Printer Friendly

THE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR OF MOTHERS WITH CHILDREN AGED 0-6 YEARS ON HOME ACCIDENTS AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES/0-6 YAS GRUBU COCUGU OLAN ANNELERIN EV KAZALARI VE KORUNMA YOLLARI KONUSUNDAKI BILGI, TUTUM VE DAVRANISLARI.

INTRODUCTION

Accidents are currently the leading preventable health issue across all age groups, particularly in childhood in developed and developing countries, and they are ranked number 1 in causes of death and disablities (1). Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that more than 9000 children die of accidents each year, 225,000 children are hospitalized, and 9 million children are treated in emergency rooms due to injuries (2).

Children are more exposed to accidents than adults because they have different physical, anatomic, and physiologic characteristics, and it is associated with their age, and level of development. Accident frequecy varies with age (3)

Researchers reported that 90% of accidents in children under the age of 5 years in the United States of America (USA), and 50% of deaths resulting from these injuries occurred in the home environment (4). Researchers found that 2.6 million people visited emergency rooms in England each year, and approximately 4000 of the patients died (5). Although there is no clear updated available data for home accidents in Turkey, some studies showed that these accidents constituted 18-25% of all accidents (6). The rate of home accidents in children aged 0-6 years (38.4%) was ranked first among other family members (7).

Children aged 0-6 years have a higher risk of home accidents because they spend most of their time at home, have not completed their neurologic development, are not aware of situations and behaviors that may cause accident risk; they are curious about learning, and exploring everything. They require adult supervision to provide a safe environment, and to protect against accidents just as in the fullfillment of their other responsibilities. This adult is generally the mother of the child (6).

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate mothers' knowledge of precautionary measures, and the level of practise in the prevention of home accidents, and to evaluate the effect of other factors in home accidents in children.

METHODS

The present study was a prospective, single-centered study, designed as a descriptive and analytical survey. Ethics committee approval (no. 1180) was obtained local ethic committee.

217 women attending our family medicine polyclinic for whatever reason who had children between the ages of 0-6 years, and who had sufficient cooperation and orientation, agreed to and thus were included in the study.

A questionnaire designed specifically for the study was completed during face-to-face interviews.

The questionnaire comprised 20 questions regarding sociodemographic data, indoor precautionary measures taken for the prevention of accidents, children's previous home accidents, and the Diagnostic Scale for Safety Measures against Home accidents of Mothers of Children aged between 0-6 years was also used.

The mothers' level of education was classified in two groups as low (elementary education or below), and high (high school education and above). The mothers' knowledge of home accidents was probed using open-ended questions, and they were then grouped. The types of home accidents were classified as penetrating stab wounds, falls on slippery surfaces, falls from heights, poisoning, burns due to fre/iron/hot materials/water, electric shock, drowning in water, choking due to foreign body. Mothers were free to specify more than one option in questions that interrogated household safety measures, and safety measures in houses with stairs.

Cinar et al. developed the "Diagnostic Scale for Safety Measures against Home accidents of mothers of children aged between 0-6 years" (8) for the assessment of safety measures taken by mothers for the prevention against the most frequently observed home accidents: falls, burns, poisoning, and drowning. The scale consisted of 40 items including 34 positive, and 6 negative expressions. In the five point Likert-type scale, scores were graded from 1 to 5, and the scores varied according to the responses. The response of 'always' was graded 5, 'most of the time' 4, 'sometimes' 3, 'rarely' 2, and 'never' 1, in items indicating positive expressions; the grading was reversed in negative expressions in items 6, 9, 23, 26, 30, and 40. The minimum score was 40, and the maximum score was 200. The highest score indicated that the mother took the highest level of care to protect their children against home accidents.

Tha data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS) 19.0. The Chi-square, t-test, and the one-way ANOVA test were used in the comparison of qualitative data in the evaluation of the study data in addition to descriptive statistical methods such as mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. P values [less than or equal to]0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

217 mothers were interviewed in the scope of the study; however, 17 questionnaires were excluded due to missing data, and inappropriately aged children. The mean age of the mothers was 33.32[+ or -]5.64 years (min: 22, max: 50 years). Regarding education, 72.5% of mothers had high school education and above, 107 (53.5%) were working, and 93 (46.5%) were housewives. The distribution of the sociodemographic characteristics of the mothers is summarized in Table 1.

Seventy-eight percent (n=156) of children had their own rooms in their homes. 125 (62.5%) mothers primarily took care of their children by themselves, and the grandmother or a first-degree relative took care of 24.5% (n=49) of children, and babysitters took care of 13% (n=26).

Eleven percent of mothers (n=22) had a chronic disease that required continous follow-up. No chronic disease was detected in children of 81% (n=162) of mothers; at least one child of 19% (n=38) of mothers had a chronic disease that required continous follow-up. Eight (4%) mothers cared for disabled individuals who required continuous care at home.

Some 87.5% (n=175) of mothers reported knowledge of home accidents. The most familiar accidents were falls and bumps, with burns ranking second. The distribution of home accidents that mothers reported awareness of is presented in Diagram 1.

A high percentage (88.5%, n=177) of mothers used commercially-available indoor safety measures for the protection of children against home accidents. However, 11.5% (n=23) used no safety measures. The distribution of safety measures is shown in Diagram 2.

There were stairs in the homes of 38% of mothers (n=76). Slip preventive carpet or carpet fex was installed in 23.7% (n=18) of homes with stairs, hand rails in 55.3% (n=42), and stair safety gates in 31.6% (n=24).

At least one child of 58% (n=116) of mothers had experienced at least one home accident. Falls were the top ranking home accident, burns were second. The distribution of home accident types experienced by children is presented in Table 2.

The 200 mothers had a total of 349 children. 162 (46.4%) children experienced home accidents; 152 experiencing one, 8 children had two, and 1 child had three home accidents. 100 children (61.23%) were male and experienced home accidents; 48.76% of children (n=79) did not attend any health facility following their home accidents. Of the children who experienced home accidents, 45.7% (n=74) were aged between 2 and 4 years. 105 (52.5%) of first children of the family experienced some kind of accident, the rate was 45.9% (n=45) in the second child, 29% (n=9) in the third child, and 33.3% (n=3) in the fourth child.

No statistically significant association was detected between mother's age, number of people living in the family, children's caregiver, and mothers' level of knowledge of home accidents. The knowledge of working mothers with higher education, and the knowledge of families with a monthly average income above 1500 TL, and families having fewer than 3 children were higher than the other groups (p<0.001). It was observed that mothers in nuclear families, and fragmented families were more aware of home accidents (p=0.040). The association between mothers' level of knowledge home accidents, and experiencing home accidents of at least one child with sociodemographic characteristics is shown in Tables 3 and 4.

The assessment of factors associated with the status of mothers' use of safety measures is presented in Table 5. Accordingly, the level of use of safety measures of working mothers with higher education who had fewer than 3 children was higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The mean score of mothers in diagnostic scales for safety measures against home accidents was 178.85[+ or -]18.42 (min: 52, max: 200). The mean score of mothers aged below 35 years with a higher level of education, who knew about home accidents, and used safety measures was higher. The mean scores of mothers who live with 3 or fewer family members were higher than the other groups. The highest score (91.5%) was obtained from items of scale informing that 'I assume that worn-out electric cables are hazardous for children', and 'I tightly close the cap on medicine bottles so that my child cannot open it;' the lowest score (17.5%) was recorded in the response to 'I allow my child to wander around the kitchen while I am cooking'.

DISCUSSION

In the literature no difference was detected between the mother's age and the scale score in the study of Capik and Gurol, and between the mean age of mothers whose children did and did not experience home accidents in the study of Karatepe and Akis (9,10). Although some studies (Tsoumakas et al.) reported that younger mothers were careflul about home accidents, and their children's frequency of experiencing home accidents was lower, some studies suggested no association, or claimed the opposite (Yalaki et al.) (11,12). In our study no association was detected between the mother's age and being aware of home accidents or use of safety precautions against home accidents. The mean age of mothers whose children experienced home accidents was statistically significantly higher. The scale score for the identification of precautionary measures against home accidents was considerably higher in mothers aged under 35 years. The distinction in the present study suggests that socioeconomic and cultural values might be a factor. More comprehensive studies evaluating all socioeconomic characteristics are required.

Education level is a determinant of true knowledge and true practices in the prevention of child accidents. The frequency of home accidents significantly increased as the education level of mothers decreased (13). Capik and Gurol found that mothers with higher education had more knowledge and attitudes towards home accidents, and of their prevention (9). Similarly, in the present study, we found that mothers with high school education or above were more aware of home accidents, used safety precautions more frequently inside the house, and their scale score of knowledge of precautionary measures against home accidents was higher. King et al. reported that the scale score of their group positively increased after they were given home visit education on the prevention of home accidents in children (14). Similarly, Altundag and Ozturk found that the level of knowledge of mothers significantly increased after face-to-face education (15). Mothers with higher levels of education who are educated about home accidents and prevention methods have significant importance in the prevention of home accidents.

However, no association was detected between family type and the use of safety measures of mothers and children's experiencing home accidents. In contrast to our study, other studies reported a higher risk of accidents in extended families (12,16). When considering studies that demonstrated that the caregiver became distracted, it could be suggested that the risk of stress and possibility of accidents increases as the number of children, and number of people living in the family increased (16,17), mothers' awareness of accidents and the rate of taking precautionary measures decreases as the number of children and number of people living in the family increases, and accordingly, the rate of possibile home accidents increases in children. Factors such as children paying less attention and being less careflul due to having siblings, parents not spending equal time with each child, and children playing with their siblings might cause the higher prevalence of home accidents in children who have siblings.

The socioeconomic status of family is a determinant factor in injuries of children in home accidents. Studies showed that children in families with lower socioeconomic level more frequently experienced home accidents (12,18). However, no difference was detected in the present study between economic condition and experiencing accidents, or between the use of precautionary measures and obtained scores. One could suggest that families with poor socioeconomic conditions may be more exposed to dangers due to having poorer housing and living conditions.

In the present study, 53.6% of mothers were working. However, the awareness of home accidents, and the rate of using precautionary measures were higher in working mothers compared with non-workers; no association was detected between home accidents and the working status of mothers. Similar studies conducted in Turkey reported no statistically significant association between mothers working status and children experiencing home accidents (19). Santo et al. found that children of working mothers experienced home accidents less frequently compared with non-working mothers (20). Boztas reported that the injury rate of children due to home accidents of working mothers was higher compared with that of children of non-working mothers (21). The results suggest that accidents might be associated with reasons other than working status; working mothers leave their children under other people's supervision, and the attention and ability of caregivers might be a more significant factor.

The presence of chronic disease did not affect the scores obtained from the scale in our study; however, more home accidents were detected in children of mothers with chronic disease. Researchers found that home accidents were less frequent in children of healthier mothers (19). Boztas found that children of mothers who described their own health as poor experienced 2.4 times more home accidents than those whose mothers described themselves as healthy (21). It may be suggested that due to unhealthy mothers spending excessive time with their own disease and treatment process and additional burdens of chronic disease, they could not spend enough time with their children, which caused the increased risk of home accidents in children.

In our study, 62.5% of mothers primarly took care of their children by themselves. We detected that the rate of precautionary measures use was lower in mothers who took care of their children by themselves. Similar to the study of Karatepe, we found no association between the caregiver and the status of experiencing home accidents (19). Researchers in another study reported that the risk of being injured due to home accidents in children whose caregivers were not their mothers was 2.1 times higher than in children whose mothers took care of them (21).

A study conducted with children in Brazil reported that 65.7% of accidents occurred at home, 25.4% in the street, and 6.1% occurred at school. In addition, boys were more exposed to accidents than girls, and falling/slipping were the most common accidents (22). Many studies conducted in Turkey and in other countries demonstrated that the most common accidents were falls in children (10,16,19). Consistent with the literature, in the present study, we found the most common accidents were falls and bumps. Falls being the most common accidents (despite mothers knowing the most common accidents were falls, bumps, and burns), suggests that mothers were not well informed about precautinary measures. Investigation of risk factors for falls and bumps, and taking precautionary measures against these accidents may significantly decrease the effects of home accidents in children. Although the frequency of burns, electric shock, drowning in water, and poisoning is lower compared with falls, more focus must be given to preventive measures because they may result in death.

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that the number of injuries due to accidents in boys aged below 15 years was higher than in girls of the same age group (2). Karatepe and Nakis found a higher frequency of accidents in boys (10), and Ozmen et al. found that 61.2% of children who had home accidents were boys (23). Researchers reported that 60% of children attending hospital due to home accidents were boys (24). Consistent with other studies, we found the rate of home accidents higher among boys. The reason could be that boys are more energetic than girls.

Children's age is a significant factor in home accidents. The frequency of home accidents was found higher in children under the age of 5 years in some studies (25-27). In contrast, we found that 45.7% children who experienced home accidents were aged between 2-4 years. Researchers in a study found more home accidents in children aged between 24-35 months compared with other age groups (16). Karatepe found that the possibility of home accidents increased in children aged 0-4 years as the they became older; however, the possibility of home accidents decreased in children aged 5-6 years (19). The reason could be that children of younger ages spend more time at home, they are more interested with their environment, are curious and willing to learn, and their hand skills are under developed.

In our study, we detected that 51.4% of children were taken to health facilities after home accidents. The rate was 60.4% in the study of Yalaki et al.; the rate was between 25% and 47.5% in other studies (10,12,16).

The mean scale scores of mothers in our study was 178.85[+ or -]18.42. In literacy the scores were between 76.92[+ or -]12.45 162.13[+ or -]22.39 in Turkey (23,28). Mothers with higher scores in our study compared with other studies demonstrated that mothers included in the present study took precautionary measures at high levels. This could be because the socioeconomic and cultural levels of mothers in the present study were higher than those in other studies.

Mothers scored the highest from the expressions 'I assume that worn-out electric cables are hazardous for children', and 'I tightly close the cap on medicine bottles so that my child cannot open it', however the lowest score was recorded for the expression 'I allow my kid to wander around the kitchen while I am cooking.' Ozmen et al. found that mothers scored the highest for the expression 'I do not keep poisonous substances (e.g., rat poison, detergent, paint, bleach, gas, gasoline) in reach of children,' and received the lowest score from the expression 'I attach the baby nipple or 'evil eye' amulet on his/her cloth with a safety pin' (23). We assume that the variety in responses to questions might be due to the home environment and sociocultural differences of families.

CONCLUSION

Mothers did not effectively use safety measures. Organising education for parents and caregivers and the development of projects to create knowledge and awareness of safety measures will protect children against home accidents.

Home accidents are prominent and preventable public health care issues. Home accidents may be prevented using simple preventive measures both in the house and in theneighborhood. We must inform families about home accidents, and the prevention of accidents in the framework of 'Preventive Medicine' is one of the most significant divisions of the discipline of primary care physicians.

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the local ethics committee (No. 1180).

Informed Consent: Written consent was obtained from the participants.

Peer Review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Conception/Design of Study- M.U., M.U..; Data Acquisition- M.U., M.U.; Data Analysis/Interpretation-M.U.; Drafting Manuscript- M.U.; Critical Revision of Manuscript-M.U., M.U., D.T.; Final Approval and Accountability- M.U., M.U., D.T.; Technical or Material Support- M.U., D.T.; Supervision- D.T.

Confict of Interest: Authors declared no confict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: Authors declared no financial support.

Etik Komite Onayi: Etik komite onayi bu calisma icin, yerel etik komiteden alinmistir (No. 1180).

Bilgilendirilmis Onam: Katilimcilardan bilgilendirilmis onam alinmistir.

Hakem Degerlendirmesi: Dis bagimsiz.

Yazar Katkilari: Calisma Konsepti/Tasarim- M.U., M.U.; Veri Toplama- M.U., M.U.; Veri Analizi/Yorumlama- M.U..; Yaz Taslagi- M.U.; Icerigin Elestirel Incelemesi- M.U., M.U., D.T.; Son Onay ve Sorumluluk- M.U., M.U., D.T.; Malzeme ve Teknik Destek- M.U., D.T.; Supervizyon- D.T.

Cikar Catismasi: Yazarlar cikar catismasi beyan etmemislerdir.

Finansal Destek: Yazarlar finansal destek beyan etmemislerdir.

REFERENCES

(1.) Rivara FP, Grossman D. Injury Control. In: Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds). Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 18. Baski. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier 2007;366-75.

(2.) National Action Plan for Child Injury Prevention; An agenda to prevent injuries and promote the safety of children and adolescents in the United States. Atlanta (GA), CDC 2012.

(3.) Baysal SU, Yildirim F, Bulut A. Cocuk guvenligi: yaralanmalardan ve zehirlenmelerden korunma guvenlik kontrol listesi. Istanbul: Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Basimevi 2005.

(4.) Hendrickson SG. Reaching an underserved population with a randomly assigned home safety intervention. Injury Prevention 2005;11:313-7. [CrossRef]

(5.) The Department of Trade and Industry. Research on the patterns and trends in home accidents. London: DTI 1999.

(6.) Turan T, Dundar SA, Yorganci M, Yildirim Z. 0-6 yas grubu cocuklarda ev kazalarinin onlenmesi. Ulusal Travma ve Aci Cerrahi Dergisi 2010;16(6):552-7.

(7.) Erkal S, Safak S. Tuzlucayir saglik ocagi bolgesinde yasayan ailelerde ev kazasi gorulme durumu ve konutlarin ev kazasi riski acisindan incelenmesi. Saglik ve Toplum 2003; Nisan-Haziran:96-100.

(8.) Cinar ND, Gorak G. 0-6 yas cocuklarda annenin ev kazalarina yonelik guvenlik onlemlerini tanilama olceginin gelistirilmesi, gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismasi. Cocuk Forumu 2003;6:22-7.

(9.) Capik C, Gurol AP. Egitimin annelerin ev kazalarina yonelik guvenlik tedbirlerini tanilama yetilerine etkisi. ,Kafkas J Med Sci 2014;4(3):87-94. [CrossRef]

(10.) Karatepe TU, Akis N. 0-6 yas cocuklarda ev kazasi gecirme sikligi ve iliskili faktorler. Uludag Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi 2013;39(3):165-8.

(11.) Tsoumakas K, Dousis E, Mavridi F, Gremou A, Matziou V Parent's adherence to children's home-accident preventive measures. Int Nurs Rev 2009;56(3):369-74. [CrossRef]

(12.) Yalaki Z, Tasar MA, Kaya N, Dallar Y. Sosyoekonomik duzeyi dusuk olan ailelerin ev kazalari hakkinda bilgi duzeylerinin olculmesi. JAEM 2010:129-33. [CrossRef]

(13.) Erkal S, Safak S. Determination of the risks of domestic accidents for the 0-6 age group in the Tuzlucayir Village Clinic neighborhood. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2006;48:56-62.

(14.) King JW, LeBlanc JC, Barrowman NJ, Klassen TP, Bernard-Bonnin AC et al. Long term effects of a home visit to prevent chilhood injury: three year follow up of an randomized trial. Inj Prev 2005;11(2):106-9. [CrossRef]

(15.) Altundag S, Ozturk C. Ev kazalarina yonelik egitimin, guvenlik onlemleri alinmasi ve kaza gorulme sikligina etkisi. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007;13(3):180-185.

(16.) Kose OO, Bakirci N. Cocuklarda ev kazalari. STED 2007;16(3):31-5.

(17.) Baysal SU, Birinci A. Cocukluk caginda kazalar ve yaralanma kontrolu. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr 2006;2:64-79.

(18.) Kendrick D, Young B, Mason-Jones AJ, Ilyas N, Achana FA, Cooper NJ et al. Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention (Review). Evid Based Child Healt 2013 May;8(3):761-939. [CrossRef]

(19.) Karatepe TU. Nilufer Halk Sagligi egitim ve arastirma bolgesinde 0-6 yas cocuklarda ev kazasi gecirme sikligi ve iliskili faktorler, Uzmanlik Tezi. T.C. Saglik Bakanlig Uludag universitesi Tip Fakultesi Halk Sagligi Anabilim Dali; 2011.

(20.) Santo JAD, Goodman RM, Glik D, Jackson K. Childhood unintentional injuries: factors predicting injury risk among preschoolers. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2004;29(4):273-83. [CrossRef]

(21.) Boztas G. 0-48 aylik cocuklarin ev kazalari sonucu olusan yaralanmalarina iliskin annelerin davranis ve goruslerini etkilen faktorlerin belirlenmesi (Kecioren SGB, Uyanis Saglik Ocagi, 2007), Uzmanlik Tezi. T.C. Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Halk Sagligi Anabilim Dali; 2008.

(22.) Del Ciampo LA, Ricco RG, De Almedia CA, Mucillo G. Incidence of childhood accidents determined in a study based on home surveys. Ann Trop Pediatr 2001 Sep;21(3):239-243. (p-11) [CrossRef]

(23.) Ozmen D, Ergin D, Sen N, Cetinkaya A. 0-6 yas grubu cocugu olan annelerin ev kazalarina yonelik guvenlik onlemlerinin tanilanmasi. Aile ve Toplum 2007;3(12):13-20.

(24.) Altundag S, Ozturk MC Ev kazalari nedeniyle hastaneye gelen 3-6 yas grubu cocuklardaki kaza turleri ve bunu etkileyen etmenler. Cocuk Formu 2004:60-64.

(25.) Kilic B, Demiral Y Izmir'de bir gecekondu bolgesinde evde yaralanma insidansi. Toplum Hekimligi Bulteni 2006;25(3):27-32.

(26.) Mohammadi R, Ekman R, Svanstrom L, Gooya MM. Unintentional home related injuries in the Islamic Republic of Iran: findings from the first year of a national programme. Pub Health 2005;11(9):919-24. [CrossRef]

(27.) Agran PF, Winn D, Anderson C, Trent R, Haynes LW. Rates of pediatric and adolescent injuries by year of age. Pediatrics 2001;108:44-54. [CrossRef]

(28.) Kostu M. 0-6 yas grubunda cocugu olan annelerin ev kazalarindan cocuklarini korumaya yonelik aldiklari guvenlik onlemlerinin belirlenmesi. III. Ulusal Ana Cocuk Saglig Kongresi Bildiri Ozetleri Kitabi. 22-24 Eylul, Izmir 2005:282.

Muge UCUNCU (1) [iD], Muhammed UCUNCU (2) [iD], Dilek TOPRAK (3) [iD]

(1) Ortakoy Beltas Family Health Center, Istanbul, Turkey

(2) Istanbul Gelisim University, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey

(3) Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Family Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey

ORCID IDs of the authors: M.U. 0000-0001-6125-1848; M.U. 0000-0003-4638-1059; D.T.- 0000-0001-5119-9089

Cite this article as: Ucuncu M, Ucuncu M, Toprak D. The knowledge, attitude, and behavior of mothers with children aged 0-6 years on home accidents, and preventive measures. J Ist Faculty Med 2019;82(4):219-28. doi: 10.26650/IUITFD.2018.0011

Corresponding author/Iletisim kurulacak yazar: mugekusbeoglu@gmail.com

Submitted/Basvuru: 20.11.2018 * Revision Requested/Revizyon Talebi: 29.01.2019 *

Last Revision Received/Son Revizyon: 31.01.2019 * Accepted/Kabul: 15.02.2019 * Published Online/Online Yayin: 04.09.2019

DOI: 10.26650/IUITFD.2018.0011
Table 1: Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics

                                     n    %

Age
20-24                                  9   4.5
25-29                                 48  24
30-34                                 58  29
35-39                                 55  27.5
40-44                                 24  12
[greater than or equal to]45           6   3
Education
Illiterate                             7   3.5
Primary school                        31  15.5
Elementary school                     17   8.5
High school                           40  20
University/Higher education          105  52.5
Profession
White-collar                          84  42
Blue-collar                           23  11.5
Not working                           93  46.5
Monthly income (TL)
0-1500                                32  16
1501-3000                             35  17.5
[greater than or equal to]3001       133  66.5
Family type
Nuclear family                       164  82
Extended family                       31  15.5
Fragmented family                      5   2.5
The number of people in the family
[less than or equal to]3              90  45
[greater than or equal to]4          110  55
The number of children in the house
1                                    101  50.5
2                                     66  33
[greater than or equal to]3           33  16.5

Table 2: Distribution of the types of accidents.

Accident type                n

Falling on slippery surface  85
Falling from height          58
Burn                         36
Penetrating stab wounds      26
Poisoning                    12
Electric shock                6
Foreign body aspiration       5
Risk of drowning in water     2
Other (*)                     2

(*) Objects falling on children, and contact with chemical substances
were grouped as 'other.'
(**) One child could have experienced more than one accident, parents
may choose more than one option

Table 3: Distribution of mothers in accordance with the awareness of
home accidents.

Awareness of mothers
about home accidents                   Aware of   Unaware of  p
                                       n    %     n     %
Mother's age
< 35                                    98  85.2  17    14.8   0.287
[greater than or equal to] 35           77  90.6   8     9.4
Mother's occupational status
Working                                102  95.3   5     4.7  <0.001
Not working                             73  78.5  20    21.5
Level of education
Low                                     38  69.1  17    30.9  <0.001
High                                   137  94.5   8     5.5
Income (TL)
0-1500                                  20  62.5  12    37.5  <0.001
1501-3000                               30  85.7   5    14.3
[greater than or equal to]3001         125  94     8     6
Family type
Nuclear family                         147  89.6  17    10.4   0.040
Extended family                         23  74.2   8    25.8
Fragmented family                        5  100    0     0
Grandmother                             46  93.9   3     6.1
Babysitter (caregiver)                  23  88.5   3    11.5
Number of people living in the family
[less than or equal to] 3               83  92.2   7     7.8   0.086
[greater than or equal to] 4            92  83.6  18    16.4
Number of children living
in the family
1                                       93  92.1   8     7.9  <0.001
2                                       60  90.9   6     9.1
[greater than or equal to]3             33  66.7  11    33.3
Child's room
Ye s                                   149  95.5   7     4.5  <0.001
No                                      26  59.1  18    40.9
Child care
Mother                                 106  84.8  19    15.2   0.262
Grandmother                             46  93.9   3     6.1
Babysitter (caregiver)                  23  88.5   3    11.5

Table 4: Distribution of children in accordance with the occurrence of
home accidents.

Home accident in children                     Yes       No    p
                                         n    %     n   %
Mother's age (years)
< 35                                      59  51.3  56  48.7  0.030
[greater than or equal to] 35             57  67.1  28  32.9
Mother's occupational status
Working                                   65  60.7  42  39.3  0.473
Not working                               51  54.8  42  45.2
Level of education
Low                                       30  54.5  25  45.5  0.631
High                                      86  59.3  59  40.7
Income (TL)
0-1500                                    19  59.4  13  40.6  0.941
1501-3000                                 21  60    14  40
[greater than or equal to]3001            76  57.1  57  42.9
Mother's chronic disease
Yess                                      19  86.4   3  13.6  0.003
No                                        97  54.5  81  45.5
Family type
Nuclear family                            99  60.4  65  39.6  0.098
Extended family                           13  41.9  18  58.1
Fragmented family                          4  80     1  20
Number of people living in the family
[less than or equal to] 3                 48  53.3  42  46.7  0.251
[greater than or equal to] 4              68  61.8  42  38.2
Number of children living in the family
1                                         49  48.5  52  51.5  0.004
2                                         49  74.2  17  25.8
[greater than or equal to]3               18  54.5  15  45.5
Child's room
Yes                                       94  60.3  62  39.7  0.232
No                                        22  50    22  50
Child care
Mother                                    72  57.6  53  42.4  0.818
Grandmother                               30  61.2  19  38.8
Babysitter (caregiver)                    14  53.8  12  46.2
Awareness of home accidents
Aware of                                 106  60.6  69  39.4  0.081
Unaware of                                10  40    15  60

Table 5: Distribution of mothers according to the use of safety
precautions

Using safety precaution                  Using       Not using   p
Mother's age (years)                     n      %      n  %

< 35                                     105   91.3  10    8.7   0.180
[greater than or equal to] 35             72   84.7  13   15.3
Mother's occupational status
Working                                  103   96.3   4    3.7  <0.001
Not working                               74   79.6  19   20.4
Level of education
Low                                       43   78.2  12   21.8   0.011
High                                     134   92.4  11    7.6
Income (TL)
0-1500                                    26   81.2   6   18.8   0.355
1501-3000                                 32   91.4   3    8.6
[greater than or equal to]3001           119   89.5  14   10.5
Family type
Nuclear family                           146   89    18   11     0.510
Extended family                           26   83.9   5   16.1
Fragmented family                          5  100     0    0
Number of people living in the family
[less than or equal to] 3                 84   93.3   6    6.7   0.074
[greater than or equal to] 4              93   84.5  17   15.5
Number of children living in the family
1                                         95   94.1   6    5.9   0.030
2                                         56   84.8  10   15.2
[greater than or equal to]3               26   78.8   7   21.2
Child's room
Yes                                      141   90.4  15    9.6   0.177
No                                        36   81.8   8   18.2
Child care
Mother                                   105   84    20   16     0.028
Grandmother                               48   98     1    2
Babysitter (caregiver)                    24   92.3   2    7.7
Awareness of home accidents
Aware of                                 159   90.9  16    9.1   0.013
Unaware of                                18   72     7   28
Home accident of child
Yes                                      101   87.1  15   12.9   0.508
No                                        76   90.5   8    9.5
COPYRIGHT 2019 AVES
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ARASTIRMA / RESEARCH
Author:Ucuncu, Muge; Ucuncu, Muhammed; Toprak, Dilek
Publication:Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
Article Type:Clinical report
Geographic Code:0DEVE
Date:Dec 1, 2019
Words:5401
Previous Article:COLPOSCOPIC EXAMINATION IN CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE WOMEN WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR NON-16/18 HPV TYPES/HPV TIP 16 VE 18 DISINDA POZITIF, SMEAR SONUCU NORMAL...
Next Article:MIDURETRAL SLING CERRAHISI KOMPLIKASYONLARI/COMPLICATIONS OF MIDURETHRAL SLING OPERATIONS.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters