TRACING THE BOUNDARY: SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE NEOLITHIC ASBESTOS WARE.
The tradition of making pottery with admixture of asbestos seems to be a unique phenomenon of Fennoscandia and neighbouring regions (Fig. 1). Asbestos Ware (in this paper, the term is used for any pottery with asbestos temper) seems to appear in the 1st half of the 5th millennium cal BC in the Saimaa area in Finland, next to large asbestos outcrops--the "core area" of the tradition (Oinonen et al. 2014, 1420, fig. 1). But later in the 2nd half of the 4th and in the 3rd millennium BC Asbestos Ware spread throughout a huge region from northern Sweden to Arkhangelsk area in Russia. Although natural sources of asbestos are found in many places around the world, for now, beyond the above-mentioned territory, there is no known Neolithic tradition of making pottery with intentionally admixed asbestos. There are rare mentions of asbestos temper in ancient pottery in the Urals (Voevodskij 1936, 56), talc and mica were also used as temper there (Kosarev 1978, 182; Myl'nikova 2015, 27). The evidence of occasional use of asbestos temper was mentioned for the prehistoric Korean pottery (Kim 1962). However, no long-living tradition of making Asbestos Ware emerged there, even though there is plenty of natural asbestos.
Due to its properties, or rarity and prestige, or any other reason, in the Neolithic, asbestos was transported far from natural outcrops to be used as temper for making pottery. The approximate distance for the discussed region of the Karelian Isthmus is 200-300 km from the southern border of large anthophyllite deposit in Lake Saimaa region (Lavento & Hornytzkyj 1996, 52) and 200-250 km from Ignoila (Korud-Jarvi), chrysotile-asbestos occurrence to the east of Onega Lake. Archaeological sites with asbestos-tempered pottery of Modlona type in Vologda region are the most remote from natural asbestos deposits, with the distance of up to 700 km.
Asbestos-tempered pottery in Finland and Karelia was first described already at the beginning of the 20th century (Ailio 1909; Tallgren 1914; Palsi 1915). Later several types of Asbestos Ware of a different chronological period were also defined (Meinander 1954; Siiriainen 1967).
General classification and periodization of Asbestos Ware from Finland was given by Christian Carpelan (1979). He described two types of Early Asbestos Ware--Kaunissaari and Early Comb Ware with asbestos or Ka 1:2(asb); Typical Comb Ware with asbestos (TCW(asb)); several Late Neolithic types: Kierikki, Polja and Jysma; Sarsa-Tomitsa pottery for the Early Metal Epoch; and the Early Iron Age Saraisniemi 2 Ware, including Kjelmoj, Anttila, Sirnihta and Luukonsaari groups.
Asbestos Ware was also quite extensively studied in Karelia (Bryusov 1940; Gurina 1961; Pankrushev 1978). Classification and chronology of Karelian Asbestos Ware was developed by Aleksandr Zhulnikov, based on materials from "sealed" archaeological contexts obtained through the excavation of numerous prehistoric dwellings in the Onega and the White Sea basins (Zhul'nikov 1999). For Karelian Eneolithic period, he defined Voynavolok, Orovnavolok, and Palayguba Asbestos Ware types (4th-2nd millennia).
At the eastern periphery of the Asbestos Ware distribution, it is found in archaeological contexts of Modlona type in Russian Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, also in the materials of Volosovo culture (Oshibkina 1966, 37; 1978, 128; Krajnov 1987, 27).
Morphology, peculiarities of formation technique and decoration of pottery with asbestos differ depending on territory and period and can hardly be considered as the same pottery tradition. In this paper, the term "pottery tradition" means a stable set of features in ceramics that characterizes certain technological methods of making a pot, its specific morphology, and decoration. Different ceramic types can be variants of the same large tradition or represent different traditions, depending on the degree of similarity.
The classification of Finnish Stone Age pottery is based on well-defined local pottery groups, mainly from the southern and coastal territories (Europaeus-Ayrapaa 1930; Carpelan 1979; Vikkula 1981; Siiriainen 1984; Pesonen 1999; Nordkvist 2015). This classification is widely used today, although significant varieties within distinguished classical types, as well as the obscurity of their definitions, was recently pointed out (Mokkonen & Nordqvist 2017; Nordqvist 2018). Less studied pottery with asbestos from northern and interior areas is generally referred to as "Asbestos" or "Asbestos and Porous-Ware" (Nordqvist et al. 2012, 7).
Because different criteria were used to define Neolithic asbestos-tempered pottery types in Finland and Karelia, comparing those types is associated with many difficulties. Later, comparison of Asbestos Ware types defined by different researchers for different regions, on various methodological principles, revealed some common traits in pottery types from Karelia and Finland (Carpelan 1979; Lavento & Hornytzkyj 1996; Zhul'nikov 1999; Zhulnikov et al. 2012; Mokkonen & Nordqvist 2017). Despite regional peculiarities, the existence of certain stylistic-chronological "horizons" (Kierikki / Voynavolok, Polja / Orovnavolok) is generally accepted.
According to regional archaeological periodization, co-existing pottery types could belong to different archaeological periods (e.g. the Late or Final Neolithic in Finland and Estonia are chronologically equal to the Early Metal Period in the Eastern Gulf of Finland (Gerasimov & Krijska 2013, 13, fig. 1; Nordqvist & Mokkonen 2017, 79, fig. 1; Tarasov et al. 2017, 101, fig. 1). Development of radiocarbon dating methods made it possible to chronologically compare these archaeological materials.
Chronological frames of different types of Asbestos Ware from Finland and Karelia (Fig. 2) were recently sufficiently improved by a series of AMS dates (Pesonen et al. 2012; Oinonen et al. 2014; Nordqvist & Mokkonen 2017; Tarasov et al. 2017). However, geographical distribution of this phenomenon was not in the focus of study for a while, even though some new maps of cultural areas were recently published (Nordqvist & Mokkonen 2017, 81). The most recent review of archaeological contexts with Asbestos Ware distant from the mineral sources (Zhul'nikov 2006) was made almost 15 years ago. Since then, new archaeological contexts with Asbestos Ware were studied on the Karelian Isthmus and in the southern Ladoga area; in addition to that, intensive archaeological surveys were conducted at the southern shore of the Gulf of Finland, next to the Russian-Estonian border.
Based on updated data, this paper discusses the southern periphery of Asbestos Ware tradition that includes the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga area (Fig. 3) and the boundary of its spreading for different chronological periods. This required tracing the south-western boundary of geographical distribution of archaeological contexts with Asbestos Ware, typological attribution of pottery with asbestos from analysed contexts, and considering transformations of prehistoric communication networks.
Chronological frames of the study were defined in accordance with the chronology of the Stone Age Asbestos Ware in the studied area (5th-3rd millennia BC).
Data sources and classification approach
Today, over 30 archaeological sites with Asbestos Ware are known in the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga area (Fig. 3, Table 1). This is not much compared to Finland and Karelia, but the discussed area is on the periphery of the Asbestos Ware distribution and located as far as some 300-400 km from the asbestos outcrops.
Many archaeological collections with Asbestos Ware were obtained in the northern part of the Karelian Isthmus at the beginning of the 20th century (Viipuri Hayrynmaki, Viipuri Karstila Selankangas, Kaukola Kyostalanharju, Kaukola Nokopelto, Raisala Pitkajarvi, Johannes Kaijala Vantsi and others), now they are stored in the National Museum in Helsinki, Finland--KM) (Ailio 1909; Palsi 1915; Europaeus-Ayrapaa 1930; Ayrapaa 1934, 51; Huurre 2003, 154 ff.). These collections also originate mainly from mixed archaeological contexts containing pottery of different types and chronological periods that can be separated only by typological criteria. Developing of AMS method of radiocarbon dating allowed direct dating of foodcrust on pottery with asbestos from old collections (Pesonen 2004; Seitsonen et al. 2012, 105 ff.).
In the southern part of the Isthmus, two sites with Asbestos Ware--Tarkhovka and Glinyanyi Ruchey--were discovered and studied in the beginning of the 20th century, at the southern shore of the Sestroretskiy Razliv Lake (Sosnovskij & Zemlyakov 1917; Sosnovskij 1935, 24; Zemlyakov 1941, 158). There were no full-scale excavations at those sites, and today those sites are totally destroyed (Gerasimov 2003; 2006). These contexts are represented by very scarce materials obtained from those sites and now stored in the Kunstkamera Museum (Saint Petersburg, Russia).
In the 1960s-70s, the central part of the Karelian Isthmus was surveyed by a schoolteacher V. M. Sokolov, who discovered Kanneljarvi 1 and 2 sites and collected archaeological material from the shoreline at Kamenka 1 (Kaukjarvi Kelonen) site (Gurina 1961, 421; Timofeev 1993, 9; Gerasimov et al. 2003, 30; Mokkonen & Nordqvist 2006). More sites with Asbestos Ware were found in the beginning of the 21st century, in the course of a sequence of international multidisciplinary research projects that involved Russian, Finnish, and Estonian institutions (Gerasimov et al. 2018a): Protochnoje 2-3 (Pontuksenhauta 1-2, Rupunkangas-1, 2, 4), Novoselki 5 (Seppala 2, 4), Komsomolskoje 3 (Pyhajarvi Kunnianniemi 1), Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi Vanhasniemi 2), Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi Ristila), Ozernoje-3, Gvardeyskoye 1 (Gerasimov et al. 2007a, 2007b; 2008).
About 10 000 sqm of Neolithic--Early Metal epoch cultural layer have been studied in Okhta 1 site in Saint Petersburg in 2007-2013 by Tatyana M. Gusentsova (Sorokin et al. 2009a; 2009b; Kul'kova et al. 2010; Sorokin 2011); the materials including Porous and Asbestos Ware were partly published (Kul'kova & Gusentsova 2012; Gusentsova & Kholkina 2015). Large collections including Asbestos Ware were also obtained on Podolye 1 and 3 sites in the southern Ladoga region (Gusentsova & Kholkina 2015; Kholkina 2016; Kul'kova et al. 2016).
A representative archaeological collection including Asbestos Ware was obtained from Berezovo 2 site, in the very north-western corner of the Karelian Isthmus, adjacent to the north-western Ladoga Area (Gerasimov et al. 2018b). The site was studied in 2018 by 1700 sqm excavation area that covered the whole site extension. The archaeological collection consists of Late Mesolithic, Middle, and Late Neolithic materials (Gerasimov et al. 2018b).
In addition to Okhta 1 and Podolye sites, with thousands of Asbestos Ware sherds (at least 130 vessels in Okhta and at least 16 vessels from Podolye 1), materials from the sites excavated in the 2nd half of the 20th--beginning of the 21st century are rather scarce, resulting from stray finds, cleanings and testpits, or small-scale trial excavations. Some collections include only a few sherds large enough to be used for studying technological, morphological, and ornamentation peculiarities.
Anyway, at least part of the studied material can be attributed to representative Asbestos Ware types described in publications. Main characteristics of Asbestos Ware types that were recognized on the Karelian Isthmus are represented in Table 2. The only exception is Typical Comb Ware with asbestos, as its only difference from Typical Comb Ware is temper (Carpelan 1979, 13). Those characteristics were used to classify the analysed pottery.
Most of the material mentioned in Table 1 was analysed in the course of this study. Clay mass was analysed visually, with a hand magnifier (x8) and scanning microscope Leica DVM 5000 (x35-x70) in "Geomodel" research park of Saint Petersburg State University. The sherds that were broken at the junctions of structural elements of vessels were analysed to recognize pot-making technique (use of coils or patches). Reconstruction of vessel shapes is based on the analysis of preserved profiled fragments, mainly rims and bottoms. Decoration was analysed at the following structural levels: morphology of decoration elements, combinations of elements used, arrangement of elements in motifs and compositions.
Asbestos Ware from the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga area
Early Asbestos Ware (Ka1:2(asb) on Karelian Isthmus was identified in Kerstila Selankangas (Ayrapaa 1934, 51; Pesonen 1996, 10) and Kaukola Kyostalanharju sites (Nordqvist et al. 2008, 301). Several sherds were found in the collections of Tarkhovka (Fig. 4: 2-3) and Glinyanyi Ruchey (Fig. 4: 1). Those sherds have no other temper but asbestos, the rim is slightly bended inside, the surface was smoothed. Ornament of rows of pits alternated with lines was made with a "retreating" shovel. This ornament resembles one typical for Kaunissaari Early Asbestos Ware in Finland (Pesonen 1996, fig. 5: 3). One more sherd of the Early Asbestos Ware (Fig. 4: 4) that resembles Kaunissaari type (Pesonen 1996, fig. 6: 4, 6) was found by Dr Stanislav Belskiy (MAE RAS) in Sovinlahti (Karelian Isthmus) in 2019, but that one came from a stray find, and no cultural layer was defined in the vicinity.
Several sherds of Typical Combed Ware (by morphology and ornamentation), but with asbestos temper, were found in Okhta 1 and Berezovo 2 (Fig. 4: 5) sites.
Pottery resembling Kierikki type was revealed in Silino (Muola Telkkala) and Novoselki 5 (Raisala Seppala - Fig. 4: 6) sites. It includes asbestos temper combined with feather and down, has well-smoothed surface and is ornamented with rows of deep conical pits. Kierikki Ware was also defined in Kajala Vantsi site (Nordqvist et al. 2008, 295) and similar pottery was described in Okhta 1 materials (Kul'kova & Gusentsova 2012).
The widest-spread type of Asbestos Ware in the research area seems to be Polja (Table 1, Figs 4-6). It is not easy to confidently define such pottery, because studied sherds are often poorly preserved, and the criteria of the Polja type definition are uncertain. The sherds may contain asbestos temper only, or else asbestos combined with feather and shells. Rims bended inwards under strait angle that characterize the type are only present in a few cases. At least two vessels from Gvardeyskoye 1 site had flat bottoms 7-8 mm thick (Fig. 5: 3). Surfaces were scratched. Ornamentation consists of "wound cord" imprints or small shallow pits (Fig. 5: 7). There are no deep conical pits. Imprints that resemble "Textile" ornament were found on a sherd with asbestos temper from Raisala Pitkajarvi site (KM 6939: 99, 160).
Asbestos Ware from Okhta 1 and Podolye 1 sites bears some peculiarities. The pottery collection from Okhta 1 site is much larger and more diverse than that from Podolye 1 site. Moreover, almost all the pottery groups defined in Okhta 1 have parallels in Podolye 1 materials (Gusentsova & Kholkina 2015, 223). Pottery with asbestos may also include feather and down, shells, sand, and chamotte temper in different combinations. Rims are slightly bended inwards or straight, the estimated diameter of vessels is 30 to 50 cm. Most rims are decorated with comb stamp imprints or shallow pits. Vessel bodies are decorated with rows of comb stamp, notches, pits and drawn lines, geometrical motifs are also found. In this pottery, some vessels have similarities with Kierikki and Polja types, others--with the Karelian types of Voynavolok and Orovnavolok (Kul'kova & Gusentsova 2012).
In Podolye 1, rims of vessels with asbestos temper are also slightly bended inwards (Fig. 7: 1, 4-5). Rim cuts are often ornamented with comb stamp. The only ornamentation elements on those vessels are comb stamp imprints that make rows or geometrical motifs of lines crossing at different angles (Gusentsova & Kholkina 2015; Kholkina 2016). This pottery has many similarities with Karelian Orovnavolok type, especially at its later stage (Zhul'nikov 1999, 50). However, it differs because of its many geometrical motifs (stretched figures, crossing bents, zigzag). Some common traits can be traced in the pottery from Podolye and Volosovo Ware; the area of Volosovo tradition is quite close to the southern Ladoga (Krajnov 1987, 12). Those traits include feather and shells temper, ornamentation with comb stamp imprints in vertical zigzag pattern. However, important peculiarities of the Volosovo Ware, such as frame stamp imprints, decoration with nets of scratched lines or "retreating" shovel (Tsetlin 2008, 136 f.) are absent in Podolye 1.
A series of radiocarbon dates were obtained for Okhta 1 and Podolye 1 sites (Sorokin et al. 2009a; 2009b; Kul'kova et al. 2010; Kul'kova & Gusentsova 2012; Kul'kova et al. 2014; Gusentsova & Kul'kova 2016; Kul'kova et al. 2016); however, not many of radiocarbon dates from the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga can be confidently related to the potsherds of the Asbestos Ware (Table 1). The dates obtained from typologically attributed sherds match the chronology developed for the Asbestos Ware both in Finland and Karelia, while the dates from Okhta 1 belong to the latest stage of wide distribution of Asbestos Ware.
Analysis of asbestos-tempered pottery in archaeological contexts from the Karelian Isthmus and Southern Ladoga region shows the presence of almost all the main Neolithic (and Early Metal Period) types defined for both Finland and Karelia.
Two stylistic variants defined for the Early Asbestos Ware--Ka 1:2(asb) and Kaunissaari--seem to generally overlap in space and time, even though the former is wider spread further to the north-west, and the latter is dated slightly younger (Pesonen 1996, 28).
Ka I:2(asb) does not really differ from the Early Comb Ware Ka 1:2 pottery (Sperrings 2, in the Russian terminology) neither in morphology or ornamentation, nor in technological peculiarities (U-type of coils junction), but it differs in temper. Ka I:2 pottery with or without asbestos temper is often present in the same archaeological contexts, and direct radiocarbon dating of sherds indicates the same chronology. Therefore, in a certain sense, they can be considered the same cultural tradition. Collections from Tarkhovka and Glinyanyi Ruchey in the southern part of the Karelian Isthmus include both Ka I:2(asb) sherds and Sperrings 2 sherds with some organic temper (shell?). For now, those sites represent the most south-western extent of the Early Asbestos Ware and the Sperrings Ware distribution. Also, a few sherds of Sperrings pottery (both Ka1:1 and Ka1:2) were found on Okhta 1 site.
Sperrings pottery appears in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland at the same time as Narva pottery. Simultaneous emergence of the two pottery-making traditions, which pronouncedly differ in their production technology, morphology and ornamentation, displayed quite an obvious boundary between two cultural areas, even though their lithic assemblage and subsistence system were quite similar--both after the emergence of pottery and before it (Krijska & Gerasimov 2014; Gerasimov & Kriiska 2018). No archaeological contexts containing pottery of either Sperrings or Narva types are known. "Hybrid" pottery--Sperrings with shells temper--was found at Berezye site in the Volkhov River mouth, in the southern Ladoga region (Timofeev 1985, 14). But the Early Combed Ware with shells and organic temper was also found in Finland and can be considered as a variant of the Sperrings tradition.
The spread of TCW in the eastern Gulf of Finland region seems to be a short period of "unification" of pottery tradition that continued probably for just few centuries--the recently estimated frameworks are 3950-3500(3400) (Seitsonen et al. 2012, 111). Although one of the characteristics of TCW is the use of medium- and fine-grained mineral temper, pottery of the same type but with asbestos temper was found in the Ancient Lake Saimaa area, in the Karelian Isthmus and at Okhta site.
The settlement pattern and subsistence strategy did not pronouncedly change after the Sperrings/TCW shift (e.g. Gerasimov et al. 2010); however, new types of artefacts, increasing amount of imported flint and amber, subterranean dwellings and other cultural changes definitely reflected changes in the structure of society and interregional communication networks (Tallavaara et al. 2010; Nordqvist & Herva 2013; Oinonen et al. 2014; Mokkonen et al. 2017).
The short stage of "pure" TCW contexts was followed by the period of "diversification" of pottery-making tradition after around 3600 BC. From this time, several types of Asbestos Ware spread in regions far from the natural asbestos outcrops, but also different types of Porous Ware (pottery with organic temper) appeared on the same and neighbouring territories. TCW (meaning Comb Ware with mineral temper and well-structured ornamentation with comb stamp and deep conical pits) was mainly presented in the same archaeological contexts, and direct radiocarbon dating of sherds shows chronological coexistence of these pottery types (Nordqvist & Mokkonen 2017).
The 2nd half of the 4th millennium BC and the 3rd millennium BC is the time when different types of Asbestos Ware were presented on in large region far to the south-east from natural asbestos sources. Asbestos Ware was found in Arkhangelsk and Vologda regions up to the upper course of the Sukhona River, where asbestos temper is contained in the pottery of Volosovo type (Krajnov 1987, 27) and Modlona type (Oshibkina 1966, 37; 1978, 118, 128).
The main Finnish and Karelian Asbestos Ware types--Kierikki / Voynavolok (3600-3200 BC) and Polja / Orovnavolok (3400-2800 BC)--are presumably regional variants of the same tradition (Zhulnikov et al. 2012; Mokkonen & Nordqvist 2017). Moreover, some "transitional" pottery was described (Zhulnikov et al. 2012). Those types are often found in the same contexts and their estimated chronology seems to overlap. Thus, it is very probable that Kierikki / Voynavolok and Polja / Orovnavolok pottery represents the development of the same pottery style in cultural groups closely connected by well-developed inter-regional networks.
Today, Okhta 1 site is the most south-western site where Late Neolithic Asbestos Ware is found. Intensive surveys along the southern shore of the Gulf of Finland were conducted during the last two decades (see Gerasimov 2015; Kriiska et al. 2016), but they brought no finds of the Asbestos Ware to the south and south-west of the Neva mouth. Moreover, Asbestos Ware does not spread further to the south. Few Neolithic sherds with asbestos temper were found in Pskov region, Russia, but those were considered as evidence of a communication route between the Baltic and Karelia that went through the Velikaya River (Mazurkevits 2009). Furthermore, no Asbestos Ware finds were reported in the Dvina--Lovat' interfluve, although the archaeology and especially Stone Age archaeology of this area was intensively studied for several decades (Miklyaev 1995; Mazurkevich et al. 2009). Thus, it seems that the tradition of making pottery with asbestos temper does not extent further to the south-west than the mouth of the Neva River. To the east, it continues along the southern coast of Lake Ladoga--there are Podolye 1 and Podolye 3, and several sites in the mouth of the Svir' River--Voznesenye, Zayatskaya, Padan'1 and Padan' 4 (Gusentsova 2009, 98). Further in the direction of Onega Lake, there are more and more sites with Asbestos Ware.
Thus, it appears that the south-western boundary of spreading of the Late Neolithic Asbestos Ware follows that of the Early Asbestos Ware and the Sperrings Ware. At least, from the Early Neolithic time, the Karelian Isthmus and southern Ladoga region were closely connected with Saimaa region and made south-western periphery of the Sperrings Ware and the Early Asbestos Ware. Through the several centuries of a kind of "cultural unification" associated with the TCW, the boundary became less pronounced (although the rare finds of TCW with asbestos temper do not appear beneath the border either). In the Late Neolithic, however, it becomes visible again. The tradition of making Asbestos Ware on the Karelian Isthmus and in the southern Ladoga region indicates that there was a well-developed delivery system for raw asbestos from remote outcrops.
The Early Asbestos Ware on the Karelian Isthmus is represented by a limited amount of sherds, therefore they may be hypothetically considered as imported vessels (at least until the contrary is confirmed through geochemical analyses). The amount of finds of Asbestos Ware in the Late Neolithic contexts, however, may be interpreted as made-on-place pottery. There are bundles of asbestos fiber found in cultural layers of Okhta 1 and Podolye sites (Gusentsova et al. 2014). This means that asbestos was transported for several hundreds of kilometers, in order to be used as temper. Imported asbestos was documented in materials from other sites with Late Neolithic Asbestos Ware (e.g. Zhulnikov et al. 2012). The pilot geochemical study of asbestos temper in pottery from Okhta 1 showed that asbestos was imported from different outcrops in Finland and Karelia. The chemical analyses of clay in vessels from Okhta 1 revealed that one vessel was obviously imported as a ready-made object, but most of the vessels were made on the site (Kul'kova & Gusentsova 2012).
Long-distance exchange of goods through interregional communication networks is a well-known characteristic of the East European Forest zone in the 4th and 3rd millennium BC. After TCW spread in the eastern Gulf of Finland, the amount of flint artefacts increased rapidly compared to the Late Mesolithic and Early Combed Ware periods (e.g. Gerasimov et al. 2010; Mokkonen et al. 2017). Moreover, there is much evidence that flint tools were made locally. After 3600-3500 BC, however, those networks were used to transport ready-made objects rather than raw materials. Items like amber pendants from the Baltic (e.g. Zhulnikov 2008) or chopping tools of the Russian-Karelian type from Lake Onega (e.g. Kriiska & Tarasov 2011) were produced in specialized workshops for distribution in remote regions. However, Asbestos Ware (just as the raw asbestos) does not spread further to the west than the mouth of the Neva River.
The Asbestos Ware tradition that connected Finland, the Karelian Isthmus, Karelia and the southern Ladoga region, continued till the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC. The youngest dates from Okhta 1 and Podolye 1 match the general periodization (Fig. 2), and archaeological contexts with Late Neolithic Asbestos Ware at the western and southern shores of Ladoga were covered in transgression sediments of the Ladoga (Gerasimov & Subetto 2009), which provides the same chronological estimation. The only exception is a sherd with asbestos temper from Ust'-Rybezhna 2 site (Gurina 1961; Zhul'nikov 2006; Kul'kova & Yushkova 2008). The site was located above the transgression maximum, and the upper chronological limit of its functioning is the Neva breakthrough event around 1200 cal BC.
The Karelian Isthmus and southern Ladoga region are the periphery of the spread of Asbestos Ware. Those territories were well connected with the "core" of Asbestos Ware tradition from its very beginning. All the main types of Neolithic Asbestos Ware defined on the territory of Finland (Ka 1:2(asb); Kaunissaari; TCW(asb), Kierikki; Polja) are also found in the Karelian Isthmus, including its southern part.
In the 3rd millennium BC local traditions of making pottery with asbestos temper spread in the southern Ladoga region. Pottery from Okhta 1 and Podolye 1 sites resembles both western and eastern (Karelian) traditions and shares some typical traits with Volosovo culture from the Upper Volga as well as with ceramics from Modlona sites in Vologda region. It has, however, its own local peculiarities, too.
Local traditions of making Asbestos Ware on the Karelian Isthmus and in the southern Ladoga region at Late Neolithic--Eneolithic time imply well-developed delivery system for raw asbestos from its remote outcrops.
Despite the many spatial and chronological differences in material culture, subsistence strategies, and communication networks within time and space frames of the Asbestos Ware phenomenon, it may be assumed that the use of asbestos temper could be indicative of cultural relations within certain regions.
The south-western boundary of the spread of the Late Neolithic Asbestos Ware follows that of the Early Asbestos Ware and the Sperrings Ware. Starting from the Early Neolithic time at latest, the Karelian Isthmus and the Southern Ladoga region were closely connected with Saimaa region and represented the south-western periphery of the Sperrings Ware and the Early Asbestos Ware. Resulting from several centuries of a kind of "cultural unification" associated with the TCW, this boundary became less distinct; for the Late Neolithic time, however, it is visible again. Nevertheless, the outlined south-western boundary of Sperrings / Asbestos Ware area was not a border for interregional exchange.
The study was performed within the project "Phenomenon of Asbestos Ware in pottery traditions of Eastern Europe: making and use technology, structure of interregional contacts" supported by the Russian Science Foundation, No. 19-18-00375.
The authors express their sincere gratitude to Dr Stanislav Belskiy (MAE Russian Academy of Sciences), for granting them his permission to use his very recent field discoveries from Sovinlahti, the Karelian Isthmus. The authors are grateful to the two referees for their comments on the manuscript. The publication costs of this article were covered by the Estonian Academy of Sciences, the Institute of History and Archaeology at the University of Tartu, and the Institute of History, Archaeology and Art History of Tallinn University.
Ailio, J. 1909. Die steinzeitlichen Wohnplatze in Finland. I-II. Helsingfors.
Ayrapaa, A. 1934. Uber die Streiaxtkulturen in Russland.--Eurasia Septentrionalis Antiqua, 8, 1-160.
Bryusov, A. Ya. 1940. = [phrase omitted].
Carpelan, C. 1979. Om asbestkeramikens historia i Fennoskandien.--Finskt Museum, 1978, 85, 5-25.
Emelyanov, A. V. 2005. = [phrase omitted], 17.
Europaeus-Ayrapaa, A. 1930. Die relative Chronologie der steinzeitlichen Keramik in Finnland.--Acta Archaeologica, 1, 165-190, 205-220.
Gerasimov, D. V. 2003. = [phrase omitted], 12-24.
Gerasimov, D. V. 2006. = [phrase omitted], 109-188.
Gerasimov, D. V. 2015. = [phrase omitted], 192-206.
Gerasimov, D. V. & Kriiska, A. 2018. Early-Middle Holocene archaeological periodization and environmental changes in the eastern Gulf of Finland: Interpretative correlation.--Quaternary International, 465: B, 298-313.
Gerasimov, D. V. & Krijska, A. 2013. = [phrase omitted], 12-14.
Gerasimov, D. & Subetto, D. 2009. = [phrase omitted].
Gerasimov, D. V., Bel skij, S. V. & Lisitsyn, S. N. 2007a. = [phrase omitted], 176-183.
Gerasimov, D. V., Nordkvist, K, Sejtsonen, O. & Subetto, D. A. 2007b. = [phrase omitted], 79-103.
Gerasimov, D. V., Nordkvist, K & Sejtsonen, O. 2008. = [phrase omitted], 188-193.
Gerasimov, D., Kriiska, A. & Lisitsyn, S. 2010. Colonization of the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) coastal zone in the Stone Age.--III Northern Archaeological Congress. Papers. IzdatNaukServis, Ekaterinburg, Khanty, Mansiisk, 29-54.
Gerasimov, D. V., Kriiska, A., Nordqvist, K & Kholkina, M. A. 2018a. Cross-Gulf cooperation in the Stone Age study: new results, continuing projects and research perspectives.--International Scientific Forum <<Gulf of Finland--natural dynamics and anthropogenic impact>>, Devoted to 50th Anniversary of Trilateral Gulf of Finland Co-operation: Abstracts (17-18 October 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia). VSEGEI Press, St.-Petersburg, 31-34.
Gerasimov, D. V., Tkach, E. S. & Goncharova, E. N. 2018b. = [phrase omitted], 9-20.
Gurina, N. N. 1961. = [phrase omitted].
Gusentsova, T. M. 2009. = [phrase omitted], 98-100.
Gusentsova, T. M. & Kholkina, M. A. 2015. = [phrase omitted], 218-227.
Gusentsova, T. M. & Kulkova, M. A. 2016. = [phrase omitted], 388-396.
Gusencova, T. M., Sapelko, T. V., Ludikova, A. V., Kul kova, M. A., Ryabchuk, D. V., Sergeev, A. Yu. & Kholkina, M. A. 2014. Archaeology and palaeogeography of Podolje-1 site on the southern shore of the Ladoga Lake.--Archaeology of Lake Settlements IV-II Mill. BC: Chronology of Cultures, Environment and Palaeoclimatic Rhythms. Materials of International Conference Dedicated the Semi-Centennial Anniversary of the Researches of Lake Dwellings in North-Western Russia. Saint-Petersburg, 13-15 November 2014. State Hermitage, St-Petersburg, 130-133.
Huurre, M. 2003. Viipurin laanin kivikausi.--Karjalan synty: Viipurin laanin historia, 1. Ed. M. Saarnisto. Karjalan Kirjapaino, Joensuu, 151-244.
Jorgensen, R. & Olsen, B. 1988. Asbestkeramiske grupper i Nord-Norge 2100 f Kr.--100 e. Kr. (Tromura Kulturhistorie, 13.) Universitetet i Tromso, Tromso.
Kholkina, M. A. 2016. = [phrase omitted], 15 (5), 53-62.
Kim, W.-Y. 1962. Some aspects of the comb-pattern pottery of prehistoric Korea.--Arctic Anthropology, 1: 1, 42-50.
Kosarev, M. F. 1978. = [phrase omitted].
Krajnov, D. A. 1981. = [phrase omitted], 1981, 2, 5-20.
Krajnov, D. A. 1987. = [phrase omitted], 1027.
Kriiska, A. & Tarasov, A. 2011. Wood-chopping tools of Russian-Karelian type from Latvia. (Arheologija un etnografia, XXV.) Zinatne, Riga, 57-72.
Kriiska, A., Gerasimov, D. V., Nordqvist, K, Lisitsyn, S. N., Sandell, S. & Kholkina, M. A. 2016. Stone Age research in the Narva-Luga Klint Bay area in 2005-2014.--New Sites, New Methods. (Iskos, 21.) The Finnish Antiquarian Society, Helsinki, 92-106.
Krijska, A. & Gerasimov, D. V. 2014. = [phrase omitted], 5-36.
Kul kova, M. A. & Gusentsova, T. M. 2012. = [phrase omitted], 200-206.
Kulkova, M. A. & Yushkova, M. A. 2008. = [phrase omitted], 201-220.
Kul kova, M. A., Sapelko, T. V., Ludikova, A. V., Kuznetsov, D. D., Subetto, D. A., Nesterov, E. M., Gusentsova, T. M. & Sorokin, P. E. 2010. = [phrase omitted], 142 (6), 13-31.
Kulkova, M. A., Gusentzova, T. M., Nesterov, E. M., Sorokin, P. E. & Sapelko, T. V. 2014. Chronology of Neolithic--Early Metal Age sites at the Okhta River mouth (Saint Petersburg, Russia).--Radiocarbon, 54: 3-4, 1049-1063.
Kulkova, M. A., Gusentsova, T. M. & Kulkov, A. M. 2016. = [phrase omitted], 215-218.
Lavento, M. 2001. Textile Ceramics in Finland and on the Karelian Isthmus. (SMYA, 109.) Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistys, Helsinki.
Lavento, M. & Hornytzkyj, S. 1996. Asbestos types and their distribution in the Neolithic, Early Metal Period and Iron Age pottery in Finland.--Pithouses and Potmakers in Eastern Finland: Reports of the Ancient Lake Saimaa Project. (Helsinki papers in archaeology, 9.) Ed. T. Kirkinen. Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, 41-70.
Macane, A., Nordqvist, K & Kostyleva, E. 2019. Marmot incisors and bear tooth pendants in Volosovo hunter-gatherer burials. New radiocarbon and stable isotope data from the Sakhtysh complex, Upper-Volga region.--Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101908
Mazurkevich, A N., Korotkevich, B. S., Dolukhanov, P. M., Shukurov, A. M., Arslanov, Kh. A, Savel'eva, L. A., Dzinoridze, E. N., Kulkova, M. A. & Zaitseva, G. I. 2009. Climate, subsistence and human movements in the Western Dvina--Lovat River Basins.--Quaternary International, 203: 1-2, 52-66.
Mazurkevits, A. 2009. Pihkva oblasti pohjaosa kiviaeg.--Vanem ajalugu muinasajast kuni 1920. aastani. (Setomaa, 2.) Eesti Rahva Muuseum, Tartu, 26-27.
Meinander, C. F. 1954. Die Kiukaiskultur. (SMYA, 53.) Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistys, Helsinki.
Miklyaev, A. M. 1995. = [phrase omitted], 9, 7-39.
Mokkonen, T. & Nordqvist, K 2006. Opettaja Sokolovin kivikauden kokoelma Karjalan-kannakselta.--Muinaistutkija, 2, 7-18.
Mokkonen, T. & Nordqvist, K 2017. Kierikki Ware and the contemporary Neolithic asbestos-and organic-tempered potteries in North-East Europe.--Fennoscandia Archaeologica, XXXIV, 83-116.
Mokkonen, T., Nordqvist, K & Herva, V.-P. 2017. Changes in Neolithic lithic raw materials in eastern Finland: Indications of changing contact networks.--Cultural Processes in the Circum-Baltic Space in the Early and Middle Holocene. Papers of the International Scientific Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Vladimir I. Timofeev, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, April 26-28, 2017. Ed. D. V. Gerasimov. Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography /Kunstkamera/ Russian Academy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg, 181-186.
Mylnikova, L. N. 2015. = [phrase omitted].
Nedomolkina, N. G. 2000. = [phrase omitted], 4777.
Nedomolkina, N. G. 2007. = [phrase omitted].
Nordkvist, K 2015. = [phrase omitted], 249-265.
Nordqvist, K 2018. The Stone Age of North-Eastern Europe 5500-1800 cal. BC. Bridging the Gap between the East and the West. University of Oulu, Oulu.
Nordqvist, K & Herva, V.-P. 2013. Copper use, cultural change and Neolithization in northeastern Europe (c. 5500-1800 BC).--European Journal of Archaeology, 16(3), 401-432.
Nordqvist, K & Mokkonen, T. 2017. Periodization of the Neolithic and radiocarbon chronology of the Early Neolithic and the beginning of Middle Neolithic in Finland.--Documenta Praehistorica, 44, 78-87.
Nordqvist, K, Seitsonen, O. & Uino, P. 2008. Appendix 1. Stone Age and Early Metal Period sites in the studied municipalities.--Iskos, 16, 291-328.
Nordqvist, K, Herva, V.-P., Ikaheimo, J. & Lahelma, A. 2012. Early copper use in Neolithic north-eastern Europe: an overview.--EJA, 16: 1, 3-25.
Oinonen, M., Pesonen, P., Alenius, T., Heyd, V., Holmqvist-Saukkonen, E., Kivimaki, S., Nygren, T., Sundell, T. & Onkamo, P. 2014. Event reconstruction through Bayesian chronology: Massive mid-Holocene lake-burst triggered large-scale ecological and cultural change.--The Holocene, 24(11), 1419-1427.
Oshibkina, S. V. 1966. = [phrase omitted], 4, 27-37.
Oshibkina, S. V. 1978. = [phrase omitted].
Palsi, S. 1915. Riukjarven ja Piiskunsalmen kivikautiset asuinpaikat Kaukolassa. Helsinki.
Pankrushev, G. A. 1978. = [phrase omitted].
Pesonen, P. 1996. Early Asbestos Ware.--Pithouses and Potmakers: Reports of the Ancient Lake Saimaa Project. Ed. T. Kirkinen. (Helsinki Papers in Archaeology, 9.) University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 9-39.
Pesonen, P. 1999. Suomen esihistoriallinen keramiikka.--URL: http://www.helsinki.fi/hum/arla/keram/
Pesonen, P. 2004. Neolithic pots and ceramic chronology: AMS-datings of Middle and Late Neolithic ceramics in Finland.--Fenno-ugri et Slavi 2002: Dating and Chronology. Ed. P. Uino. (Museoviraston arkeologian osaston julkaisuja, 10.) National Board of Antiquities, Helsinki, 87-97.
Pesonen, P., Oinonen, M., Carpelan, C. & Onkamo, P. 2012. Early Subneolithic ceramic sequences in eastern Fennoscandia: A Bayesian approach.--Radiocarbon, 54(3-4), 661- 676.
Petrova, N. Yu. 2008. = [phrase omitted], 259-261.
Piezonka, H., Kostyleva, E., Zhilin, M. G., Dobrovolskaya, M. & Terberger, T. 2013. Flesh or fish: First results of archaeometric research of prehistoric burials from Sakhtysh IIa, Upper Volga region, Russia.--Documenta Praehistorica, 40, 57-73.
Seitsonen, O., Nordqvist, K, Gerasimov, D. V. & Lisitsyn, S. N. 2012. The good, the bad, the weird': Stone Age and Early Metal Period radiocarbon dates and chronology from the Karelian Isthmus, north-west Russia.--Geochronometria, 39: 2, 101-121.
Siiriainen, A. 1967. Yli-Iin Kierikki: asbestikeraaminen asuinpaikka Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla.--Suomen Museo, 74, 5-37.
Siiriainen, A. 1984. On the Late Stone Age Asbestos Ware culture of northern and eastern Finland.--Iskos, 4, 30-36.
Sorokin, P. E. 2011. = [phrase omitted], 3(183), 19-25.
Sorokin, P. E., Gusentsova, T. M., Glukhov, V. O., Ekimova, A. A., Kul kova, M. A. & Mokrushin, V. P. 2009a. = [phrase omitted], 205-221.
Sorokin, P. E., Gusentsova, T. M., Ekimova, A. A., Kul kova, M. A., Nesterov, E. M. & Sharkova, A. 2009b. = [phrase omitted], 320-324.
Sosnovskij, G. P. 1935. = [phrase omitted], 109(1), 2327.
Sosnovskij, G. P. & Zemlyakov, B. F. 1917. = [phrase omitted].
Tallavaara, M., Pesonen, P. & Oinonen, M. 2010. Prehistoric population history in eastern Fennoscandia.--Journal of Archaeological Science, 37: 2, 251-260.
Tallgren, A. M. 1914. Den osteuropeiska bronsalderskulturen i Finland.--Finskt Museum, XXI, 11-22.
Tarasov, A. Yu., Nordqvist, K, Mokkonen, T. & Khoroshun, T. 2017. Radiocarbon chronology of the Neolithic--Eneolithic period in the Karelian Republic (Russia).--Documenta Praehistorica, 44, 98-121.
Timofeev, V. I. 1985. = [phrase omitted], 11-15.
Timofeev, V. I. 1993. = [phrase omitted], 833.
Timofeev, V. I. & Gerasimov, D. V. 2002. = [phrase omitted], 63-64.
Tsetlin, Yu. B. 2008. = [phrase omitted].
Utkin, A. V. & Kostyleva, E. L. 2006. = [phrase omitted], 124-126.
Vikkula, A. 1981. Vantaan Maannkuas-Stenkulla. Tutkimuksia Uskela-keramiikan alalta. (Helsingin yliopiston arkeologian laitos, moniste, 27.) Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki.
Voevodskij, M. V. 1936= [phrase omitted], 1, 51-78.
Yushkova, M. A. 2011. = [phrase omitted].
Zemlyakov, B. F. 1941. = [phrase omitted].
Zhulnikov, A. M. 2005. = [phrase omitted].
Zhulnikov, A. M. 2006. = [phrase omitted], 330-334.
Zhulnikov, A. M. 2008. Exchange of amber in Northern Europe in the III millennium BC as a factor of social interactions.--EJA, 12: 1, 3-15.
Zhulnikov, A. M., Tarasov, A. Yu. & Kriiska, A. 2012. Discrepancies between conventional and AMS dates of complexes with Asbestos and Porous Ware--probable result of "reservoir effect"?--Fennoscandia Archaeologica, XXIX, 79-86.
Dmitriy V. Gerasimov, Tatyana M. Gusentsova ja Margarita A. Kholkina
PIIRI JALGIMINE: NEOLIITILISE ASBESTKERAAMIKA LOUNAPERIFEERIA
Asbestilisandiga savinoude valmistamise traditsioon naib olevat Fennoskandia ja selle lahialade ainulaadne fenomen (jn 1). Asbestkeraamika valmistamine algas V aastatuhande keskel eKr looduslike asbestipaljandite lahedal Ida-Saimaa piirkonnas Soomes (jn 2). IV aastatuhande teisel poolel ja III aastatuhandel eKr levis see ulatuslikus piirkonnas Pohja-Rootsist Arhangelski oblastini Venemaal. Ehkki looduslikku asbesti leidub paljudes kohtades ule maailma, ei tunta kusagilt mujalt valjastpoolt eelmainitud ala neoliitikumist parit keraamikat, mille vormimismassi lisandina oleks seda mineraali kasutatud.
Viimane ulevaade looduslikest avamustest eemal paikneva arheoloogilise kontekstiga asbestilisandiga keraamika kohta ilmus 15 aastat tagasi. Selle aja jooksul on uuritud uusi asbestkeraamikaga muistiseid Karjala maakitsusel ja Laadoga lounakallastel. Lisaks on toimunud intensiivne arheoloogiline uurimistoo Soome lahe lounarannal. Nendele ajakohastatud andmetele tuginedes on kaesolevas artiklis arutletud asbestkeraamika lounapoolse perifeeria ja leviala piiri ule.
Karjala maakitsuselt ja Laadoga lounakaldalt tuntakse praeguseks umbes 30 asbestkeraamikaga asulakohta (jn 3, tabel 1). Need piirkonnad olid asbestkeraamika leviku aarealad, kuid samas sudaaladega seotud selle traditsiooni algusest peale. Koik Soomes maaratletud peamised neoliitilise asbestkeraamika tuubid (Ka 1:2(asb), Kaunissaare, tuupiline kammkeraamika (asb), Kierikki ja Polja) on esindatud ka Karjala maakitsusel, sh selle lounaosas (jn 4-6). Asbestilisandiga keraamika valmistamise lokaalne traditsioon kujunes III aastatuhandel eKr Laadoga lounakaldal. Ohta 1 ja Podolje 1 (jn 1) asulakohast leitud keraamika sarnaneb molemaga, nii laane kui ka ida (Karjala) asbestkeraamika traditsiooniga, millel on samas ka moningaid uhiseid jooni Ulem-Volga Volossovo kultuuri ja Vologda oblasti Modlona asulakohtade keraamikaga ning lokaalseid eriparasid (jn 7). Kohalik asbestkeraamika valmistamistraditsioon Karjala maakitsusel ja Laadoga lounakaldal eeldas hilisneoliitikumis ning eneoliitikumis hasti arenenud asbesti tarnesusteemi aladega, kus paiknesid selle mineraali looduslikud avamused.
Asulakohtade leviku analuus osutab, et hilisneoliitilise asbestkeraamika edelapiir jargib varase asbestkeraamika ja Sperringsi tuupi keraamika piiri. Sperringsi tuupi keraamikat hakati Soome lahe idakaldal valmistama samal ajal kui Narva tuupi keraamikat sellest edela pool. Noude valmistamistehnoloogia, morfoloogia ja ornamendi poolest selgelt kahe erineva keraamikatraditsiooni samaaegne kujunemine naitab piiri kahe kultuuripiirkonna vahel, kuigi kivitehnoloogia ning elatusviis olid sarnased nii enne kui ka parast keraamika kasutuselevottu.
Alates vahemalt varaneoliitikumist olid Karjala maakitsuse ja Laadoga lounakalda alad seotud Saimaa piirkonnaga, moodustades Sperringsi ning varase asbestkeraamika aareala. Mitu sajandit valdanud "kultuurilise uhtlustumise" ajal tuupilise kammkeraamika perioodil muutus see piir ebaselgeks, kuid sai hilisneoliitilises keraamikatraditsioonis taas nahtavaks. Regioonidevahelises kaupade vahetuses, naiteks Laanemere aarest parit merevaigust ripatsid voi Aanisjarve kallastel valmistatud Vene-Karjala tuupi raieriistad, ei olnud aga Sperringsi tuupi ja aspestkeraamika edelapoolne raja piiravaks teguriks. Vaatamata paljudele erinevustele materiaalses kultuuris, majandusstrateegiates ja suhtlusvorgustikes asbestkeraamika ajal ning levialal, voib oletada, et asbesti kasutamine savinoude vormimismassi lisandis osutab nende piirkondade vahelistele kultuurisuhetele.
Dmitriy V. Gerasimov, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography /Kunstkamera/ of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 University emb., Saint Petersburg, Russia; firstname.lastname@example.org
Tatyana M. Gusentsova, "Naslediye" Institute, 5.17D Decabristov lane, Saint Petersburg, Russia; email@example.com
Margarita A. Kholkina, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography /Kunstkamera/ of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 University emb., Saint Petersburg, Russia; firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. Sites with Neolithic Asbestos Ware on the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga area Site name Pottery type 1 Berezovo 2 Kierikki, Polja, TCW(asb) 2 Glinjanyj Ruchej Kaunissaari 3 Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi Polja Vanhasniemi 2) 4 Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi Polja Ristila 1) 5 Gvardejskoje 1 Polja 6 Johannes Kaijala Kierikki; Polja Vantsi 7 Kanneljarvi 1 Polja 8 Kanneljarvi 2 Polja 9 Kaukjarvi Kelonen Indefinable (Kamenka 1) 10 Kaukola Kankaanmaki Indefinable (Riukjarvi 2) 11 Kaukola Kal:2(asb) Kyostalanharju 12 Kaukola Nokopelto Indefinable (Riukjarvi 8) 13 Kaukola Tiirunmaki Polja Varpa 14 Komsomolskoje 3 Polja (Pyhajarvi Kunnianniemi 1) 15 Novoselki 5 (Raisala Kierikki Seppala 2-4) 16 Okhtal Kierikki / Vojnavolok; Polja/ Orovnavolok; TCW(asb) 17 Ozernoje3 Kierikki 18 Podolyel Modlona(?) 19 Podolye3 Not defined 20 Protochnoje 2 (Kaukola Indefinable Pontuksenhauta 2) 21 Protochnoje 3 (Kaukola Indefinable Rupunkangas 4) 22 Pyhajarvi Konnitsa Polja Aijo, Antti Aijo 23 Raisala Virtola Polja Pitkajarvi 24 Romashki (Sovinlahti) Kaunissaari 25 Silino (Muolaa Kierikki Telkkala) 26 Sosnovaja Gora Indefinable 27 Tarkhovka Kaunissaari 28 Tokarevo 1 TCW(asb) 29 Ust-Rybezhna 2 Orovnavolok 30 Veschevo 1 (Heinjoki Indefinable Latukangas 1) 31 Viipuri Karstila Polja Hayrynmaki 32 Viipuri Karstila Kal:2(asb) Selankangas 33 Vuoksenranta Sintola Early Asbestos Kal:2(asb) Site name [.sup.14]C dates 1 Berezovo 2 2 Glinjanyj Ruchej 3 Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi Vanhasniemi 2) 4 Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi Ristila 1) 5 Gvardejskoje 1 2900-2673 (4205 [+ or -] 35, GrA-62068), charred crust on Polja potsherd (Nordqvist 2018) 6 Johannes Kaijala 3940-3370 BC (4870 + 85, Hela- Vantsi 465), charred crust on Kierikki potsherd (Huurre 2003) 7 Kanneljarvi 1 8 Kanneljarvi 2 9 Kaukjarvi Kelonen (Kamenka 1) 10 Kaukola Kankaanmaki (Riukjarvi 2) 11 Kaukola Kyostalanharju 12 Kaukola Nokopelto (Riukjarvi 8) 13 Kaukola Tiirunmaki Varpa 14 Komsomolskoje 3 2580-2340 BC (3955 + 35, Hela- (Pyhajarvi 1844), burnt bone from a pit Kunnianniemi 1) with Polja Ware; 2840-2470 BC (4030 + 35, Hela-1819), charred crust on Polja potsherd (Seitsonen et al. 2012) 15 Novoselki 5 (Raisala Seppala 2-4) 16 Okhtal 3500-2000 BC series of [.sup.14]C dates (Kul'kova et al. 2014) 17 Ozernoje3 18 Podolyel 3700-2200 BC series of [.sup.14]C dates (Kul'kova et al. 2016) 19 Podolye3 20 Protochnoje 2 (Kaukola Pontuksenhauta 2) 21 Protochnoje 3 (Kaukola Rupunkangas 4) 22 Pyhajarvi Konnitsa Aijo, Antti Aijo 23 Raisala Virtola Pitkajarvi 24 Romashki (Sovinlahti) 25 Silino (Muolaa 3340-2910 BC (4430 + 65, AAR- Telkkala) 7130), charred crust on Kierikki potsherd 26 Sosnovaja Gora 27 Tarkhovka 28 Tokarevo 1 29 Ust-Rybezhna 2 30 Veschevo 1 (Heinjoki Latukangas 1) 31 Viipuri Karstila Hayrynmaki 32 Viipuri Karstila Selankangas 33 Vuoksenranta Sintola Site name Storage Analysed place fragments with asbestos (min vessels N) 1 Berezovo 2 MAE 300 (14) 2 Glinjanyj Ruchej MAE 2(1) 3 Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi MAE 2(1) Vanhasniemi 2) 4 Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi MAE 1(1) Ristila 1) 5 Gvardejskoje 1 MAE 75(5) 6 Johannes Kaijala KM 16 Vantsi 7 Kanneljarvi 1 MAE 7(1) 8 Kanneljarvi 2 MAE 20(2) 9 Kaukjarvi Kelonen KM, 1 (Kamenka 1) MAE 10 Kaukola Kankaanmaki KM ? (Riukjarvi 2) 11 Kaukola KM ? Kyostalanharju 12 Kaukola Nokopelto KM 7 (Riukjarvi 8) 13 Kaukola Tiirunmaki KM ? Varpa 14 Komsomolskoje 3 MAE 28(1) (Pyhajarvi Kunnianniemi 1) 15 Novoselki 5 (Raisala MAE 27(1) Seppala 2-4) 16 Okhtal MAE 130 17 Ozernoje3 MAE 2(1) 18 Podolyel MAE 137 (16) 19 Podolye3 MAE ? 20 Protochnoje 2 (Kaukola MAE 1 Pontuksenhauta 2) 21 Protochnoje 3 (Kaukola MAE 1 Rupunkangas 4) 22 Pyhajarvi Konnitsa KM ? Aijo, Antti Aijo 23 Raisala Virtola KM 21 Pitkajarvi 24 Romashki (Sovinlahti) MAE 1 25 Silino (Muolaa MAE 5(1) Telkkala) 26 Sosnovaja Gora MAE 1(1) 27 Tarkhovka MAE 2(1) 28 Tokarevo 1 MAE 1 29 Ust-Rybezhna 2 MAE 1 30 Veschevo 1 (Heinjoki MAE ? Latukangas 1) 31 Viipuri Karstila KM ? Hayrynmaki 32 Viipuri Karstila KM ? Selankangas 33 Vuoksenranta Sintola KM ? Site name Typolological Analysed attribution fragments without asbestos (min vessels N) 1 Berezovo 2 This study 2504 (?) 2 Glinjanyj Ruchej This study 35(4) 3 Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi This study 49(1) Vanhasniemi 2) 4 Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi This study 299 (4) Ristila 1) 5 Gvardejskoje 1 This study 242 (8) 6 Johannes Kaijala Huurre 2003, 154; 29 Vantsi Nordqvist et al. 2008, 295; this study 7 Kanneljarvi 1 This study 2687 (97) 8 Kanneljarvi 2 This study 64(7) 9 Kaukjarvi Kelonen Huurre 2003, 156; 157 (Kamenka 1) this study 10 Kaukola Kankaanmaki Nordqvist et al. 2008, ? (Riukjarvi 2) 299 11 Kaukola Nordqvist et al. 2008, ? Kyostalanharju 301 12 Kaukola Nokopelto Nordqvist et al. 2008, ? (Riukjarvi 8) 300 13 Kaukola Tiirunmaki Nordqvist et al. 2008, ? Varpa 302 14 Komsomolskoje 3 This study 5222 (21) (Pyhajarvi Kunnianniemi 1) 15 Novoselki 5 (Raisala This study - Seppala 2-4) 16 Okhtal Kul'kova& ? Gusentsova2012 17 Ozernoje3 This study 27 689 (109) 18 Podolyel This study 4493 (88) 19 Podolye3 Gusentsova & ? Kul'kova 2016, 388 20 Protochnoje 2 (Kaukola Gerasimov 2006, 48 - Pontuksenhauta 2) 21 Protochnoje 3 (Kaukola Gerasimov 2006, 49 13 Rupunkangas 4) 22 Pyhajarvi Konnitsa Huurre 2003, 156 ? Aijo, Antti Aijo 23 Raisala Virtola Nordqvist et al. 2008, 87 Pitkajarvi 320; this study 24 Romashki (Sovinlahti) This study 8 25 Silino (Muolaa This study 3150(32) Telkkala) 26 Sosnovaja Gora This study 365(11) 27 Tarkhovka This study 486 (58) 28 Tokarevo 1 This study 1276 29 Ust-Rybezhna 2 Gurina 1961, 468; ? Yushkova 2011, 32 30 Veschevo 1 (Heinjoki Timofeev & ? Latukangas 1) Gerasimov 2002, 63 31 Viipuri Karstila Meinander 1954, ? Hayrynmaki 151; Lavento 2001, 255 32 Viipuri Karstila Ayrapaa 1934, 51; ? Selankangas Pesonen 1996, 10 33 Vuoksenranta Sintola Huurre 2003, 157 ? Site name Other ceramic types recognized on the site 1 Berezovo 2 TCW, LCW 2 Glinjanyj Ruchej Sperrings 3 Gusinoje 3 (Pyhajarvi LCW Vanhasniemi 2) 4 Gusinoje 6 (Pyhajarvi LCW, Corded Ware Ristila 1) 5 Gvardejskoje 1 LCW, Corded Ware 6 Johannes Kaijala Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Vantsi Pitted Ware, Pyheensilta, Corded Ware, Kiukainen 7 Kanneljarvi 1 Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Corded Ware, EMP 8 Kanneljarvi 2 LCW 9 Kaukjarvi Kelonen Sperrings, TCW, LCW, (Kamenka 1) Corded Ware 10 Kaukola Kankaanmaki Sperrings, TCW, LCW, (Riukjarvi 2) Pitted Ware, Corded Ware, Kiukainen, EMP 11 Kaukola Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Kyostalanharju Pitted Ware, EMP 12 Kaukola Nokopelto TCW, EMP (Riukjarvi 8) 13 Kaukola Tiirunmaki Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Varpa EMP 14 Komsomolskoje 3 Sperrings, TCW, LCW, (Pyhajarvi Corded Ware, EMP Kunnianniemi 1) 15 Novoselki 5 (Raisala No Seppala 2-4) 16 Okhtal Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Corded Ware 17 Ozernoje3 Sperrings, TCW, LCW 18 Podolyel TCW, LCW 19 Podolye3 TCW, LCW 20 Protochnoje 2 (Kaukola No Pontuksenhauta 2) 21 Protochnoje 3 (Kaukola TCW Rupunkangas 4) 22 Pyhajarvi Konnitsa Sperrings, TCW, LCW Aijo, Antti Aijo 23 Raisala Virtola Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Pitkajarvi Pitted Ware, EMP 24 Romashki (Sovinlahti) TCW 25 Silino (Muolaa Sperrings, TCW, LCW Telkkala) 26 Sosnovaja Gora TCW, LCW 27 Tarkhovka LCW 28 Tokarevo 1 TCW, LCW 29 Ust-Rybezhna 2 EMP 30 Veschevo 1 (Heinjoki Sperrings, TCW, LCW Latukangas 1) 31 Viipuri Karstila Sperrings, TCW, LCW, Hayrynmaki Corded Ware 32 Viipuri Karstila Sperrings, LCW, Corded Selankangas Ware 33 Vuoksenranta Sintola TCW MAE = Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography /Kunstkamera/ of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia; KM = National Museum, Helsinki, Finland; TCW = Typical Combed Ware; LCW = Late Combed Ware. Table 2. Main characteristics of Neolithic asbestos-tempered pottery types recognized on the Karelian Isthmus and the southern Ladoga area Type Temper Rim/bottom shape Kal: 2 asb Asbestos, rarely - Rim is straight or L-shaped, talc or mica inwards thickening; unprofiled Kaunissaari Asbestos Rim is straight or thickened; bottom is rounded; slightly profiled Kierikki Asbestos Rim is straight or thickened; bottom is rounded; unprofiled Vojnavolok Asbestos and bird Rim is straight or feather thickened; bottom is rounded; unprofiled Polja Asbestos Rim is L-shaped; bottom is rounded; unprofiled Early Asbestos and bird Rim is straight, thickening Orovnavolok feather, shells or slanting Late Asbestos, sometimes Rim is L-shaped, straight, Orovnavolok only organics outwards slanting; bottom is flat or rounded Palajguba Asbestos, rarely Rim is L-shaped, straight organics or bent outwards; bottom is flat Volosovo Bird feather, shells, Rim is straight, thickening occasionally or slanting outwards; asbestos? bottom is rounded or flat; unprofiled Modlona Shells, undefined Rim is thickened inwards organics (rarely - or outwards bird feather), asbestos Type Elements of decoration Decoration patterns Kal: 2 asb Comb stamp "Herring bone", zigzags Kaunissaari Bone impressions, Horizontal rows of elements oval pits Kierikki Long and thin comb Horizontal rows of stamp, shallow pits, elements, horizontal drawn lines zigzag, triangles Vojnavolok Comb stamp, shallow Geometric patterns pits, other stamps absolutely prevails, zigzag stripes and rhombs Polja Comb stamp, wound- Horizontal rows of elements cord stamp Early Comb stamp, stick Horizontal rows of Orovnavolok impressions, shallow elements, zigzag stripes, pits, drawn lines vertical zigzag Late Mostly comb stamp Vertical zigzag prevails Orovnavolok Palajguba Mostly comb stamp, Vertical and horizontal also cord impressions, zigzag, horizontal line, stick impressions and horizontal rows of comb shallow pits stamp imprints Volosovo Comb stamp, round pits, Horizontal rows of stick impressions, elements, "net pattern", shallow pits, double "herring bone", rhombs or comb stamp triangles, zigzags Modlona Comb stamp, rarely - "Herring bone", zigzags, shallow pits and vertical patterns double comb stamp Type Other Source Kal: 2 asb Decoration is shallow, the Pesonen 1996 vessel is decorated from top to the bottom Kaunissaari Decoration is more sharp- Pesonen 1996 cut and deeper than for Kal: 2 asb Kierikki A lot of space is left empty; Siiriainen 1967; 1984, the surface is 30;Mokkonen& smoothed Nordqvist 2017,86 Vojnavolok The inner surface is often Zhul'nikov 1999 striated Polja Decoration is shallow, Meinander 1954, 162 irregular; the surface is smoothed or striated; there are textile imprints Early Inner surface is often Zhul'nikov 1999 Orovnavolok striated Late Inner surface is often Zhul'nikov 1999 Orovnavolok striated Palajguba Inner surface is sometimes Zhul'nikov 1999 striated Volosovo Sometimes textile or net Krajnov 1981; 1987; imprints on inner or outer Emel'yanov 2005; surface Petrova 2008; Tsetlin 2008 Modlona A lot of empty space, Oshibkina 1966; 1978 decoration is mostly in the upper part
[Please note: Some non-Latin characters were omitted from this article]
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Gerasimov, Dmitriy V.; Gusentsova, Tatyana M.; Kholkina, Margarita A.|
|Publication:||Estonian Journal of Archaeology|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||FIRST SECULAR MASONRY BUILDINGS OF THE NOVGORODIAN ARCHBISHOP'S COURT: WRITTEN SOURCES AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA.|