Printer Friendly

Technology does not equal good healthcare.

In the September 5 cover story, "The Best Healthcare in the World," Mr. Dennis Behreandt defends the American fee-for-service system, showing it to be far better than the socialized healthcare systems of other countries. With this I would agree. But what he and most Americans tail to recognize is that there is a tremendous difference between our "sophisticated diagnostic capabilities and treatments" and good healthcare. Yes, our system is the most technologically advanced in the world, but that technology is proving to be the nemesis of good healthcare for chronic degenerative diseases.

Technology and pharmacology can keep people alive, but know that there is a huge difference between being alive and having a quality life. Even so, in our attempt to keep people alive with our treatment of disease, more people in America die annually from iatrogenic causes (e.g. from the doctors, drugs, surgery, etc.) than all other causes of death combined. Plus, the jury is still out on the massive public health effort to eradicate diseases with vaccines. It seems that we are trading childhood illnesses for much more disabling conditions later in life (learning disabilities, adult onset asthma, diabetes, etc.).

In this country we have made healthcare big business, and treating disease is more important and more profitable than creating health. The definition of health is not just the absence of symptoms, but the state of complete and total well-being. Unfortunately, disease care is about the only health business we have left in this country.

Throughout antiquity, the care of one's spiritual and temporal bodies was interconnected and was under the purview of a physician/priest who mediated a two-way connection between the patient and his higher power for the benefit of the patient. Modern medicine in America has made technology and pharmacology the gods to whom the patient must submit his temporal and spiritual body for the benefit of the physician. Can this really be considered the best healthcare in the world?

WAYNE R. FISCUS, D.C.

Prescott Valley, Arizona
COPYRIGHT 2005 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Author:Fiscus, Wayne R.
Publication:The New American
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Oct 31, 2005
Words:334
Previous Article:In praise of DDT.
Next Article:Response to Congressman.


Related Articles
Business reacts to FASB's proposal for nonpension retirement benefits.
Mailbag.
Reader comments from www.advocate.com.
The marrying kind. (reader forum).
From Fr. C.M. Robitaille re just a little note about a missing word.
Another view on trade.
Sending men the message about preventive care: an evaluation of communication strategies.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters