Printer Friendly

Sustainable use of Estonian peat reserves and environmental challenges/Eesti turbavarude jatkusuutlik ja keskkonnasaastlik kasutamine.

INTRODUCTION

Peatlands cover over 4 million [km.sup.2] or 3% of the land and freshwater surface of the Earth (Maltby & Proctor 1996). Considering the area of peatlands, Estonia holds the third position in Europe after Finland and Sweden (Lappalainen 1996). Paludification of peat deposits began soon after the glacial epoch about 12 000 years ago (Tikkanen 2006), first in Upper and somewhat later in Lower Estonia. Through the postglacial period, climatic conditions have favoured the rise and development of mires. The oldest mires are Napsi, Kuiksilla, and Mehiksoo in Upper Estonia, where peat started to accumulate 9100-8800 years ago during Preboreal time (Orru et al. 1992).

Peat is organic matter accumulating at ground surface and containing a high proportion of water (92-94%). Its organic part is a mixture of plant remains at different stages of humification. The organic constituents of peat could be classified into four groups: a) bitumens, b) carbohydrates, c) lignins, and d) humic substances (Fuchsman 1980). Besides these, peat contains nitrogen components, inorganic substances, etc. Peat is well humified if over 25% of its organic mass has decayed, and poorly hurnified when the decayed constituents form less than 25%. Dry matter of peat can contain up to 35% mineral matter.

The chemical composition of peat depends on a number of factors:

--feeding type;

--geomorphological position;

--vegetation;

--geological, geobotanical, and microbiological processes.

To clarify the confusing terminology, the term "peatland" has been introduced, comprising areas with both natural and drained peat layers. When defining and distinguishing the peatlands, the so-called zero-contour of peat thickness is considered, i.e. all areas covered with peat in spite of its thickness are considered peatlands. Furthermore, the term "mire" is used for an undrained area with an over 30 cm thick peat layer (Masing 1988). Mires can be categorized as raised bogs (feeding from precipitations), transitional mire (mixed feeding), and fens (feeding from groundwater).

This paper aims to give an overview of systematic peat investigations carried out in Estonia and of results of more recent trace element analysis and balneological studies. We also discuss the challenges to sustainable managing of peatlands, relying on the experience of past decades and possibilities for future improvement in balancing the peat production and protection and restoration of mires.

INVENTORY OF ESTONIAN PEATLANDS

In 1971-1987 an inventory of Estonian peatlands was carried out by the Geological Survey of Estonia (EGS). According to guidelines of that time, the research incorporated the landscape areas covered with a peat layer (MRSFSR 1973). The inventory was carried out by counties and its results showed that peatlands took up nearly 25.8% of Estonia's territory (Orru 1987). Some small peatlands with a thin (0.00-0.30 m) peat layer have been excluded from the monograph Estonian Peat Resources (Orru et al. 1992) as at the time of the inventory the organic matter had become even more mineralized due to drainage. Thus, according to its composition such peat was no longer a typical peat, but rather a mixture of peat and mineral soil. After recalculations the total number of peatlands was 9836 and their area was 10 091 [km.sup.2] (22.3% of Estonia's territory). The monograph is complemented by a map of Estonian peatlands at a scale of 1:400 000.

Methods used in the inventory and review of unpublished data

In the peat inventory all 9836 peatlands with an area over 1 ha were prospected - the thickness and area of the peat layer were determined. Most of the peatlands were fens with a relatively thin (0.9-1.6 m) peat layer. More typical 539 peatlands with a thick peat layer and typical genesis were investigated in more detail. Samples were taken for the determination of botanical composition, degree of humification, natural moisture content, ash content, and pH value of peat. In addition, the vegetation and hydrological conditions of peatlands were described.

All 9836 peatlands were marked on aerial photos at a scale of I : 10 000. The prognosticated resources were calculated in 1059 and inferred resources in 539 peat deposits. As the remaining 8238 peatlands have a thin peat layer (0.1-0.9 m) and small area (1-10 ha), the resources were not calculated there. After that technical plans of 539 peat deposits were composed, presenting peat types (eutrophic, mesotrophic, oligotrophic), thickness and range of peat deposits, areas suitable for peat production, and potential drainage network. Of those, 520 are included in the handbook Estonian Mires (Orru 1995). It appeared that these well-investigated 539 peatlands (7499.5 km2) form the majority of the total area of peatlands (10 091 km2) (Table 1). The peatlands with prognosticated resources cover 1520.1 [km.sup.2] and small peatlands 1071.4 [km.sup.2].

During further investigation of Estonian peatlands and their peat deposits in 1987-1992 also the contents of trace elements and chemical composition of organic substances were analysed and samples for [C.sup.14] and pollen analyses were taken to determine the genesis and age of peat deposits.

The aim of the overview in Table I was to introduce data of manuscript reports stored in the archives of the EGS. It appeared that during the inventory altogether 33 611 samples were taken for analysing general characteristics of peat (natural moisture content, ash content, degree of humification) and botanical composition, and 18 794 samples were collected for determining the acidity of peat (Table 1). Systematic analysis of the obtained data could be useful for solving the topical problems related to mires and peat, such as genesis of mires and peat, peat accumulation rate, influence of drainage, climate change, environmental protection and nature conservation issues. For example, such analysis has been made for Mannikjarve bog (Sillasoo et al. 2007), but using the data obtained during the inventory, could also be compiled for different types of mires in many other regions.

Peat deposits

During the inventory of Estonian peatlands (1971-1987) and the following research (1987-1992) peat resources were calculated in accordance with the guidelines (MRSFSR 1973) for the investigation of the deposits with an at least 0.9 m thick peat layer in a more than 10 ha area. The peat deposits within the zero-contour cover 9016 [km.sup.2], with the commercial resources occurring on 5382 [km.sup.2], i.e. on 60% of the area (Table 1). The geological peat resources in Estonia are 2.37 billion tonnes (Orru et al. 1992), while the total peat resources of the planet amount to approximately 5000-6000 billion [m.sup.3] (Lappalainen 1996).

Altogether, 279 of the total of 1598 peat deposits are included into the environmental register compiled by the EGS. These deposits are vacant for peat production (Fig. 1). Peat resources included in the register amount to 1.60 billion tonnes, i.e. 67% of total peat resources established by the inventory.

PEAT PRODUCTION

The first written notes of using peat as a fuel in Estonia, at Sindi textile factory, date back to 1861. In 1876 peat from Laugesoo mire was used in Ilmatsalu and approximately at the same time in Lavassaare (Valk 1988).

Before the Second World War 140 [km.sup.2] in 422 mires were rented out to peat production companies or individual producers, mainly for production of litter peat. Presently most of these peat production areas are depleted. In 1939, a total of 1.7 million [m.sup.3] of peat was extracted (Raudsepp 1946). Among others, the extracted fuel peat was used at Meleski and Jarvakandi glass factories and Kreenhohn textile factory in Narva. Until 1936 the proportion of peat in country's fuel balance was 6.7% (Raudsepp 1946), since the trend was to use less timber for heating purposes to preserve forests.

Today peat production in Estonia is regulated by the Sustainable Development Act, according to which the quota is 2.6 million tonnes (40% air-dry peat) per year. The volume of produced peat must not exceed its natural accumulation. The average accumulation rate of peat in fens is 19-100 cm and in raised bogs 12-300 cm per 1000 years (Maltby & Proctor 1996). It depends on climatic conditions; it has varied at different climate periods and may considerably vary between regions, even within one mire. Ilomets (1994) has estimated the annual average accumulation rate of peat to be 0.5 mm in fens and 1.5 mm in raised bogs in Estonia.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Systematic data about volumes of peat production have been collected since 1953. Peat production has ranged from 0.24 to 2.84 million tonnes (Fig. 2). In the increase of production three stages can be noted:

1. 1965 - Oru peat briquette factory was launched (nowadays closed);

2. 1967-1968 - a number of new deposits for litter peat production were taken into use;

3. 1985-1986 - production of peat fertilizers was started.

In the last decade 0.33-1.5 million tonnes of peat has been produced (40% air-dry peat) annually. In the nearest future these amounts will not increase because the recent milling technology does not enable extraction of larger quantities from the existing mining claims. As the protection of mires has become a priority, annual production up to 1.5 million tonnes can now be considered optimal, in spite of the quota of 2.6 million tonnes per year.

Presently 77 production areas (205 [km.sup.2]) are included into the environmental register, with the total resources of 0.24 billion tonnes of slightly humified and 0.75 billion tonnes of well humified peat. The currently operated production areas are in good condition. Many companies use modern equipment that has a low noise level and generates less dust. Recently several depleted peat fields have been newly taken into use.

CONSERVATION OF PEATLANDS

In the 1960s peat extraction (40 deposits) was started in several raised bogs and in order to preserve the ecological balance, protection of mires became an issue.

There are several reasons for protecting the peatlands:

--preservation of biological and landscape diversity;

--preservation of natural resources (clean water, berries, herbs);

--as a habitat of threatened species;

--scientific value as a reference area in its uniqueness or typicality;

--recreational and educational value for humans;

--ecotourism.

Considering that Estonia has joined the European Union, it is important to see the protection of peatlands in a broader context. Together with Natura 2000 areas ca 2500 [km.sup.2] of mires have been designated as protected areas (Fig. 1), 72% of which is represented by raised bogs (Ramst & Orru 2007). Especially important is the protection of natural fens that are extremely vulnerable to human activity due to their feeding type (groundwater, springs, floods).

Because of the importance of threatened species, the topmost part of peatlands has been recently studied (Paal et al. 1998; Karofeld & Pajula 2005; Kaakinen & Salminen 2006). The character and conditions of peatlands are often primarily connected to their vegetation. A more comprehensive view would consider also the hydrological conditions, composition of peat, and thickness of the peat layer, which influence the character of vegetation in a mire (Loopmann 1994). A considerable part of Estonian peatlands has been partly or completely drained, both peat production areas, and fields and forests with a thin peat layer. The exact area of such peatlands is presently under research and unambiguous data on the extent of the influence of draining are still missing. While Loopmann (1994) has suggested that non-drained peatlands make up nearly 71%, Ilomets et al. (2007, pp. 20-22) declare that only 30% of peatlands have not been drained. The authors of the present paper, relying on their extensive experience in peat investigations, suggest that the draining affects vegetation and groundwater generally down to the 200-500 m level. The more precise research on the extent and area of the influence is in progress.

RECENT STUDIES

Abandoned peat production fields pose an important environmental issue in Estonia. They cover 89 [km.sup.2] according to the Environmental Register of Estonia. Many of them have considerable peat resources, including 0.05 billion tonnes of poorly humified and 0.25 billion tonnes of well hurnifred peat. If the abandoned areas are not revegetated, they constitute an important source of [CO.sub.2] emission (Karofeld 2004). Under such conditions, peat finally mineralizes and ceases to exist as organic sediment.

The investigations carried out by the EGS revealed the variable state of abandoned peat production fields (Orru & Ramst 2008). Some fields are covered with forest, mostly with birches and pines while spruce is less common. Among mire plants Cyperaceae and Gramineae predominate but also different moss species, especially sphagnum species are common. Some abandoned areas are overgrown with cotton grass. The growth of cotton grass is peculiar, being extensive at first, but ceasing later. This is probably due to changes in groundwater level as evaporation increases when trees grow taller.

In addition to using peat in horticulture and as a fuel, peat utilization in balneology has been introduced in Estonia. Respective investigations were carried out by the EGS and the East-Tallinn Central Hospital on patients with Heberden-Bouchard disease. The results show that the strength of hands and flexibility of fingers improved and pain decreased in patients treated with balneological peat (Orru et al. 2008). Balneological peat is rich in bioactive substances, e.g. humic (particularly hymatomelanic) and fulvic acids. The amount of peat suitable for balneological purposes in Estonia is estimated at 1 million tonnes (Orru et al. 2008).

Peat is able to bind hazardous elements, and can thus be used in several environmental technological solutions. In Estonia the content of harmful elements is highest in fens in river valleys feeding from springs (Orru & Orru 2006). As a result of natural processes these substances have been transported into peat by groundwater. Because of anthropogenic pollution like traffic, in some roadside peatlands the content of Pb and Cd was higher in the upper part of the peat layer (Orru & Orru 2006).

CONCLUSIONS

During the last decades the Estonian peatlands and their peat resources have been thoroughly investigated. Nevertheless, there are several issues that need more detailed research. In recent years the studies have focussed on the processes occurring in the top 50-cm layer of mires and on their vegetation, while less attention has been paid to the genesis of peat and hydrological conditions, i.e. the processes in natural mires and the influence of drainage. The manuscript reports of the inventory contain much material (first of all, the data on the botanical composition of peat) that should be systematically analysed. In the future the use of peat as a natural resource (e.g. in environmental technology solutions, balneology, peat chemistry) should be expanded. Cooperation between geologists, botanists, hydrologists, ecologists, and other environment specialists is of vital importance for successful resolution of the problems related to the complex ecosystem of mires.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the colleagues and co-authors of manuscript reports from the EGS who have participated in peat investigation since 1972 - Hilja Allikvee, Mare Veldre, Maria Sirokova, Rein Ramst, and others. All manuscripts are available in EGS archives. Merike Rass assisted in compiling Fig. 1 for this paper. Peat investigations in Estonia (inventory of peatlands and abandoned peat production areas, additional investigations, compilation of monographs Estonian Peat Resources and Estonian Mires) were financed by the Estonian Government. The Environmental Investment Centre has supported the projects "Trace elements in Estonian peat" and "Utilisation of Estonian peat in balneology".

Received 5 February 2008, accepted 18 March 2008

REFERENCES

Fuchsman, C. H. 1980. Peat Industrial Chemistry and Technology. Academic Press, New York, 279 pp.

Ilomets, M. 1994. On the growth of peats in Estonia. In Year-Book of the Estonian Geographical Society, Vol. 26 (Mardiste, H. & Roosaare, J., eds), pp. 13-18. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn [in Estonian, with English summary].

Ilomets, M., Kimmel, K., Sten, C.-G. & Korhonen, R. 2007. Mires in Estonia and Southern Finland. NGO GeoGuide Baltoscandia, Tallinn, 32 pp.

Kaakinen, E. & Salminen, P. 2006. Mire conservation and its short history in Finland. In Finland - Land of Mires, The Finnish Environment 23 (Lindholm, I. & Heikkila, R., eds), pp. 229-238. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.

Karofeld, E. 2004. Mud-bottom hollows: exceptional features in carbon-accumulating bogs? Holocene, 14, 119-124.

Karofeld, E. & Pajula, R 2005. Distribution and development of necrotic Sphagnum patches in two Estonian raised bogs. Folia Geobotanica, 40,357-366.

Lappalainen, E. 1996. General review on world peatland and peat resources. In Global Peat Resources (Lappalainen, E., ed.), pp. 53-56. International Peat Society, Jyvaskyla.

Loopmann, A. 1994. Kui palju on Eestis kuivendamata soid [How many undried peatlands are in Estonia]. Eesti Turvas, 4, 17-19 [in Estonian, with English summary].

Maltby, E. & Proctor, M. 1996. Peatlands. Their nature and role in the biosphere. In Global Peat Resources (Lappalainen, E., ed.), pp. 11-19. International Peat Society, Jyvaskyla.

Masing, V. 1988. Soode moiste levik ja vaartus. In Eesti sood [Estonian Mires] (Valk, U., ed.), pp. 7-12. Valgus, Tallinn [in Estonian, with English summary].

[MRSFSR] Ministerstvo RSFSR 1973. Instruktsiya po razvedke torfyanykh mestorozhdenii [Instruction for the study of peat deposits]. Otdel Torfyanogo Fonda, Moscow, 240 pp. [in Russian].

Orru, H. & Orru, M. 2006. Sources and distribution of trace elements in Estonian peat. Global and Planetary Change, 53,249-258.

Orru, H., Orru, M., Tuulik, V. J. & Ubner, M. 2008. The resources and properties of Estonian balneological peat. News of the Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian University [accepted].

Orru, M. 1987. Kui palju on Eestis soid [How many peatlands are in Estonia]. Eesti Loodus, 10, 646-652 [in Estonian, with English summary].

Orru, M. 1995. Eesti turbasood [Estonian Mires]. Estonian Geological Survey, Tallinn, 240 pp. [in Estonian, with English summary].

Orru, M. & Ramst, R. 2008. Revegetation processes in abandoned peat production fields in Estonia. In Proceedings of the 13th International Peat Congress, International Peat Society [accepted].

Orru, M., Sirokova, M. & Veldre, M. 1992. Eesti turbavarud [Estonian Peat Resources]. RE Eesti Geoloogia Keskus, Tallinn, 146 pp. [in Estonian, with English summary].

Paal, J., Ilomets, M., Fremstad, E., Moen, A., Borset, E., Kuusemets, V., Tmus, L. & Leibak, E. 1998. Estonian Wetlands Inventory. Eesti Loodusfoto, Tartu, 166 + 28 pp.

Ramst, R. & Orru, M. 2007. Sood Eestis. In 15 aastat Eesti Turbalittu [Estonian Peat Society for 15 years] (Paal, J., ed.), pp. 134-144. Eesti Turbalft, Tallinn [in Estonian].

Raudsepp, A. 1946. Eesti NSV turbasood [Estonian Peatlands]. Teaduslik Kirjandus, Tartu, 240 pp. [in Estonian].

Sillasoo, U., Mauquoy, D., Blundell, A., Charman, D., Blaauw, M., Daniell, J. R. G., Toms, P., Newberry, J., Chambers, F. M. & Karofeld, E. 2007. Peat multi-proxy data from Mannikjarve bog as indicators of late Holocene climate changes in Estonia. Boreas, 36, 20-37.

Tikkanen, M. 2006. Glacial and postglacial history of the Baltic Sea and Finland. In Finland - Land of Mires, The Finnish Environment 23 (Lindholm, I. & Heikkila, R., eds), pp. 59-67. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.

Valk, U. 1988. Soode kasutamine. In Eesti sood [Estonian Mires] (Valk, U., ed.), pp. 187-217. Valgus, Tallinn [in Estonian, with English summary].

Mall Orru (a) Hans Orru (b)

(a) Geological Survey of Estonia, Kadaka tee 82, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; orru@egk.ee

(b) Department of Public Health, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; Hans.Orru@ut.ee
Table 1. Overview of the data of the Estonian peatland inventory

County                        Peatland area, [km.sup.2]

                Well         Other         Small      Total     Peat
              investi-      larger       peatlands              depo-
               gated       peatlands    (resources              sits
                539       (prognostic    were not
             peatlands     resources)   calculated)
             (inferred
             resources)

Hiiu             73.5          0             0           73.5     38.5
Saare           158.4          5.00          0          163.4     87.5
Valga           202.4         67.1          81.8        351.3    152.0
Ida-Viru        804.6         77.4         137.0       1019.0    530.1
Voru            189.9         76.4          94.6        360.9    176.6
Polva           206.7         83.9          89.8        380.4    142.0
Laane-Viru      417.1         65.3          59.3        541.7    233.8
Jogeva          590.4        155.0          41.5        786.9    459.7
Tartu           711.0         99.6          59.1        869.7    543.0
Harju           833.3        251.4         162.4       1247.1    506.8
Jarva           712.4        100.7          23.0        836.1    489.2
Viljandi        617.7        174.1          66.7        858.5    474.5
Rapla           491.3        201.8          61.3        754.4    365.9
Parnu          1096.6        124.5         135.5       1356.6    849.8
Laane           394.5         37.8          59.3        491.6    332.7

Total          7499.8       1520.0        1071.3      10091.1   5382.1

County         Peat              Number of samples in manuscripts
             reserves
             (million   Technical   Bota-    Oxides    Trace       pH
             tonnes)    analyses    nical             elements
                        (ash and    compo-
                        moisture    sition
                        content,
                        degree of
                        humifi-
                        cation)

Hiiu          224.5         203       203      62         36       203
Saare          89.5         652       652      74         44         0
Valga         231.4        2310      2310      48         24      2310
Ida-Viru       10.2        2123      2123      32         12      1775
Voru          133.7        1665      1665      26         32       832
Polva         148.4        1397      1397      34         16       694
Laane-Viru    207.9        1660      1660      26         56       855
Jogeva        195.5        1454      1454      52         46       727
Tartu          23.5        2181      2181      38         44      1080
Harju         475.9        2562      2562      32        114      1129
Jarva         195.1        2400      2400      34         53      1700
Viljandi      241.0        3150      3150      54         65      1575
Rapla          64.7        3741      3741      47         62      1870
Parnu          48.7        6208      6208      48         56      3104
Laane          80.1        1905      1905      38         24       940

Total        2370.0       33611     33611     645        684     18794
COPYRIGHT 2008 Estonian Academy Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Orru, Mall; Orru, Hans
Publication:Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EXES
Date:Jun 1, 2008
Words:3530
Previous Article:Estonian georesources in the European context/ Eesti maavarad Euroopa kontekstis.
Next Article:Development of sustainable georesources for the built environment in the United Kingdom/ Georessursside jatkusuutlik arendamine Uhendkuningriigi...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters