Printer Friendly

Surveillance intervals after polypectomy should be narrowed.

WASHINGTON -- Postpolypectomy surveillance should follow surgery far sooner than current guidelines recommend, according to a study presented at the annual Digestive Disease Week.

In a retrospective cohort study, Dr. Madhavi Rudraraju of the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, and her colleagues including Dr. William Tierney found that the recurrence rate for advanced adenomas following polypectomy was 25.8%, and the time to recurrence was 6.4 months--much sooner than the 3-year follow-up surveillance period recommended by current guidelines (Gastroenterology 2006;130:1872-85).

The researchers analyzed medical records at the VA Medical Center in Oklahoma City from Jan. 1, 1990, to Dec. 31, 2002. The patients had had at least one surveillance colonoscopy following removal of a polyp with high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

Patients under 40 years of age and those with a history of colon cancer were excluded from the study.

There were two control groups: patients with tubular adenomatous polyps, who were matched for polyp size and had at least one surveillance colonoscopy; and those with normal colonoscopy findings who had undergone at least one subsequent colonoscopy. Both groups were also matched for age, gender, race, and year of index colonoscopy.

Polyps with advanced features (adenoma greater than 1 cm; villous histology; HGD; colon cancer) were counted as outcomes of interest. Polyps found in the same region of the colon within 6 months or after documented incomplete polypectomy were counted as residual, rather than incident, lesions, and were therefore excluded.

Most of the patients in all three groups were male and white, and the mean age was 66 years. A total of 89 patients met the study criteria for having HGD.

In the HGD group, the mean polyp size was 1 cm, the mean number of polyps was 4.1, all had complete resection, and 73% were sessile. Polyp characteristics for the tubular adenoma group were similar--mean size was also 1 cm, mean number was 4.4, 79.8% were sessile, and, as in the HGD group, 100% were completely resected.

"At the Oklahoma VA Medical Center, surveillance is performed at the least at 3 and 12 months, but most patients had it at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months," said Dr. Rudraraju. This practice of aggressive surveillance has continued at this facility despite the recent guidelines.

The study found that in the HGD group, 25.8% (23 of 89 patients) went on to develop advanced polyp recurrence, and among those 23 patients, the median time to recurrence was 6.4 months. In contrast, 16.8% (15 of 89) of the tubular adenoma group developed recurring advanced polyps at a median time of 36.6 months after initial polypectomy. In the group with no polyps on initial colonoscopy, 5.6% (5 of 89) developed advanced polyps at a median of 34.8 months later.

The range of advanced polyp development in the HGD group was 2.6-101 months. Overall, 5.6% (5 of 89) developed colon cancer at a median of 6 months after initial polypectomy.

"Until we have further prospective evidence about this group of patients with high-grade dysplasia, it would be very reasonable for clinicians to consider intense early surveillance, given [that] this represents the largest study to date looking at this particular group of patients," said Dr. Rudraraju in an interview.

"Our data demonstrate [that] this group likely has a high rate of synchronous advanced polyps, and an early 'second look' procedure may be necessary to achieve optimal prevention of colorectal cancer."

Dr. Rudraraju conceded that the study had limitations, such as the fact that the researchers did not know their patients' family histories of colorectal cancer, and that pathology specimens were unavailable for review, since it was a retrospective study.

BY DENISE NAPOLI

Assistant Editor
COPYRIGHT 2007 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Gastroenterology
Author:Napoli, Denise
Publication:Internal Medicine News
Article Type:Clinical report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 15, 2007
Words:622
Previous Article:Rosiglitazone found to quell ulcerative colitis: in a study of 105 patients, 44% of those taking Avandia had clinical remission, vs. 23% on placebo.
Next Article:AMA: investigate store clinics.
Topics:


Related Articles
Colorectal surveillance: limit in low-risk patients; postpolypectomy colonoscopy every 5 years. (Shift Toward Population Screening).
Guidelines urge broader colorectal ca screening. (Fewer Follow-Up Surveillance Exams).
Colonoscopy after polypectomy: too much surveillance; Primary care survey points to overuse.
5-year wait for postpolypectomy surveillance is now deemed safe.
Practical pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Barrett's screening based on inadequate evidence.
CT colonography refines neoplasia screening.
First colonoscopy has most impact on mortality.
Colonoscopy quality varies by specialty, volume.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters