Printer Friendly

Terminating debt instrument hedges. (Gains & Losses).

Rev. Rul. 2002-71 clarifies when to account for gain or loss from a termination of a swap used to hedge a debt instrument. It generally provides that when the swap hedges the entire term of the underlying debt instrument, the gain or loss should be spread over the remaining term of the hedged debt. If the swap hedges only a portion of the debt's term, however, the gain or loss is spread over the remaining portion of the term hedged, that was the remaining term of the swap--not over the entire remaining debt term.

Many taxpayers enter into interest-rate swaps to hedge debt instruments. For instance, a taxpayer with a floating-rate borrowing may enter into a swap that essentially converts the borrowing into a fixed-rate borrowing. Under the swap, the taxpayer makes fixed-rate payments to its counterparty in return for receiving the floating rate under the swap; in practice, however, the payments ate typically netted.

If market interest rates rise, the taxpayer will have a built-in gain on the swap. If the taxpayer terminates the swap at that time, the taxpayer will receive a payment from its counterparty, representing the present value of anticipated future payments under the swap. Under the normal rules for accounting for swaps under Regs. Sec. 1.446-3, the termination payment would be recognized on the termination of the swap. The hedge timing rules, however, preempt the normal rules and would require the spread of gain over the term that the debt was hedged.

Under Regs. Sec. 1.446-4(e)(4), gain or loss from a hedging transaction "must be accounted for by reference to the terms of the debt instrument and the period or periods to which the hedge relates." Generally, the gain or loss is properly accounted for under constant-yield principles, as though it adjusted the yield of the debt instrument over the term to which the hedge relates.

Rev. Rul. 2002-71 addressed a situation in which an interest-rate swap hedged only a portion of the debt instrument's entire term. It provided two examples involving five-year swaps used to hedge debt instruments with a 10-year term. In both examples, the taxpayer terminated the swap at the end of the second year. The ruling held that gain or loss from terminating the swap is neither spread over the entire term of the debt instrument nor accounted for entirely in the termination year. Instead, the gain or loss must be spread over years three through five (i.e., the remaining period to which the terminated hedge relates). If the debt instrument is retired before the end of the fifth year, the ruling holds that the remaining balance of the gain or loss should be accounted for at that time.

In light of this ruling, it may be advisable for taxpayers to review their treatment of interest-rate swaps and determine if they have been under-or overreporting gain or loss from terminated hedged transactions. Some taxpayers may be accounting for the gain or loss by spreading it over the entire remaining term of the hedged debt instrument, even though the hedging transaction relates to a shorter period of time. Others may be accounting for the gain or loss entirely in the year the transaction is terminated, rather than spreading it over the period originally hedged. If taxpayers reported the transactions incorrectly, they might find it appropriate to tile an amended return or an application to change accounting method.

In reviewing hedging transactions, it is also advisable to assess whether they were properly identified, as required by Regs. Sec. 1.1221-2(f). Although the hedge timing rules do not require identification, that is necessary to obtain ordinary treatment under the rules on the character of a hedging transaction. Absent an effective identification for tax purposes, gain or loss from terminating a swap could be treated as a capital gain or loss.

FROM JO LYNN RICKS, J.D., LL.M., AND HELEN YANCHISIN, J.D., WASHINGTON, DC
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Sair, Edward A.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Mar 1, 2003
Words:657
Previous Article:Software royalty source and withholding.
Next Article:Favorable Rev. Rul. on contingent convertible bonds.


Related Articles
The challenges of hedge accounting: the explosion of new hedging instruments has outpaced accounting guidance.
Proposed section 988 regulations.
Hedge accounting: is deferral the only option?
Taxation of business hedges: an analysis of the new regulations.
New hedging regulations designed to minimize "character" mismatch for tax purposes.
Ordinary treatment now available for hedging transactions.
FASB considers measuring derivatives at fair value.
Letter ruling addresses timing issue for nonidentified hedging transactions.
The decision on derivatives.
Official Releases.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |