Printer Friendly

T-cell Co-inhibitory Molecules in Sepsis-induced Immunosuppression: From Bench to Bedside.

Byline: Jian-Feng. Xie, Hai-Bo. Qiu, Yi. Yang

Sepsis, which is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is a leading cause of death in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).[sup][1] Epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of sepsis has been gradually increasing during the past decades.[sup][2],[3] It still remains a major challenge for clinicians to find potential targets to improve the outcome of septic patients.

Numerous of studies showed that host immunological response played an important role in sepsis. Immune dysregulation is often associated with sepsis death distribution.[sup][4] Hyperinflammation, which contributes to organ failure, is often the cause of early death within several days. However, more septic patients die in the late course because of persistent inflammation and secondary infection which induced by innate immune dysregulation and adaptive immunosuppression.[sup][5] Therefore, regulating adaptive immunity may improve the outcome of septic patients. In sepsis, upregulated expression of CD80, CD86, CD25, and CD69 and the increased concentration of serum proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1[sz] indicate immune activation. By contrast, downregulation of the CD28 and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR)-mediated activation pathway, upregulated expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and expansion of regulatory T-cell (TReg) and myeloid-derived suppressor cell populations indicate sepsis-induced immunosuppression.[sup][6]

T-cells play an important role in adaptive immunity. The balance of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules, which are expressed on T-cells control the immunological response, is crucial in the adaptive immunosuppression induced by sepsis.[sup][7],[8] Upregulated expression of co-inhibitory receptors on T-cell surface inhibit T-cell function by inducing cell exhaustion and apoptosis. A postmortem study from Boomer et al . indicated that these co-inhibitory molecules may be potential targets in the treatment of sepsis.[sup][9]

Immunosuppression in Sepsis

Conventionally, intense inflammation, or which called "cytokine storm," was considered to be the most important host response to infection in the possible induction of organ dysfunction. Therefore, anti-inflammatory treatment was thought to be an effective strategy in sepsis. Results in animal experiments showed that TNF, IL-1[sz], IL-6, etc., monoclonal antibodies could greatly improve survival in the sepsis model. However, clinical studies of anti-inflammatory therapies failed to improve the outcome of septic patients. These results directed researchers to start a new direction of study in the immunological response to sepsis.

Recent studies showed that both pro- and anti-inflammatory response occurred in sepsis simultaneously, even in the early stages. Van Dissel et al. [sup][10] measured circulatory cytokines in febrile patients and found that in addition to an increased level of proinflammatory cytokine TNF-a, the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 showed elevated levels. Furthermore, the high ratio of IL-10 to TNF-a was found to be associated with fatal outcome in the community-acquired infection. Later, Monneret et al. [sup][11] measured cytokines and monocyte HLA-DR expression in septic shock patients and found that all included patients had elevated IL-10 concentrations and decreased HLA-DR expression. Interestingly, the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-a was not dissimilar between survivors and nonsurvivors. However, there were significantly higher IL-10 concentrations and lower HLA-DR expression in nonsurvivor patients. These results indicate that not only does the anti-inflammatory response occurred in sepsis but is also associated with the outcome.

It has also been demonstrated that there is a significant loss of lymphocyte cells and other immune cells during sepsis which is associated with programmed cell death.[sup][12] Hotchkiss et al. [sup][13] reported that caspase-3-mediated lymphocyte apoptosis in sepsis contribute to immunosuppression. Besides immune cell depletion, lymphocyte exhaustion is also common during sepsis as Boomer et al .[sup][9] found upregulated expression of exhaustion markers such as T-cell immunoglobulin mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (Lag-3) on T-cells in septic patients. Thus, sepsis directly or indirectly impairs almost all categories of immune cells.[sup][4] The study has demonstrated that sepsis results in immunosuppression which induces secondary infection and death.

With a better understanding of the pathophysiology mechanism of immunological response during the different stage of sepsis, immunosuppression, but not hyperinflammation, is considered to be a more critical factor affecting the outcome of septic patients.[sup][6],[14] Otto et al .[sup][15] reported that the late phase of sepsis was associated with significantly increased positive blood culture results and incidence of opportunistic infection which indicates that immunosuppression is the predominant factor to cause high mortality in sepsis. In addition, Boomer et al .[sup][9] performed a postmortem study concerning immune function in sepsis. They harvested the spleen and lung cells from patients who died of septic and nonseptic and tested the function of immune cells. The results showed some of the mechanisms of immunosuppression in sepsis which involves both the innate and adaptive immune system. They found that when compared with nonseptic patients, the expression of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD28 was downregulated and the expression of co-inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 was upregulated in T-cells in septic patients. These results indicate that targeted immune-enhancing therapy may be an effective strategy in septic patients.

Adaptive immunosuppression, often associated with significant morbidity and mortality is critical in sepsis. T-cells play a crucial role in adaptive immunity. Theoretically, the upregulated expression of co-inhibitory receptors and the downregulated expression of the co-stimulatory receptor is the sign of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Therefore, the co-signaling molecules may be further targets for sepsis therapy.

Effect of T-cell Co-inhibitory Molecules in Sepsis-induced Immunosuppression

T-cell co-signaling receptors which transduce positive or negative signals into T-cells are all cell-surface molecules.[sup][8] T-cell function is controlled by the balance of expressing co-signaling molecules. At present, few studies have reported on the effect of inhibiting the co-stimulatory receptors of T-cell in immunosuppression induced by sepsis. By contrast, numerous animal experiments have been performed and the results show that blocking co-inhibitory signals improves the outcome of sepsis.

It has been shown that there are more than ten co-inhibitory receptors expressed on the T-cell surface,[sup][9] among which several have been well studied in sepsis-induced immunosuppression such as PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Strategies of targeting this co-inhibitory to reverse immunosuppression in sepsis have begun to be applied in patient care.

Programmed Cell Death Protein 1

PD-1, a member of the B7-CD28 superfamily, is one of the best characterized co-inhibitory molecules. It is shown that PD-1 plays an important role in host immunological response. In sepsis, PD-1 is not only upregulated on T-cells but also on monocytes/macrophages, impairing the function of these immune cells.[sup][19] Signaling through PD-1 inhibits the ability of T-cells to proliferate and attenuates cytotoxic T-cell function. Animal studies showed that CD4 and CD8 T-cells of PD-1 expression increased by 48 h after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Blocking the PD-1 signal could inhibit lymphocyte apoptosis and improve 7 days survival in the CLP model.[sup][17]

Recent clinical studies indicated that PD-1 upregulation on the T-cell surface was associated with mortality. Chang et al .[sup][18] reported that CD8 expression of PD-1 was significantly higher in septic patients compared to non-septic patients. After blocking PD-1 in vitro , they found that anti-PD-1 decreased cell apoptosis and improved cellular functions of T-cells from septic patients. Shao et al .[sup][19] showed that PD-1 of T-cell expression was significantly higher in septic shock patients than septic patients without shock. In addition, they also found significantly elevated PD-1 expression in nonsurvival septic shock patients compared to survival. These results indicate that anti-PD-1 may improve survival of septic patients. This is currently being investigated by a clinical study (NCT 02960854) in America.

Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4

CTLA-4, also known as CD152, is upregulated in T-cells after activation and plays an important negative regulatory role in the immune system. CTLA-4 is homologous to the T-cell co-stimulatory receptor CD28, which binds CD80 and CD86, transmits an inhibitory signal to T-cells and prevents T-cell activation. In the murine sepsis model, CTLA-4 expression increased not only on CD4 and CD8 T-cells but also on TReg cells.[sup][20] Anti-CTLA-4 (aCTLA-4) therapy decreased sepsis-induced apoptosis. It has been shown that aCTLA-4 has a dosage-dependent effect on survival where high dose worsened survival while low-dose improved survival.[sup][20] Furthermore, Chang et al .[sup][21] revealed that aCTLA-4 therapy could also improve survival in primary and secondary fungal sepsis in animal experiments. In clinical studies, the CTLA-4 expression of CD4 T-cells was significantly higher in septic patients than nonseptic patients which indicate that it is a potential target for sepsis therapy.[sup][22] However, further study needs to be performed to confirm the effect of the aCTLA-4 block in sepsis.

T-cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin Domain Protein 3

T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3 is another co-inhibitory molecule which regulates both innate and adaptive immune functions. Yang et al .[sup][23] studied the effect of TIM-3 on immune function in sepsis. They found that Tim-3 is a negative regulator of the toll-like receptor-mediated immunological response. Interestingly, different from PD-1 and CTLA-4, when the authors blocked the Tim-3 pathway, they found that lymphocyte apoptosis was exacerbated and mortality increased. A possible reason for this contrasting result is that blocking the Tim-3 pathway might exacerbate the sepsis-induced proinflammatory response during the early phase of sepsis. From these results, it can be ascertained that timing is a crucial factor for immunotherapy in sepsis.

B and T Lymphocyte Attenuator

B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), expressed on T-cells, B-cells, natural killer cells, macrophages and dendritic cells is upregulated in macrophages, inflammatory monocytes, dendritic cells and CD4 T-cells and induces immune cell dysfunction in the murine sepsis model. BTLA-deficient mice that received CLP had reduced lymphocyte apoptosis and lower mortality when compared to the wild-type.[sup][24] Shubin et al. [sup][25] reported that an increased BTLA [sup]+ CD4[sup]+ lymphocyte frequency in nonseptic critically ill patients was associated with a subsequent infection. These results indicate that BTLA could be used as a biomarker and mediator of sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

However, different results were later found in a clinical study. A prospective clinical study involving 336 septic patients from Shao et al. showed that the percentage of BTLA [sup]+ CD4[sup]+ T-cells was higher in healthy volunteers than in septic patients.[sup][26] In addition, a lower percentage of BTLA [sup]+ CD4[sup]+ T-cells in the early stages of sepsis is associated with the severity and the mortality. The contradictory results between the two clinical studies may be explained by the utilization of different populations in varying phases of sepsis during the periods when BTLA expression was measured. Therefore, further studies need to be performed to confirm the function of BTLA in sepsis.

Other co-inhibitory molecules expressed on T-cells are also studied in other conditions than sepsis. For example, Lag-3 and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) are well studied in autoimmunity disease, cancer, and chronic viral infections.[sup][27] However, these co-inhibitory molecules may also play an important role in sepsis which needs to be investigated in the future.

Immunotherapy in Sepsis-induced Immunosuppression: One Size Does Not Fit All

In addition to antibiotic and other sepsis management strategies, immunotherapy may be an effective approach to improve the outcome of septic patients. Several small clinical studies with therapy by granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor, IL-7 and interferon-a showed beneficial effects in sepsis.[sup][28],[29],[30] However, the immunological responses of sepsis are too complex to be characterized by a simple immune method. While intensive inflammation and immunosuppression both induce poor outcome in sepsis, it is difficult to decide between decreasing excessive inflammation or boosting host immunity.

Targeted immunotherapy on co-signaling molecules involved in sepsis has resulted in different effects. For example, in the early phase of sepsis, during which host has hyperinflammation, blocking the co-inhibitory molecule Tim-3 can increase mortality in experimental models,[sup][23] while blocking the co-stimulatory molecule CD28, significantly decreased mortality.[sup][31] As recent study describes, immunotherapy should be based on immune system status. Shakoory et al. [sup][32] reanalyzed the data of a Phase III study concerning the role of an IL-1 receptor antagonist in sepsis. In that study, the IL-1 receptor antagonist failed to improve 28-day survival in sepsis patients. However, when they analyzed the data of a subgroup patients with macrophage activation syndrome, the IL-1 receptor antagonist clearly reduced mortality. Thus, we believe that boosting host immunity offers increased effectiveness in patients with dominant immunosuppression but not intensive inflammation.

The immune system provides a diverse array of responses in the different stages of sepsis. In the early phase of sepsis, the proinflammatory response may be dominant while immunosuppression is dominant in the late stage.[sup][6] However, it is difficult to pinpoint the exact phase of sepsis in the clinic. In addition, several factors such as age, microorganism load, virulence, and comorbidities of patients also affect the host response in sepsis. Therefore, determining the immune status of sepsis patients is crucial to guide immunotherapy. At present, HLA-DR has been the best studied and may be used as an optimal clinical marker to determine the immune status in sepsis patients.[sup][33]

In conclusion, immunosuppression induced by sepsis is very common and co-inhibitory molecules expressed on the T-cell surface play a crucial role in this mechanism. Several studies have shown that targeting these molecules could improve survival in sepsis which indicates that these co-inhibitory molecules may be potential targets for sepsis treatment. However, precision immunotherapy based on the immune status of patients is needed while we reverse the immunosuppression. Only in the right patient and at the right time, immunotherapy improves the survival of patients with sepsis.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was sponsored by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81671892 and No. 81601723), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK20161433), from Hongri Medical Research and Education Fund (No. WH2015-01-01) and grant from Projects of Jiangsu Province's Medical Key Discipline (2017).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

2. Seymour CW, Rea TD, Kahn JM, Walkey AJ, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: Analysis of incidence, care, and outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:1264-71. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0713OC.

3. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014;311:1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.

4. Delano MJ, Ward PA. Sepsis-induced immune dysfunction: Can immune therapies reduce mortality? J Clin Invest 2016;126:23-31. doi: 10.1172/JCI82224.

5. Torgersen C, Moser P, Luckner G, Mayr V, Jochberger S, Hasibeder WR, et al. Macroscopic postmortem findings in 235 surgical intensive care patients with sepsis. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1841-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318195e11d.

6. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: From cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:862-74. doi: 10.1038/nri3552.

7. Ford ML. T cell cosignaling molecules in transplantation. Immunity 2016;44:1020-33. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.012.

8. Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:227-42. doi: 10.1038/nri3405.

9. Boomer JS, To K, Chang KC, Takasu O, Osborne DF, Walton AH, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA 2011;306:2594-605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1829.

10. van Dissel JT, van Langevelde P, Westendorp RG, Kwappenberg K, Frolich M. Anti-inflammatory cytokine profile and mortality in febrile patients. Lancet 1998;351:950-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60606-x.

11. Monneret G, Finck ME, Venet F, Debard AL, Bohe J, Bienvenu J, et al. The anti-inflammatory response dominates after septic shock: Association of low monocyte HLA-DR expression and high interleukin-10 concentration. Immunol Lett 2004;95:193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.07.009.

12. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2063. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312359.

13. Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Freeman BD, Tinsley KW, Cobb JP, Matuschak GM, et al. Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1230-51. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00002.

14. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: A novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:260-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70001-X.

15. Otto GP, Sossdorf M, Claus RA, Rodel J, Menge K, Reinhart K, et al. The late phase of sepsis is characterized by an increased microbiological burden and death rate. Crit Care 2011;15:R183. doi: 10.1186/cc10332.

16. Huang X, Venet F, Wang YL, Lepape A, Yuan Z, Chen Y, et al. PD-1 expression by macrophages plays a pathologic role in altering microbial clearance and the innate inflammatory response to sepsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:6303-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809422106.

17. Brahmamdam P, Inoue S, Unsinger J, Chang KC, McDunn JE, Hotchkiss RS. Delayed administration of anti-PD-1 antibody reverses immune dysfunction and improves survival during sepsis. J Leukoc Biol 2010;88:233-40. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0110037.

18. Chang K, Svabek C, Vazquez-Guillamet C, Sato B, Rasche D, Wilson S, et al. Targeting the programmed cell death 1: Programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway reverses T cell exhaustion in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 2014;18:R3. doi: 10.1186/cc13176.

19. Shao R, Fang Y, Yu H, Zhao L, Jiang Z, Li CS. Monocyte programmed death ligand-1 expression after 3-4 days of sepsis is associated with risk stratification and mortality in septic patients: A prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2016;20:124. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1301-x.

20. Inoue S, Bo L, Bian J, Unsinger J, Chang K, Hotchkiss RS. Dose-dependent effect of anti-CTLA-4 on survival in sepsis. Shock 2011;36:38-44. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182168cce.

21. Chang KC, Burnham CA, Compton SM, Rasche DP, Mazuski RJ, McDonough JS, et al. Blockade of the negative co-stimulatory molecules PD-1 and CTLA-4 improves survival in primary and secondary fungal sepsis. Crit Care 2013;17:R85. doi: 10.1186/cc12711.

22. Boomer JS, Shuherk-Shaffer J, Hotchkiss RS, Green JM. A prospective analysis of lymphocyte phenotype and function over the course of acute sepsis. Crit Care 2012;16:R112. doi: 10.1186/cc11404.

23. Yang X, Jiang X, Chen G, Xiao Y, Geng S, Kang C, et al. T cell Ig mucin-3 promotes homeostasis of sepsis by negatively regulating the TLR response. J Immunol 2013;190:2068-79. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202661.

24. Shubin NJ, Chung CS, Heffernan DS, Irwin LR, Monaghan SF, Ayala A. BTLA expression contributes to septic morbidity and mortality by inducing innate inflammatory cell dysfunction. J Leukoc Biol 2012;92:593-603. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1211641.

25. Shubin NJ, Monaghan SF, Heffernan DS, Chung CS, Ayala A. B and T lymphocyte attenuator expression on CD4+ T-cells associates with sepsis and subsequent infections in ICU patients. Crit Care 2013;17:R276. doi: 10.1186/cc13131.

26. Shao R, Li CS, Fang Y, Zhao L, Hang C. Low B and T lymphocyte attenuator expression on CD4 T cells in the early stage of sepsis is associated with the severity and mortality of septic patients: A prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2015;19:308. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1024-4.

27. Anderson AC, Joller N, Kuchroo VK. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory receptors with specialized functions in immune regulation. Immunity 2016;44:989-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.001.

28. Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R, Baumann T, Hetzger K, Gregor J, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:640-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200903-0363OC.

29. Venet F, Foray AP, Villars-Mechin A, Malcus C, Poitevin-Later F, Lepape A, et al. IL-7 restores lymphocyte functions in septic patients. J Immunol 2012;189:5073-81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202062.

30. Nalos M, Santner-Nanan B, Parnell G, Tang B, McLean AS, Nanan R. Immune effects of interferon gamma in persistent staphylococcal sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:110-2. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.185.1.110.

31. Ramachandran G, Kaempfer R, Chung CS, Shirvan A, Chahin AB, Palardy JE, et al. CD28 homodimer interface mimetic peptide acts as a preventive and therapeutic agent in models of severe bacterial sepsis and gram-negative bacterial peritonitis. J Infect Dis 2015;211:995-1003. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu556.

32. Shakoory B, Carcillo JA, Chatham WW, Amdur RL, Zhao H, Dinarello CA, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor blockade is associated with reduced mortality in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome: Reanalysis of a Prior Phase III Trial. Crit Care Med 2016;44:275-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001402.

33. Pickkers P, Kox M. Towards precision medicine for sepsis patients. Crit Care 2017;21:11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1583-z.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Perspective
Author:Xie, Jian-Feng; Qiu, Hai-Bo; Yang, Yi
Publication:Chinese Medical Journal
Article Type:Report
Date:Jul 27, 2017
Previous Article:Clarifications on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Hemodynamics.
Next Article:Acute Appendicitis in the Early Stage after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |