Ten-year risk of heart disease may be "lip of iceberg lifetime risk found to be much higher.
Many such individuals may be lulled into complacency after learning from their physician of their favorable 10-year risk. Very few are aware of their high lifetime risk. That's because physicians don't routinely estimate it.
But that could soon change, according to predictions made at the annual scientific sessions of the American Heart Association. Investigators are developing a calculator tool for lifetime predicted risk of cardiovascular disease akin to the widely used Framingham Risk Score for 10-year predicted risk. A patient's risk factors would be plugged in, and a lifetime risk level would be calculated.
"Physicians are told in the ATP III guidelines to consider lifetime risk in primary prevention, but they're not really told how to go about doing that. Our thought is to make a tool that physicians can easily use. The real goal here is to use it for patient communication. It would be really terrific if we could identify more people as being at high lifetime risk and get them to understand that even though they might be at low risk now, they need to do something more," explained Dr. Amanda K. Marma, an intern in pediatrics at Children's Hospital, Boston.
She presented an analysis of 10-year and lifetime predicted risks for cardiovascular disease in U.S. adults based on extrapolation from 6,329 cardiovascular disease-free participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2003-2004 and 2005-2006. The purpose of the study, which she worked on while a medical student at Northwestern University in Chicago, was to demonstrate the need for greater public health efforts addressing lifetime risk.
The study showed, for example, that among Americans aged 40-59 years--a group of particular interest in terms of cardiovascular prevention efforts--80% have a low short-term predicted risk-that is, less than a 10% chance of developing coronary heart disease or diabetes within the next 10 years. But three-quarters of those in this low short-term-risk group are at high lifetime predicted risk as defined by a 39% or greater estimated likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease, including stroke.
Lifetime risk was estimated using an algorithm previously developed by Dr. Marma's coinvestigators and validated in the Framingham Study population (Circulation 2006;113:791-8). The algorithm showed, for example, that the predicted lifetime risk of a 50-year-old, nonsmoking, nondiabetic man with optimal blood pressure and a total cholesterol below 180 mg/dL was 5%, but with one major risk factor his lifetime risk would soar to 50%.
As an example of how knowledge of lifetime estimated risk might serve as extra motivation for risk factor modification, Dr. Marma cited the example of a 50-year-old, nondiabetic, nonsmoking woman with a total cholesterol of 240 mg/dL, an HDL of 58 mg/dL, and an untreated systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg. Her 10-year predicted risk of MI or coronary death using the ATP III algorithm is just 2%. But her lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease is 50%.
Among other key findings from the analysis of lifetime cardiovascular risk:
* Just 18% of adults--28 million Americans--are at high short-term predicted risk, defined as 10% or greater in the next 10 years.
* Only 11.4% of adults are at both low short-term and lifetime predicted risk.
* Two-thirds of all individuals at low short-term risk are at high lifetime predicted risk.
* Many women and younger men identified as low risk using the ATP III tool turn out to be at high lifetime risk. That's important in light of criticism that the ATP III tool does a relatively poor job of discriminating risk in those groups.
In an interview, former AHA president Raymond J. Gibbons said he strongly favors incorporating routine assessment of lifetime risk into prevention efforts.
"There are many patients who you would think of differently if you looked at them from a lifetime risk standpoint versus a 10-year-risk standpoint," said Dr. Gibbons, professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
"If we just look at 10-year risk in, say, a 40-year-old, we're in effect saying it's okay if you die at 52. That's not acceptable to my 40-year-old patients," the cardiologist added.
The data were published online simultaneously in Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (doi: 10.1161 /circoutcomes. 109.869727).
The work was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE|
|Publication:||Family Practice News|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2009|
|Previous Article:||Spinal disease risk high in obese teens.|
|Next Article:||HITECH security regs may hamper move to EHR.|