Printer Friendly

Survival of termites (Isoptera) exposed to various levels of relative humidity (RH) and water availability, and their RH preferences.

Due to their small size and relatively unsclerotized body, water loss is a common problem facing all termite species, and they must locate and utilize water resources to prevent or tolerate desiccation. Water resources may be found as free water, moist food, or moist soil. Termites live in various habitats and microhabitats with differing levels of ambient humidity and availability of water, and water management among termite species has been the subject of many studies (Collins 1958, 1963, 1966, 1969; Abushama 1974; Rust et al. 1979; Steward 1983; Sponsler & Appel 1990; Rudolph et al. 1990; Grube & Rudolph 1999a, 1999b; Gallagher & Jones 2010; Gautam & Henderson 2014). Some kalotermitid termites exhibit behavior and impacts on survival that indicate that high humidity is toxic to them (Collins 1969; Minnick et al. 1973; Steward 1982, 1983; Rudolph et al. 1990; Wood row et al. 2000). Strickland (1950), Collins (1958, 1969, 1991), and Khan (1980), found that different termite species can tolerate various (sometimes extreme) humidity and temperature conditions; however, there are undoubtedly conditions that termites prefer over other conditions that they can tolerate.

The first objective of this study was to investigate the survivorship of 4 termite (Isoptera) species that inhabit distinctly different microhabitats, including Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Rhinotermitidae), Neotermes jouteli (Banks in Banks and Snyder) (Kalotermitidae), Cryptotermes brevis Walker (Kalotermitidae), and Cryptoterme cavifrons Banks (Kalotermitidae). Coptotermes formosanus and N. jouteli live in high relative humidity (RH) environments, whereas Cr. brevis is found in dry timber and Cr. cavifrons is found in natural wood that can be wet or dry.

The second objective of this study was to investigate the RH preferences of the aforementioned species. Humidity is not the only water source available to termites. There are other water sources that termites might use. These include metabolic water obtained through the breakdown of food, from the fat body, free liquid water, as well as water bound to various substrates (e.g., wood, soil, and nestmate cadavers). Different termite species (i.e., drywood, dampwood, subterranean) use or avoid certain environments with different moisture and water sources. Whereas drywood termites depend heavily on metabolically derived water, dampwood and subterranean termites that live in high RH environments obtain water from their surroundings (Lee & Wood 1971, Brammer & Scheffrahn 2007, Scheffrahn & Su 2007). The third objective of this study was to investigate whether these 4 termite species use a variety of water sources for survival.

Materials and Methods

INSECT COLONIES

Individuals from colonies of C. formosanus, N.jouteli, Cr. cavifrons, and Cr. brevis were collected in Broward County, Florida. Different colonies of C.formosanus were collected from bucket traps as described by Su and Scheffrahn (1986). Colonies of N. jouteli, Cr. cavifrons, and Cr. brevis were collected from different pieces of wood. Coptotermes formosanus and N. jouteli were kept in polystyrene boxes (17.15 x 12.22 x 6.03 cm) with wood (Pinus sp.) maintained at 26.4 [degrees]C, and were regularly misted with water to maintain >95% RH. Cryptotermes termites were kept in polystyrene boxes with wood pieces and stored in the Incubator (26.4 [degrees]C and 41.5% RH). For Cr. cavifrons, small dishes with water were provided. Populations of each termite species survived well in these conditions and were used for experiments as needed. Termites were kept in the incubator for <6 mo before use.

TERMITE SURVIVORSHIP AT VARIOUS RELATIVE HUMIDITIES

Desiccative humidity chambers consisted of clear polystyrene boxes (17.15 x 12.22 x 6.03 cm) with internal RH conditions stabilized using three saturated salt solutions (i.e., NaCI, Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2], and Mg[Cl.sub.2]), silica gel, and water (Fig. 1A) as described by Rockland (1960), and Winston and Bates (1960). Open Petri dishes (93 mm diameter, 22 mm height) containing water or 1 of the saturated salt solutions were placed at the center of 4 chambers (Fig. 1A, a-d), while silica gel was placed on the bottom of the chamber (Fig. 1A, e) to produce the lowest RH. The container edge was coated with petroleum jelly (Eboneen Products Company, Inc., Hartford, Connecticut) to create a seal between the lid and chamber. Temperature and humidity levels were measured daily using a probe (THW3; Amprobe, Everett, Washington) (Fig. 1B, i) through an access hole (1.59 cm diameter) in the lid. These holes were plugged with rubber stoppers while not in use (Fig. 1B, h). The average RH ([+ or -] standard error of the mean [SEM]) of the chambers and their associated stabilizing material were as follows (n = 73): 92.0 [+ or -] 0.07% ([H.sub.2]O), 72.9 [+ or -] 0.08% (NaCI), 55.7 [+ or -] 0.09% (Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]), 34.3 [+ or -] 0.04% (Mg[Cl.sub.2]), and 18.2 [+ or -] 0.14% (silica gel). The average temperature ([+ or -]SEM) of the chambers and their associated stabilizing material were as follows (n = 73): 23.5 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C ([H.sub.2]O), 23.6 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (NaCl), 23.5 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]), 23.7 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (MgCLJ, and 23.6 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (silica gel). Groups of 10 termite individuals per species were placed in the Petri dish (35 mm diameter, 10 mm height) of each chamber with small holes cut into the lids of the dishes to allow air movement and yet prevent termite escape. Dishes were also provisioned with a small (15 x 15 x 9 mm) piece of wood (Pinus sp.) as a food source. Four dishes, each containing 1 of the 4 termite species, were placed in the humidity chamber surrounding water or salt solutions (Fig. 1A, a-d), or on top of the silica gel in a chamber (Fig. 1A, e).

Temperature and humidity readings were recorded every 24 h post-introduction for 12 d. Daily counts of live termites were recorded for a 12 d period. A follow-up experiment also was conducted to examine recovery of N. jouteli individuals that exhibited visible reduction in body mass. At the conclusion of the 12 d study, the surviving N. jouteli Individuals from the various RH were weighed and then placed in a Petri dish and provided with food and water for 1 wk. Surviving termites were counted and weighed again to examine recovery when provided with adequate food and water resources.

Statistical analysis was carried out using JMP statistical software (SAS 2015). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) for a 4 by 5 factorial experimental design was conducted to test for differences. Termite species (4) and RH (5) were the factors, and percentage survival was the response variable. Percentage survival values were arcsine-square root transformed before analysis. Post hoc Tukey honest significant difference tests were used to evaluate all pairwise differences at a = 0.05. Data from 6 replicates were analyzed.

TERMITE PREFERENCE FOR VARIOUS RELATIVE HUMIDITIES

Multiple-choice arenas were constructed by connecting a central chamber (89 mL [3 oz] clear plastic jars, 52 mm diameter, 53 mm height) with four radial chambers (Fig. 2A). Drierite (WA. Hammond DRIERITE Co. Ltd., Xenia, Ohio) was used for the central chamber, whereas water, NaCI, Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2], and Mg[Cl.sub.2] were used for the 4 radial chambers to maintain desired RH.The average (n = 21) RH ([+ or -] SEM) of the chambers and their associated stabilizing material were as follows: 90.7 [+ or -] 0.24% ([H.sub.2]O), 71.7 [+ or -] 0.20% (NaCl), 52.0 [+ or -] 0.12% (Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]), 34.1 [+ or -] 0.16% (Mg[Cl.sub.2]), and 8.4 [+ or -] 0.48% (Drierite). The average (n = 21) temperature ([+ or -] SEM) of the chambers and their associated stabilizing material were as follows: 23.4 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C ([H.sub.2]O), 23.5 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (NaCI), 23.4 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]), 23.4 [+ or -] 0.06 [degrees]C (Mg[Cl.sub.2]), and 23.4 [+ or -] 0.05 [degrees]C (Drierite). A temperature and humidity probe was inserted through access holes (1.59 cm diameter) in the lids to take measurements inside the chambers as described previously (Fig. 2A, b). Relative humidity stabilizing solutions or materials were placed in the bottom of the jar chambers (Fig. 2B).

Chambers housed modified plastic vials (25 mm inner diameter, 15 mm height) cut to hold the termites while preventing their escape (Fig. 2C, k). A hole (6 mm diameter) was drilled into the wall of each of the 4 radial chambers (2.5 cm from base) to allow pieces of plastic tubing (5.5 mm diameter, 50.0 mm length) (Fig. 2C, j) to connect radial termite vials to the vial in the central chamber. All termite vials were suspended by plastic tubes above the stabilizing materials. Groups of 25 pseudergates were placed into the introduction chamber for the larger sized species N. jouteli, while 50 termites (pseudergates and workers) were used for the other 3 smaller sized species.

Termites could move and acclimate to any chamber for 12 to 16 h. Black satin cloth covered the arenas to provide darkness. Counts of termites within each chamber were then recorded. Termites found in the connecting tubes were included in the counts for the connected chamber. Statistical analysis was conducted using JMP statistical software (SAS 2015). A 4 by 5 factorial analysis was conducted with termite species (4) and RH (5) as the factors and percentage of termites found in a chamber as the response variable. The percentage values were arcsine-square root transformed before the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test whether there was a significant difference among RH preference for the 4 species. Post hoc Tukey honest significant difference tests were used to separate the differences for all pairs at a = 0.05. Data from 6 replications were analyzed.

TERMITE SURVIVORSHIP WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF WATER SOURCES

Experimental chambers were constructed using clear plastic jars (52 mm diameter, 53 mm height) with plastic lids and lid liners. The bottoms of these jars were scratched with sandpaper to provide traction for termite movement. Temperature and humidity levels inside the jars were measured as described previously.

Five chambers that provided various sources of water, or the lack thereof, were used for the experiment. These included: chambers with a piece of dry wood (Pinus sp.; 18 x 18 x 8 mm), a piece of dry wood with a humidity source (i.e., a 2 x 6 cm wetted filter paper strips attached to the upper inner side of the chamber), a piece of wet wood, a piece of dry wood with wet sandy soil (5 g sand + 1.5 mL deionized water), and a piece of dry wood with a source of free water in a small dish (modified shell vial cap, 15 mm diameter, 3 mm height). Water was added as needed to maintain RH and free water levels. The average (n = 48) RH ([+ or -] SEM) of the chambers and their associated water sources were as follows: 91.0 [+ or -] 0.22% (wet wood), 49.6 [+ or -] 0.61% (dry wood), 92.6 [+ or -] 0.22% (wet soil), 91.1 [+ or -] 0.22% (wood + water), and 94.2 [+ or -] 0.18% (wood + RH). The average (n = 48) temperature ([+ or -] SEM) of the chambers and their associated water sources were as follows: 24.2 [+ or -] 0.08 [degrees]C (wet wood), 24.1 [+ or -] 0.08 [degrees]C (dry wood), 24.2 [+ or -] 0.07 [degrees]C (wet soil), 24.2 [+ or -] 0.07 [degrees]C (wood + water), and 23.0 [+ or -] 0.03 [degrees]C (wood + RH).

Three sets of each of the chambers were broken down weekly for 4 wk to record termite survival for each species using destructive sampling. The data were analyzed using JMP statistical software (SAS 2015) and a 4 by 5 factorial experimental design with termite species (4) and water source (5) as the factors, and percentage survival as the response variable. Percentage survival data were arcsine square root transformed before analysis. Weekly data were analyzed separately. ANOVA was conducted to test for significant differences and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference tests were used to separate the differences for all pairs at a = 0.05. Data from 3 replications were analyzed.

Results

TERMITE SURVIVORSHIP AT VARIOUS RELATIVE HUMIDITIES

Termites displayed statistically different responses to RH (F = 90.0; df = 3, 116; P <0.001). There was no significant difference in survival at any RH (18.2-92.0%) for Cr. cavifrons, Cr. brevis, and N. jouteli, but there was a significant difference for C. formosanus. This species survived at 92.0% RH, but died within a few days when maintained at <72.9% RH (Table 1). However, N. jouteli individuals in all the humidity chambers (18.2-72.9% RH) except the water chamber (92.0% RH) were visibly smaller at the end of the experiment than at the start. The Cryptotermes species did not exhibit this change in size. At 18.2 to 72.9% RH levels, N. jouteli groups decreased in mass (4.4-151.2 mg loss per 10 termites). Of the 180 N. jouteli individuals that survived at the various RH and were then placed in a dish and provided with food and water, 172 recovered. These 172 individuals exhibited a total weight gain of approximately 327 mg. The remaining 8 individuals were not accounted for, indicating they may have been cannibalized by nestmates as a food and water source. The N. jouteli groups of 10 individuals exhibited a decrease in mass of approximately 42.0% of their weight, either due to the loss of body water or body fat.

TERMITE PREFERENCE FOR VARIOUS RELATIVE HUMIDITIES

Termites displayed statistically different responses to RH (F = 7.06; df =3,116; P<0.001). The wetwood (nests in wood or soil high in moisture) species of C formosanus and N. jouteli preferred the highest RH of 90.7% RH, which was significantly more than Cr. cavifrons and Cr. brevis and significantly more than the other RH (Table 2). The Cryptotermes species did not exhibit a preference for any RH when compared among species and among RH.

TERMITE SURVIVORSHIP WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF WATER SOURCES

Termites displayed statistically different responses to RH for wk 1 (F = 5.71; df = 3, 56; P <0.001), wk 2 (F = 3.30; df = 3, 56; P <0.001), wk 3 (F = 3.89; df = 3, 56; P <0.001), and wk 4 (F = 4.91; df = 3, 56; P <0.001). Within a week, none of the C. formosanus individuals survived in the chambers provisioned with a piece of dry wood at RH <49.6%. Survival of C. formosanus was significantly lower in the dry wood chamber when compared to the other 3 species at all weeks. They survived significantly better throughout the 4 wk experiment when provided with some form of water at RH >90% (Table 3) when compared to the low humidity of the dry wood chamber. The only exception was the low survivorship of 33.3% when C. formosanus was provided with a piece of dry wood and free water at 91.1% RH for 4 wk. Because of the high survivorship of 96.7% at 4 wk when provided with dry wood at a slightly elevated RH (94.2%), the low 33.3% survivorship may be attributed to other factors such as handling. In the first 3 weeks, survival was not significantly different for N. jouteli, Cr. Brevis, and Cr. cavifrons when compared between the 5 water source chambers, as well as when compared with each other. After 4 wk, survival of C. formosanus exposed to dry wood was significantly lower when compared to wet wood, wet soil, and wood with a RH source. Cryptotermes brevis also exhibited significantly lower survival with wet wood when compared to C. formosanus, and wood with a RH source when compared to Cr. cavifrons (Table 3).

Discussion

Results of this study showed that C formosanus is less capable of tolerating desiccation than N. jouteli, Cr. cavifrons, or Cr. brevis. This agrees with previous studies of Collins (1958, 1963, 1966, 1969) and Khan (1980) on Kalotermitidae and Rhinotermitidae species. Neotermes jouteli did not express a difference in survival at the various RH, but lost body mass while remaining alive, most likely due to the need to generate metabolic water from reserve body fat, and exhibited a reduction in movement at RH below 72.9%.

The Cryptotermes species did not show a difference in survival when compared at the 5 RH of the first objective and did not exhibit a change in behavior. The physiological mechanisms involved in desiccation tolerance remain to be elucidated, but are probably related to cuticular permeability and percentage of total body water.

The results illustrate the necessity for C. formosanus, and preference of N. jouteli, to inhabit environments with high levels of moisture. Coptotermes formosanus, a subterranean species, not only requires high RH, but also other sources of water for normal activity and survival (Gautam & Henderson 2011). Tunneling activity of Coptotermes gestroi (Wasmann) (Rhinotermitidae), Heterotermes tenuis (Hagen) (Rhinotermitidae), C formosanus, and Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) (Rhinotermitidae) in studies by Arab and Costa-Leonardo (2005) and Su and Puche (2003), showed that these species tunneled more in substrates with higher moisture content. Additionally, the effect of substrate and food moisture levels on survival, consumption, and distribution of Microcerotermes crassus Snyder (Termitidae), Macrotermes carbonarius (Hagen) (Termitidae), Macrotermes gilvus (Hagen) (Termitidae), C. gestroi, C. formosanus, Reticulitermes speratus (Kolbe) (Rhinotermitidae), R. flavipes, Reticulitermes tibialis Banks in Banks and Snyder (Rhinotermitidae), and Reticulitermes virginicus (Banks) (Rhinotermitidae) also highlights the importance of adequate water availability for other species (Delaplane & La Fage 1989; Nakayama et al. 2004, 2005; Green et al. 2005; McManamy et al. 2008; Wong & Lee 2010; Hu et al. 2012). Many termites (including C. formosanus and N. jouteli) are more likely to be found, survive longer, and consume food resources at higher rates in environments in which water resources are more likely to persist, but some, such as Cr. brevis, are not.

As reported for Kalotermitidae and Termopsidae by Collins (1991), the dampwood termite, N. jouteli, lives within its food source and requires moist conditions. However, N. jouteli and Cr. cavifrons inhabit wood pieces that are more likely to be subject to RH changes. Given that their geographic ranges include areas with extended wet and dry seasons, it is beneficial for them to be able to tolerate a range of RH and water availabilities. In this study, Cr. cavifrons and N. jouteli were able to tolerate conditions in which water sources were lacking, as well as utilize water sources when they were present.

As was noted by Pence (1956) and Collins (1958), the Cryptotermes species in this study were also less active than the subterranean and dampwood species, and tended to aggregate with little movement unless disturbed. Coptotermes formosanus and N. jouteli, while more active, also tended to aggregate. This aggregative huddling was likely a behavioral mechanism to prevent desiccation from water loss through evaporation from the body by decreasing overall surface area of the group. This behavior, termed the "group effect" by Grasse and Chauvin (1944), was reported to increase termite survival for several species (Pence 1956; Sen-Sarma & Chatterjee 1966; Minnick et al. 1973; Abushama 1974; Ahmad et al. 1982; Malik & Sheikh 1990; Cabrera & Rust 1996).

Another group behavior involved in desiccation tolerance is the consumption of nestmates. Cannibalism, as described by Collins (1991), was not explicitly observed in this study, but the fact that there were individuals missing from the Neotermes recovery study suggests they were probably cannibalized. This behavior is an additional means of obtaining water and food resources under water-stressed conditions.

Whereas some termites require access to water sources, too much moisture can be detrimental to other species. While each week of exposure was not statistically compared to the other weeks, there was a decrease in average survival from week 1 to 4 for Cr. brevis. There was also a decrease in survival for Cr. brevis when exposed to environments with RH >90%, and indicated that avoiding prolonged contact with free water is important to survival in this species. Our results agree with previous works of Collins (1969), Minnick et al. (1973), Steward (1982, 1983), Rudolph et al. (1990), and Woodrow et al. (2000), in which they found evidence of water toxicity in drywood termite species. If individuals of cr. brevis could avoid direct contact with a water source, such as on the wood block provided, they were generally better able to tolerate these less-than-favorable environments with extended exposure.

Results of this study highlight the importance of water to the survival of four termite species and the differences in their RH preference, desiccation and RH tolerance, and moisture exposure tolerance. Further studies are needed to examine their morphological and physiological characteristics such as cuticular structure, spiracular openings, and cuticular permeability that may contribute to these differences.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to A. Mullins (University of Florida) for review of this article and R. Pepin for technical support. This manuscript is a portion of a dissertation submitted by J. Zukowski in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. at the University of Florida. This work was supported in part by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project number FLA-FTL-005342. Additional funding was provided by USDA-ARS under the grant agreement No. 58-6435-8-108.

References Cited

Abushama FT. 1974. Water-relations of the termites Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman) and Trinervitermes geminatus (Wasmann). Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie 75: 124-134.

Ahmad M, Afzal M, Salihah Z. 1982. The effects of different relative humidities on survival and moisture loss of workers and soldiers of Heterotermes indicolo (Wasmann) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidiae) under starvation conditions. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 14: 652-670.

Arab A, Costa-Leonardo AM. 2005. Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the tunneling behavior of Coptotermes gestroi and Heterotermes tenuis (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Behavioural Processes 70: 32-40.

Brammer AS, Scheffrahn RH. 2007. A drywood termite. Cryptotermes cavifrons Banks (Insecta: Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Services, Entomology & Nematology Department, http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/urban/termites/c_cavifrons.htm (last accessed 15 Apr 2017).

Cabrera BJ, Rust MK. 1996. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on aggregation and water loss in the Western drywood termite, Incisitermes minor (Hagen). Proceedings of the National Conference on Urban Entomology 1: 39-41

Collins M. 1958. Studies on water relations in Florida termites. I. Survival time and rate of water loss during drying. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 21: 341-352.

Collins M. 1963. Studies on water relations in North American termites I. Eastern species of the genus Reticulitermes (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae). Ecology 44: 600-604.

Collins M. 1966. Studies on water relations in North American termites II. Water loss and cuticular structures in eastern species of the Kalotermitidae (Isoptera). Ecology 47: 328-331.

Collins M. 1969. Water relations in termites, pp. 433-458 In Krishna K, Weesner FM [eds.], Biology of Termites, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.

Collins M. 1991. Physical factors affecting termite distribution. Sociobiology 19: 283-286.

Delaplane KS, La FageJP. 1989. Preference for moist wood by the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 82: 95-100.

Gallagher NT, Jones SC. 2010. Moisture augmentation of food items by Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 55: 735-747.

Gautam BK, Henderson G. 2011. Relative humidity preferences and survival of starved Formosan subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) at various temperature and relative humidity conditions. Environmental Entomology 40: 1232-1238.

Gautam, BK, Henderson G. 2014. Water transport by Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Environmental Entomology 43:1399-1405.

Grasse PP, Chauvin R. 1944. L'effect de group et la survie des neutres dans les societies d'Insectes. Revue Scientifique 82: 461-464.

Green JM, Scharf ME, Bennett GW 2005. Impacts of soil moisture level on consumption and movement of three sympatric subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in a laboratory assay. Journal of Economic Entomology 98: 933-937.

Grube S, Rudolph D. 1999a. The labial gland reservoirs (water sacs) in Reticulitermes santonensis (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): studies of the functional aspects during microclimatic moisture regulation and individual water balance. Sociobiology 33: 307-323.

Grube S, Rudolph D. 1999b. Water supply during building activities in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes santonensis De Feytaud (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae). Insertes Sociaux 46:192-193.

Hu J, Neoh K-B, Appel AG, Lee C-Y 2012. Subterranean termite open-air foraging and tolerance to desiccation: comparative water relation of two sympatric Macrotermes spp. (Blattodea: Termitidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A: Physiology 161: 201-207.

Khan MA. 1980. Effect of relative humidity on survival of termites under starvation conditions. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie 67:133-178.

Lee KE, Wood TG. 1971. Termites and Soils. Academic Press, New York.

Malik SA, Sheikh KH. 1990. Effect of different relative humidities on survival and moisture loss of termite workers and soldiers. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 22: 159-165.

McManamy K, Koehler PG, Branscome DD, Pereira RM. 2008. Wood moisture content affects the survival of Eastern subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), under saturated relative humidity conditions. Sociobiology 52:145-156.

Minnick DR, Kerr SH, Wilkinson RC. 1973. Humidity behavior of the drywood termite Cryptotermes brevis. Environmental Entomology 2: 597-601

Nakayama T, Yoshimura T, Imamura Y 2004. Recovery of Japanese subterranean termites, Reticulitermes speratus and Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), from desiccation treatment. Sociobiology 43: 489-499.

Nakayama T, Yoshimura T, Imamura Y 2005. Feeding activities of Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki and Reticulitermes speratus (Kolbe) as affected by moisture content of wood. Journal of Wood Science 51: 60-65.

Pence RJ. 1956. The tolerance of the drywood termite, Kalotermes minor Hagen, to desiccation. Journal of Economic Entomology 49: 553-554.

Rockland LB. 1960. Saturated salt solutions for static control of relative humidity between 5[degrees] and 40[degrees]C. Analytical Chemistry 32:1375-1376.

Rudolph D, Glocke B, Rathenow S. 1990. On the role of different humidity parameters for the survival, distribution and ecology of various termite species. Sociobiology 17: 129-140.

Rust MK, Reierson DA, Scheffrahn RH. 1979. Comparative habits, utilization and xeric adaptations of the Southwestern drywood termites, Incisitermes fruticavus Rust and Incisitermes minor (Hagen) (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Sociobiology 4: 239-255.

SAS. 2015. Using JMP Pro 11. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

Scheffrahn RH, Su N-Y 2007. West Indian drywood termite. Cryptotermes brevis (Walker) (Insecta: Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Services, Entomology & Nematology Department, http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/urban/termites/west_indian_drywood_ter-mite.htm (last accessed 15 Apr 2017).

Sen-Sarma PK, Chatterjee PN. 1966. Humidity behavior of termites. I. Effect of relative humidity on the longevity of workers of Microcerotermes beesoni Snyder (Insecta: Isoptera: Termitidae) under starvation condition. Forest Bulletin no. 23. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun (Entomology), India.

Sponsler RC, Appel AG. 1990. Aspects of the water relations of the Formosan and Eastern subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Environmental Entomology 19:15-20.

Steward RC. 1982. Comparison of the behavioral and physiological responses to humidity of five species of dry-wood termites, Cryptotermes species. Physiological Entomology 7: 71-82.

Steward RC. 1983. The effects of humidity, temperature and acclimation on the feeding, water balance and reproduction of dry-wood termites (Cryptotermes). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 33: 135-144.

Strickland M. 1950. Differences in toleration of drying between species of termites (Reticulitermes). Ecology 31: 373-385.

Su N-Y, Puche H. 2003. Tunneling activity of subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in sand with moisture gradients. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 88-93.

Su N-Y, Scheffrahn RH. 1986. A method to access, trap, and monitor field populations of the Formosan termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in the urban environment. Sociobiology 12: 299-304.

Winston PW, Bates DH. 1960. Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41: 232-237.

Wong N, Lee C-Y 2010. Influence of different substrate moistures on wood consumption and movement patterns of Microcerotermes crassus and Coptotermes gestroi (Blattodea: Termitidae, Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103: 437-442.

Woodrow RJ, Grace JK, Nelson U, Haverty Ml. 2000. Modification of cuticular hydrocarbons of Cryptotermes brevis (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) in response to temperature and relative humidity. Environmental Entomology 29:1100-1107.

John Zukowski (1,*) and Nan-Yao Su (1)

(1) University of Florida, Entomology and Nematology Department, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA, E-mail: jzukows2@ufl.edu (J. Z.), nysu@ufl.edu (N.-Y. S) (*) Corresponding author; E-mail: jzukows2@ufl.edu (J. Z.)

Caption: Fig. 1. Experimental units to examine termite survival when exposed to various relative humidity (RH) levels: A) Humidity chambers with lids removed: a: [H.sub.2]O dish with filter paper ring (92.0 [+ or -] 0.07% RH); b: NaCl dish (72.9 [+ or -] 0.08% RH); c: Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2] dish (55.7 [+ or -] 0.09% RH); d: Mg[Cl.sub.2] dish (34.3 [+ or -] 0.04% RH); e: silica gel layer (18.2 [+ or -] 0.14% RH);/: wood food source; g: holding dish with modified lid. B) Humidity chambers with lids in place: h: rubber stopper; /: temperature/humidity probe; j: chamber lid.

Caption: Fig. 2. Materials for determining relative humidity (RH) level preferences of four termite species. A) Arena with chamber lids in place: a: chamber lid; b: rubber stopper; c: jar chamber. B) Arena with chamber lids removed: d: filter paper semicircle; e: Drierite introduction chamber;/: H20 chamber; g: Mg[Cl.sub.2] camber; h: Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2] chamber; i: NaCl chamber. C) Close-up of arena components housing termites:j: connecting tube; k: holding dish; l: filter paper food source.
Table 1. Percentage of survival (mean [+ or -] standard error of the
mean [SEM]) of 4 termite species (Coptotermes formosanus, Neotermes
jouteli, Cryptotermes brevis, and Cryptotermes cavifrons) exposed to 5
RH and 23 [degrees]C for 12 d.

               [H.sub.2]O            NaCl
Species        (92.0 [+ or -]0.07%)  (72.9 [+ or -] 0.08%)

C. formosanus  100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa      0.0[+ or -]0.0Ab
N. jouteli      98.3 [+ or -] 1.7Aa  100 [+ or -] 0.0Ba
Cr. cavifrons   98.3 [+ or -] 1.7Aa  100 [+ or -] O.OBa
Cr. brevis      95.0[+ or -]2.2Aa     93.3[+ or -]4.9Ba
Mean survival   97.9 [+ or -] 0.8a    73.3 [+ or -] 8.9b
at RH (d)

               RH (abc)
               Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]  Mg[Cl.sub.2]
Species        (55.7 [+ or -]0.09%)    (34.3 [+ or -]0.04%)

C. formosanus   0.0 [+ or -] 0.0Ab      0.0 [+ or -] 0.0Ab
N. jouteli     96.7 [+ or -] 2.1Ba     95.0 [+ or -] 3.4Ba
Cr. cavifrons  96.7 [+ or -] 2.1Ba     98.3 [+ or -] 1.7Ba
Cr. brevis     96.7 [+ or -] 5.4Ba     96.7 [+ or -] 2.1Ba
Mean survival  71.3 [+ or -] 8.7b      72.5 [+ or -] 8.8b
at RH (d)

               Silica gel            Mean species survival (d)
Species        (18.2 [+ or -]0.17%)

C. formosanus   0.0 [+ or -] 0.0Ab   20.0 [+ or -] 7.4A
N. jouteli     98.3 [+ or -] 1.7Ba   97.7 [+ or -] 0.9B
Cr. cavifrons  90.0 [+ or -] 6.3Ba   96.7 [+ or -] 1.5B
Cr. brevis     91.7 [+ or -] 4.0Ba   93.7 [+ or -] 1.7B
Mean survival  70.0 [+ or -] 8.6b
at RH (d)

(a) Means followed by the same lowercase letters within a row or means
followed by the same capital letter within a column are not
significantly different at the a = 0.05 level (Tukey honest significant
difference test).
(b) Value for the combination (species x RH) of treatments are means of
6 observations.
(c) Mean RH [+ or -] SEM produced by water, 3 salts, and silica gel are
found in parentheses.
(d) Values for each main treatment effect (species, RH) are means of 30
and 24 observations, respectively.

Table 2. Relative humidity (RH) (mean [+ or -] standard error of the
mean [SEM]) preference of 4 termite species (Coptotermes formosanus,
Neotermes jouteli, Cryptotermes brevis, and Cryptotermes cavifrons)
expressed as the percentage of individuals found at each RH level.

                 RH (abc)
                 [H.sub.2]O             NaCl
Species          (90.7 [+ or -] 0.24%)  (71.7 [+ or -]0.20%)

C formosanus     89.3[+ or -]2.5Aa       4.00 [+ or -] 1.5Ab
N. jouteli       91.3[+ or -]2.8Aa       4.70[+ or -]1.2Ab
Cr. cavifrons    18.3[+ or -]16.4Ba     42.3 [+ or -] 19.0Aa
Cr. brevis        3.00[+ or -]2.3Ba      7.00 [+ or -] 4.3Aa
Mean preference  50.5 [+ or -] 9.3a     14.5 [+ or -] 5.7b
at RH (d)

                 RH (abc)
                 Mg[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2]  Mg[Cl.sub.2]
Species          (52.0 [+ or -]0.12%)    (34.1 [+ or -]0.16%)

C formosanus      3.30[+ or -]1.4Ab       2.00 [+ or -] 0.9Ab
N. jouteli        3.30[+ or -]2.6Ab       0.70 [+ or -] 0.7Ab
Cr. cavifrons     1.00[+ or -]1.0Aa      21.0[+ or -]13.2Aa
Cr. brevis       30.7[+ or -]19.5Aa      17.7 [+ or -] 10.9Aa
Mean preference   9.6 [+ or -] 5.3b      10.3 [+ or -] 4.4b
at RH (d)

                 RH (abc)
                 Drierite
Species          (8.4 [+ or -]0.48%)

C formosanus      1.3[+ or -]0.8Ab
N. jouteli        0.0 [+ or -] O.OAb
Cr. cavifrons    17.3[+ or -]8.8Aa
Cr. brevis       42.3[+ or -]15.9Aa
Mean preference  15.3 [+ or -] 5.5b
at RH (d)

(a) Means followed by the same lowercase letters within a row or means
followed by the same capital letter within a column are not
significantly different at the [alpha] = 0.05 level (Tukey honest
significant difference test).
(b) Value for the combination (species x RH) of treatments are means of
6 observations of 50 termites per arena (25 termites for N. jouteli).
(c) Mean RH produced by water, 3 salts, and indicating Drierite are
found in parentheses.
(d) Values for each main treatment effect (species, RH) are means of 30
and 24 observations, respectively.

Table 3. Effects of water source and species on worker survival (%) of
4 species of termite (Coptotermes formosanus, Neotermes jouteli,
Cryptotermes brevis, and Cryptotermes cavifrons) from 1 to 4 wk
(mean [+ or -] standard error of the mean [SEM]).

                  Water source (abc)
                  Wet wood               Dry wood
Species           (91.0 [+ or -] 0.22%)  (49.6 [+ or -]0.61%)

Wk 1
C. formosanus      93.3[+ or -]6.7Aa      0.0[+ or -] 0.0Ab
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Ba
Cr. cavifrons      86.7[+ or -]8.8Aa     90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Ba
Cr. brevis         63.3 [+ or -] 21.9Aa  86.7[+ or -]8.8Ba
Mean survival      85.0[+ or -]6.6ab     66.7 [+ or -] 12.1b
with source (d)
Wk 2
C formosanus       90.0[+ or -]5.8Aa      0.0[+ or -] 0.0Ab
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Ba
Cr. cavifrons      83.3 [+ or -] 6.7Aa   90.0[+ or -]5.8Ba
Cr. brevis         26.7[+ or -]21.9Aa    73.3[+ or -]21.9Ba
Mean survival      74.2 [+ or -] 9.8a    63.3 [+ or -] 12.4a
with source (d)
Wk 3
C formosanus       90.0[+ or -]5.8Aa      0.0[+ or -] 0.0Ab
N. jouteli         90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Aa  83.3[+ or -]12.0Ba
Cr. cavifrons      83.3[+ or -]8.8Aa     96.7[+ or -]3.3Ba
Cr. brevis         26.7[+ or -]26.7Aa    80.0[+ or -]11.5Ba
Mean survival      72.5 [+ or -] 10.3a   65.0 [+ or -] 12.0a
with source (d)
Wk 4
C formosanus      100[+ or -] 0.0Aa       0.0[+ or -] 0.0Ab
N. jouteli         86.7[+ or -]8.8ABa    90.0 [+ or -] 0.0Ba
Cr. cavifrons      86.7[+ or -]8.8ABa     100[+ or -] 0.0Ba
Cr. brevis         26.7[+ or -]14.5Ba    83.3[+ or -]8.8Ba
Mean survival      75.0 [+ or -] 9.5a    68.3 [+ or -] 12.2a
with source (d)

                  Water source (abc)
                  Wet soil              Wood + water
Species           (92.6 [+ or -]0.22%)  (91.1 [+ or -]0.22%)

Wk 1
C. formosanus     100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa    100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     93.3[+ or -]3.3Aa
Cr. cavifrons      93.3[+ or -]6.7Aa     86.7[+ or -]13.3Aa
Cr. brevis         73.3[+ or -]13.3Aa    80.0 [+ or -] 10.0Aa
Mean survival      90.8 [+ or -] 4.5a    90.0 [+ or -] 4.3a
with source (d)
Wk 2
C formosanus       96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     63.3[+ or -]31.8Aa
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa
Cr. cavifrons      80.0[+ or -]11.5Aa   100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa
Cr. brevis         56.7[+ or -]29.6Aa    80.0 [+ or -] 11.5Aa
Mean survival      82.5 [+ or -] 8.4a    85.0 [+ or -] 8.5a
with source (d)
Wk 3
C formosanus       96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Aa
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     86.7[+ or -]8.8Aa
Cr. cavifrons      86.7[+ or -]6.7Aa     93.3[+ or -]3.3Aa
Cr. brevis         50.0[+ or -]26.5Aa    60.0[+ or -]30.6Aa
Mean survival      82.5 [+ or -] 8.3a    82.5 [+ or -] 8.2a
with source (d)
Wk 4
C formosanus       96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     33.3[+ or -]33.3Aab
N. jouteli         93.3[+ or -]3.3Aa     96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa
Cr. cavifrons      90.0[+ or -]10.0Aa    73.3[+ or -]14.5Aa
Cr. brevis         56.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     36.7[+ or -]31.8Aa
Mean survival      84.2 [+ or -] 5.4a    60.0 [+ or -] 13.0a
with source (d)

                  Water source (abc)
                  Wood + RH
Species           (94.2 [+ or -]0.18%)   Mean species survival (d)

Wk 1
C. formosanus      93.3[+ or -]3.3Aa     77.3[+ or -]10.4A
N. jouteli        100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa     95.3[+ or -]2.2B
Cr. cavifrons      76.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     86.7[+ or -]3.7AB
Cr. brevis        100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa     80.7[+ or -]5.9AB
Mean survival      92.5 [+ or -] 3.0a
with source (d)
Wk 2
C formosanus       90.0 [+ or -] 10.0Aa  68.0[+ or -]11.2A
N. jouteli         96.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     95.3[+ or -]2.2B
Cr. cavifrons      86.7[+ or -]3.3Aa     88.0[+ or -]3.1AB
Cr. brevis         80.0 [+ or -] 10.0Aa  63.3[+ or -]9.4A
Mean survival      88.3 [+ or -] 3.7a
with source (d)
Wk 3
C formosanus       90.0[+ or -]5.8Aa     73.3[+ or -]10.1AB
N. jouteli        100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa     91.3[+ or -]3.5A
Cr. cavifrons      90.0 [+ or -] 0.0Aa   90.0[+ or -]2.4A
Cr. brevis         36.7[+ or -]12.0Aa    50.7 [+ or -] 10.0B
Mean survival      79.2 [+ or -] 8.0a
with source (d)
Wk 4
C formosanus       96.7[+ or -]3.3ABa    65.3[+ or -]12.4AC
N. jouteli         83.3 [+ or -] 6.7ABa  90.0[+ or -]2.4AB
Cr. cavifrons     100 [+ or -] 0.0Aa     90.0[+ or -]4.3B
Cr. brevis         26.7[+ or -]14.5Ba    46.0[+ or -]8.8C
Mean survival      76.7 [+ or -] 9.6a
with source (d)

(a) Weekly mean RH [+ or -] SEM associated with each water source are
found in parentheses.
(b) Means for each combination of treatment (species x water source)
followed by the same lowercase letters within a row or means followed
by the same capital letter within a column are not significantly
different at the [alpha] = 0.05 level (Tukey honest significant
difference test).
(c) Values for each combination (species x water source) of treatments
are means of 3 observations.
(d) Values for each main treatment effect (species, water source) are
means of 15 and 12 observations, respectively.


Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research
Author:Zukowski, John; Su, Nan-Yao
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Date:Sep 1, 2017
Words:6546
Previous Article:Comparison of orchid bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) species composition collected with four chemical attractants.
Next Article:Exploring whether and how ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) affect reproductive fitness in Senna mexicana var. chapmanii (Fabaceae).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters