Support our local police! (Inside Report).
"A new FBI program designed to provide local police with intelligence reports on potential terrorism is sputtering because many police officials believe the application process is too long and intrusive," reported the August 2nd issue of USA Today. "They also say the reports aren't that valuable." For access to the reports, police officials would have to undergo detailed background checks, sometimes taking up to six months. This would be tantamount to charging the FBI with vetting state and local police personnel involved in counter-terrorism efforts. Bureau whistle-blower Colleen Rowley, recall, described the FBI's handling of the pre-Black Tuesday terrorism inquiry as so spectacularly inept that some field agents joked that "spies or moles ... working for Osama bin Laden" had infiltrated the Bureau.
Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, observes that police officials are "infuriated" by the Bureau's background check requirement. "Most of these people have been chiefs for a long time with established records in law enforcement. Having to wait for clearance is unbelievable.... We should be sharing information right away." William Berger, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, received a 12-page application from the FBI requiring a detailed family profile, including credit references and other personal information. "I didn't have time for it, and I don't know many chiefs who do, especially when the information we're getting in return is minimal at best."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||the new supercops, the Federal Bureau of Investigations|
|Publication:||The New American|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Aug 26, 2002|
|Previous Article:||FBI-mafia axis. (Inside Report).|
|Next Article:||FTAA progress report. (Insider Report).|