Printer Friendly

Supreme Court on abortion protests. (Policy & Practice).

Abortion opponents were celebrating the U.S. Supreme Court's 8-1 ruling that authorities cannot use federal racketeering and extortion laws to prosecute clinic protesters. But abortion supporters were quick to point out that the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act is not affected by the decision, and this law prohibits virtually all the activities prosecutors were fighting with the racketeering and extortion statutes. U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, writing for the court, said in upholding a 1998 Chicago jury verdict, that violent or threatening behavior in front of abortion clinics is coercion, not extortion, because it 'does not involve obtaining anything of value.
COPYRIGHT 2003 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Perlstein, Steve; Silverman, Jennifer
Publication:OB GYN News
Date:Apr 1, 2003
Previous Article:Teen access to confidential care. (Policy & Practice).
Next Article:Pennsylvania malpractice concerns. (Policy & Practice).

Related Articles
ALL Divisions to Protest at Supreme Court - Nebraska Partial Birth Abortion Hearings.
Roe v. Wade at 30 years: uncertain times ahead. (Shrinking Number of Providers).
Roe v. Wade turns 30, faces an uncertain future. (Older Providers not being Replaced).
Supreme Court Hands Pro-Lifers a Victory; 'All Who Cherish the Freedom of Speech Can Applaud the Supreme Court's Ruling Against NOW,' Connor Said.
Pro-Abortion Senators Propose Bill; To Invalidate Limits on Abortion.
ACLJ Represents Members of Congress in Asking Supreme Court to Take Partial- Birth Abortion Case.
Teens for life.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters