Systematics and leaf architecture of the Gunneraceae.
A. EVOLUTIONARY TRENDS
Gunnera appears to have undergone a large amount of morphological evolution in its leaves and growth habit, while its fruit and flower morphology have remained largely conservative. The basal position of G herteri is supported by its incipient polystely, with three steles in the stems reported by Mattfeld (1933) and four steles in young stems becoming a complete ring in mature specimens examined by Wilkinson (2000). Other small-leafed species are mildly polystelic, as are those of the subgenera Milligania and Misandra (Batham, 1943; Wilkinson, 1998, 2000). Larger species have many steles; e.g., 59 in G. perpensa and hundreds in species of the subgenus Panke (Batham, 1943; Wilkinson 1998, 2000). Our analyses suggest that ancestral Gunnera was a small, sympodially branching, cauline herb, producing axes in the axils of its leaves, lacking stolons, and with isophyllous, opposite leaves. Leaves were low rank, were ovate with a rounded and crenate apex, had a decurrent base with three distinct veins in the petiole, and had reticulate, palinactinodromous primary venation. They had radially elongated, irregular, shared areoles lacking freely ending veinlets. Leaf tissue probably contained druses. Many of these characters may be plesiomorphies shared with the ancestor of herbaceous Saxifragaceae (Figs. 15, 16, 18).
[FIGURE 18 OMITTED]
Gunnera evolved by the acquisition of a number of important apomorphies, such as the development of a physiologically complex intracellular symbiosis with Nostoc cyanobacteria (cf. Bergman et al., 1992) and the production of paniculate, anemophilous infloresences with unisexual male flowers apically, and female or hermaphroditic flowers basally. The primitively microreticulate, tricolpate pollen of basal Saxifragaceae developed the bulging mesocolpia distinctive of Gunnera (cr. Praglowski, 1970; Jarzen, 1980).
From this stock the subgenus Gunnera evolved unicellular trichomes, reniform leaves with bases becoming lobate, a "trichotomous" midvein, moderate-sized primaries, reticulate orthogonal tertiaries, teeth with admedial veins of a lower order than the principal vein, and secondaries originating at increasingly obtuse angles apically. The descendent lineage is also united in having larger pollen. This clade diverged into two lineages: the Prorepens clade, which remained of small stature and tended to become dioecious, and the "Megaphyll" clade, which tended to increase its leaf size and rank (Figs. 16, 18), as well as the frequency of hermaphroditic flowers and the number of steles within its stem. This clade shows a trend toward increasing leaf rank, from low second rank in the Prorepens clade, toward higher second rank in the members of the basal megaphyll clade, and finally to third-rank leaves in the subgenus Panke (Figs. 16, 18). This coherent increase in leaf rank differs from that implied in the phylogenies of Wanntorp et al. (2002). Within the small-leafed Prorepens clade, the subgenus Misandra developed glandular sinuses and well-developed areolation. The subgenus Milligania evolved narrower, ovate, actinodromously veined leaves, with the conjunctal veins of the teeth often joining the principal vein alternately. The split between Milligania and Misandra is also supported by aspects of the Nostoc symbiosis. In Gunnera monoica of subgenus Milligania, mature Nostoc colonies appear to be highly productive (Stock & Silvester, 1994). This is not the case in G. magellanica of subgenus Misandra, in which the more basal and mature colonies of cyanobionts show less nitrogenase activity (Soderback et al., 1990). This is mirrored by evidence that Milligania seems to control its symbiont to such a degree that the cyanobionts lose the ability to synthesize the full range of photosynthetic proteins (Silvester, 1976), whereas in G. magellanica there has been no such loss (Soderback & Bergman, 1992).
The Megaphyll clade evolved toward larger, thicker leaves that culminated in the Latin American radiation of Panke (Fig. 15, 16). This clade is characterized by the modification of the lobate leaf base, probably as an expansion of the leaf as basal lateral primaries grew from the petiole at angles increasingly obtuse to the midvein. This seems to have been accomplished by a more basal branching from the petiole vein and an expansion of the foliar part of the leaf, in which the primary veins that form the margin (without laminar tissue) are derived evolutionarily from the petiole. Marginal teeth lost the dark-staining apical process, although hints of a clear glandular, tylate process remain in G. perpensa. Tooth venation developed a second order of reticulate accessories. From this inferred ancestor there evolved an even larger-leafed clade, in which alveolarity and colleters, as well as quadrangular areoles and an orthogonal reticulum of quintenary veins, developed. The alveolarity is caused by the thickening of successive vein orders, probably for structural reasons related to larger leaves. Druses were again lost. This trend toward leaf expansion produced the massive leaves, as well as the fleshy stems (pachycauls), of Panke.
Of particular interest is the evolution of the primary venation pattern and the akroteria in Gunnera. The midvein patterns of more-derived lineages probably evolved through midvein bifurcation and the promotion of secondary veins to the status of primaries. Trichotomies in the subgenus Milligania and in G lobata are actually a pair of opposite secondaries arising from the midvein at moderately acute angles. In larger leaves (e.g., G perpensa, G macrophylla), these secondary veins were promoted to primary thickness, perhaps for structural reasons. These trichotomous midribs actually represent two quick bifurcations in immediate proximity. A similar near-trichotomy is found in young Panke leaves, which suggests evolutionary recapitulation (Fig. 6A-6C). The lowermost of these branches then gets promoted to the primary order and subsequently outgrows the more apical secondary branch, producing the bifurcation seen in mature Panke leaves.
The large pedate lobes of some species of the subgenus Panke may have allowed for great expansion in their size, providing greater photosynthetic area and the ability to overshadow smaller, weedy competitors. Size increase was accomplished by expanding the akroteria--i.e., marginal teeth at the ends of primary veins--followed by the formation of secondary, and then higher-order, teeth. The orbicular-leafed clade of Panke may be the result of the secondary venation system expanding between primaries through intercalary growth to fill out the increased space between marginal primaries as the leaf expanded. This is suggested by the increased number of interangular veins (i.e., secondary veins that joined and fused) in these species. This mode of marginal growth produced relatively shallow lobes and more distinct, higher-order teeth.
B. IMPLICATIONS FOR HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY
Our phylogenetic analysis suggests possible stages in the biogeographical history of Gunnera (Fig. 19). Mora-Osejo (1984) accounted for the Gondwana distribution of Gunnera by suggesting a radiation out of Antarctica. Our phylogeny harmonizes with biogeographical patterns and the sequence of continental drift separation in both Australasia and South America. On the other hand, Wanntorp and Wanntorp (2003) produce a less parsimonious vicariance pattern by proposing a mixture of vicariance and long-distance dispersal. Two major nodes in their scheme are not accounted for by commonly accepted scenarios for continental vicariance. In the case of G. macrophylla, they propose long-distance dispersal from New Zealand to New Guinea and Malaya and a parallel dispersal of small-leafed G. cordifolia from New Zealand to Australia (Tasmania). In the case of South American clades, they propose dispersal from South America to North America and then a return dispersal of Panke.
[FIGURE 19 OMITTED]
The earliest confirmed fossil record of Gunnera comes from pollen found in rocks of Turonian Age (Late Cretaceous) in Peru, ca, 93 Ma (ages from Geological Society of America, 1996). This supports an origin for the genus in West Gondwanaland (Brenner, 1968; Jarzen, 1980; Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989). The Peruvian pollen falls into the size range of all Gunnera species except those of the subgenus Ostenigunnera (Belsky et al., 1965). This suggests that it derives from the core Gunnera clade above the node of Ostenigunnera, placing a minimum age on that node.
By the Campanian Age of the Late Cretaceous, post-Ostenigunnera-grade pollen occurs in Antarctica, New Zealand, Australia, and Africa. The node between the subgenus Milligania (in New Zealand and Tasmania) and the subgenus Misandra (centered in Tierra del Fuego) is datable by the separation of New Zealand from western Gondwanaland in the early Campanian, 80-84 Ma (Tulloch & Kimbrough, 1989; Laird, 1993). Australia also began to move away from Antarctica at about this time, but probably after New Zealand (Smith et al., 1994; Swenson et al., 2001). Campanian Gunnera pollen from Australia shows exine sculpturing similar to that of Milligania (Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989; Wanntorp et al., 2004), and it may be that the lineage of this group was by this time distinct from its Tierra del Fuego counterpart, which differs in exine sculpturing. This hypothesis would place G cordifolia near the base of Milligania just above the Prorepens node. As noted above, several general features of leaf morphology shared with Ostenigunnera suggest that this species is quite primitive. Indeed, Schindler (1905) separated G cordifolia from other species of Milligania in his diagnosis. However, its clavate fruit form and sometimes monoecious flowering habit suggest its placement near G monoica and G. strigosa. Gunnera pollen is absent from Australia after the Paleocene and does not reoccur there until the Pliocene (Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989). Thus it is possible that G cordifolia represents a Neogene redispersal event from New Zealand.
The subgenus Perpensum became distinct in the Campanian at more or less the same time as Milligania. South America and Africa were clearly separated by 90 Ma (Turonian), when Tethyan marine taxa reached the South Atlantic (Raven & Axelrod, 1974; Pitman et al., 1993; but for an estimate of 105 Ma see McLoughlin, 2001). This is when the ancestors of Gunnera perpensa would have been isolated. The post-G, perpensa Megaphyll clade would then have evolved in South America-Antarctica. Fossil pollen from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica shows exine sculpturing similar to that of G macrophylla (Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989; Wanntorp et al., 2004). This pollen disappears from the Antarctic record in the earliest Tertiary, probably because of climatic cooling, which allowed only temperate species to spread between South America and Australia during the early Tertiary (Raven & Axelrod, 1975). This places the latest possible period for cladogenesis between the subgenera Pseudo-Gunnera and Panke at the end of the Cretaceous, although additional evidence suggests an earlier divergence.
Recently discovered megafossils of highly alveolar, palinactinodromous leaves from the Campanian-Maastrichtian of Wyoming and Montana show affinities with Panke (Fuller & Hickey, unpubl., cited in Wilkinson, 1998). Its earliest occurrence is in the Judith River Formation, dating to 80 Ma (Hicks, 1993; Hicks et al., 1995). This is consistent with evidence from the pollen record (Jarzen, 1980; Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989) and implies that the separation of Panke and Pseudo-Gunnera had already occurred on the South America-Antarctica landmass.
Although North and South America were separate, a selective dispersal corridor via islands was provided by the Caribbean plate (Raven & Axelrod, 1974, 1975; Pitman et al., 1993; Smith et al., 1994). The modern occurrence of Panke in Hawaii and the Juan Fernandez Islands indicates that this subgenus is prone to bird dispersal. Gunnera macrophylla is similarly found on oceanic islands today, including the young, volcanic Vanuatu archipelago. It probably reached its current Malaysian-New Guinean range by long- distance dispersal across the Indian Ocean via islands. Gunnera macrophylla-like pollen did not reach New Guinea until the Neogene, ca. 23 Ma (Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989). This was a time of global cooling that drove many austral tropical species northward (Raven & Axelrod 1972, 1974, 1975; Mercer, 1983). This pollen type was present, however, on the Indian subcontinent as it rafted northward during the early Tertiary (Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989).
C. ECOLOGICAL TRENDS
Given the great age of Gunnera, its apparent ecological conservatism is significant. Before the evolution of mutualism with Nostoc, the ancestors of Gunnera probably grew in a habitat much like that of its modern sister groups. Webb and Gornall (1989) suggested that the primitive Saxifraga inhabited damp areas on the margin of temperate forests. Chrysosplenium can be found in such habitats today and is particularly associated with damp, shady areas and stream banks within forests, especially gymnosperm-dominated forests (Hara, 1957; Ohwi, 1965; Yuzepchuk, 1971; Savile, 1975; Hickman, 1993). From the stream- or pond-edge of mid-Late Cretaceous gymnosperm-dominated forests, the ancestors of Gunnera may have spread to more open areas while still requiring damp conditions.
With the establishment of the Nostoc symbiosis, Gunnera was able to invade poor, sandy soils, such as the waterlogged, sandy-paludal habitat where G herteri grows today (cf. Osten, 1932). This ability to thrive in poor soils may have been aided by an additional symbiosis with mycorrhizae, although this has been reported only from the highly derived G petaloidea (Koske et al., 1992). Some species radiated onto permanently damp sand dunes (e.g., as in Misandra, Ostenigunnera, and some species of Milligania), while others remained on stream banks (Perpensum and some species of Milligania and Misandra). Once the constraint of soil nutrients was overcome through mutualism, the clade appears to have evolved toward larger size in plants and leaves, which could have been advantageous in overtopping competition. The availability of sunlight in open, disturbed areas, as along waterways, may have aided this directionality.
Movement toward tropical zones would have made available more areas with moisture levels conducive to the radiation of subgenus Gunnera, especially the Pseudo-Gunnera-Panke clade. Although increasing leaf size would have been selected for in warmer climes, smaller, more densely foliate forms were probably favored in the colder, austral zones. High transpiration rates may have restricted near-equatorial populations to higher altitudes (Bader, 1961; Jarzen, 1980) where areas of landslides as well as cliffs provided islands of open habitat for colonization. Increasingly sturdy and erect stems that produced leaves only near the apex (i.e., the pachycauls of Panke), as well as thick petioles, would have been necessary to support massive leaves that provided yet more photosynthetic area. At the same time, such stems were useful in resisting burial due to slumping and alluviation. The subgenus Pseudo-Gunnera developed an alternative strategy for coping with frequent burial in tropical mountains (where it is found today in New Guinea) through the production of numerous stolons and the ability to produce adventitious roots from leaves. The increasingly thick and succulent petioles in the line leading to G. manicata acquired thorns or hardened processes, perhaps in response to large herbivores.
D. IMPLICATIONS FOR MACROSYSTEMATICS: A HERBACEOUS RADIATION OF EUDICOTS?
No evidence was noted in this study of a compound-leafed ancestry for Saxifraga, Chrysosplenium, or Gunnera. The taxa with which these genera grouped in cladograms were consistently groups with simple leaves, such as Pachysandra. This raises the possibility that this group represents a distinct "rosid" radiation separate from much of the traditional subclass Rosidae with its possible sapindopsoid or cunoniaceous origins (Hickey & Wolfe, 1975; Takhtajan 1980, 1983; Cronquist, 1981; Dickison, 1989). This conclusion is similar to that implied by recent genetic analyses (Soltis et al., 2000, 2003; Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003; Hilu et al., 2003). A number of the apomorphies linked Gunnera and Saxifragaceae in the cladistic analyses. These include low rank, palinactinodromous leaves that lacked fourth and higher order veins or freely ending veinlets and possessed chloranthoid teeth. Such leaves are reminiscent of those of early angiosperm fossils and represent character states that may precede the evolution of the trochodendroid hamamelids (cf. Hickey & Doyle, 1977; Taylor & Hickey, 1992). Further research may identify a more basal outgroup for the Gunneraceae-Saxifragaceae clade.
The tricolpate pollen of some Saxifragaceae, as well as that of Gunnera, suggests that they occupy a basal position among eudicots in light of evidence for the monophyletic origin of tricolpate pollen (Doyle & Hotton, 1991; Chase et al., 1993; Crane et al., 1995; Sytsma & Baum 1996; Hoot et al., 1999; Soltis et al., 2000, 2003). Dickison (1989) suggested that among the plesiomorphies shared by rosids and basal hamamelids are trilacunar, three-trace nodes that may be related to the three-veined petiole of the basal Saxifragaceae-Gunneraceae. Although Dickison saw the rosidhamamelid ancestor as having several ovules per locule, recent phylogenetic and anatomical studies suggest that primitive carpels may have been unilocular (Taylor & Hickey, 1992; Crane et al., 1995; Hickey & Taylor, 1996; Taylor & Kirchner, 1996). If so, then unilocular taxa like the tricolpate Gunnera, Chrysosplenium, or the tricolporate Astilbe, may fall near the base of the rosid-hamamelid clade, or the "core eudicots" (sensu Soltis et al., 2003). There is increasing evidence for an herbaceous ancestry for the eudicots (Donoghue & Doyle, 1989; Doyle & Hotton, 1991 ; Taylor & Hickey, 1992; Hickey & Taylor, 1996), which may therefore warrant the placement of herbaceous groups near the base of the eudicots. Paleobotanical considerations of eudicot origins need to incorporate a search image of small, low-rank herbaceous leaves like those of the subgenus Ostenigunnera and the genera Chrysosplenium and Saxifraga.
Gunnera has long proved difficult to place systematically. The same consistent suite of fertile characters that so well designates the monogeneric Gunneraceae has offered little evidence for direct comparison with other taxa. The very simple flowers have led to superficial comparisons with groups such as Haloragaceae and Balanophoraceae, which may represent convergence through reduction (cr. Hooker, 1856). On the other hand, leaves vary greatly within Gunnera, and the study of leaf architecture provides a robust data set both for examining the phylogenetics within Gunnera and for determining its higher-order affinities. Ontogenetic evidence within Gunnera is congruent with a phylogenetic trend that sees species with large, elaborately veined leaves develop from ancestors having small, poorly organized leaves. The resultant hypothesis of Gunnera phylogeny is congruent with the biogeographical distribution of its subgenera and with the separation times of the Gondwana continents (Figs. 16, 19). It seems that the ecological range of Gunnera and its two major clades, the Prorepens clade and the Megaphyll clade, was fully established during its early radiation by the Turonian and has remained remarkably consistent. Thus Gunnera palynofossils should prove to be useful environmental indicators even in the distant past.
Leaf architecture and its ontogeny in Gunnera strongly suggest a relationship with the lower, herbaceous Saxifragaceae (Figs. 12, 13). For this reason we support placement of Gunneraceae in the order Saxifragales (as recognized by Takhtajan, 1983, 1997). The sister relationship with Saxifragaceae has implications for the evolutionary polarization of traits within that family. This implies a much greater antiquity for Saxifragaceae than has previously been proposed (Savile, 1975; Benton, 1993; Soltis et al., 2001a, 2001b). Both the pollen record and paleobiogeography indicate that the Gunneraceae was well established by the Turonian (93 Ma), so the ancestors of modern Saxifragaceae should be sought in some prior age. Gunnera represents one of yet another of the evolutionary directions taken by a basal herbaceous angiosperm radiation that included the eudicots beginning in the early-mid Cretaceous.
IX. Appendix: Characters and Character States
Characters and character states for the data matrix (Table IV) used to produce the cladograms are set forth below. Discussion is provided for those taxa showing more than one state, or when additional explanation is warranted. Leaf architectural characters and their states are mostly derived from Hickey (1973, 1979). Additional character states are defined and, if derived from another source, the citation is given after the character state description. For those characters for which data are not based on the authors' own study, citations follow the character-state descriptions.
A. FOLIAR MORPHOLOGY: FORM
1. General laminar form: (0) elliptical; (1) ovate; (2) obovate; (3) reniform, distinguished from ovate in that the width of the leaf exceeds its length; (4) orbicular, distinguished from elliptical by having width and length approximately equal.
2. Apex: (0) acute; (1) obtuse; (2) rounded; (3) acuminate; (4) embayed, with indentation at the apex equal to, or greater than, one-third of the leaf length.
3. Base: (0) decurrent to sublobate; (1) lobate; (2) truncate to cordate; (3) rounded; (4) lobate-auriculate, having ear-shaped lobes of the lamina developing toward the petiole and partially enclosing the lobate base.
4. Lobes or akroteria: (0) lobes absent, akroteria only present as marginal teeth; (1) lobed, akroteria indented one-quarter of the distance to the midvein; (2) pedate, having two orders of lobes or akroterion pairs; (3) having primary akroteria as large, convex-convex teeth, with secondary akroteria as marginal teeth: akroteria are indented generally less than one-quarter of the distance to the midrib and therefore do not qualify as lobes.
For discussion of the terms in these character states, see the section "Systematic Leaf Architecture of Gunneraceae" above, and Fig. 3. Gunnera brephogea is borderline between states 2 and 3, with some specimens falling into either character state. This demonstrates the arbitrariness of the division into distinct categories of what is in fact an evolutionary, and probably ontogenetic, spectrum. Gunnera brephogea has been coded as state 2, because this strengthens its position as intermediate between the "pedate" and "orbicular" lineages of the subgenus Panke.
5. Margin: (0) serrate; (1) crenate, or dentate, with one order of teeth; (2) dentate in two orders; (3) dentate in three or more orders; (4) dentate with secondary akroteria as broad, first-order teeth, the margins of which bear higher-order akroteria that resemble teeth in venation but lack sinuses; thus the margin of the broad, first-order teeth is essentially repand; (5) entire.
States 1 and 2 are merely points along a spectrum of marginal form in Gunnera. In order to assign this state, leaves were assumed to have a single order of teeth unless a substantial majority of teeth were associated with second-order teeth. Thus the existence of small numbers of secondary teeth does not warrant assignment to state 2.
In Gunnera pilosa and G. talamancana, high-order teeth are incipient (state 4). They are apparent by their glandularity and venation pattern but project barely, if at all, beyond the margin. These repand margins have a tendency to be revolute.
6. Tooth form, first-order teeth: (0) acuminate-convex (type D 1); (1) convex-convex (type Al); (2) straight-straight (type B2); (3) convex-concave (type C1); (4) acuminate-acuminate (type A4); (5) concave-concave (type C3); (6) Disanthus N/A; (7) Cnestis N/A; (8) acuminate-straight (type D2).
In determining tooth form, only that portion of the leaf margin separated from other teeth by sinuses was considered.
B. VENATION CHARACTERS
7. Primary venation type: (0) pinnate; (1) actinodromous; (2) palinactinodromous, but with basal origination of three primaries; (3) acrodromous.
Palmate and pinnate venation types can intergrade and thus represent points along a morphocline. This is particularly evident in the subgenus Milligania. For this reason, character 8, state 2 (below) includes pinnately veined leaves.
8. Mode of origination of lateral primaries or basal secondaries: (0) three distinct veins in the petiole; (1) basal with lateral primaries forming a margin along a lobate base; (2) basal, with only one vascular bundle visible in the petiole, including pinnately veined leaves with a pair of strong, basally originating secondaries; (3) suprabasal; (4) Griselinia N/A; (5) Aucuba N/A; (6) Cnestis N/A.
9. Course of midrib: (0) straight, unbranched; (1) straight, reticulating, becoming indistinct from higher-order veins; (2) midrib lacking (i.e., dichotomizing from the base); (3) straight, trichotomous approximately halfway toward the apex, or with oppositely arising secondaries forming a virtual trichotomy; (4) straight, dichotomizing once below the apex; (5) straight, dichotomizing twice below the apex.
10. Number of agrophic veins present on each side of lamina: (0) absent; (1) 1; (2) 2; (3) 4; (4) 5 or 6; (5) N/A, true pinnate venation.
11. Primary vein development (including agrophic veins in craspedodromous leaves): (0) marginal; (1) reticulate; (2) Trochodendron N/A (A); (3) Ampelopsis N/A; (4) Griselinia N/A; (5) Disanthus N/A; (6) Proserpinaca N/A; (7) Lopezia N/A; (8) Aucuba N/A; (9) Cnestis N/A.
12. Secondary vein, type and course: (0) brochidodromous; (1) semicraspedodromous; (2) craspedodromous, branched or sinuous, includes reticulate; (3) craspedodromous or marginal, recurved; (4) craspedodromous or marginal, uniformly curved.
13. Secondary vein, angle of origination: (0) moderately acute, 45[degrees]-65[degrees]; (1) narrowly acute, <45[degrees]; (2) widely acute, >65[degrees].
14. Variation in angle of secondary origination: (0) upper veins more obtuse; (1) uniform; (2) upper veins more acute; (3) angle irregular.
15. Tertiary pattern: (0) reticulate-orthogonal; (1) reticulate-random; (2) percurrent.
16. Quaternary course: (0) orthogonal; (1) random reticulate; (2) ramified admedial; (3) fourth order lacking.
17. Quintenary course: (0) fifth-order veins absent; (1) random; (2) orthogonal.
18. Marginal veins: (0) looped; (1) incomplete.
19. Areolation: (0) imperfect; (1) well developed; (2) incomplete.
20. Areole shape: (0) quadrangular; (1) irregular.
21. Freely ending veinlets: (0) simple, linear or curved; (1) branched once; (2) branched more than once; (3) veinlets lacking; (4) veinlets occasional.
The absence of freely ending veinlets in Gunnera was noted by Palkovic (1974). In leaves of the larger species, particularly in subgenus Panke, veinlets are found in a small minority of areoles.
22. Alveolarity of laminar tissue: (0) none or slightly prominent major veins; (1) subalveolar, with prominent veins on abaxial surface; (2) alveolar.
This character refers to the texture of the leaf formed by prominent veins and surrounding impressed areas of laminar tissue on the abaxial surface. On the adaxial surface, the veins are highly impressed and around small hills of laminar tissue, which thus appears colliculate. Alveolarity within Gunneraceae is distinctive in this character because prominent or impressed veins include the penultimate vein order present (e.g., the fifth or sixth order), whereas in other taxa that sometimes show alvaeolarity, accentuation of the veins is usually restricted to the third (or fourth) order; e.g., Vitaceae, Platanaceae. The presence of pseudo-colleters (character 39 below) in many species of Gunnera greatly exaggerates their alveolarity.
23. Leaf rank (Hickey, 1977: appendix; Hickey & Taylor, 1991): (0) first rank; (1) low second rank ([2r.sup.0]-[2r.sup.1); (2) high second rank ([2r.sup.2]-[2r.sup.3]); (3) third rank.
This character represents the general organizational regularity of the leaf. It is significant because it makes less likely the derivation of very irregularly veined leaves from highly ordered leaves under normal mesic conditions. Because Gunneraceae show a broad spectrum of rank, from the low first-order leaves of Gunnera herteri to the highly reiterative venation of subgenus Panke, this character should elucidate trends toward greater or lesser rigidity in venation pattern. In general, leaf rank tends to reflect the general size of the leaf within Gunnera.
24. Crystalline inclusions in leaf tissue: (0) absent; (1) sandy; (2) druses; (3) raphides, as well as other forms; (4) framboids.
For a discussion of oxalate crystals in Saxifraga, see Gornall (1986). Druses are reported for Gunnera herteri by Mattfeld (1933).
C. MARGINAL TEETH, GLANDS, AND SINUSES
25. Glands: (0) on teeth; (1) on teeth and in sinuses; (2) marginal; (3) absent.
26. Apical termination of marginal teeth: (0) tylate; (1) tylate with dark-staining apical process; (2) foramenate; (3) simple; (4) papilose; (5) spinose; (6) Cnestis N/A; (7) Disanthus N/A.
27. Principal vein: (0) central and direct; (1) eccentric, running to one side of the axis of symmetry of the tooth; (2) Disanthus N/A; (3) Cnestis N/A.
28. Termination of principal vein: (0) tapered; (1) bulbous; (2) truncate; (3) splayed; (4) Cnestis N/A; (5) Disanthus N/A.
29. Suite of veins associated with the principal vein of the tooth: (0) no admedial, conjunctals and accessories only; (1) admedial and conjunctals only; (2) admedial, conjunctals, and one order of reticulate accessories; (3) admedial, conjunctals, and reticulate accessories in more than one order; (4) admedial, conjunctals, and freely ending accessories; (5) admedial and freely ending accessories, true conjunctals lacking; (6) Disanthus N/A; (7) Cnestis N/A.
30. Conjunctal veins: (0) joining and fusing with the principal vein, opposite; (1) joining and fusing with the principal vein, alternate; (2) incipiently connivent, with only a few strands merging; (3) connivent with the principal (i.e., running alongside it and splaying or ending concurrently in tooth epithem); (4) convergent but remaining separate; (5) only one conjunctal, joining; (6) "vitioid" tooth venation, in which alternate conjunctals split just before meeting the principal vein, with the admedial portion of the conjunctal joining the principal while the exmedial portion connives; (7) Cnestis N/A; (8) Disanthus N/A; (9) Griselinia N/A.
Although character state 0 occurs in a minority of modern Cercidiphyllum leaves, it is indicated as the ancestral state in the fossil record (see the discussion in the text). However, recoding our cladistic matrix for this character would not affect the placement of Cercidiphyllum.
31. Strength of the admedial: (0) same order as the principal vein; (1) lower order than the principal vein; (2) N/A Disanthus; (3) N/A Cnestis; (4) absent.
32. Sinus shape: (0) angular; (1) rounded; (2) rounded sinuses between first-order teeth, sinuses between the higher order lacking; (3) N/A Disanthus; (4) N/A Cnestis.
33. Source of sinus venation: (0) conjunctal; (1) branch from conjunctal; (2) combinations of conjunctal and its branch; (3); combination of conjunctal and admedial; (4) convergent, thickened, merging admedials; (5) combination of admedial and branch from admedial; (6) combination of branches from admedial and conjunctal; (7) branch from admedial; (8) Disanthus N/A; (9) Gunnera pilosa N/A; (A) Gunnera talamancana N/A.
D. EPIDERMAL CHARACTERS
34. Epidermal cell morphology (Dilcher, 1974): (0) elongate cells and deeply undulate outline; (1) isodiametric, pentagonal-hexagonal, straight to round walls; (2) hexagonal with straight walls, interspersed with irregularly shaped, sinuously walled cells.
35. Trichomes (Theobald et al., 1979): (0) absent; (1) unicellular; (2) uniseriate, multicellular; (3) multicellular-stellate; (4) multiseriate.
36. Trichome placement: (0) on the margin only; (1) on the lower surface veins and the margin; (2) on veins of both surfaces and margin; (3) on veins of both surfaces, margin, upper surface, and areoles; (4) on the veins and areoles of both surfaces, plus the margin; (5) on the veins, areoles, and sinuses; (6) Gunnera herteri N/A; (7) Trochodendron N/A; (8) Tetracentron N/A; (9) Cercidiphyllum N/A; (A) Aucuba N/A; (B) Disanthus N/A; (C) Ascarina N/A; (D) Hamamelis N/A; (E) Chrysosplenium N/A; (F) Griselinia N/A; (G) on the petiole only; (H) Myrothamnus N/A.
37. Petiolar processes: (0) thoms or processes lacking; (1) thorns or processes present. This character does not include trichomes. Thorns on the petioles of Panke species often extend onto the primary veins.
38. Colleters, circular glandular processes emerging from laminar tissue of the leaf's upper surface, at the intersection of fourth- and fifth-order veins, secretory: (0) absent; (1) present.
Colleters are unique to the Gunnera subgenera Panke and Pseudo-Gunnera and have been discussed by numerous authors (Solereder, 1908; Palkovie, 1974; Mora-Osejo, 1984; Wilkinson, 1998).
39. Pseudo-colleters, conical, nonglandular processes emergent from the upper surface of leaf tissue in the midst of areoles or subtended by seventh- or higher-order venation: (0) absent; (1) present.
These have often been noted as a variant form of colleter (Solereder, 1908; Palkovic, 1974; Mora-Osejo, 1984), but because these are not glandular they are not true colleters (cf. Wilkinson, 2000).
The sources for characters 38 through 47 are as follows: Gunnera (Praglowski, 1970; Jarzen, 1980; Jarzen & Dettmann, 1989), Proserpinaca (Praglowski, 1970); Ascarina (Walker & Walker, 1984), Aucuba (Chao, 1954), Griselinia (Heusser, 1971) Cercidiphyllum, Trochodendrales, Hamamelidaceae (Zavada & Dilcher, 1986; Hufford & Crane, 1989; Endress, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c); Platanus (Kubitzki, 1993a); Lopezia (Patel et al., 1984); Saxifraga (Erdtman, 1966; Ferguson & Webb, 1970); Chrysosplenium (Heusser, 1971; Gupta & Sharma, 1986); Cnestis (Dickison, 1979), Vitaceae (Erdtman, 1966); Myrothamnus (Zavada & Dilcher, 1986; Kubitzki, 1993b; Wanntorp et al., 2004). In some cases character states were based on photographs in the above publications.
40. Form: (0) monosulcate; (1) tricolpate; (2) bicolpate; (3) tricolporate; (4) triporate; (5) periporate.
41. Protruding apertures: (0) absent; (1) present.
42. Pollen size: (0) medium (2540 [micro]m); (1) small (10-24 [micro]m); (2) large (>40 [micro]m).
43. Aperture shape: (0) elliptic furrow (i.e., aperture termini round); (1) lenticular (i.e., aperture termini pointed); (2) circular.
The potential systematic utility of this character is noted by Hufford and Crane (1989).
44. Nonapertural exine sculpturing (Walker & Walker, 1984): (0) reticulate, beaded, spinulose, or verrucate; (1) reticulate, smooth, without tectal spinules; (2) tectum with insular protrusions; (3) rugulate, imperforate, with viscin threads; (4) psilate; (5) clavate.
45. Nonapermral exine structure (Walker & Walker, 1984): (0) tectate perforate to semitectate; (1) tectate imperforate; (2) intectate.
46. Columellae and foot layer: (0) both present; (1) both absent.
47. Nonapertural exine lumina: (0) polygonal; (1) round; (2) Proserpinaca N/A; (3) Lopezia N/A; (4) Aucuba N/A; (5) Griselinia N/A; (6) Saxifraga N/A; (7) Pachysandra N/A; (8) Myrothamnus N/A.
48. Apertural sculpturing: (0) smooth to finely verrucate; (1) coarsely granulate; (2) pore, no sculpturing.
49. Endexine: (0) thick, under apertures only; (1) endexine throughout, thickened under apertures; (2) endexine throughout, not thickened under apertures; (3) endexine absent under apertures.
50. Pollen maturity at shedding: (0) 2-celled state; (1) 3-celled state.
F. MISCELLANEOUS, REPRODUCTIVE, AND ANATOMICAL CHARACTERS
51. Growth habit: (0) cauline herb, with bifurcating axis, opposite, axillary leaves without stolons; (2) tree or shrub; (3) pachycaul; (4) rhizomatous herb, with leaves basal; (5) woody vine (Schindler, 1905; Ohwi, 1965; Spongberg, 1972; Cronquist, 1981; Webb & Gornall, 1989; Endress, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c; Heywood, 1993; Kubitzki, 1993a, 1993b). (Note the absence of state 1 for this character, both here and in the matrix in Table IV.)
52. Stolons: (0) absent; (1) present.
We have coded all stolons the same, despite indications that stolons in Misandra and Milligania differ from those of Pseudo-Gunnera, because the latter are not subtended by foliose leaves and lack adventitive root primordia (see the discussion in the text).
53. Symbiotic Nostoc cyanobacteria: (0) absent; (1) present.
The Nostoc symbiosis is unique to Gunnera among angiosperms (Bergman et al., 1992).
54. Sieve-element plastid types: (0) plastids containing starch crystals only (S-type); (1) plastids containing proteins (P-type)(Behnke, 1981, 1986, 1991).
55. Stipules: (0) present; (1) absent.
Gunnera possesses axillary scales, called "ligules" or "rhizome scales" (Schindler, 1905), which are sometimes considered to be stipulate (cf. Cronquist, 1981, 1988). However, MoraOsejo (1984) argued for their derivation from reduced leaves and did not consider them to be stipules. Examination of the ligules in G. chilensis suggests that they may represent developmentally reduced leaves. Study of the minute "ligules" in the smaller and presumably more primitive species indicates that they are indeed cataphylls (Wanntorp et al., 2003).
56. Ovule: (0) orthotropous, bitegmic; (1) anatropous or hemianatropous, bitegmic; (2) anatropous, unitegmic (Davis, 1966; Palkovic, 1974; Orchard, 1975; Corner, 1976; Cronquist, 1981; Dahlgren & Thorne, 1984; Webb & Gornall, 1989; Kubitzki, 1993b).
57. Embryo-sac development: (0) monosporic, 8-nucleate (Polygonum type); (1) tetrasporic, 16-nucleate (Peperomia type); (2) Oenothera type; (3) bisporic (Allium type). Same sources as for character 56.
58. Nucellus: (0) crassinucellar; (1) tenuinucellar. Same sources as for character 56.
59. Endosperm development: (0) nuclear; (1) cellular. Same sources as for character 56.
60. Number of seeds per fruit: (0) 1; (1) many. Same sources as for character 56.
61. Flowering habit: (0) all flowers hermaphroditic; (1) monoecious (mixture of unisexual and some hermaphroditic flowers); (2) dioecious (Scbindler, 1905; Ohwi, 1965; Meijden & Caspers, 1971; Spongberg, 1972; Palkovie, 1978; Cronquist, 1981; Lowry & Robinson, 1988; Webb & Gornall, 1989; Endress, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c; Heywood, 1993; Kubitzki, 1993a, 1993b; Takhtajan, 1997).
62. Inflorescence type: (0) panicle or compound spike; (1) spike or raceme; (2) dense racemose head; (3) corymb; (4) solitary flower; (5) cyme. Same sources as for character 61.
Platanus has been coded as a panicle on the basis of the likely derivation of its inflorescence (Kubitzki, 1993a). Myrothamnus is also considered a reduced panicle (Kubitzki, 1993b). Chrysosplenium often has a single flower, but, because some species have compound inflorescences of the corymb type (Ohwi, 1965), we have coded this as basic to the genus, assuming that the solitary flowers are a reduced derivative.
63. Embryo shape: (0) straight, cylindrical; (1) undifferentiated or with slight cotyledons; (2) with two lobes, obcordate. Same sources as for character 61.
64. Phyllotaxis: (0) opposite; (1) alternate; (2) whorled.
65. Sessile, cauline leaves (sometimes improperly called "ligules" on Gunnera): (0) absent; (1) like other leaves, but smaller and sessile; (2) small, straplike; (3) small, shieldlike; (4) budlike; (5) pinnatifid to laciniate.
Study indicates these to be cataphylls (Mora-Osejo, 1984; Wanntorp et al., 2003); cf. character 55 above.
The authors gratefully acknowledge Britt Wheeler, administrative assistant, Division of Paleobotany, Yale Peabody Museum, for preparing and proofreading the manuscript. Special thanks are due to Linda Klise, collections manager of the division, for her assistance with nomenclature and proofreading.
VIII. Literature Cited
Alberch, P., S. J. Gould, G. F. Oster & D. B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296-317.
Albert, V. A., A. Buckland, K. Bremer, M. W. Chase, J. R. Mauhart, B. D. Mishler & K. C. Nixon. 1994. Functional constraints and rbcL evidence for land plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 534-567.
Allan, H. H. 1961. Flora of New Zealand. Vol. 1. Indigenous Traccheophyta. E. Owen, Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand..
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
Arber, A. 1920. Water plants: A study of aquatic angiosperms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Ash, A., B. Ellis, L. J. Hickey, K. Johnson, P. Wilf & S. Wing. 1999. Manual of leaf architecture: Morphological description of dicotyledonous and net-veined monocotyledonous angiosperms. An informal publication prepared by the Leaf Architecture Working Group (LAWG), privately published and distributed. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Bader, F. J. W. 1961. Das Areal der Gattung Gunnera L. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematic. Pflazengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 80: 281-293.
Bartling, F. G. 1830. Ordines naturales plantarum. Gottingen.
Batham, E. J. 1943. Vascular anatomy of New Zealand species of Gunnera. Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand. 73: 209-216.
Baum, D. A. 1994. rbcL and seed-plant phylogeny. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 39-41.
Behnke, H.-D. 1981. Sieve-element characters. Nordic J. But. 1: 381-400.
--. 1986. Contributions to the knowledge of sieve-element plastids in Gunneraceae and allied families. PI. Syst. Evol. 151: 215-222.
--. 1991. Distribution and evolution of forms and types of sieve-element plastids in dicotyledons. Aliso 13: 167-182.
Belsky, C. Y., E. Boltenhagen & R. Potonie. 1965. Sporae dispersae der Oberen Kriede von Gabun, Aquatoriales Afrika. Palaontol. Z. 39: 72-83.
Bentham, G. & J. D. Hooker. 1865. Genera plantarum. London.
Benton, M. J. (ed.). 1993. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Bergman, B., C. Johansson & E. Soderback. 1992. Tansley Review No. 42: The Nostoc-Gunnera symbiosis. New Phytol. 22: 379-400.
Brenner, G. J. 1976. Middle Cretaceous floral provinces and early migration of angiosperms. Pp. 23-47 in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Brenner, N. 1968. Middle Cretaceous spores and pollen from Northeastern Peru. Pollen & Spores 10: 341-383.
Candolle, A. de. 1868. Prodromus. Vol. 16. Paris.
Carlquist, S. 1990. Leaf anatomy of Geissolomataceae and Myrothamnaceae as a possible indicator of relationship to Bruniaceae. Bull. Torrey Botanical Club 117(4): 420-428.
Chandrasekharam, A. 1974. Megafossil flora from the Genesee locality, Alberta, Canada. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, Palaophytol. 147: 1-41.
Chao, C.-Y. 1954. Comparative pollen morphology of the Cornaceae and allies. Taiwania 5: 93-106.
Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. Morgan, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y.-L. Qiu, K. A. Krun, J. H. Rettig, E. Cunti, J. D. Palmer, J. R. Manhart, K. J. Sytsma, H. J. Michaels, W. J. Kress, K. G. Karol, W. D. Clark, M. Heden, B. S. Gaut, R. K. Jansen, K.-J. Kim, C. F. Wimpee, J. F. Smith, G. R. Furnier, S. H. Strauss, Q.-Y. Xiang, G. M. Plunkett, P. S. Soltis, S. M. Swensen, S. E. Williams, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, L. E. Eguiarte, E. Golenberg, G. H. Learn Jr., S. W. Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan & V. A. Albert. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri But. Gard. 80: 528-580.
Cheeseman, T. F. 1925. Manual of the New Zealand flora. Ed. 2. Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand.
Conti, E., A. Litt & K. J. Sytsma. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: Evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. But. 83: 221-233.
Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The seeds of dicoyledons. Vol. 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Crane, P. R. 1989. Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of nonmagnoliid dicotyledons. Pl. Syst. Evol. 162: 165-191.
--, E. M. Friis & K. R. Pedersen. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 27-33.
Cronquist, A. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
--. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
--. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Ed. 2. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
Dahlgren, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic J. Bot. 3: 119-149.
-- & R. F. Thorne. 1984. The order Myrtales: Circumscription, variation, and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 633--694.
Davis, G. L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Dickison, W. C. 1973. Anatomical studies in the Connaraceae. III. Leaf Anatomy. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 121-137.
--. 1979. A survey of pollen morphology of the Connaraceae. Pollen & Spores 21:31-79.
--. 1989. Comparisons of primitive Rosidae and Hamamelidae. Pp. 47-73 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Dilcher, D. 1974. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot. Rev. 40:1-157.
Donoghue, M. J. & J. A. Doyle. 1989. Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of the Hamamelidae. Pp. 17-45 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Doyle, J. A. 1969. Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and its evolutionary significance. J. Arnold Arbor. 50(1): 1-35.
-- & L. J. Hickey. 1976. Pollen and leaves from the Mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. Pp. 139-206 in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
-- & C. L. Hotton. 1991. Diversification of early angiosperm pollen in a cladistic context. Pp. 139206 in S. Blackmore & S. H. Barnes (eds.), Pollen and spores. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
--, M. J. Donoghue & E. A. Zimmer. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosoml RNA data on the origins of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81:419-450.
Doyle, M. F. 1990. The biosystematics of Gunnera (Gunneraceae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Ph.D. diss., Claremont Graduate School.
-- & R. Scogin. 1988a. Leaf phenolics of Gunnera manicata (Gunneraceae). Aliso 12: 77-80.
-- & --. 1988b. A comparative phytochemical profile of the Gunneraceae. New Zealand J. Bot. 26: 493-496.
Emberger, L. 1960. Les vegetaux vasculaires. 139 pp. in M. Chaudefaud & L. Emberger (eds.), Traite de botanique (systematique). Vol. 2, fasc. II. Masson et Cie., Paris.
Endlicher, S. L. 1837. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Fr. Beck, Vienna.
Endress, P. K. 1989. The systematic position of Myrothamnaceae. Pp. 193-200 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
--. 1993a. Hamamelidaceae. Pp. 322- 331 in K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
--. 1993b. Cercidiphyllaceae. Pp. 250-252 in K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
--. 1993c. Trochodendraceae. Pp. 599-602 in K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Erdtman, Cr. 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy--Angiosperms. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.
Eyde, R. H. 1988. Comprehending Comus: Puzzles and progress in the systematics of the dogwoods. Bot. Rev. 54: 233-351.
Ferguson, I. K. & D. A. Webb. 1970. Pollen morphology in the genus Saxifraga and its taxonomic significance. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 295-311.
Foster, A. S. 1952. Foliar venation in angiosperms from the ontogenetic standpoint. Amer. J. Bot. 39: 752-766.
Fuller, D. Q. 1995a. Systematics and leaf architecture of Gunnera. B.A. thesis, Yale Univ.
--. 1995b. Systematics and leaf architecture of the Gunneraceae (Abstract). Amer. J. Bot. 82(6): 130-131.
Geological Society of America. 1996. Geological age chart. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
Gibbs, R. D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. McGill-Queen's Univ. Press, Montreal.
Gornall, R. J. 1986. Trichome anatomy and taxonomy of Saxifraga (Saxifragaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 6: 257-275.
--, K. I. A. Al-Shammary & M. Gregory. 1998. Escalloniaceae. Pp. 41-86 in D. F. Culter & M. Gregory (eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Ed. 2, vol. 4. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gray, A. 1854. Botany of the U.S. exploring expedition. Phanerogamia I.
Gupta, H. P. & C. Sharma. 1986. Pollen flora of North-West Himalaya. Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow.
Hansen, B. 1980. Balanophoraceae. Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 23: 1-80.
Hara, H. 1957. Synopsis of the genus Chrysosplenium L. (Saxifragaceae). J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 7(1): 1-90.
Heusser, C. J. 1971. Pollen and spores of Chile. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Heywood, V. H. 1993. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Hickey, L. J. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 60: 17-33.
--. 1977. Stratigraphy and paleobotany of the Golden Valley Formation (Early Tertiary) of Western North Dakota. Geological Society of America Memoir 150. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
--. 1979. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Pp. 25-39 in C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Ed. 2, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
-- & J. A. Doyle. 1977. Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for Angiosperm evolution. Bot. Rev. 43: 3-104.
-- & D. W. Taylor. 1991. The leaf architecture of Ticodendron and the application of foliar characters in discerning its relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 105-130.
-- & --. 1996. Origin of the angiosperm flower. Pp. 176-231 in D. W. Taylor & L. J. Hickey (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution & phylogeny. Chapman and Hall, New York.
-- & J. A. Wolfe. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Vegetative morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 538-589.
Hickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
Hicks, J. F. 1993. Chronostratigraphic analyses of the foreland basin sediments of the latest Cretaceous, Wyoming, U.S.A. Ph.D. diss., Yale Univ.
---, J. D. Obradovich & L. Tauxe. 1995. A new calibration point for the late Cretaceous time scale: The [40.sup.Ar]/[39.sup.Ar] isotopic age of the C33r/C33n geomagnetic reversal from the Judith River formation (Upper Cretaceous), Elk Basin, Wyoming, USA. J. Geol. 103: 243-256.
Hideux, M. J. & I. K. Ferguson. 1976. The sterostructure of the exine and its evolutionary significance in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Pp. 327-377 in I. K. Ferguson & J. Muller (eds.), The evolutionary significance of the exine. Linnean Society Symposium Series, 1. Academic Press, London.
Hilu, K. W., T. Borsch, K. Muller, D. E. Snltis, P. S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M. W. Chase, M. P. Powell, L. A. Alice, R. Evans, H. Sanqnet, C. Neinhuis, T. A. B. Slotta, J. G. Rohwer, C. S. Campbell & L. W. Chatron. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Amer. J. Bot. 90(12): 1758-1776.
Hooker, J. D. 1856. On the structure and affinities of Balanophoraceae. Trans. Lima. Soc. London 22: 1-18.
Hoot, S. B., S. Magallon-Puebla & P. R. Crane. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three sequence data sets: atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 1-32.
Huber, H. 1963. Die verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der Rosifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staatsamml. Munchen 5: 1-48.
Hufford, L. & P. R. Crane. 1989. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the 'lower' Hamamelidae. Pp. 175-192 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Humbert, H. 1950. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores (plantes vasculaires). Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Hutchinson, J. 1973. The families of flowering plants. Ed. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huynh, K.-L. 1976. L'arrangement du pollen du genre Schisandra 1 (Schisandraceae) et sa signification phylogengenique chez les angiospermes. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 52: 227-253.
Jarzen, D. M. 1980. The occurrence of Gunnera pollen in the fossil record. Biotropica 12:117-123.
-- & M. E. Dettmann. 1989. Taxonomic revision of Tricolpites reticulatus Cookson ex Couper, 1953 with notes on the biogeography of Gunnera L. Pollen & Spores 31:97-112.
Johansson, C. & B. Bergman. 1992. Early events during the establishment of the Gunnera/Nostoc symbiosis. Planta 188: 403-413.
--. & --. 1994. Reconstitution of the symbiosis of Gunnera manicata Linden: Cyanobacterial specificity. New Phytologist 126: 643-652.
Johnson, L. A. & D. E. Soltis. 1994. matK DNA Sequences and Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str. Syst. But. 19: 143-156.
-- & --. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemonaceae) using matK sequences. Ann. Missouri But. Gard. 82: 149-175.
Jussieu, A. L. de. 1789. Genera plantarum. T. Barrois, Paris.
Kedves, M. 1989. Evolution of the Normapolles complex. Pp. 1-7 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 2. "Higher" Hamamelidae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Kaske, R. E., J. N. Gemma & M. F. Doyle. 1992. Mycorrhizal status of Gunnerapetaloidea in Hawaii. Pacific Sci. 46: 480-483.
Kubitzki, K. 1993a. Platanaceae. Pp. 521-522 in K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
--. 1993b. Myrothamnaceae. Pp. 468-469 in K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Laird, M. G. 1993. Cretaceous continental rifts: New Zealand region. Pp. 37-50 in P. F. Ballance (ed.), South Pacific sedimentary basins. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Lidgaard, S. & P. R. Crane. 1988. Quantitative analyses of the early angiosperm radiation. Nature 331: 344-346.
Lindley, J. 1846. The vegetable kingdom. London.
Linne, C. 1767. Systema naturae and mantissa. Ed. 12. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.
--. 1787. The families of plants. Translated by E. Darwin from the last edition of Genera Plantarum and of the Mantissae Plantarum Alterum and from the Supplementum Plantarum. Vol. 1-2. Lichfield.
Loconte, H. 1996. Comparison of alternative hypotheses for the origin of the angiosperms. Pp. 267-285 in D. Taylor & L. J. Hickey (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Lowry, T. K. & E. R. Robinson. 1988. The interaction of gynomoecy, dichogamy, and wind-pollination in Gunneraperpensa L. (Gunneraeeae) in South Africa. Monogr. Syst. But. Missouri But. Gard. 25: 237-246.
Mabberly, D. J. 1993. Balanophoraceae. Pp. 175-177 in V. H. Heywood (ed.), Flowering plants of the world. New York, Oxford Univ. Press.
Macbride, J. F. 1959. Flora of Peru. Part 5, no. 1. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
Maclaughy, V. 1917. Gunnera petaloidea Gaud., a remarkable plant of the Hawaiian Islands. Amer. J. But. 4: 33-39.
Maddison, W. P. & D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
Mattfeld, J. 1933. Weiteres zur Kenntnis der Gunnera herteri Osten. Pp. 102-118 in Ostenia: Coleccion de trabajos botanicos dedicados a Don Cornelio Osten. Montevideo, Uruguay.
McLoughlin, S. 2001. The breakup history of Gondwana and its impact on pre-Cenozoic floristic provincialism. Austral. J. But. 49: 271-300.
Meijden, R. van def. 1975. Gunnera. Pacific Plant Areas 3: 258-259.
-- & N. Caspers. 1971. Haloragaceae. Pp. 239-263 in Flora Malesiana I. 7(1). Wolters-Noordhoff Publishers, Groningen, Netherlands.
Meissner, C. F. 1836-1843. Plantarum vascularum genera. Weidmann, Leipzig.
Melchior, H. 1964. Myrtiflorae. Pp. 345-366 in H. Melchior (ed.), A. Engler's Syllabus der PflazenFamilien. 12 aufl., bd. 2. Gebruder Borntrager, Berlin-Nilgassee.
Mercer, J. 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the Southern Hemisphere. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 11: 99-132.
Moore, D. M. 1983. Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
--. 1993. Haloragaceae. Pp. 154-155 in V. H. Heywood (ed.), Flowering plants of the world. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Mora-Osejo, L. E. 1984. Haloragaceae. Pp. 1-178 in Flora de Colombia. Vol. 3. Univ. Nacional de Colombia, Colciencias.
Moreau, F. 1984. Contribution phytodermalogique a la systematique des Saxifragacees sensu stricto et des Crassulacees. Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vrg. 7:31-92.
Morgan, D. R. & D. E. Soltis. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80(3): 631-660.
Niklas, K. J. 1994. Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Orchard, A. E. 1975. Taxonomic revision in the family Haloragaceae. I. The genera Haloragis, Haloragodendron, Glischocaryon, Mezeilla and Gonocarpus. Bull. Auckland Inst. Mus. 10: 1-299.
Osborn, B., F. Doris, A. Cullen, R. McDonald, G Campbell & M. Steer. 1991. Gunnera tinctoria: An unusual nitrogen-fixing invader. BioScience 41: 224-234.
--, A. Cullen, P. W. Jones & G. Campbell. 1992. Use of nitrogen by the Nostoc-Gunnera tinctoria (Molina) Mirbel symbiosis. New Phytol. 120: 481-487.
Osten, C. 1932. Una Gunnera en el Uruguay, Gunera herteri Osten n. sp. Herbarium Corn. Osten, Comunicaciones 33-39 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pacheco, P., T. F. Stuessy & D. J. Crawford. 1991. Natural interspecific hybridization in Gunnera (Gunneraceae) of Juan Fernandez Islands, Chile. Pacific Science 45: 389-399.
Palkovic, L. A. 1974. The genecology of genus Gunnera in Mexico and Central America. Ph.D. diss., Harvard Univ.
--. 1978. A hybrid of Gunnera from Costa Rica. Syst. Bot. 3: 226-235.
Patel, V. C., J. J. Skvarla & P. H. Raven. 1984. Pollen characters in relation to the delimitation of Myrtales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 858-969.
Peterson, O. G. 1893. Haloragidaceae. Pp. 226-237 in A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. III, 7. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Pitman, W. C., S. Cande, J. LaBreeque & J. Pindell. 1993. Fragmentation of Gondwana: The separation of Africa from South America. Pp. 15-34 in P. Goldblatt (ed.), Biological relationships between Africa and South America. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
Pole, M. 1991. A modified terminology for angiosperm leaf architecture. J. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 21(4): 297-312.
Praglowski, J. 1970. The pollen morphology of the Haloragaceae with reference to taxonomy. Grana 10: 159-239.
Qiu, Y.-L., M. W. Chase, D. H. Les & C. R. Parks. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: Cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 507-606.
Radford, R. E., W. C. Dickison, J. R. Massey & C. R. Bell. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper and Row, New York.
Raven, P. H. & D. I. Axelrod. 1972. Plate tectonics and Australasian paleobiogeography: The complex biogeographic relations of the region reflect its geologic history. Science 176: 1379-1386.
-- & --. 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61: 539-673.
--& --. 1975. History of the flora and fauna of Latin America. Amer. Sci. 63: 420-429.
St. John, H. 1946. Endemism in the Hawaiian flora, and a revision of the Hawaiian species of Gunnera (Haloragidaceae). Hawaiian Plant Studies, 11. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 25: 377-420.
--. 1957. Gunnera magnifica, a new species from the Andes of Colombia. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 51: 521-528.
Savile, D. B. O. 1975. Evolution and biogeography of Saxifragaceae with guidance from their rust parasites. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 354-361.
Schindler, A. K. 1905. Halorrhagaceae. Page 225 in A. Engler (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich. Regni vegetabilis conspectus, IV. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Schwarzwalder, R. N. & D. L. Dilcher. 1991. Systematic placement of the Platanaceae in the Hamamelidae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 962-969.
Scott, D. H. 1891. Origin of polystely in dicotyledons. Ann. Bot. (London) 5: 514-517.
Silvester, W. B. 1976. Endophyte adaptation in Gunnera-Nostoc symbiosis. Pp. 521-538 in P. S. Nutman (ed.), Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
-- & D. R. Smith. 1969. Nitrogen fixation by Gunnera-Nostoc symbiosis. Nature 224: 1231.
Smith, A. G., D. G. Smith & B. M. Funnell. 1994. Atlas of Meozoic and Cenozoic coastlines. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Soderback, E. & B. Bergman. 1992. The Nostoc-Gunnera magellinica symbiosis: Phycobiliproteins, carboxysomes and Rubisco in the cyanobiont. Physiol. Pl. (Copenhagen) 84: 425-432.
--, P. Lindblad & B. Bergman. 1990. Developmental patterns related to nitrogen fixation in the Nostoc-Gunnera magellanica Lam. symbiosis. Planta 182: 355-362.
Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of dicotyledons. Vols. 1 and 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Soltis, D. E. & P. S. Soltis. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: A comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 84(4): 504-522.
--, D. R. Morgan, A. Grable, P. S. Soltis & R. Kuzoff. 1993. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto. Arner. J. Bot. 80: 1056-1081.
--, R. K. Kuzoff, E. Conti, R. Gornall & K. Ferguson K. 1996. matK and rbcL gene sequence data indicate that Saxifraga (Saxifragaceae) is polyphyletic. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 371-382.
--, P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prince, W. J. Kress, K. C. Nixon & J. C. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S r DNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
--, R. K. Kuzoff, M. E. Mort, M. Zanis, M. Fishbein, L. Hufford, J. Koontz & M. K. Arroyo. 2001a. Elucidating deep-level phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae using sequences for six chloroplastic and nuclear DNA regions. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 669-693.
--, M. Tago-Nakazawa, Q.-Y. Xiang, S. Kawano, J. Murata, M. Wakabayashi & C. Hibsch-Jetter. 2001b. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution in Chrysosplenium (Saxifragaceae) based on matK sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 88(5): 883-893.
--, A. E. Senters, M. J. Zanis, S. Kim, J. D. Thompson, P. S. Soltis, L. P. Ronse de Craene, P. Endress & J. D. Farris. 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: Implication for the origin of pentamery. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 461-470.
Soo, C. R. 1975. A review of the new classification systems of flowering plants (Angiospermatophyta, Magnoliophina). Taxon 24: 585-592.
Spicer, R. A. 1986. Pectinal veins: A new concept in terminology for description of dicotyledonous leaf venation patterns. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 379-388.
Spongberg, S. A. 1972. The genera of Saxifragaceae in the southeastern United States. 53: 409-498.
Standley, P. C. & L. O. Williams. 1963. Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana Bot. Part 7: 564-566.
Stock, P. A. & W. B. Silvester. 1994. Phloem transport of recently-fixed nitrogen in the Gunnera-Nostoc symbiosis. New Phytol. 126: 259-266.
Swenson, U., R. S. Hill & S. McLoughlin. 2001. Biogeography of Nothofagus supports the sequence of Gondwana break-up. Taxon 50: 1025-1041.
Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP. Version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
Sytsma, K. J. & D. A. Baum. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and the diversification of angiosperms. Pp. 314-340 in D. W. Taylor & L. J. Hickey (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution & phylogeny. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering plants: Origin and dispersal. Trans. C. Jeffrey. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
--. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225-359.
--. 1983. The systematic arrangement of dicotyledonous families. Pp. 180-201 in C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Ed. 2, vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
--. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Taylor, D. W. & L. J. Hickey. 1990. An Aptian plant with attached leaves and flowers: Implications for angiosperm origin. Science 247: 702-704.
-- & --. 1992. Phylogenetic evidence for the herbaceous origin of angiosperms. Pl. Syst. Evol. 180: 137-156.
-- & G. Kirchner. 1996. The origin and evolution of the angiosperm carpel. Pp. 116-140 in D. W. Taylor & L. J. Hickey (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution & phylogeny. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Theobald, W. L., J. L. Krahulik & R. C. Rollins. 1979. Trichome description and classification. Pp. 40-53 in C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Ed. 2, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Thorne, R. F. 1989. Hamamelididae: A commentary. Pp. 9-16 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
--. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 225-348.
Towata, E. M. 1985. Mucilage glands and cyanobacterial colonization in Gunnera kaalensis (Haloragaceae). Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville) 146: 56-62.
Traverse, A. 1988. Paleopalynology. Unwin Hyman, Boston.
Tulloch, A. J. & D. L. Kimbrough. 1989. The Paparoa metamorphic core complex, New Zealand: Cretaceous extension associated with fragmentation of the Pacific Margin of Gondwana. Tectonics 8: 1217-1234.
Walker, J. W. & A. G. Walker. 1984. Ultrastructure of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and the origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 464-521.
Wanntorp, L. & H.-E. Wanntorp. 2003. The biogeography of Gunnera L.: Vicariance and dispersal. J. Biogeogr. 30: 979-987.
--, --, B. Oxelman & M. Kallersjo. 2001. Phylogeny of Gunnera. Pl. Syst. Evol. 226: 85-107.
--, -- & M. Kallersjo. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Gunnera based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region, rbcL and rps16 intron sequences. Syst. Bot. 27(3): 512-521.
--, Wanntorp H.-E. & R. Rutishauser. 2003. On the homology of the scales in Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 142: 301-308.
--, J. Praglowski & E. Grafstrom. 2004. New insights into the pollen morphology of the genus Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Grana 43: 15-21.
Webb, C. & R. J. Gornall. 1989. Saxifrages of Europe. Christopher Helm, London.
--, W. R. Sykes & P. J. Garnock-Jones. 1988. Flora of New Zealand. Vol. 4. Naturalized pteridophytes, gymnosperms, and dicotyledons. Botany Division of D.I.S.R., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Wilkinson, H. 1998. Gunneraceae. Pp. 260-272 in D. F. Cutler & M. Gregory (eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Ed. 2, vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
--. 2000. A revision of the anatomy of Gunneraceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134: 233-266.
Willis, J. C. 1966. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. Ed. 7, rev. by H. K. Airy Shaw. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Wolfe, J. A. 1989. Leaf-architectural analysis of the Hamamelididaein. Pp. 75-104 in P. R. Crane & S. Blackmore (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Yuzepchuk, S. V. 1971. Chrysospenium. Pp. 155-166 in V. L. Komarov & S. V. Yuzepchuk (eds.), Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 9. Rosales and Sarraceniales. Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Moscow-Leningrad.
Zanis, M. J., P. S. Soltis, Y. L. Qiu, E. Zimmer & D. E. Soltis. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses and perianth evolution in basal angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 90(2): 129-150.
Zavada, M. S. & D. L. Dilcher. 1986. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 348-381.
Zimmerman, W. J. & B. Bergman. 1990. The Gunnera symbiosis: DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism and protein comparisons of Nostoc symbionts. Microbial Ecol. 19: 291-302.
DORIAN Q FULLER
Institute of Archaeology
University College London
London WC1H 0PY, England
LEO J. HICKEY
Department of Geology & Geophysics
New Haven, CT 06520-8109, U.S.A.
Table 1 Affinities of Gannera proposed or implied by various authors Proposed Source(s) affinity Haloragaceae/ Bentham & Hooker, 1865; de Candolle, 1868; Haloragales Engler & Prand (Peterson, 1893); Schindler, 1905; Hutchinson, 1973; Cronquist, 1981; Heywood, 1993 Urticales Jussieu, 1789; Battling, 1830; Endlicher, 1837 Arialaceae Lindley, 1846 Umbellales Gibbs, 1974 Onagraceae Gray, 1854; Gibbs, 1974; Doyle & Scogin, 1988a, 1988b Vitaceae Behnke, 1981; Thorne, 1992 Cornaceae Thorne, 1992 Connaraceae Behnke,1986 Eucryphiaceae Behnke,1986 Balanophoraceae Hooker, 1856; Hansen, 1980; Mabberley, 1993 Saxifragaceae Huber, 1963; Takhtajan, 1980, 1983; Dahlgren, 1983; Doyle & Scogin, 1988a, 1988b Hamamelidaceae Chase et al., 1993 Cercidiphyllaceae Chase et al., 1993; Sytsma & Baum, 1996 Platanaceae Chase et al., 1993 Trochodendrales Chase et al., 1993 Myrothamnaceae Hoot et al., 1999; Soltis et al., 2000, 2003; Wanntorp et al., 2001, 2002 Table II The division of Gunnera species into subgenera following different authors Maclaughy, Mattfeld, Meijden and Schindler, 1905 1917 1933 Caspers, 1971 Milligania (9 spp.) Milligania Milligania Gunnera Misandra (3 spp.) Misandra Misandra section: Misandra Pseudo- Pseudo- Pseudo- section: Gunnera (1 sp.) Gunnera Gunnera Gunnera (including (including Perpensum) Milligania, Pseudo- Gunnera, Perpensum) Per pensum (1 sp.) Perpensum Panke (19 spp.) Pazzke Panke section: Panke Ostenigunnera Ostenigunnera (1 sp., discovered 1929) Table III Specimens examined, including leaf clearings and herbarium sheets Family or Species Figure No. OTU subgenus Gunneraceae Milligania Gunnera eordifolia (Hook. f.) Hook f. G. dentata Kirk 4E, 5A GDEN G. monoica Raoul 3D, 9C GMON G. prorepens Hook. f. 4C GPRO G. strigosa Sol. (GSTR) 4D, 7C G. hamiltonii 1B, 4F GHAM Kirk ex W. Ham. Misandra G. lohata Hook. f. 4A, 9D GLOB G. magellanica Lam 413, 4G GMAG Ostenigunnera G. herteri Osten 1A, 5B, 7A GHER Pankc G. brephogea 1F GBRE Linden et Andre G. chilensis Lam. 1C, 6C, 6D GCHI G. insignis Oerst. 5C, 6B, 8C, 9F GINS G. killipiania Lundell GKIL G. manicata Linden GMAN G. mexicana Brandegee GMEX G. petaloidea Gaudich G pilosa Kunth 1D, 8B, 8D (GPIL) G. talamancana H. GTAL Weber & L. E. Mora Perpensum G. perpensa L. I E, 6A, 9B GPER Pseudo-Gunnera G macrophylla Blume 3C, 8A, 9A, 9E GMAC Other families Aextoxicaceae Aextoxicon punctatum Ruiz & Pav. Berberidopsidaceae Berberidopsis corallina Hook. f. Buxaceae Pachysandra 10H, 11A PACH procumbens Michx. Cercidiphyllaceae Cercidiphyllaun 10G CERC japonicum Siebold & Zuce. Connaraceae Cnestis palala Merr. ONES Cornaceae Aucuba japonica Thunb. AUCU Griselinia jodinfolia Taub. G scandens Taub. GRIS Euchryphiaceae Eucryphia lucida EUCR (Labill.) Baill. Haloragaceae Haloragis acutangula F. Muell. Loudonia roei Schltr. Proserpinaca l0A PROS palustris L. Hamamelidaceae Disanthus DISA cercidifolia Maxim. Hamomelis virginiana L. 10D HAMA Liquidambar LIQU formosana Hance Myrothamnaceae Myrothamnus moschata Baill. Onagraceae Lopezia trichota 10B LOPE Schltr. Penthoraceae Penthorum sedoides L. Platanaceae Platanus 10E PLAT Saxifragaceae occidentalis L. Astilbe japonica A. Gray Chrysosplenium 7F CHRY alternifolium L. C. grarvanum Maxim. CHRY C. griffithii CHRY Hook. f. & Thomas Jepsonia parryi (Torrey) Small Leptarrhena pvrifolia (D. Don) Ser. Lithophragma affinis A. Gray Mitella breweri A. Gray Peltiphyllum peltatum (Torrey) Eng. Saxifraga SAXI mertensiana Bong. S. (Micranthes) 7B, 7D, 11C MICR eriophora S. Watson S. (Micranthes) MICR nivalis L. S. sarmentosa L. SAXI Sullivantia oregana S. Watson Tolmiea menziesii (Pursh) Torrey & A. Gray Tetracentraceae Tetracentron 10f, 11B TETR Trochodendraceae sinense Oliv. Vitaceae Trochodendron TROC ralioides Siebold & Zucc. Ampelopsis AMPE heterophylla Blume Vitis inconstans Miq. 10C VITI Family or subgenus Herbarium materials (a, b) Milligania R. C. Gunn s.n. (YU) ex Herb Kirk 365 (US), NCLC 6923 Fosberg 30750 (US), Fosberg 30777 (US), Fuller and Jones 310 (YU), Fuller and Jones 311 (YU), L. Cockayne 4537, NCLC 6900 Fosberg 30731 (US); Walker 4869 (US), NCLC 6917 Walker 4420 (US), NCLC 6918 Fuller 95-1 (YU), NCLC 6927 Misandra Goodall 2303 (US), NCLC 69157; Moore 2062 (US) Banks and Solander (US): US 1232964, NCLC 6915 Sleumer 1048 (US), NCLC 6916 Ostenigunnera Herter 226976 (US), NCLC 6914; anon. (US): US 2104785 Pankc B.T. 542 (NY), NCLC 6890; Bunting 11.674 (NY), Wiggins 10993-A (NY) Bettreund 12556 (UC) Crosby 11436 (NY), Lent 277 (NY), Hill 17747 (NY), Gomez 19719 (NY), Skog 1301 (US), Hickey 5031 (YU): Standley 37583 (?) Steyermark 49835 (US), NCLC 6919; Breedlove 9000 (US) Pabst 77112 (NY), Krapovickas 23066 (NY), Reitz 2.669 (US), NCLC 1870 Martinez 3230 (CAS); Reisfield 1481 (NY), NCLC 6899; Neal and Harrt s.n. (YU) Ewan 16628 (US), St. John 20525 (NY), NYBG 6911; Pennell 2660 (US), Pennington 5508 (US), Barriga 13232 (NY) Lent 118 (NY), NCLC 6912; NYBG 650206-04 (NY), NCLC 6920; Rodriguez 437 (UC) Perpensum Ash 2843 (US), NCLC 6922; Strey 7960 (US), Bourell 2731 (CAS) Pseudo-Gunnera Hoogland & Pullen 5591 (US), NCLC 6921; Barker 67544 (US), Bartlett 8532 (US), Fuller and Doyle 216 (YU), Fuller and Doyle 217 (YU), Fuller and Doyle 219 (YU) Other families Aextoxicaceae Unknown (US): US 2343533, NCLC 503 Berberidopsidaceae Philippi s.n. (US): US 1391551, NCLC 967 Buxaceae Kearney 108 (US), NCLC 4655 Cercidiphyllaceae Nikko s.n.: US 1314386, NCLC 4115 Connaraceae Rock 769 (US), NCLC 263 Cornaceae Wilson 6440 (US), NCLC 2744 Eyerdan 10530 (US), NCLC 3795 Philippi 1084 (US), NCLC 3793 Euchryphiaceae Arthur 5111 (US), NCLC 3193 Haloragaceae McDonald s.n. (US): US 2634123, NCLC 1863 Pritzel 836 (US), NCLC 1861 Chandler s.n. (US): US 983503, NCLC 1869 Hamamelidaceae Wilson 7743 (US), NCLC 805 Palmer 4441 (US), NCLC 6343 Shimada and Tanaka 3298 (US), NCLC 816 Myrothamnaceae Decary 10246 (US), NCLC 826 Onagraceae Rose and Painter 6692 (US), NCLC 1908 Penthoraceae Burton s.n. (YU), NCLC 6717 Platanaceae Hickey s.n. (YU), NCLC 6344A Saxifragaceae Nanokawa s.n. (US): US 206082, NCLC 3488 Hall 3068 (US), NCLC 3530 Togasi 702 (US), NCLC 3538 Rock 4979 (US), NCLC 3539 C.C. Parry s.n. (YU) M. McCluskey 117 (YU) Brewer 1146 (YU) Brewer 1679 (YU) Bolander 4986 (YU) Cusick 3321 (US), NCLC 3468 Moran 15406 (US), NCLC 3458 Coville and Kearney 1108 (US), NCLC 3466 Tsu 1679 (US), NCLC 3508 T. J. Howell s.n. (YU) Bolander 4792 (YU) Tetracentraceae Oliver s.n. (US): US 596944, NCLC 184 Trochodendraceae Unknown (US): US 1271620, NCLC 174 Vitaceae Barnes 20191 (US), NCLC 172 Li Hao-min 13169 (YU), NCLC 6452 (a) For specimens without collector numbers, herbarium serial numbers are given after the colon, if possible. (b) Key: (CAS) = California Academy of Science; (US) = U. S. National Herbarium; (YU) = Yale Herbarium; (NY) = New York Botanical Garden; (UC) = University of California at Berkeley. Table IV Data matrix for phylogenetic analysis OTUs Character states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or taxa abbreviations, see Table III; for character state definitions, see Appendix. Table V Pairwise patristic distances between outgroup taxa and representative Gunnera species (a) GHER GPRO GLOB GPER GMAC GCHIL Mean CHRY 0.177 0.516 0.516 0.452 0.541 0.694 0.482 MICR 0.277 0.492 0.554 0.462 0.562 0.677 0.504 PLAT 0.557 0.574 0.574 0.492 0.567 0.607 0.561 PACH 0.534 0.534 0.586 0.5 0.579 0.759 0.582 TROC 0.6 0.554 0.646 0.569 0.625 0.646 0.606 SAXI 0.508 0.538 0.615 0.6 0.625 0.754 0.606 TETR 0.571 0.603 0.635 0.524 0.629 0.73 0.615 GRIS 0.607 0.623 0.656 0.574 0.65 0.754 0.644 CNES 0.705 0.623 0.656 0.607 0.683 0.672 0.657 CERC 0.646 0.646 0.646 0.585 0.688 0.769 0.663 AUCU 0.641 0.672 0.688 0.562 0.667 0.781 0.668 HAMA 0.597 0.645 0.677 0.645 0.705 0.758 0.671 VITI 0.721 0.656 0.656 0.656 0.667 0.689 0.674 PROS 0.585 0.631 0.723 0.646 0.75 0.815 0.691 AMPE 0.738 0.639 0.672 0.689 0.75 0.787 0.712 DISA 0.708 0.677 0.708 0.692 0.797 0.815 0.732 LOPE 0.688 0.703 0.688 0.719 0.81 0.828 0.739 MYRO 0.569 0.677 0.708 0.661 0.734 0.831 0.697 (a) Abbreviations as in Table III.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The Botanical Review|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||Systematics and leaf architecture of the Gunneraceae.|
|Next Article:||Palynological characters and their phylogenetic signal in Rubiaceae.|
|Stephens, Smiley founded AIS.|
|Systematics and leaf architecture of the Gunneraceae.|
|Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics; v.37, 2006.|
|The new taxonomy.|