Printer Friendly

System leads to feather-bedding.

I'M afraid AW of Gosforth's example of an inhuman bedroom tax cuts little ice with me.

AW's letter highlights the feather-bedded system linked to housing benefits and indeed social housing which deters people from actually making decisions and actions to deal with their own problems.

If this hypothetical couple, whose two children go to university, use the money they would have spent on these children to pay the extra rent ready for their possible return, they could stay exactly where they are.

Just remember we are talking about subsidised housing with no repair bills unlike many families in similar positions who have scrimped and scraped to buy a modest house and when things go wrong there is no one there to help them they simply have to deal with their own problem.

Subsidised authority-owned housing has been a constant source of feather-bedding for many people for too long and these families should take responsibility for their own, something that many of us have had to do for many, many years.

A THOMPSON, Harlow Green, Low Fell, Gateshead.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Publication:Evening Chronicle (Newcastle, England)
Date:Mar 12, 2013
Previous Article:POEM OF THE DAY.
Next Article:We struggled on no benefits.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters