Printer Friendly


How to cite: Bratu, Sofia (2017). The Inexorable Shift Towards an Increasingly Hostile Cyberspace Environment: The Adverse Social Impact of Online Trolling Behavior," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 9(2): 88-94.

1. Introduction

Online trolling and other anomalous conducts impact online communities. Trolls rely on their culture's structural and regularizing variables to enable their behaviors. Cultural environment influences online trolling relevantly. Perceptions are constructed both by the practice of the observer (Benedikter et al., 2016) and that of the wrongdoer. Online trolling is a ceaseless, obstreperous online deviant conduct by a person toward other users, having a broad diversity of displayed routines, meanings, circumstances, and repercussions (media misuses the term to define a range of acts of online aberrance and noncompliance). Individuals grasp trolls dissimilarly contingent on their routines and settings (Terry, 2016), generating major discord. Trolling, the act of aiming at harmless actors in a particular web space, and the troll may be distinguished. Predictably there is no preexistent acquaintanceship among trolls and sufferers. Some trolls intermingle and regulate undertakings with other trolls, and nearly all of the latter communicate with their targets or with an online community. Links between diverse trolls, the latter and their targets, and between trolls and the community are setting reliant. (Fichman and Sanfilippo, 2016)

2. The Influence of Deviant, Disruptive, and Non-Normative Conducts on Online Communities

The term "trolling" defines the posting of hateful comments by a person or group along with the more aggressive, premeditated and prepared hate movements (Popescu and Ciurlau, 2016) undertaken by groups of people. The stratagems used by trolls are instances of "silencing strategies." The latter endeavor to eliminate the persons from involvement in online public space, or discourage them from getting involved with additional public discussion. The media depiction and conceiving of trolling strengthen such "silencing strategies." Trolling categorizes injured parties in a vulnerable condition and restricts freedom of expression. Social media sites, via their architecture and the privacy they can provide users, rest control under the authority of the troll, while the injured party is egged on in media narratives and public debates (Benedikter, 2016) on trolling to be deceitful in the manners in which they react to online mistreatment through the employment of "silencing strategies." (Lumsden and Morgan, 2017)

Trolling is an interactive alienated conduct noticeable within Internet culture throughout the world. Grasping the compensations appreciated by persons that undertake trolling conducts is essential to a more profound comprehension what inspires individuals to troll. As the favorable outcome of trolling conducts is contingent on the interplay with other individuals (Giroux, 2016), the social collaboration of trolling conduct may be an important motivational element. Persons with high feature self-centeredness may be too egocentric (Nagel, 2016) to be interested in deliberately disturbing other users on Facebook via trolling conducts. Facebook may not be the most advantageous setting for Machiavellianism's unscrupulous, unreliable conduct. Trait psychopathy and sadism are important positive predictors of Facebook trolling conduct. (Craker and March, 2016)

Trolls either exaggerate or completely fabricate a news story too astonishing for media channels to be indifferent. By giving an account of the (non)narrative, media channels provide the trolls coverage and fun, while participating media obtain an item and brief looks to commodify via advertisements. Trolls may know precisely how to exploit the news cycle, and thus further an inherent flak of the manners in which media investigate (Bratu, 2016) and broadcast the news. Numerous media channels are so enthusiastic to report the most recent, most bizarre, and most unbelievable narrative (Petcu, 2015) that producers frequently are unsuccessful in supervising even the most superficial contextual investigation, or they do that but opt for running deceiving fragments anyhow. Newspersons have time limits to satisfy and are performing under intensifying stress to preserve their public in an overloaded market. Trolls' effective alteration of the news cycle is very influential. (Phillips, 2015)

3. The Effect of Socio-Cultural and Technological Settings on Online Trolling

The social norms, values, and beliefs influence a specific culture and therefore facilitate certain conducts. When persons do not empathize with the criteria of the group (Peters and Besley, 2016), they are less expected to abide by social norms or act in manners that are required. No particular aspect or incentive is abandoned in generating a certain conduct: enabling components are thoroughly interconnected, making the discrepancy between social and technical apparently intricate. Specific cultures, in consort with particular social groups, tend to be more frequently aimed by trolls, ridiculing models of downgrading and bias in general society. Cultural standards of good manners, attachment to instructions, and degrees of power distance may affect motive to troll, trolling conducts, perception of such conducts as trolling, and the impact of trolling on online groups. Individuals are attempting to readjust patterns against which (Peters, 2015) they see as intrusion in online settings. Media frequently zero in on emotionally stimulating and contentious matters, drawing viewers and consideration as a result of fear mongering. Trolling offers a significant subject to bolster exactly into the media propensity that clarifies why the media construct the conduct so adversely (Lucas, 2016) and why media interest has been drawn to trolling for a long time, although previous images were unsuccessful in distinguishing the conduct from other performances of online deviance or disorder. (Fichman and Sanfilippo, 2016)

Facebook trolls tend to be pitiless, emotionally malicious, and are motivated by the enjoyment they gain via other individuals' irritation. Significant degrees of adverse social strength envisage Facebook trolling undertaking. Facebook users who take part in trolling conducts tend to be inherently stimulated (Nica, 2016) by acquiring detrimental power (Lazaroiu, 2016) and impact over other individuals as a social reward, being typified by an absence of compassion, rudeness, and gratification of others' suffering (as implied by significant degrees of cruelty and psychopathy), and being motivated by obtaining negative power (Cheung and Leung, 2016) and impact over others (as suggested by significant degrees of adverse social strength). Trolls satisfy their predilection for detrimental social power (Olssen and Peters, 2015) by generating social anarchy and harmful interpersonal dealings. (Craker and March, 2016)

The significance of the term "troll" is co-produced by posters to the online debates and comment sequences consistent with their rhetorical requirements at the moment of their accounts. The occurrence of trolls in online realms may function to establish an aggressive online area, rejecting new posters and discouraging the advancement of online communities. Trolling is a disagreeable and unprincipled conduct which may create considerable maltreatment. The action tendency of discussion is to attain disorder and irritation (Popescu et al., 2016) within the online fora. Online realms may have aspects conceived into them which are designated to inhibit trolling conducts. Compelling users to link all their online performances may have an unexpected shortcoming (Buran, 2015) in hindering individuals' freedom of expression (Brown, 2016), where there is a concern that what is expressed may be removed from context or be misconstrued. (Coles and West, 2016)

4. Trolls' Synchronously Harmonious and Disgraceful Link to Mainstream Culture

The views of trolling purposes have enlarged to comprise diverse ideologically directed trolls. The troll's preferred result is not constantly stimulated by ordinary recreation but by social observations and ideology via unveiling or mockery. Occasionally it undermines common routine or endeavors to mortify and discredit a group of individuals or a public personality. Displaying an ideology that diverges from the particular online community's perspective may lead to being conceived as a troll. Individual egos are instrumental in social status negotiation. Individuals establish full identities exclusive to online settings by benefiting from characteristics of the milieu (Agostinone-Wilson, 2016) so that to influence their social standing within it. Persons defamed or deprived frequently attempt to bring into disrepute others with more social capital with the intention of enhancing their own social status. Psychological elements function both as grounds of out of ordinary and vindictive driving forces and as self-governing ones. Some acts of abnormality are simply made possible by technology (Nica et al., 2016a, b, c), having no offline equivalent or surrogate path. Reacting to the facilitating character of the technological traits of the social web, endeavors have been made to entrench social values opposing trolling and deviant conduct. Trolls frequently criticize perceived social issues in a manner that makes the public embarrassed. Standards of social tolerability have altered notably throughout history (Canovas, 2015), but there is continuance in rules and opposition to change that is preserved through subgroups and similar in generational dissimilarity. (Fichman and Sanfilippo, 2016)

Trolling displays a variability of meaning (Cheng, 2016) both within and between posters in online realms. The same performances of trolling may be portrayed either constructively or damagingly, having implications for the goals of the users and the affirmed target of the trolling undertakings. Disregarding trolls is not viable when trolling is employed as a way to attach trolls and cannot be interdicted in the online realm, hindering the setting up of satisfactory conduct online. Cases of trolls aiming at high-profile persons are being extensively covered in the press and constitute the starting point of court actions. Legislation action cannot determine trolling conducts as unlawful, because now and then they may be inexplicit (Vecsey, 2015), depicted as required, prosocial or differently not against regularizing criteria. Hosts of online realms may strive to institute patterns of politeness or to use legitimate judiciousness (Schwieler and Magrini, 2015) as an instrument of troll handling, where users may be adopting online discourteousness. (Coles and West, 2016)

Trolls' conduct supplies an inherent, and occasionally unequivocal, zapper of current media (i.e. mediocre journalistic standards) and cultural systems. Trolls' heterogeneous wrongdoings expose prevailing cultural mores. Trolls' conducts, which are eagerly denounced as being ruthless, offensive, and going beyond acceptable boundaries of the law, enable the reorganization of what the main culture interprets as acceptable, opportune, and normal. Trolling conducts may fall on the excessive end (Kantarelis and Kantarelis, 2017) of the cultural spectrum. Trolls are the result of and entrenched within leading institutions and perceptions (Ruthrof, 2016), which are in every way as prejudicial as the trolls' most obstreperous conducts. Trolls think that nothing should be considered purposefully, interpreting public presentations of emotionalness, political creed, and/or ideological inflexibility (Svizzero and Tisdell, 2016) as a battle cry. Anonymity enables trolls to participate in conducts they would not reproduce in public environments, either as the particular conducts would be regarded socially intolerable, or as the trolls' online characters would conflict with their offline contexts. The power underlying forces between trolls and their victims are essentially disproportional. Trolls get to opt for the intensity to which their observations harmonize their personal beliefs. Victims of trolling are supposed to be convinced, and are only criticized firmer if they counterattack. (Phillips, 2015)

5. Conclusions

The diverse types of icing out trolls indicate the need of having some mechanism to carry out democratic requirements. Excluding distractive users is unambiguously pertinent to considerate communities in which the typical member invests reasoning and endeavor. Dynamic supervision by moderators and administrators hinders divergences from escalation and may constructively influence the culture (Cole, 2016), both in relation to what conducts are satisfactory and how compliance is egged on. While the social interventions home in on constructive underpinning and example regulating (Wen, 2015), technological ones generally address conducts via sanction. Such reactions supply a way to eradicate communities of troublemaking users, clean platforms of disrespectful materials, and offer surveillance of questionable and previous wrongdoers. Such interventions may be effective if restrictions to reentry are extraordinary, aiming the sanctioning aspects related to the effortlessness of unconventionality online. Automated interventions offer an uncomplicated mechanism to sanitize conversations within a community or remove indecent pictures unsuitable for numerous forums. (Fichman and Sanfilippo, 2016)


Agostinone-Wilson, Faith (2016). "A Critical Overview of the Digital Knowledge Commons from a Marxist Perspective," Knowledge Cultures 4(6): 176-206.

Benedikter, Roland, Katja Siepmann, and Annabella Mcintosh (2016). "Zoltan Istvan's 'Teleological Egocentric Functionalism:' A Libertarian Philosophical Basis for 'Transhumanist' Politics," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 15: 82-107.

Benedikter, Roland (2016). "Extremism and Ethnicity: A Crucial Interface of Contemporary Geopolitical Strategy to Be Better Addressed by International Policy," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(1): 7-29.

Bratu, Sofia (2016). "The Critical Role of Social Media in Crisis Communication," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 15: 232-238.

Brown, Jessica Autumn (2016). "The New 'Southern Strategy:' Immigration, Race, and 'Welfare Dependency' in Contemporary US Republican Political Discourse," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 22-41.

Buran, Sumeyra (2015). "Correspondence between Cyborg Body and Cyber Self," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 5(2): 290-322.

Canovas, Frederic (2015). "Dishing the Dirt: Reading Oscar Wilde's Trial in the French Press," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 5(2): 71-84.

Cheng, Tony (2016). "A Plea for the Plurality of Function," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 15: 70-81.

Cheung, Fanny Sau-Lan, and Wing-Fai Leung (2016). "Facebook Users' Habits in Getting Commercial Information: A Study on Hong Kong Students," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 11(3): 56-71.

Cole, Mike (2016). "Imperialism and Racialised World Capitalism or Intercultural Twenty-First Century Socialism," Knowledge Cultures 4(6): 228-249.

Coles, Bryn Alexander, and Melanie West (2016). "Trolling the trolls: Online Forum Users Constructions of the Nature and Properties of Trolling," Computers in Human Behavior 60: 233-244.

Craker, Naomi, and Evita March (2016). "The Dark Side of Facebook: The Dark Tetrad, Negative Social Potency, and Trolling Behaviours," Personality and Individual Differences 102: 79-84.

Fichman, Pnina, and Madelyn R. Sanfilippo (2016). Online Trolling and Its Perpetrators: Under the Cyberbridge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Giroux, Henry A. (2016). "Feature Editorial: Neoliberal Politics and the Dead Bodies of Children," Knowledge Cultures 4(6): 11-19.

Kantarelis, Thanos D., and Demetri Kantarelis (2017). "In Search of the Criterion Standard Test in Diagnostic Testing," American Journal of Medical Research 4(1): 118-140.

Lazaroiu, George (2016). "Individual Personality Characteristics as Pivotal Predictors of Facebook Use," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(1): 182-188.

Lucas, Robert E.B. (2016). "Integral Migration in Developing Economies: An Overview of Recent Evidence," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 159-191.

Lumsden, Karen, and Heather M. Morgan (2017). "Media Framing of Trolling and Online Abuse: Silencing Strategies, Symbolic Violence and Victim Blaming," Feminist Media Studies. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1316755

Nagel, Mechthild (2016). "Gender and the Law," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(2): 107-119.

Nica, Elvira (2016). "Will Technological Unemployment and Workplace Automation Generate Greater Capital-Labor Income Imbalances?," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 11(4): 68-74.

Nica, Elvira, loan Hurjui, and Ionela Georgiana Stefan (Iftimie) (2016a). "The Relevance of the Organizational Environment in Workplace Bullying Processes," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(2): 83-89.

Nica, Elvira, Cristina Manole, and Ana-Madalina Potcovaru (2016b). "Competition in the Worldwide Workplace: Economic Globalization and Labor Rights," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(3): 73-79.

Nica, Elvira, Cristina Manole, and Roxana Briscariu (2016c). "The Detrimental Consequences of Perceived Job Insecurity on Health and Psychological Well-being," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(1): 175-181.

Olssen, Mark, and Michael A. Peters (2015). "Marx, Education and the Possibilities of a Fairer World: Reviving Radical Political Economy through Foucault," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 14: 39-69.

Petcu, Carmen (2015). "Language, Subjectivity, and Psychoanalysis in Kristeva's Detective Novels," Analysis and Metaphysics 14: 94-100.

Peters, Michael A. (2015). "The History and Practice of Lying in Public Life," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 14: 43-56.

Peters, Michael A., and Tina Besley (2016). "'We Never Expel a Foreigner'--Globalism, Interconnectivity and the Experiment of the Open Society," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 112-126.

Phillips, Whitney (2015). This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press.

Popescu, Gheorghe H., and Florin Cristian Ciurlau (2016). "Can Environmental Sustainability Be Attained by Incorporating Nature within the Capitalist Economy?," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 11(4): 75-81.

Popescu, Gheorghe H., Mihaela Comanescu, and Oana Matilda Sabie (2016). "The Role of Human Capital in the Knowledge-networked Economy," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(1): 168-174.

Ruthrof, Horst (2016). "Speculations on the Origins of Language," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 15: 90-107.

Schwieler, Elias, and James M. Magrini (2015). "Meditative Thought and Gelassenheit in Heidegger's Thought of the 'Turn:' Releasing Ourselves to the Original Event of Learning," Analysis and Metaphysics 14: 7-37.

Svizzero, Serge, and Clement Tisdell (2016). "The Post-2015 Global Development Agenda: A Critical Analysis," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(1): 72-94.

Terry, April (2016). "Reconceptualizing Gender: A Historical Perspective from Structure to Process and Intersectionality," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(2): 69-82.

Vecsey, Zoltan (2015). "A Representational Account of Fictional Characters," Analysis and Metaphysics 14: 68-79.

Wen, Huike (2015). "Radical or Conventional?--Portrayal in Chinese Media of the Relationship between an Older Woman and a Younger Man," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 5(2): 356-373.

SOFIA BRATU Spiru Haret University

Received 29 June 2017 * Received in revised form 19 August 2017

Accepted 19 August 2017 * Available online 2 September 2017

COPYRIGHT 2017 Addleton Academic Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bratu, Sofia
Publication:Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice
Article Type:Report
Date:Jul 1, 2017

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters