Systematic withdrawals: an income strategy every advisor must learn.
Systematic withdrawals can be simply defined as drawing a predetermined rate or dollar amount from an investment portfolio each year to generate retirement income.
Standard literature defines retirement income success as not running out of money before death, at a pre-determined withdrawal amount (not rate). That means a 4 percent withdrawal rate was successful for the client when they pass away with money remaining after having received the pre-determined amount of money each year from their portfolio. This is a very important distinction to make. I'll say it another way: A 4 percent withdrawal rate is always possible, because no matter the dollar amount of the withdrawals, one can always take 4 percent per year out of the account. (Remember studying the asymptote, the curve that never reaches the axis?). However, this does not mean the client's income plan was successful, because they may not have achieved the desired income level.
I emphasize this because a simple narrative understanding of the 4 percent withdrawal rate often leads to trouble. Given the client's age and life expectancy, one can feasibly take a higher rate of withdrawals (greater than 4 percent) at later ages than someone at younger ages, with the same outcome. Because systematic withdrawal is a probability-based income strategy, you'd better know the probabilities of various withdrawal rates and clearly explain those to the client--and monitor the plan closely. By monitoring the portfolio's asset allocation and withdrawal rates, adjustments can and should be made to ensure success. Make sure this is well understood by the client before the plan is implemented. (For more on withdrawal rate probabilities, I highly recommend David Zolt's work in targeting safe withdrawal rates.)
When drawing income from a portfolio using systematic withdrawals, proper asset selection is critical. Why? In times of historically low interest rates, the fixed income portion of the portfolio may provide low levels of income for the client, thus placing a heavier burden on the equities in the portfolio. Naturally, this can result in less favorable outcomes during high market volatility. This challenge is well-documented in studies of "sequenceof-returns risk," which translates roughly into: Don't allow the portfolio to perform poorly in the early years of one's retirement, or chances of portfolio (income) failure increase dramatically.
For whom might a systematic withdrawals approach be suitable?
* Retirees who are very comfortable with risks such as: market, interest rate, sequence of returns, frailty, advisor risk
* Those who wish to maximize possible estate size
* Retirees who anticipate meaningful changes in their future income needs and desire maximum flexibility in their asset management
* Those with great concerns about inflation who wish to maximize their inflation hedge
* People who are vehemently opposed to using insurance-based products to generate income
While this discussion was never intended to be an exhaustive analysis of systematic withdrawals, it should serve as a catalyst to learn as much as possible before deciding on using the strategy as a default approach to income planning. As a true probability-based approach, systematic withdrawals offers a lot of possibility for those families and advisors who wish to understand its many nuances.
What are your thoughts on systematic withdrawls as an income planning strategy? Go to LifeHealthPro.com and let us know.
founding principal of Fourth Dimension Financial Group, LLC
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||REAL RETURNS|
|Date:||May 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Marketing efficiently through seminars: content creation.|
|Next Article:||Human vs. Robo-Advisors: Will ethics trump compliance?|