Printer Friendly

Susceptibility and activity of glutathione S-transferases in nine field populations of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) to pyridaben and azocyclotin.

The citrus red mite, Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae), is a major pest worldwide (Gerson 2010). This mite can feed on Ill host plants and very commonly on citrus (Migeon & Dorkeld 2010). In southern China (Feng & Shi 2006) as well as in Japan (Furuhashi 1980), the populations have 2 infestation peaks every year, one in early summer (Jun-Jul), and the other in autumn (Oct-Nov), but maintain low density during late summer and winter. Failure to implement timely pest management adversely affects citrus harvest quantity and quality (weight, sugar content, and appearance) (Wang et al. 1999). Control of this mite depends largely on acaricide applications. Compared with insects, phytophagous mites including this species have biological/ecological traits which favor rapid development of resistance to acaricides, such as a short life cycle, abundant progeny, and arrhenotokous reproduction. For example, Tetranychus urticae and P. ulmi from the family Tetranychidae are among the 10 arthropod species, which were the first to develop pesticide resistance. Indeed P. citri is the third species that developed severe resistance from this family, and the control resistant mites has become exceedingly challenging (Van Leeuwen et al. 2010). According to the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database, 48 cases of resistance to acaricides by P. citri have been reported around the world, including 22 cases in China, 15 in Japan, 9 in USA, l in South Africa, and l in Georgia (Whalon et al. 2010). In USA, acaricide resistance of citrus red mite has been reported in California and Florida, and the acaricides include carbophenothion, chlorfenson, demeton, dicofol, dioxathion, ethion, parathion, and tetradifon. In Japan, citrus red mite populations have developed resistance amitraz, benzoximate, binapacryl, chlorfenson, DDT, dicofol, dimethoate, fluoroacetate, oxydeprofos, phenkapton, and quinomethionate (Whalon et al. 2010). In addition, the citrus red mite has developed resistance to the recently developed acaricide, bifenzate, in Belgium, Japan, and Spain (Van Leeuwen et al. 2011). In China, the resistance status of citrus red mite is more severe compared to other counties, because Chinese citrus growers prefer to use acaricide sprays as the main means to control this mite (Lu et al. 2009). To control the mite population below the economic injury levels of 3-5 mites per leaf, weekly sprays are common during the peaks of heavy infestations (Ho 2000). Although acaricide spraying was an effective control measure in the past, its continued use in citrus orchards has disrupted natural biological systems and led to dramatic resurgences in mite populations. Resurgences are often a result of undesirable effects of acaricides on non-target organisms and the development of acaricide resistance (Zhao 2000). Increasing resistance levels to the most commonly used acaricides have led to multiple treatments, including overdoses; thereby raising serious environmental and human health concerns. Since acaricide resistance was first reported in 1979 in China, this mite has developed resistance to dicofol, pyrethroids, organotin miticide, hexythiazox, spirotetramat, amitraz, propargite, diafenthiuron, abamectin, and mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor (METI) acaricides (Hu et al. 2010; Huang 1979; Ran et al. 2009). These problems have highlighted the need to establish an efficient resistance management strategy based on all available information concerning the extent and nature of resistance.

The METI acaricides (i.e., tebufenpyrad, fenpyroximate, pyridaben, and fenazaquin), which are now widely used globally, were developed in the 1990s and inhibit complex I (NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase) of the mitochondrial respiratory pathway (Hollingworth & Ahammadsahib 1995). Pyridaben (2-tert-butyl-5-(4-tert-butyl-benzoylthio)-4-chloropyridazin-3(2H)-one) is a pyridazinone-derived acaricide that functions by binding its active site to a crucial co-enzyme in mitochondria (complex I at coenzyme site Q), and thus inhibits electron transport in phytophagous mites and insects (Denholm et al. 1998; Hirata et al. 1995). However, azocyclotin is an organotin miticide whose mode of action is to disrupt ATP formation by inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation (Van Leeuwen et al. 2010).

Pyridaben was introduced in China in 1992 and has been widely used in ornamentals and orchards to control mite pests resistant to conventional acaricides (Shi & Feng 2006). According to the Institute of the Control of Agrochemicals, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China (ICAMA), 346 commercial products of pyridaben were registered for use against P. citri. Compared to pyridaben, commercial products of other METI acaricides registered in China between 2008 and 2010 were 2 products containing fenazaquin and 44 products containing fenpyroximate, (ICAMA 2010). However, several field populations of P. citri have already developed high levels of pyridaben resistance in spite of its short term use. Recent investigation has demonstrated that the populations collected from the Chongqing municipality, Pinghe in Fujian Province, Linhai in Zhejiang province, and Yidu in Hubei province have expressed 163.3-, 266.5-, 417.9-, and 601.5-fold resistance to pyridaben, respectively (Hu et al. 2010). Judging by the present status, effort needs to be placed on resistance management to ensure future effective pest control. In addition, better understanding of mechanisms of resistance to pyridaben in P. citri is needed for logical selection of alternate acaricides for resistance management.

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs, EC belong to a supergene family of enzymes that are involved in phase II detoxification of xenobiotics, protection from oxidative damage, and intracellular transport of hormones, endogenous metabolites, and exogenous chemicals (Freitas et al. 2007; Huang et al. 1998). In insects, GSTs have been implicated as a major detoxification mechanism for several classes of insecticides i.e., organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates, and chlorinated hydrocarbons such as DDT (Lumjuan et al. 2005; Willoughby et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2007). However, elevated levels of GSTs activity have been shown recently to be associated with the resistance of spider mite to acaricides, particularly in abamectin resistant populations of T. urticae (Konanz & Nauen 2004). Furthermore, experiments with synergists suggest that GSTs have a major role in pyridaben resistance in P. citri (Liu et al. 2010; Meng et al. 2000).

In the present study, 9 field collected populations of P. citri from China were investigated. Preliminary susceptibility screening of the commercially important acaricide pyridaben and a potential alternate acaricide, azocyclotin, was conducted. In addition, comparison analyses of the GSTs from the 9 populations were performed (including the activities, the kinetics, and an in vitro assay), in order to better understand possible mechanisms of pyridaben resistance in field populations of P. citri.



In 2010, P. citri were collected from citrus orchards in 9 locations in Sichuan Province and Chongqing municipality, China (Table l). In each sample location, more than 2,000 mites with associated citrus leaves were collected from more than 10 citrus trees (Table l). Fresh leaves, collected at random from Citrus reticulata Blanco mandarin orange trees with no prior pesticide exposure from orchards at the Citrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, were used to rear the collected mites in the laboratory during the experiments. The leaves were replaced every 3 d. Sites were selected based on their importance as citrus production areas, and they received various levels of acaricide applications for the management of P. citri (Liu et al. 2010). The identity of P. citri was confirmed by J. J. Wang. Voucher specimens (50 for each population) were deposited in the insect collection of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.


Formulated acaricides used in this study were pyridaben 150 g L-1 EC (Saomanjing[R]) and azocyclotin 200 g L-1 SC (Sanzuoxi[R]), which were purchased from Jiangsu Kesheng Group Co., Jiangsu, China, and Jiangxi Huxing Chemical Co., Jiangxi, China, respectively. Bovine serum albumin (BSA), coomassie brilliant blue G-250, and l-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) were supplied by Shanghai Chem. Ltd., Shanghai, China. Reduced glutathione (GSH) and Ethacrynic acid (EA) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Missouri, USA).


In general the bioassay procedures recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations were followed (FAO 1980). Each field population was assayed by a slide-dip method with 7 treatment concentrations of each acaricide. Each acaricide was diluted with double-distilled water (dd[H.sub.2]O) and various concentrations were tested until a satisfactory range (10-90% mortality) was ascertained. The control group was treated with dd[H.sub.2]O alone. Each slide, containing 30-40 adult female individuals that were 3-5 d old, was dipped into the pesticide solution for 5 s. The slides were placed in an incubator at 28 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C, 75-80% relative humidity, with a photoperiod of light: dark, 14:10 h. Mortality was assessed after 24 h. Mites that did not move after stimulation by a camel hair brush were scored as dead. Each treatment (comprising 3 slides) was replicated 3 times on 3 different days. Mortality data was corrected by Abbott's Formula (Abbott 1925) and analyzed by probit analysis to determine the lethal concentrations ([LC.sub.50]) (Raymond 1985).

GSTs Preparation

One hundred female adults from each population were homogenized in 4 mL ice-cold sodium phosphate buffer (0.02M; pH 7.3) and centrifuged at 5,000 g for 5 min at 4[degrees]C in a CF16RX refrigerated centrifuge (Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The pellets were discarded and the supernatant was again centrifuged at 4[degrees]C for 15 min at 17,500g. Finally, the supernatant was used as the enzyme source for GST activity assays. The protein contents of enzyme homogenates were determined according to the Bradford method with BSA as a standard (Bradford 1976). The measurement was performed with the A-5002 thermomax kinetic microplate reader (Tecan Ltd., Salzburg, Austria) at 595 nm.

Determination of GSTs Activities and Kinetics

GSTs activity was determined with CDNB and GSH as substrates in 96-well microplates (Habig et al. 1974). The total reaction volume per well of a 96-well microplate was 300 [micro]L. This consisted of 100 [micro]L supernatant, 100 [micro]L CDNB (containing 2% [v/v] ethanol) and 100 [micro]L GSH in 0.05 M, pH 7.5 Tris-HCl, with a final concentration of 0.6 mM of CDNB and 6.0 mM and GSH. The non-enzymatic reaction of CDNB with GSH measured without homogenate served as the control. The change in absorbance was measured continuously for 5 min at 340 nm and 37[degrees]C in an A-5002 thermomax kinetic microplate reader (Tecan Ltd., Salzburg, Austria). Changes in absorbance per minute were converted into nmol CDNB conjugated/min/mg protein based on the extinction coefficient of the resulting 2, 4-dinitrophenyl-glutathione ([[epsilon].sub.340nm] = 9.6 [mM.sup.-1] [cm.sup.-1]) (Habig et al. 1974).

The values of [V.sub.max] and [K.sub.m] of total GSTs from P. citri were determined for CDNB and GSH. The activity was recorded as a range of concentrations (0.02-0.6 mM for CDNB or 0.3-6.0 mM for GSH), while the concentrations of the other substrates were kept constant at 6.0 mM GSH or 0.6 mM CDNB. [V.sub.max] and [K.sub.m] values were calculated by the Michaelis-Menten equation in SPSS 10.0 for Windows (Rauch & Nauen 2004).

In vitro Assay

To evaluate the sensitivity of GSTs to different inhibitors, 3 chemicals (pyridaben, azocyclotin, and EA) were selected to assess in vitro inhibition against GSTs. Stock solutions of the inhibitors were diluted with 0.05 M, pH 8.0, Tris-HCl buffer. Twenty-five [micro]L of the enzyme source and 25 [micro]L inhibitor solutions, with an appropriate concentration range (i.e., 1.0-1,000 mg/L for EA, 0.48-384.70 mg/L for pyridaben, and 0.86-1,713.00 mg/L for azocyclotin (which were ascertained from various concentrations of each inhibitor to test the inhibition rate until concentrations causing 10-90% inhibition were delimited), were incubated for 5 min at 37[degrees]C and added to the CDNB/GSH substrate mixture as described above. Reactions without the inhibitor were included as controls. The median inhibition concentration ([I.sub.50]) for each inhibitor was determined based on the log-concentration vs. probit (% inhibition) regression analysis. Three replications were conducted for each treatment above.

Statistical Analysis

All the data from the 9 field populations of P. citri were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), the means were separated by Duncan's Multiple Range Test or LSD Test for significance (P = 0.05) with SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS 1999). Regression analysis was performed to calculate the GST kinetic parameters, [LC.sub.50] values of different acaricides, and [I.sub.50] values of different inhibitors. The significant level of resistance rate (RR) was ascertained by the confidence interval overlap of the [LC.sub.50] values. The Chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to determine the difference between the theoretic and the measured values of acaricide toxicity results. Correlation analyses were conducted to find the relationship between GSTs activity and [LC.sub.50] values of each acaricide against the 9 populations of P. citri.



Compared with the reference dose of each acaricide, the Jiangjin and Meishan populations were susceptible to pyridaben and azocyclotin, respectively. In addition, the population sampled from Jiangjin expressed the greatest sensitivity to pyridaben and thus was regarded as relatively susceptible to pyridaben compared to the other 8 populations. Comparison among resistance ratios (RR) with the relatively pyridaben-susceptible population indicated that all other 8 field collected populations had significant levels of resistance. Resistance ratios ranged from 2 (Jianyang population) to 140 (Pujiang population) (Table 2).

The Meishan population had the lowest [LC.sub.50] value when treated with azocyclotin and was used as the relatively susceptible population to azocyclotin for comparison to the other 8 populations. Comparison of RR values to the relatively azocyclotin susceptible population suggested that only the Beibei, Jiangjin, Jintang, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations had significant levels of resistance. Resistance ratios ranged from 2 (Jianyang, Pengshan, Pujiang, and Wanzhou populations) to 36 (Beibei population) (Table 2).

Activity of GSTs

The Pujiang population exhibited 4.7-fold increased GST activity in comparison with the pyridaben susceptible population (Jiangjin population), and GST activity in the Beibei, Jintang, Meishan, Pengshan, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations was increased 2.3-,1.9-, 1.8-, 2.1-, 2.2-, and 2.7-fold, respectively, in comparison with the Jiangjin population. GST activity in the Jianyang population was 0.9-fold lower than in the Jiangjin population (Fig. l). In addition, the correlation coefficient between GST activity and [LC.sub.50] of pyridaben was r = 0.93, while the correlation coefficient between GST activity and [LC.sub.50] of azocyclotin was r = 0.03 (Fig. 2).

Kinetic Parameters of GSTs

The kinetic parameters of GSTs in P. citri were determined from Lineweaver-Burk plots and presented in Table 3. For the catalytic activity of GSTs toward GSH and CDNB as expressed by the [V.sub.max] value, the Pujiang population had the highest [V.sub.max] value and exhibited a 276.0-fold increased catalytic activity of GSH in comparison with the susceptible Jiangjin population. The catalytic activity of GSH in Jintang, Pengshan, and Zhongxian was increased (8.8-, 2.5-, and 19.0-fold, respectively) compared with the susceptible Jiangjin population. The catalytic activity of GSH in the Beibei, Jianyang, Meishan, and Wanzhou populations decreased compared with the susceptible Jiangjin population. In addition, the catalytic activities of CDNB in the Beibei, Jintang, Pengshan, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations were significantly higher than the pyridaben susceptible population, and exhibited 2.5-, 11.6-, 7.0-, 5.1-, and 6.4-fold increases, respectively. However, the catalytic activity of CDNB in the Jianyang, Meishan, and Pujiang populations was 0.7-, 0.1- and 0.3-fold lower, respectively, than that of the pyridaben susceptible population; but no significant difference of catalytic activity of CDNB was detected among these populations (P < 0.05) (Table 3).


All field collected populations had higher [K.sub.m] values of GSH compared to the reference [K.sub.m] value in the pyridaben susceptible population. Among these, the Pengshan population exhibited a 4.1fold increase in [K.sub.m] value. In addition, the [K.sub.m] value of CDNB in the Jintang, Meishan, Pengshan, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations suggested 2.3-, 1.3-, 10.2-, 5.4-, and 2.9-fold increases, respectively, compared with the pyridaben susceptible population. However, the Pujiang population was determined as having the smallest [K.sub.m] value toward CDNB, while the Pengshan population was determined as having the largest [K.sub.m] value toward CDNB among all the populations (Table 3).

In vitro assay

The median inhibition concentrations ([I.sub.50]s) of the 3 inhibitors (EA, pyridaben, and azocyclotin) were calculated for GSTs from the 9 field collected populations of P. citri (Table 4). The statistical analysis indicated that azocyclotin was the most sensitive inhibitor of the GSTs ([I.sub.50] values ranging from 0.00 to 0.52 mg [liter.sup.-1]) compared with the [I.sub.50] values of EA and pyridaben, which ranged between 0.03 to 3.60 and 0.03 to 28.94 mg [liter.sup.-1], respectively.


Panonychus citri presents a challenge to pest managers due to its inherent ability to develop resistance in a few generations. In recent years, some conventional control options for citrus red mite have become restricted, because the use of more toxic compounds, such as dicofol, has been strictly prohibited. Some novel acaricides, such as METIs and spirodiclofen, have been introduced recently. However, after several years of effective use in citrus, resistance problems have arisen. In some citrus growing areas, growers use these novel acaricides more than 5 times per growing season while the label guidelines specify only 2 applications per year (Hu et al. 2010). Development of resistance in citrus red mite can increase grower costs by more than two-fold and theses can mount further as resistance levels escalate. In the current study, the susceptibilities of 9 field collected populations of P. citri to the acaricides, pyridaben, and azocyclotin, were determined. Mites from the Pengshan, Pujiang, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations exhibited >10-fold resistance to pyridaben compared with the pyridabensusceptible population collected in Jiangjin. However, with the exception of the Zhongxian population, the preceding populations also had the lowest resistance ratio (<5) for azocyclotin compared with the azocyclotin-susceptible population collected in Meishan. Therefore, azocyclotin may be an effective alternative to manage resistance to pyridaben. Previous studies with a field-collected population of P. citri selected with pyridaben for 12 generations showed that it had developed 35-fold resistance, while it still exhibited a low level of cross-resistance (4-fold) to azocyclotin (Meng et al. 2000). A similar low level of cross resistance to azocyclotin also was found in T. urticae. A pyridaben-resistant colony, maintained in the laboratory, was established by treatment with pyridaben for 20 generations (PR-20 population); and it was extremely resistant to pyridaben (resistance ratio = 240), but showed low levels of resistance (resistance ratio = 3.8) to azocyclotin (Kim et al. 2006). Pyridaben belongs to the METI-acaricides, and cross-resistance between METIs has been reported both in laboratory-selected populations and in field-collected populations of T. urticae (Kim et al. 2006; Stumpf & Nauen 2001). The responses of [F.sub.2] females from the reciprocal crosses of resistant and susceptible individuals suggest that resistance to pyridaben is under monogenic control (Van Pottelberge et al. 2009b). Monogenic resistance, which is considered more likely to spread within populations than polygenic resistance, tends to be more stable and is less easily managed (Roush & McKenzie 1987). Based on the different modes of action between pyridaben and azocyclotin, azocyclotin may be a good rotation acaricide for the management of pyridaben resistance.


The mechanisms of resistance to acaricides in mite species are reduced penetration, enhanced metabolism, and target site insensitivity. Of these factors, enhanced metabolic detoxification by GSTs, mixed function oxidases (MFOs), and/or esterases (ESTs) has been considered as a main mechanism of acaricide resistance of mites (Van Nieuwenhuyse et al. 2009; Van Pottelberge et al. 2009a). Experiments with synergists (DEM, PBO, and TPP inhibitors against GSTs, MFO, and EST, respectively) suggest that GSTs play a major role in pyridaben resistance in field collected pyridaben-resistant P. citri populations (Liu et al. 2010), while the same result was also reported in a laboratory pyridaben-selected population of P. citri (Meng et al. 2000). However, an experiment with synergists involving the PR-20 population of T. urticae (a field collected population that was further selected with pyridaben for 20 generations) revealed that MFO plays a major role in pyridaben resistance in this population (Kim et al. 2006). We suggest that the different results from the synergist experiments between P. citri and T. urticae might be caused by differences in inter-specific and non-specialized synergistic activity (Young et al. 2005). In the present study, the activity of GSTs from 9 field collected citrus red mites increased as the pyridaben resistance levels increased (Pujiang > Zhongxian > Wanzhou > Pengshan > Beibei > Jintang > Meishan > Jianyang > Jiangjin) with the exception of the Beibei and Jianyang populations. The analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between GSTs activities and the [LC.sub.50] of pyridaben was r = 0.93, while the correlation between GSTs activities and the [LC.sub.50] of azocyclotin was only r = 0.03 (Fig. 2). This could mean that in P. citri field populations GSTs were involved in resistance of to pyridaben but not to azocyclotin.

All the kinetic parameters (including [V.sub.max] and [K.sub.m] for both GSH and CDNB) in the Jintang, Pengshan, and Zhongxian populations increased significantly compared with the pyridaben susceptible population from Jiangjin. In addition, the catalytic activity of CDNB (presented by [V.sub.max]) in the Beibei, Jintang, Pengshan, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations were found to be significantly greater than the pyridaben susceptible population (2.5-,11.6-, 7.0-, 5.1-, and 6.4-fold increase, respectively), indicating an over-expression (Konanz & Nauen 2004) or structural alteration (Wang et al. 2008) of GSTs in these populations. The [K.sub.m] value of GSH in all field collected populations increased relative to the [K.sub.m] value in the pyridaben susceptible population. In addition, the [K.sub.m] values of CDNB in the Jintang, Meishan, Pengshan, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian populations was 2.3-, 1.3-, 10.2-, 5.4-, and 2.9-fold, respectively, greater than the [K.sub.m] value of the pyridaben susceptible population.

Ethacrynic acid (EA) always presents a strong inhibitory effect on GSTs in many pests, i.e., Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattellidae) (Yu & Huang

2000), T. urticae (Konanz & Nauen 2004), and Li poscelis paeta (Pearman) (Liposcelididae) (Wu et al. 2009). In our current study, azocyclotin had the greatest inhibitory effect on GSTs compared with EA and pyridaben, indicating that azocyclotin could be used as an effective pesticide synergist for the control of pesticide resistance caused by GSTs, i.e., azocyclotin could block GST activity due to rapid depletion of GSH (Li et al. 2009). Nevertheless, the effectiveness of azocyclotin as a synergist requires further research.

In summary, the present study has provided some basic information on the toxicity of pyridaben and azocyclotin against P. citri, and certain characteristics of GST activity in 9 field populations of P. citri were described. In addition, our study illustrated that GSTs could be associated with varying susceptibility levels to pyridaben. This is only the first step in the biochemical differentiation of various P. citri field populations. The results of further studies will contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of acaricide resistance in P. citri.


We thank Dr. Helen Hull-Sanders and Stephen Sanders for invaluable comments and improvement of both content and English language. This study was supported in part by a grant from MOA (201103020), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team at the University (IRT0976), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTC, 2009BA1042), and the earmarked fund for the Modern Agro-industry (Citrus) Technology Research System of China to JinJun Wang. The technical assistance of Yi Yin and Rui Zhang is appreciated.


Abbott, S. W. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265-267.

Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254.

Denholm, I., Horowitz, A. R., Gahill, M., AND Ishaaya, I. 1998. Management of resistance to novel insecticides, pp. 260-282 In I. Ishaaya and D. Degheele (eds.), Insecticides with Novel Modes of Action-Mechanism and Application. Springer Verlag, Berlin. pp: 260-282.

Fao. 1980. Recommended methods for measurement of resistance to pesticides. FAO Plant Production and Protection Papers. 21: 49-54.

Freitas, D. R., Rosa, R. M., Moraes, J., Campos, E., Logullo, C., DA, J., and Masuda, A. 2007. Relationship between glutathione S-transferase, catalase, oxygen consumption, lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress in eggs and larvae of Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 146: 688-694.

Furuhashi, K. 1980. Studies on population dynamics of citrus red mite, Panonychus citri McGregor in citrus orchards. Shizuoka Pref. Citrus Exp. Stn. Spec. Bull. 4:1-56.

Gerson, U. 2003. Acarine pests of citrus: overview and non chemical control. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 8: 3-12.

Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J., and Jakoby, W. B. 1974. Glutathione-S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 249: 7130-7139.

Hirata, K., Kawamura, T., Kudo, M., and Igarashi, H. 1995. Development of a new acaricide, pyridaben. J. Pestic. Sci. 20: 177-179.

Ho, C. C. 2000. Spider-mite problems and control in Taiwan. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24: 452-462.

Hollingworth, R. M., and Ahammadsahib, K. I. 1995. Inhibitors of respiratory complex I: mechanisms, pesticidal actions and toxicology. Rev. Pestic. Toxicol. 3: 277-302.

Hu, J. F., Wang, C. F., Wang, J., You, Y., and Chen, F. 2010. Monitoring of resistance to spirodiclofen and five other acaricides in Panonychus citri collected from Chinese citrus orchards. Pest Manag. Sci. 66: 1025-1030.

Huang, H. S., Hu, N. T., Yao, Y. E., Wu, C. Y., Chiang, S. W., and Sun, C. N. 1998. Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of a glutathione S-transferase involved in insecticide resistance from the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28: 651-658.

Huang, M. D. 1979. Integrated Management of Citrus Red mite. Chinese Science Press. pp: 361-369.

ICAMA (INSTITUTE OF THE CONTROL OF AGROCHEMICALS, Ministry of Agriculture). 2010. China Pesticide Information Network: http//

Kim, Y. J., Park, H. M., Cho, J. R., and Ahn, Y. J. 2006. Multiple Resistance and Biochemical Mechanisms of Pyridaben Resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 954-958.

Konanz, S., and Nauen, R. 2004. Purification and partial characterization of a glutathione S-transferase from the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 79: 49-57.

Liu, Y. H., Jiang, H. B., Yuan, M. L., Fan, Y. H., Yang, L. H., Chen, J., and Wang, J. J. 2010. Resistance monitoring and synergism on four acaricides against Panonychus citri. J. Fruit. Sci. 27: 323-327.

Lu, H., Chen, B. X., Dong, Y. Z., Wang, A. Y., and Yi, G. J. 2009. Field trials of thirteen acaricides against Panonychus citri. Gongdong Agric. Sci. 9: 96-107.

Lumjuan, N., McCarroll, L., La-Aiede, P., Hemingway, J., and Ranson, H. 2005. Elevated activity of an Epsilon class glutathione transferase confers DDT resistance in the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35: 861-871.

Meng, H. S., Wang, K. Y., Jiang, X. Y., and Yi, M. Q. 2000. Selection and biochemical mechanism of the resistance to pyridaben in Panonychus citri. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2: 30-34.

Migeon, A., and Dorkeld, F. 2010. Spider Mites Web:

Ran, C., Chen, Y., and Wang, J. J. 2009. Susceptibility and carboxylesterase activity of five field populations of Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) to four acaricides. Intl. J. Acarol. 35: 115-121.

Rauch, N., and Nauen, R. 2004. Characterization and molecular cloning of a glutathione S-transferase from the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34: 321-329.

Raymond, M. 1985. Presentation d'um programme Basic d'analyse log-probit pour micro-ordinnateur. Cah Orstom Ser Ent Med Parasitol. 23: 117-121.

Roush, R. T., and McKenzie, J. A. 1987. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32: 361-380.

Shi, W. B., and Feng, M. G. 2006. Field efficacy of application of Beauveria bassiana formulation and low rate pyridaben for sustainable control of citrus red mite Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) in orchards. Biol. Control. 39: 210-217.

SPSS. 1999. SPSS 10.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Stumpf, N., and Nauen, R. 2001. Cross-resistance, inheritance, and biochemistry of mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor-acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 1577-1583.

Van Leeuwen, T., Van Nieuwenhuyse, P., Vanholme, B., Dermauw, W., Nauen, R., and Tirry, L. 2011. Parallel evolution of cytochrome b mediated bifenazate resistance in the citrus red mite Panonychus citri. 20: 135-140.

Van Leeuwen, T., Vontas, J., Tsakarakou, A., Dermauw, W., and Tirry, L. 2010. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40: 563-572.

Van Nieuwenhuyse, P., Van Leeuwen, T., Khajehali, J., Vanholme, B., and Tirry, L. 2009. Mutations in the mitochondrial cytochrome b of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) confer cross-resistance between bifenazate and acequinocyl. Pest Manag. Sci. 65: 404-412.

Van Pottelberge, S., Van Leeuwen, T., Khajehali, J., and Tirry, L. 2009a. Genetic and biochemical analysis of a laboratory-selected spirodiclofen-resistant strain of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 65: 358-366.

Van Pottelberge, S., Van Leeuwen, T., Nauen, R., and Tirry, L. 2009b. Resistance mechanisms to mitochondrial electron transport inhibitors in a fieldcollected strains of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 99: 23-31.

Wang, L. D., You, M. S., and Wu, Q. 1999. Damage of citrus leafminer to citrus and its economic threshold. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 10: 457-460.

Wang, Y., Qiu, L., Ranson, H., Lumjuan, N., Hemingway, J., Setzer, W. N., Meehan, E. J., and Chen, L. 2008. Structure of an insect epsilon class glutathione S-transferase from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae provides an explanation for the high DDT-detoxifying activity. J. Struct. Biol. 164: 228-235.

Whalon, M. E., Mota-Sanchez, R. M., Holling worth, R. M., and Duynslager, L. 2008. Artrhopods Resistant to Pesticides Database (ARPD):

Willoughby, L., Batterham, P., and Daborn, P. J. 2007. Piperonyl butoxide induces the expression of cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Pest Manag. Sci. 63: 803-808.

Wu, S., Dou, W., Wu, J. J., and Wang, J. J. 2009. Purification and partial characterization of glutathione S-transferase from insecticide-resistant field populations of Liposcelis paeta Pearman (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 70: 136-150.

Young, S. J., Gunning, R. V., and Moores, G. D. 2005. The effect of piperonyl butoxide on pyrethroid-resistance-associated esterases in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 61: 397-401.

Yu, S. J., and Huang, S. W. 2000. Purification and Characterization of Glutathione S-Transferases from the German Cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 67: 36-45.

Zhang, Y. Y., Zhao, Z. M., and Wu, S. C. 1994. Integrated Pest Management of citrus mites. Plant. Prot. Technol. Extent. 14: 23-34.

Zhao, Z. M. 2000. The recent study of citrus pest in China. Entomol. Knowl. 37: 110-116.

Zhu, Y. C., Snodgrass, G. L., and Chen, M. S. 2007. Comparative study on glutathione S-transferase activity, cDNA, and gene expression between malathion susceptible and resistant strains of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris. Pestic. Bio chem. Physiol. 87: 62-72.


(1) Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, P.R. China

(2) Sichuan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China

Population               Location                     Origin

Beibei           Chongqing municipality     Citrus reticulate Banco
Jiangjin         Chongqing municipality     Citrus reticulate Banco
Wanzhou          Chongqing municipality     Citrus reticulate Banco
Zhongxian        Chongqing municipality     Citrus reticulate Banco
Jintang          Sichuan Province           Citrus reticulate Banco
Jianyang         Sichuan Province           Citrus reticulate Banco
Pengshan         Sichuan Province           Citrus reticulate Banco
Pujiang          Sichuan Province           Citrus reticulate Banco
Meishan          Sichuan Province           Citrus reticulate Banco

Population         Collection date

Beibei                4-16-2010
Jiangjin              5-03-2010
Wanzhou               5-11-2010
Zhongxian             5-19-2010
Jintang               5-21-2010
Jianyang              5-14-2010
Pengshan              5-16-2010
Pujiang               5-29-2010
Meishan               4-11-2010


Acaricide      Population       n       [chi      Slope ([+ or -] SE)

Pyridaben      Jiangjin        616      1.33     1.12 ([+ or -] 0.17)
               Beibei          710      2.11     0.52 ([+ or -] 0.11)
               Jianyang        687      4.68     0.89 ([+ or -] 0.13)
               Jintang         485      3.71     0.61 ([+ or -] 0.13)
               Meishan         575      2.18     0.63 ([+ or -] 0.12)
               Pengshan        473      0.23     0.93 ([+ or -] 0.18)
               Pujiang         527      2.00     1.57 ([+ or -] 0.33)
               Wanzhou         519      0.99     0.75 ([+ or -] 0.16)
               Zhongxian       670      2.08     1.22 ([+ or -] 0.17)

Azocyclotin    Meishan         470      5.48     0.31 ([+ or -] 0.08)
               Beibei          566      2.06     0.63 ([+ or -] 0.10)
               Jiangjin        515      5.29     1.00 ([+ or -] 0.15)
               Jintang         688      4.03     0.45 ([+ or -] 0.15)
               Jianyang        639      5.86     0.61 ([+ or -] 0.12)
               Pengshan        507      5.50     0.71 ([+ or -] 0.12)
               Pujiang         519      3.76     0.80 ([+ or -] 0.13)
               Wanzhou         498      4.07     0.70 ([+ or -] 0.09)
               Zhongxian       621      3.39     0.46 ([+ or -] 0.10)

Acaricide      Population     [LC.sub.50] [95%CI]       RR [95%CI]
                              (mg [liter.sup.-1])

Pyridaben      Jiangjin          0.2 [0.2; 0.3]             --
               Beibei            2.0 [1.1; 3.1]          9 [6; 11]
               Jianyang          0.5 [0.3; 0.6]          2 [2; 2]
               Jintang           1.7 [1.0; 3.0]          8 [6; 10]
               Meishan           1.1 [0.7; 1.4]          5 [4; 5]
               Pengshan          2.6 [1.6; 4.0]         12 [9; 14]
               Pujiang          30.9 [23.0; 55.1]      140 [134; 192]
               Wanzhou           5.3 [3.8; 7.8]         24 [22; 27]
               Zhongxian        14.9 [11.7; 20.6]       68 [68; 71]

Azocyclotin    Meishan            40 [21; 70]               --
               Beibei           1463 [1063; 1656]       36 [30; 37]
               Jiangjin          128 [72; 206]           3 [2; 5]
               Jintang           304 [239; 337]          8 [7; 8]
               Jianyang           88 [(50; 139)          2 [l; 3]
               Pengshan           87 [53; 154]           2 [l; 3]
               Pujiang            60 [32; 93]            2 [l; 2]
               Wanzhou           104 [71; 157]           2 [2; 4]
               Zhongxian         734 [683; 1115]        18 [17;25]

Note: n = number of mites; RR = resistance ratio; CI = confidence

(a) Chi-squared goodness-of-fit test.



Population           [V.sub.max]                [K.sub.m]

Jiangjin          311 [+ or -] 11 a         87 [+ or -] 11 a
Jianyang          264 [+ or -] 64 a         87 [+ or -] 2 a
Meishan            11 [+ or -] 0 a         328 [+ or -] 12 cd
Jintang          2744 [+ or -] 178 a       306 [+ or -] 15 c
Beibei            194 [+ or -] 53 a        190 [+ or -] 59 b
Pengshan          776 [+ or -] 148 a       359 [+ or -] 14 d
Wanzhou            11 [+ or -] 1 a         343 [+ or -] 25 cd
Zhongxian        5907 [+ or -] 276 a       318 [+ or -] 25 cd
Pujiang         85841 [+ or -] 10084 b     120 [+ or -] 7 a


Population           [V.sub.max]                [K.sub.m]

Jiangjin          210 [+ or -] 10 a         58 [+ or -] 14 bc
Jianyang          153 [+ or -] 25 a         12 [+ or -] 2 a
Meishan            16 [+ or -] 1 a          73 [+ or -] 10 c
Jintang          2427 [+ or -] 36 f        134 [+ or -] 18 d
Beibei            527 [+ or -] 37 b         33 [+ or -] 2 ab
Pengshan         1484 [+ or -] 393 d       593 [+ or -] 56 f
Wanzhou          1088 [+ or -] 26 c        316 [+ or -] 14 e
Zhongxian        1334 [+ or -] 280 cd      167 [+ or -] 11 d
Pujiang            68 [+ or -] 4 a           5 [+ or -] 0 a

Each value represents the mean ([+ or -] SE). Mean values within
the same column followed by different letters are significantly
different in ANOVA (LSD, P < 0.05). [V.sub.max]: nmol [min.sup.-1]
[(mg pro).sup.-1]. [K.sub.m]: [micro]M.



Population                 EA                       Pyridaben

Jiangjin          0.03 [+ or -] 0.00 a         3.21 [+ or -] 0.53 a
Jianyang          0.37 [+ or -] 0.00 b        10.26 [+ or -] 0.00 b
Meishan           0.83 [+ or -] 0.20 c        27.21 [+ or -] 2.38 e
Jintang           3.60 [+ or -] 0.45 e        12.72 [+ or -] 4.41 c
Beibei            1.16 [+ or -] 0.02 d        17.55 [+ or -] 0.74 cd
Pengshan          0.06 [+ or -] 0.00 a        24.21 [+ or -] 2.52 de
Wanzhou           0.98 [+ or -] 0.03 cd       28.94 [+ or -] 9.17 e
Zhongxian         0.24 [+ or -] 0.00 ab       18.40 [+ or -] 3.28 bcd
Pujiang           1.09 [+ or -] 0.02 cd        0.03 [+ or -] 0.01 a


Population             Azocyclotin

Jiangjin          0.03 [+ or -] 0.00 a
Jianyang          0.52 [+ or -] 0.18 c
Meishan           0.32 [+ or -] 0.16 b
Jintang           0.00 [+ or -] 0.00 a
Beibei            0.08 [+ or -] 0.01 a
Pengshan          0.02 [+ or -] 0.00 a
Wanzhou           0.49 [+ or -] 0.00 c
Zhongxian         0.01 [+ or -] 0.00 a
Pujiang           0.00 [+ or -] 0.00 a

Inhibition measured as 50% inhibitory concentration (i.e.,
[I.sub.50]) in mg [liter.sup.-1]. Each value represents the mean
([+ or -] SE). Mean values within the same column followed by
different letters are significantly different in ANOVA (LSD,
P < 0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2011 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Niu, Jin-Zhi; Liu, Guo-Ying; Dou, Wei; Wang, Jin-Jun
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2011
Previous Article:Flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) dispersal from alternate hosts into southern highbush blueberry (ericales: ericaceae) plantings.
Next Article:A contribution to thrips-plant associations records (Insecta: Thysanoptera) in Costa Rica and Central America.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters