Super-Earths--dense or fluffy: exoplanets of a certain size apparently come in two types.
The Swiss-led HARPS mission suggests that between 30 and 50 percent of sunlike stars in the solar neighborhood host super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. But NASA's Kepler mission finds that these planets circle roughly 15 percent of the stars in its far-flung field of view.
That discrepancy is of great interest, because the number of planets in the weight class just above Earth hints at how many bodies of terrestrial proportions are likely to be discovered.
But a new report suggests there may not be a discrepancy at all.
"We know the Geneva team does a good job observing, and they have a good technique. And we know the Kepler telescope is working beautifully. So we wanted to see if there was a plausible, believable way in which you could have the difference between those two surveys," says Greg Laughlin, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
In a paper posted online August 30 at arXiv.org, he and UC Santa Cruz graduate student Angie Wolfgang propose that there are two kinds of low-mass planets out there, one of which is more amenable to discovery by HARPS.
Laughlin and Wolfgang produced a simulation based on the HARPS data. In it, they created a population of planets between one and 17 Earth masses around the more than 100,000 stars being monitored by Kepler and gave the virtual planets varying characteristics and orbital periods between one and 50 days. When peppered with two distinct kinds of planets in the size range--one rocky and dense, the other gaseous and fluffy--the simulation mimics Kepler's data. "You can explain the results of those surveys if you have these two distinct populations" Laughlin says.
HARPS searches for distant planets by looking for the telltale signs of an orbiting planet tugging on its host star in what's called a radial velocity survey. Kepler uses the transit method, monitoring a star field for blips in brightness caused by a planet briefly blocking some of the star's light. These different methods can bias the types of planets detected--heavier planets tug more on their stars, and bloated planets with bigger radii block more light.
Ideally, densities for detected planets could be found by using both methods, but that often proves tricky. Two super-Earths that have been detected using both methods--CoRoT-7b and GJ 1214b--have similar masses but different densities. Both are examples that fit well with Wolfgang and Laughlin's ideas, says Andrew Youdin of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass.
Caltech planetary astronomer John Johnson notes that both surveys suggest that there are lots and lots of planets out there, and some might be quite familiar. "Kepler's been telling us that the local universe is teeming with Earths," he says. "They're just all over the place. We need to go out and find them."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Atom & Cosmos|
|Date:||Oct 8, 2011|
|Previous Article:||Feathers rock.|
|Next Article:||Chase continues for a lighter Higgs: latest estimates narrow target for mass of elusive particle.|