parental care in three species of damselfishes (Pomacentridae: Actinopterygii)/La hipotesis territorial predice la compensacion entre las oportunidades reproductivas y el cuidado parental en tres especies de peces damisela (Pomacentridae: Actinopterygii).

INTRODUCTION

Reproduction is the final target of any organism. It is through reproduction that the organism passes away its genetic information to keep present in the gene pool of its population. Despite of that, to reproduce is useless if the offspring itself does not reach the reproductive age, what may demand parental care. This behavior brings many costs and a trade-off between reproducing and taking care of the offspring is expected (Clutton-Brock, 1991). Parental care is usually accomplished by females, since they benefit more from the energy invested in the offspring than males (Queller, 1997), although, in many cases males exert this (Ridley, 1978).

There are various explanations for why males care for their offspring (Wright, 1998). Williams (1975) provided one of the most convincing explanations. He suggests that prolonged paternal care will evolve when males already defend territories including a rare spawning site to attract females as a resource defence polygyny (Emlem & Oring, 1977). The presence of eggs is also supposed to attract more females (Manica, 2010). Birds and fishes are especially prone to paternal care (Ridley, 1978); among them coral reef damselfishes are known to be devote fathers (Breder & Rosen, 1966).

The Pomacentridae family (damselfishes) belongs to suborder Labroidei, Perciformes, Actinopterygii (Nelson, 1994). They are divided in 28 genera and 384 species (Froese & Pauly, 2011) distributed through all the tropical oceans. Restricted to shallow regions with hard substrate, their main region of diversity is the South Pacific Ocean. In Brazil four genera and 14 species are known (Moura & Menezes, 2003). These species are explored for aquarium trade, from January 1995 to November 2000 a total of 6.800 individuals were traded in Ceara state (Monteiro-Neto et al., 2003). The present study focused three of the most frequent species in Sao Paulo State northern coast (Menezes & Figueiredo, 1985): Abudefduf saxatilis, Stegastes fuscus and Chromis multilineata. These species form territories in at least part of the reproductive season; males court females, fecundate the eggs and guard them. How long the paternal care lasts, what is guarded in the territory and what kind of substrate is used for spawning varies between species (Emery, 1973).

Although Williams (1975) explains most of the parental care in fishes, it is not known to explain the variation in paternal effort in pomacentrids. This paper aims to compare A. saxatilis, S. fuscus and C. multilineata, and then define what aspects of their biology may explain how much males care for their offspring. For that we test the following predictions drawn from territorial hypothesis: (1) female should be iteroparous, (2) females should forage and feed more than guarding males, (3) time budget dedicated to territoriality should not change from territorial to parental males, (4) egg-clutches should be easily spotted, (5) egg-clutches should be placed on rare defendable resources.

Iteroparity is expected since females will not benefit from paternal males if they cannot, ecologically or physiologically, lay multiple clutches per breading season (Tallamy, 2000). The second prediction is based on the idea that, by feeding more, females will increase their fecundities; this was reviewed by Armstrong & Witthames (2011). If taking care of an empty territory or one filled with eggs takes the same amount of time and offspring survival is greatly enhanced by parental care, then, we may expect that paternal care will occur, what takes us to prediction three. The fourth prediction that clutches will be easily seen has two consequences; it may be easily seen and evaluated by a female searching for a good father to deliver her eggs to (Sikkel, 1995), albeit it may also result in being easily spotted by a visual oriented egg predator, common on reefs (LoweMcConnell, 1999). Finally, territoriality will only occur when a resource for which animals would compete has an aggregated pattern of distribution (Wilson, 2000), thus, a territorial explanation for paternal care requires first that the parents are territorials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site

The present study was carried out in Sao Sebastiao and Ilhabela, northern shore of Sao Paulo, Brazil (23[degrees]49[degrees]S, 45[degrees]25'W). The region is characterized by the presence of Sao Sebastiao Channel and by its predominantly rocky shore, most of which is covered with algae, soft corals and sponges. Sao Sebastiao Island represents an obstacle for winds and more energetic events, with less turbulent water inside the channel.

Collects and fecundity analysis

Seventeen mature Abudefduf saxatilis females were collected with hook and bait and killed with benzocaine at 100 ppm for 20 min, animals were then injected with formalin at 10%. They were dissected and gonads were submitted to histology. We used haematoxylin-eosin (HE) method with the gonads included in paraffin and cut in 5 [micro]m slices. Only one female of Stegastes fuscus and no Chromis multilineata were collected. The same treatment given to A. saxatilis was done to S. fuscus but further data for C. multilineata and S. fuscus iteroparity were taken from literature (Myrberg et al., 1967; Souza et al., 2007). Observing how distended the visiting females' abdomens were after they left the nest, as commonly used in aquaculture (Woynarovich, 1989), offered an indirect and complementary approach to the presence of iteroparous females in the study area.

Observation

We did 114 h of SCUBA diving in a mean depth of 4 m during day time from November 2002 to February 2003, including finding individuals, nest marking, acclimatation period, evaluating algae coverage and egg location (for C. multilineata). Observed individuals were standardized for size (A. saxatilis ~150 mm, S. fuscus ~130, C. multilineata ~110 mm). Observations started after a 5 min acclimation interval.

We began by doing an ethogram listing and describing all the behaviors of interest with ad libitum method (Martin & Bateson, 2007). Meanwhile we also checked where eggs were placed and how easily seen they were. Nests were marked with a coloured buoy anchored to the bottom by a fishing weight and accompanied four times a day to evaluate parent desertion and egg hatching.

We than did 15 min sessions using focal animal with instant samples every 30 s (Martin & Bateson, 2007) measuring the frequency of each behavior. Underwater notes were taken with soft pencils on polyethylene waterproof sheets with tables printed in laser printers. Focal animals were identified by species, life stage (with or without eggs) and sex.

Abudefduf saxatilis may be sexed by its color and behavior (males are bluish and guard a territory). Male and female Stegastes fuscus were identified by accompanying a marked nest previously filled with eggs (Since only males guard the eggs; Souza et al., 2007) or by their courting behavior. Chromis multilineata could be sexed by the presence of a swallowed genital papilla in females (Myrberg et al., 1967; Swerdloff, 1970).

Data analysis

An analysis of similarity using Euclidian distance (ANOSIM) (Costa et al., 2010) was used to compare the behaviors of the three species with 1000 permutations. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to order the sampled individuals by the number of observations of each behavior (Manly, 2008) . A Mann-Whitney sum of ranks test (Zar, 1999) checked the difference in the time spent foraging between males and females within each species due to the heterocedastic nature of the data. Following, a t-test (Zar, 1999) compared the time dedicated to territoriality between males guarding territories with or without eggs, since these data were normally distributed. Type I error tolerance was [alpha] = 0.05.

RESULTS

Fourteen behaviors were observed (Table 1), although, they varied greatly among the three species (ANOSIM = 0.6248; N = 300; P < 0.001). Abudefduf saxatilis and Stegastes fuscus behave more similarly than Chromis multilineata. This may be observed both in the PCA (Fig. 1), where these two species overlay while C. multilineata is concentrated on the left of axis 2, and in the barplot (Fig. 2), where the frequency of the main behaviors are similar for A. saxatilis and S. fuscus, but differ from C. multilineata. The PCA pointed that the vectors 'guarding' and 'fanning' ordered A. saxatilis and S. fuscus, while 'feeding' and 'foraging' influenced C. multilineata (Fig. 1). The first and second axis explained 80.2% of the data dispersal.

Female Abudefduf saxatilis presented multiple spawning with oocytes ready to be delivered and atretic follicles in their ovaries in the 17 collected females. The single mature female of Stegastes fuscus collected also presented atretic follicles and mature eggs, suggesting multiple spawnings. Furthermore, the remaining turgid abdomens seen on females leaving the nest site may be due to oocytes still available for future mates.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Females of A. saxatilis and S. fuscus, but not C. multilineata, spend more time foraging and feeding than males (Table 2). Males of A. saxatilis fed almost five times less than females, while S. fuscus males forage just about 39% less. This time budget is directed to other activities such as territoriality and parental care, while females certainly increase energy intake. Chromis multilineata males foraged just a little less than females (15%).

The same happened with time invested in territory defence before and after eggs were delivered to the territorial male. A. saxatilis and S. fuscus males spend the same time budget on territory defence with or without eggs (less than 40% increase for A. saxatilis and about 35% decrease for S. fuscus), but the investment in territory defence by C. multilineata raised significantly (more than 10-fold) for the short time these males held their territories (Table 3).

A. saxatilis and S. fuscus spawn on clear rock surfaces kept by their mates in the territory. A. saxatilis clutches are purple patches of eggs of around 250 [cm.sup.2] adhered to rocky surfaces in the territory of a male. The eggs of S. fuscus form white elliptic clutches of around 200 [cm.sup.2]. Both these species have to build their nests clearing rock areas with their teeth. C. multilineata eggs are cryptic and disperse amid Sargassum tuffs (see Fig. 3 in Myrberg et al., 1967). This alga is abundant and widely spread on the rocky shores of Sao Paulo northern coast.

DISCUSSION

Pomacentrid males invest their time and energy in parental care. Parental care in Abudefduf saxatilis and Stegastes fuscus lasts until the larvae hatch, parents defend offspring from predators, fan and clean the eggs. These two species agree in every aspect with the general pattern suggested for pomacentrids by Breder & Rosen (1966) and Balon (1975). They present nuptial color (A. saxatilis) or no secondary sex character (S. fuscus), mate in pairs, spawn demersal adhesive eggs on rocks, which will be guarded and fanned by the male. Both are egg-guarders who belong to the nesting sub-guild and are litophyles. On the other hand, Chromis multilineata, despite showing no colour dimorphism, mating in pairs and spawning demersal adhesive eggs, does not guard the eggs for more than a few hours, hiding them amid Sargassum banks in Sao Paulo coast, disagreeing markedly from previous classifications of Pomacentridae.

Since parental care is probably a characteristic inherited from their sister-group, Cichlidae, and C. multilineata is a derived taxon within Pomacentridae (Cooper et al., 2009), its lack of paternal behavior is probably a secondary loss within Pomacentridae. If so, what are the possible causes for this loss? The predictions drawn from the classic book of Williams (1975) have pointed us some cues.

The first prediction suggested that, for paternal care to evolve, females should be iteroparous, so that they may benefit from guarding males (Tallamy, 2000). Results confirmed iteroparity in A. saxatilis and S. fuscus (presence of atretic follicles in fertile females), while abdominal turgidity suggested the same for all the three species. This was already expected from other studies (Myrberg et al., 1967 for C. multilineata; Bessa et al., 2007 for A. saxatilis; and Souza et al., 2007 for S. fuscus); what confirms the first prediction for all the three species.

Our second prediction, that females were expected to forage and feed more than males, was proven only for the two paternal species. Males of C. multilineata forage as much as females. This extra feeding time females have may be converted in more numerous or larger eggs (Tsadik & Bart, 2007), increasing both the fitness of females and males that reproduced with them through indirect fitness (Donelson et al., 2008).

Time invested in territory defence did not increase for A. saxatilis and S. fuscus (prediction 3), but rose significantly for C. multilineata. Both sexes of the latter species can forage equally because neither spends time on territory defence. This will only change when males start courting females, moment when their territorial behavior increases. Other species from the genus Chromis have been described as territorials and paternal (Fishelson, 1970; Tzioumis & Kingsford, 1999). Even C. multilineata, in reefs where Sargassum were less abundant, defended algae tuffs and guarded them after spawning (Myrberg et al., 1967). It is important to mention that S. fuscus territoriality is similar to A. saxatilis' during the reproductive period only. This species will stay guarding a territory for its feeding value (algae garden) in the cold months of the year, while male A. saxatilis have left their territories and spend the time foraging in the water column.

The easily seen eggs of A. saxatilis and S. fuscus confirmed prediction four. This will allow females to use it to choose partners. Clutches were much more conspicuous in the two former species and egg condition is known to be a cue for male quality (Sikkel, 1995; Manica, 2010). In C. multilineata a series of female visits to a male nest were described to happen one after the other in a short interval (Myrberg et al., 1967), what we also observed in Sao Paulo. Therefore, eggs are probably not used by females to choose partners and paternal care is less interesting in terms of sexual selection. C. Chromis multilineata females probably use more cues from the male than from eggs he would be guarding.

The same conspicuous clutches that attract females can be spotted by visually oriented predators, increasing the need for nest protection. Some common visually oriented egg predators found in Sao Paulo rocky shores are Abudefduf saxatilis, Chaetodon striatus and Diplodus argenteus (Randall, 1967), amid many others.

Rare nest sites distributed in patches are a defendable resource to be guarded in territories (Maher & Lott, 1995). Our last prediction suggests that paternal males are supposed to be territorials since before reproductive period. Territorial males will have to spend time guarding a territory as much as they will spend on defending its offspring, reducing the costs of paternal care and, thus, explaining the evolution of this kind of sex role reversal. As long as A. saxatilis has to guard the clear rock nest he built and S. fuscus has the nest and an algae garden to guard in its territory, the extra cost driven to parental care is paid by the benefits of enhancing offspring survival. Since in rocky shores with large Sargassum banks covering up to 80% of the substrate, a common situation in Sao Paulo coast (Paula & Oliveira-Filho, 1980), algae tuffs are not a rare resource distributed in patches. It is less

likely that C. multilineata will develop territoriality for guarding this nest site, augmenting the costs of parental care by the male.

We conclude that the variation in male parental care in the pomacentrids of Sao Paulo northern coast is explained by the territorial hypothesis, mainly in accordance to the availability of nest sites and the need to guard it as a scarce resource.

DOI: 10.3856/vol40-issue1-fulltext-13

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the financial support of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, CNPq (process No. 130812/2002-1) and Coordenadoria de Pessoal de Nivel Superior through the program of research support, PROAP-CAPES; also the Centro de Biologia Marinha of Universidade de Sao Paulo, CEBIMar-USP, for logistic support. Further thanks are due to two anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions, Flavia Krauss and Judy Finlayson for Spanish and English review, respectively. EB thanks Jose Renato Leite for his continuous support and Ana Maria de Souza for supervision. JS is fellow of CNPq (process 306169/2008-8).

REFERENCES

Armstrong, M.J. & P.R. Witthames. 2011. Developments in understanding of fecundity of fish stocks in relation to egg production methods for estimating spawning stock biomass. Fish. Res. (in press).

Balon, E.K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32(6): 821-863.

Bessa, E., J.F. Dias & A.M. Souza. 2007. Rare data on a rocky shore fish reproductive biology: sex ratio, length of first maturation and spawning period of Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus, 1758) with notes on Stegastes variabilis spawning period (Perciformes: Pomacentridae) in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Braz. J. Oceanogr., 55: 199-206.

Breder Jr., C.M. & D.E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes: how fish breed. TFH Publications, Jersey City, 941 pp.

Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1991. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 368 pp.

Cooper, W.J., L.L. Smith & M.W. Westneat. 2009. Exploring the radiation of a diverse reef fish family: Phylogenetics of the damselfishes (Pomacentridae), with new classifications based on molecular analyses of all genera. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 52: 1-16.

Costa, D.A., L.C.G. Vieira, L.C.F. Silva, R.A. Carvalho, M.V.C. Vital, G.F. Lima-Filho, A.V.T. Silveira & B.B. Santos. 2010. Metodos para comparacao de comunidades: um estudo da fauna de invertebrados de duas areas da regiao metropolitana de Goiania. Estudos, 37(2): 369-379.

Donelson, J.M., M.I. Mc Cormick & P.L. Munday. 2008. Parental condition affects early life-history of a coral reef fish. J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 360: 109-116.

Emery, A.R. 1973. Comparative ecology and functional osteology of fourteen species of the damselfish (Pisces: Pomacentridae) at Alligator Reef, Florida Keys. Bul. Mar. Sci., 23: 649-770.

Emlem, S.T., & L.W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197: 215-223.

Fishelson, L. 1970. Behavioral observations on eniwetok damselfishes (Pomacentridae: Chromis) with special reference to the spawning of Chromis caeruleus. Copeia, 1970(2): 371-374.

Froese, R. & D. Pauly. 2011. Fish Base. [www.fishbase.org]. Reviewed: 25 January 2011.

Lowe-McConnell, R.H. 1999. Estudos ecologicos de comunidades de peixes tropicais. EdUSP, Sao Paulo, 535 pp.

Maher, C.R. & D.F. Lott. 1995. Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Anim. Behav., 49: 1581-1597.

Manica, A. 2010. Female scissortail sergeants (Pisces: Pomacentridae) use test eggs to choose good fathers. Anim. Behav., 79: 237-242.

Manly, B.J.F. 2008. Metodos estatisticos multivariados: uma introducao. Artmed, Porto Alegre, 230 pp.

Martin, P. & P. Bateson. 2007. Measuring behaviour, an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 176 pp.

Menezes, N.A. & J.L. Figueiredo. 1985. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. V Teleostei (4). Sao Paulo, 105 pp.

Monteiro-Neto, C., F.E.A. Cunha, M.C. Nottingham, M.E. Araujo, I.L. Rosa & G.M.L. Barros. 2003. Analysis of the marine ornamental fish trade at Ceara State, northeast Brazil. Biodivers. Conserv., 12: 1287-1295.

Moura, R.L. & N.A. Menezes. 2003. Pomacentridae. In: N.A. Menezes, P.A. Buckup, J.L. Figueiredo & R.L. Moura (eds.). Catalogo das especies de peixes marinhos do Brasil. Museu de Zoologia USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 91-92.

Myrberg Jr., A.A., B.D. Brahy & A.R. Emery. 1967. Field observations on reproduction of the damselfish, Chromis multilineata (Pomacentridae), with additional notes on general behavior. Copeia, 1967(4): 818-827.

Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the world. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 600 pp.

Paula, E.J. & E.C. Oliveira-Filho. 1980. Phenology of two populations of Sargassum cymosum (Phaeophyta - Fucales) of Sao Paulo State coast, Brazil. Bol. Inst. Bot., 8: 21-39.

Queller, D.C. 1997. Why do females care more than males? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B., 264: 15551557.

Randall, J. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud. Trop. Oceanogr. Miami, 5: 665-847.

Ridley, M. 1978. Paternal care. Anim. Behav., 26: 904932.

Sikkel, P.C. 1995. Diel periodicity of spawning activity in a permanently territorial damselfish: a test of adult feeding hypothesis. Environ. Biol. Fish., 42: 241-251.

Souza, L.L.G., S. Chellappa & H.C.B. Gurgel. 2007. Biologia reprodutiva do peixe-donzela, Stegastes fuscus Cuvier, em arrecifes rochosos no nordeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool., 24(2): 419-425.

Swerdloff, S.N. 1970. Behavioral observations on Eniwetok damselfishes (Pomacentridae: Chromis) with special reference to the spawning of Chromis caeruleus. Copeia, 1970(2): 371-374.

Tallamy, D.W. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of exclusive paternal care in arthropods. Anim. Behav., 60: 559-567.

Tsadik, G.G. & A.N. Bart. 2007. Effects of feeding, stocking density and water-flow rate on fecundity, spawning frequency and egg quality of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture, 272: 380-388.

Tzioumis, V. & M.J. Kingsford. 1999. Reproductive biology and growth of the temperate damselfish Parma microlepis. Copeia, 1999(2): 348-361.

Williams, G.C. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 210 pp.

Wilson, E.O. 2000. Sociobiology, the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 697 pp.

Woynarovich, E. 1989. Manual de piscicultura. CODEVASF, Brasilia, 71 pp.

Wright, J. 1998. Paternity and paternal care. In: T.R. Birkhead & A.P. Moller (eds.). Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London, pp. 117-145.

Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 663 pp.

Received: 9 March 2011; Accepted: 9 January 2012

Eduardo Bessa (1,2) & Jose Sabino (3)

(1) laboratorio de Ecologia Comportamental da Reproducao, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso Rod MT 358 km 7, Jd. Aeroporto, CEP 78300-000. Tangara da Serra-MT, Brazil

(2) Depto. de Zoologia e Botanica, UNESP, Instituto de Biologia, Letras e Ciencias Exatas Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Biologia Animal

(3) Universidade Anhanguera-Uniderp, Projeto Peixes de Bonito, 79037-280 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

Corresponding author: Eduardo Bessa (prof.bessa@yahoo.com.br)
Table 1. Behavioral repertoire of the pomacentrids from Sao Paulo
northern shore.

Tabla 1. Repertorio comportamental de los pomacentrideos de la
costa norte de Sao Paulo.

Pattern          Category              Act

                 Feeding               Foraging
                                       Feeding
                                       Filial cannibalism
Self             Stationary            Resting
  preservation                         Intraspecific
                 Escaping              Interspecific
                                       Flashing
                 Indirect aggression   Guarding
Territoriality   Chasing               Intraspecific
                                       Interspecific
Reproductive     Sexual reproduction   Courtship
                                       Mating
Parental care    Shared effort         Fanning
                                       Nest cleaning

Pattern          Category              Description

                 Feeding               Searching for food
                                       Grabbing food
                                       Feeding on its own eggs
Self             Stationary            Stopped by the bottom
  preservation                         Escaping co-specific chasers
                 Escaping              Escaping heterospecific chasers
                                       Snapping the bottom with the
                                       flank in territory or not
                 Indirect aggression   Staying in the territory on
                                       guard for invaders
Territoriality   Chasing               Swimming behind co-specifics
                                       Swimming behind heterospecifics
Reproductive     Sexual reproduction   Attracting females
                                       Releasing gametes
Parental care    Shared effort         Making water flow over the
                                       eggs with pectoral fins
                                       Picking debris from nest
                                       with the mouth

Table 3. Do male territoriality stay the same after eggs
are delivered? t-test confirms that territoriality does not
take more effort from species like Abudefduf saxatilis
and Stegastes fuscus with more devoted paternal care, but
will cost more in species in which paternal care is less
likely to last, like Chromis multilineata. t: statistics
result, df: degree of freedom, P: associated probability.
Critical value for P was [alpha] = 0.05.

Tabla 3. ?La territorialidad de los machos se mantiene
despues que el recibe huevos? El test-t comprueba que la
territorialidad no resulta en mas esfuerzo de especies
como Abudefduf saxatilis y Stegastes fuscus con cuidado
paternal mas desarrollado, pero va a costar mas en
especies en las cuales el cuidado paternal es mas corto,
como Chromis multilineata. t: resultado de la estadistica,
df: grados de libertad, P: probabilidad asociada.
El valor critico de P fue [alfa] = 0,05.

Species                       Mean     t     df     P

A. saxatilis       without    24.8    2.27    8   0.0052
                    eggs
                  with eggs   34.6

S. fuscus          without    41.1   1.800    7    0.097
                    eggs
                  with eggs   30.7

C. multilineata    without    0.4    3.203    5    0.033
                     eggs
                  with egss   4.6
COPYRIGHT 2012 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:articulo en ingles
Author:Bessa, Eduardo; Sabino, Jose
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Mar 1, 2012
Words:3965
Previous Article:Relative efficiency of square-mesh codends in an artisanal fishery in southern Brazil/Eficiencia relativa de copos de malla cuadrada en una pesqueria...
Next Article:Daily settlement of Cancer crab megalopae in a microtidal estuary/Asentamiento diario de megalopas de jaibas del genero Cancer en un estuario...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters