Printer Friendly

Sweatshops forever: oppression raises wages.

WANT TO IMPROVE the lives of poorworkers in developing countries? Then rush out an d buy a pair of Nikes or Levi Strauss jeans, says a new report by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

The authors decided to test the burgeoning anti-sweatshop movement's claims that multi-national corporations oppress workers in developing countries. A recent Albany Times-Union column summarizes die familiar argument: "It's common knowledge [sweatshops] exist in Third World countries, and that much of the cheap labor that produces the most expensive sports apparel and sneakers are young years ago in reason children paid a substandard wage and working in horrendous conditions."

But when economists looked at reams of economic data on wages and workers' rights in developing countries, they found that multinationals generally paid more--often a lot more--than the wages offered by locally owned companies. The study cites evidence that affiliates of U.S. multinationals "pay a wage premium that ranges from 40 percent in high-income countries to 100 percent, or double the local average wage, in low-income countries."

Vietnamese workers in foreign-owned apparel and footwear factories rank in the top 20 percent of the population by household expenditure. Indonesian workers in Nike subcontractor factories earned $670 per year, compared to the average minimum wage of $134. In Mexico firms that exported more than 80 percent of their output paid wages that were 58 percent to 67 percent higher than wages paid by domestic firms.

The researchers point out that foreign direct investment is positively correlated with the number of International Labor Organization conventions ratified, and that multinational investment "is positively correlated with the right to establish free unions, the right to strike, the right to collective bargaining, and the protection of union members." The study concludes: "In short, there is no solid evidence that countries with poorly protected worker rights attract [multinational companies]." So you can shop at The Gap with a good conscience.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Citings
Author:Barley, Ronald
Publication:Reason
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Words:317
Previous Article:Where the wild suits are: satire as "libel".
Next Article:25 years ago in reason.
Topics:


Related Articles
Are wages too low? Empirical implications of efficiency wage models.
The case against sweatshops.
Minimum wage, maximum absurdity.
State boosts minimum wage.
Multiple minimums: Congress hasn't raised the federal minimum wage in years, but many states are increasing theirs.
Making a living.
PICKETING L.A. CITY WORKERS STRIKE OUT.
Increasing the minimum wage: blocked by right-wing power on Capitol Hill, labor advocates win changes at the state level.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters