Printer Friendly

Survival: sizing up the sexes.

Among mammals, more males than females die as juveniles, especially when food is scarce. A widely accepted explanation holds the mother responsible, arguing that under certain circumstances she will make a larger investment in her daughter than in her son. Now zoologists at the University of Cambridge in England propose an alternative explanation that does not insist on parental bias. They suggest in the Jan. 10 NATURE that male juveniles, because they grow faster and for a longer period than do females, are more susceptible to food deprivation.

Red deer on an island off Scotland were observed by T. H. Clutton-Brock, S. D. Albon and F. E. Guinness. They report as much as 20 percent greater mortality in male deer than in females during the first two years of life. The scientists also surveyed published reports on the sex ratio among juvenile birds and mamals. They found that the discrepancy between male and female survival is greatest in species in which there is the greatest difference between male and female adult size.

Several lines of evidence support the new theory of differential survival, say Clutton-brock and colleagues. Sex differences in mortally extend throughout an animal's period of growth, long after weaning -- for instance, among many hooved animals the greatest sex differences in mortality occur during the first and second winters. In addition, experiments with young rats and pigs on inadequate diets slow that, even in the absence of parents, males are more likely to die than are females.

Some aspects of the sex ratio remain unexplained by the nutrition theory, the scientists admit. These incluse the greater tendency of males to die during the early stages of gesttion and at birth or hatching, even in species with little size difference between male and female adults. Furthermore, when the adult female is larger than the male, as in the European sparrowhawk, there is no evidence that the juvenile female has a lower survival rate than the male.

Whichever theory is correct, the scientists suggest an "evolutionary explanation": that sexual selection favoring large adult size in males has increased the male growth rate to the point at which this growth is balanced by its cost to juveniles.
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:mammal behavior
Author:Miller, Julie Ann
Publication:Science News
Date:Jan 19, 1985
Words:365
Previous Article:Solar system search from space station.
Next Article:Biology briefs.
Topics:


Related Articles
Leaping lizards and male impersonators: are there hidden messages? By imitating male mating behavior, all-female lizard species apparently enhance...
Mammals in global decline.
Monkey love.
The mating game.
Parasites' bias for big animals gives female mammals longevity. (Gender Gap).
West Nile virus antibody prevalence in wild mammals, southern Wisconsin.
Bed liner maker picks up.
Risk factor: throat cancer linked to virus spread by sex.
Egg shell game: chicks' sex isn't just a matter of chance.
Self-sacrificial love: evolutionary deception or theological reality?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters